Cell controllers: Analysis and comparison of three major projects
Identifieur interne : 001A08 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 001A07; suivant : 001A09Cell controllers: Analysis and comparison of three major projects
Auteurs : B. Boulet ; B. Chhabra ; G. Harhalakis ; I. Minis ; J. M. ProthSource :
- Computers in Industry [ 0166-3615 ] ; 1991.
English descriptors
- Teeft :
- Action planning, Algorithm, Alternative routings, Artificial intelligence, Artificial intelligence techniques, Bottleneck workstation, Boulet, Cell control, Cell controller, Cell controllers, College park, Computation time, Conflict resolution, Controller, Corrective action, Critical review, Current research, Current schedule, Current state, Daily plan, Database, Decision frame, Decision frames, Decision horizon, Decision matrix, Decision rule, Decision variables, Default values, Different levels, Dynamic model, Dynamic world model, Evaluation criteria, Evaluation functions, Event list, Experimental determination, Expert system, Expert systems, Extensive research, Factory level, Feasible alternatives, First step, Flexible flow line, Flexible manufacturing systems, Functional design, George harhalakis, Heuristic, Hierarchical, Hierarchical production management systems, Higher level, Information technology, Initial state, Intelligent manufacturing systems, Lower level, Lower levels, Machine breakdowns, Machine tools, Madema, Madema approach, Manuf, Manuf syst, Manufacturing environment, Manufacturing orders, Manufacturing research facility, Manufacturing resource planning, Manufacturing system, Manufacturing systems, Mechanical engineering, Module, National institute, Nist, Nist model, Nist system, Operational cost, Personal computers, Planning horizon, Planning steps, Process planning, Process planning information, Process planning interface, Process planning system, Production control, Production controller, Production planning, Production scheduler, Production scheduling, Production shop, Production system, Production systems, Production task, Production tasks, Production throughput, Quality control, Real time, Relevant criteria, Resource, Resource availability, Resource model, Schedule execution, Scheduling, Scheduling algorithm, Scheduling algorithms, Scheduling function, Scheduling problem, Scheduling rule, Scheduling rules, Scheduling task, Shop floor, Shop floor activities, Shop floor control, Shop floor level, Shop level, Shortest processing time, Significant advantages, Simulation, Software, Software systems, Solution space, Static world model, Statistical analysis, Status information, Stochastic manufacturing environment, Survey computers, Systems research center, Task orders, Technological feasibility, Time horizon, Time interval, Traditional scheduling techniques, Upper level, Utility function, Virtual cell, Work center, Work center level, Work centers, Work orders, Workcell, Workcell controller, Workstation.
Abstract
Abstract: There is a critical need to achieve Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, to link the factory-level functions (Product Design, Process Planning and Manufacturing Resource Planning) with the manufacturing functions (Parts Manufacturing, Product Assembly, and Quality Control). The primary functions performed by this link for all jobs issued to the shop floor (i.e. all the parts to be manufactured in a specified period of time) include: (i) the allocation of resources (machines, material handling devices, etc.); and (ii) the scheduling of tasks (manufacturing operations, material transfers, etc.). This paper defines these functions and presents the different methods that have been proposed to solve the associated problems. It provides analysis and a critical comparison of the current research at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST, formerly NBS), European Strategic Program for Research and Development in Information Technology (ESPRIT, Project 932), and Computer Aided Manufacturing International (CAM-i) concerning planning, scheduling and control at the shop floor level.
Url:
DOI: 10.1016/0166-3615(91)90062-E
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:6FF00F7B2E6623DE90CD9E7AC25B92E742C8962BLe document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title>Cell controllers: Analysis and comparison of three major projects</title><author><name sortKey="Boulet, B" sort="Boulet, B" uniqKey="Boulet B" first="B." last="Boulet">B. Boulet</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Systems Research Center, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Chhabra, B" sort="Chhabra, B" uniqKey="Chhabra B" first="B." last="Chhabra">B. Chhabra</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Harhalakis, G" sort="Harhalakis, G" uniqKey="Harhalakis G" first="G." last="Harhalakis">G. Harhalakis</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>To whom correspondence should be addressed.</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Systems Research Center & Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Minis, I" sort="Minis, I" uniqKey="Minis I" first="I." last="Minis">I. Minis</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Proth, J M" sort="Proth, J M" uniqKey="Proth J" first="J. M." last="Proth">J. M. Proth</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>INRIA—Lorraine, CESCOM, Technopole Metz 2000, 4, rue Marconi, 57070 Metz, France</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:6FF00F7B2E6623DE90CD9E7AC25B92E742C8962B</idno><date when="1991" year="1991">1991</date><idno type="doi">10.1016/0166-3615(91)90062-E</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/6H6-3GP7HL75-5/fulltext.pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">001A08</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">001A08</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a">Cell controllers: Analysis and comparison of three major projects</title><author><name sortKey="Boulet, B" sort="Boulet, B" uniqKey="Boulet B" first="B." last="Boulet">B. Boulet</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Systems Research Center, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Chhabra, B" sort="Chhabra, B" uniqKey="Chhabra B" first="B." last="Chhabra">B. Chhabra</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Harhalakis, G" sort="Harhalakis, G" uniqKey="Harhalakis G" first="G." last="Harhalakis">G. Harhalakis</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>To whom correspondence should be addressed.</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Systems Research Center & Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Minis, I" sort="Minis, I" uniqKey="Minis I" first="I." last="Minis">I. Minis</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Proth, J M" sort="Proth, J M" uniqKey="Proth J" first="J. M." last="Proth">J. M. Proth</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>INRIA—Lorraine, CESCOM, Technopole Metz 2000, 4, rue Marconi, 57070 Metz, France</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">Computers in Industry</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">COMIND</title><idno type="ISSN">0166-3615</idno><imprint><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><date type="published" when="1991">1991</date><biblScope unit="volume">16</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">3</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="239">239</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="254">254</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0166-3615</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0166-3615</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Action planning</term><term>Algorithm</term><term>Alternative routings</term><term>Artificial intelligence</term><term>Artificial intelligence techniques</term><term>Bottleneck workstation</term><term>Boulet</term><term>Cell control</term><term>Cell controller</term><term>Cell controllers</term><term>College park</term><term>Computation time</term><term>Conflict resolution</term><term>Controller</term><term>Corrective action</term><term>Critical review</term><term>Current research</term><term>Current schedule</term><term>Current state</term><term>Daily plan</term><term>Database</term><term>Decision frame</term><term>Decision frames</term><term>Decision horizon</term><term>Decision matrix</term><term>Decision rule</term><term>Decision variables</term><term>Default values</term><term>Different levels</term><term>Dynamic model</term><term>Dynamic world model</term><term>Evaluation criteria</term><term>Evaluation functions</term><term>Event list</term><term>Experimental determination</term><term>Expert system</term><term>Expert systems</term><term>Extensive research</term><term>Factory level</term><term>Feasible alternatives</term><term>First step</term><term>Flexible flow line</term><term>Flexible manufacturing systems</term><term>Functional design</term><term>George harhalakis</term><term>Heuristic</term><term>Hierarchical</term><term>Hierarchical production management systems</term><term>Higher level</term><term>Information technology</term><term>Initial state</term><term>Intelligent manufacturing systems</term><term>Lower level</term><term>Lower levels</term><term>Machine breakdowns</term><term>Machine tools</term><term>Madema</term><term>Madema approach</term><term>Manuf</term><term>Manuf syst</term><term>Manufacturing environment</term><term>Manufacturing orders</term><term>Manufacturing research facility</term><term>Manufacturing resource planning</term><term>Manufacturing system</term><term>Manufacturing systems</term><term>Mechanical engineering</term><term>Module</term><term>National institute</term><term>Nist</term><term>Nist model</term><term>Nist system</term><term>Operational cost</term><term>Personal computers</term><term>Planning horizon</term><term>Planning steps</term><term>Process planning</term><term>Process planning information</term><term>Process planning interface</term><term>Process planning system</term><term>Production control</term><term>Production controller</term><term>Production planning</term><term>Production scheduler</term><term>Production scheduling</term><term>Production shop</term><term>Production system</term><term>Production systems</term><term>Production task</term><term>Production tasks</term><term>Production throughput</term><term>Quality control</term><term>Real time</term><term>Relevant criteria</term><term>Resource</term><term>Resource availability</term><term>Resource model</term><term>Schedule execution</term><term>Scheduling</term><term>Scheduling algorithm</term><term>Scheduling algorithms</term><term>Scheduling function</term><term>Scheduling problem</term><term>Scheduling rule</term><term>Scheduling rules</term><term>Scheduling task</term><term>Shop floor</term><term>Shop floor activities</term><term>Shop floor control</term><term>Shop floor level</term><term>Shop level</term><term>Shortest processing time</term><term>Significant advantages</term><term>Simulation</term><term>Software</term><term>Software systems</term><term>Solution space</term><term>Static world model</term><term>Statistical analysis</term><term>Status information</term><term>Stochastic manufacturing environment</term><term>Survey computers</term><term>Systems research center</term><term>Task orders</term><term>Technological feasibility</term><term>Time horizon</term><term>Time interval</term><term>Traditional scheduling techniques</term><term>Upper level</term><term>Utility function</term><term>Virtual cell</term><term>Work center</term><term>Work center level</term><term>Work centers</term><term>Work orders</term><term>Workcell</term><term>Workcell controller</term><term>Workstation</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Abstract: There is a critical need to achieve Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, to link the factory-level functions (Product Design, Process Planning and Manufacturing Resource Planning) with the manufacturing functions (Parts Manufacturing, Product Assembly, and Quality Control). The primary functions performed by this link for all jobs issued to the shop floor (i.e. all the parts to be manufactured in a specified period of time) include: (i) the allocation of resources (machines, material handling devices, etc.); and (ii) the scheduling of tasks (manufacturing operations, material transfers, etc.). This paper defines these functions and presents the different methods that have been proposed to solve the associated problems. It provides analysis and a critical comparison of the current research at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST, formerly NBS), European Strategic Program for Research and Development in Information Technology (ESPRIT, Project 932), and Computer Aided Manufacturing International (CAM-i) concerning planning, scheduling and control at the shop floor level.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>elsevier</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>workstation</json:string><json:string>module</json:string><json:string>madema</json:string><json:string>scheduling</json:string><json:string>hierarchical</json:string><json:string>cell controllers</json:string><json:string>nist</json:string><json:string>workcell</json:string><json:string>boulet</json:string><json:string>manuf</json:string><json:string>production planning</json:string><json:string>shop floor</json:string><json:string>shop floor level</json:string><json:string>manufacturing system</json:string><json:string>heuristic</json:string><json:string>software</json:string><json:string>real time</json:string><json:string>database</json:string><json:string>simulation</json:string><json:string>manufacturing environment</json:string><json:string>mechanical engineering</json:string><json:string>upper level</json:string><json:string>workcell controller</json:string><json:string>process planning</json:string><json:string>algorithm</json:string><json:string>factory level</json:string><json:string>critical review</json:string><json:string>survey computers</json:string><json:string>cell controller</json:string><json:string>task orders</json:string><json:string>action planning</json:string><json:string>quality control</json:string><json:string>production control</json:string><json:string>manufacturing systems</json:string><json:string>scheduling rule</json:string><json:string>expert systems</json:string><json:string>lower levels</json:string><json:string>college park</json:string><json:string>process planning interface</json:string><json:string>intelligent manufacturing systems</json:string><json:string>scheduling problem</json:string><json:string>technological feasibility</json:string><json:string>decision matrix</json:string><json:string>bottleneck workstation</json:string><json:string>shortest processing time</json:string><json:string>planning steps</json:string><json:string>work centers</json:string><json:string>shop floor control</json:string><json:string>decision frames</json:string><json:string>production tasks</json:string><json:string>expert system</json:string><json:string>machine tools</json:string><json:string>scheduling function</json:string><json:string>lower level</json:string><json:string>evaluation functions</json:string><json:string>production scheduler</json:string><json:string>production throughput</json:string><json:string>first step</json:string><json:string>decision variables</json:string><json:string>flexible manufacturing systems</json:string><json:string>production system</json:string><json:string>production scheduling</json:string><json:string>utility function</json:string><json:string>madema approach</json:string><json:string>time horizon</json:string><json:string>work orders</json:string><json:string>conflict resolution</json:string><json:string>controller</json:string><json:string>corrective action</json:string><json:string>event list</json:string><json:string>different levels</json:string><json:string>nist system</json:string><json:string>scheduling algorithm</json:string><json:string>significant advantages</json:string><json:string>current state</json:string><json:string>initial state</json:string><json:string>evaluation criteria</json:string><json:string>personal computers</json:string><json:string>scheduling rules</json:string><json:string>current schedule</json:string><json:string>artificial intelligence</json:string><json:string>time interval</json:string><json:string>production controller</json:string><json:string>resource availability</json:string><json:string>virtual cell</json:string><json:string>dynamic model</json:string><json:string>manufacturing research facility</json:string><json:string>daily plan</json:string><json:string>machine breakdowns</json:string><json:string>software systems</json:string><json:string>static world model</json:string><json:string>dynamic world model</json:string><json:string>status information</json:string><json:string>scheduling algorithms</json:string><json:string>decision frame</json:string><json:string>solution space</json:string><json:string>higher level</json:string><json:string>resource model</json:string><json:string>hierarchical production management systems</json:string><json:string>production systems</json:string><json:string>production shop</json:string><json:string>shop level</json:string><json:string>manufacturing orders</json:string><json:string>statistical analysis</json:string><json:string>planning horizon</json:string><json:string>schedule execution</json:string><json:string>scheduling task</json:string><json:string>george harhalakis</json:string><json:string>work center level</json:string><json:string>work center</json:string><json:string>traditional scheduling techniques</json:string><json:string>shop floor activities</json:string><json:string>production task</json:string><json:string>relevant criteria</json:string><json:string>extensive research</json:string><json:string>experimental determination</json:string><json:string>cell control</json:string><json:string>process planning system</json:string><json:string>information technology</json:string><json:string>decision rule</json:string><json:string>national institute</json:string><json:string>process planning information</json:string><json:string>current research</json:string><json:string>decision horizon</json:string><json:string>artificial intelligence techniques</json:string><json:string>operational cost</json:string><json:string>feasible alternatives</json:string><json:string>computation time</json:string><json:string>default values</json:string><json:string>alternative routings</json:string><json:string>functional design</json:string><json:string>manufacturing resource planning</json:string><json:string>manuf syst</json:string><json:string>flexible flow line</json:string><json:string>systems research center</json:string><json:string>stochastic manufacturing environment</json:string><json:string>nist model</json:string><json:string>resource</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>B. Boulet</name><affiliations><json:string>Systems Research Center, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>B. Chhabra</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>G. Harhalakis</name><affiliations><json:string>To whom correspondence should be addressed.</json:string><json:string>Systems Research Center & Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>I. Minis</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>J.M. Proth</name><affiliations><json:string>INRIA—Lorraine, CESCOM, Technopole Metz 2000, 4, rue Marconi, 57070 Metz, France</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>Computer-integrated manufacturing</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>Cell controllers</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>Scheduling</value></json:item></subject><arkIstex>ark:/67375/6H6-3GP7HL75-5</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>Full-length article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Abstract: There is a critical need to achieve Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, to link the factory-level functions (Product Design, Process Planning and Manufacturing Resource Planning) with the manufacturing functions (Parts Manufacturing, Product Assembly, and Quality Control). The primary functions performed by this link for all jobs issued to the shop floor (i.e. all the parts to be manufactured in a specified period of time) include: (i) the allocation of resources (machines, material handling devices, etc.); and (ii) the scheduling of tasks (manufacturing operations, material transfers, etc.). This paper defines these functions and presents the different methods that have been proposed to solve the associated problems. It provides analysis and a critical comparison of the current research at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST, formerly NBS), European Strategic Program for Research and Development in Information Technology (ESPRIT, Project 932), and Computer Aided Manufacturing International (CAM-i) concerning planning, scheduling and control at the shop floor level.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>8.848</score><pdfWordCount>9706</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>52889</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.2</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>16</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>548 x 742 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>154</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>1112</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>3</keywordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Cell controllers: Analysis and comparison of three major projects</title><pii><json:string>0166-3615(91)90062-E</json:string></pii><genre><json:string>research-article</json:string></genre><serie><title>PhD Thesis</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language></serie><host><title>Computers in Industry</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><publicationDate>1991</publicationDate><issn><json:string>0166-3615</json:string></issn><pii><json:string>S0166-3615(00)X0119-4</json:string></pii><volume>16</volume><issue>3</issue><pages><first>239</first><last>254</last></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>1986</json:string><json:string>1991</json:string></date><geogName></geogName><orgName><json:string>Research Director</json:string><json:string>French National Institute for Research</json:string><json:string>Johnson Controls, Inc.</json:string><json:string>Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Maryland</json:string><json:string>Automated Manufacturing Research Facility</json:string><json:string>Fast Tech Integration, Inc</json:string><json:string>HPMS</json:string><json:string>AMRF</json:string><json:string>Institute of Systems Research and Department</json:string><json:string>Systems Research Center</json:string><json:string>University of Maryland</json:string><json:string>Research and Development</json:string><json:string>Measurex Automation Systems</json:string><json:string>France There</json:string><json:string>Editorial Board of the Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing</json:string><json:string>Computer Aided Manufacturing International</json:string><json:string>Hierarchical Production Management Systems</json:string><json:string>European Institute for Advanced Studies</json:string><json:string>Digital Equipment Corp.</json:string><json:string>USA</json:string><json:string>University of Nancy</json:string><json:string>National Institute of Standards and Technology</json:string></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName><json:string>Allen Bradley</json:string><json:string>Status</json:string><json:string>Member</json:string><json:string>B. Boulet</json:string><json:string>Interesting</json:string><json:string>College Park</json:string><json:string>Jean-Marie Proth</json:string><json:string>Laboratory</json:string><json:string>Critical</json:string><json:string>Arthur Andersen</json:string></persName><placeName><json:string>Germany</json:string><json:string>Metz</json:string><json:string>Wetzlar</json:string><json:string>France</json:string></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl><json:string>[34]</json:string><json:string>[10,24,27]</json:string><json:string>[18]</json:string><json:string>[26,28-30]</json:string><json:string>[11]</json:string><json:string>[25,26]</json:string><json:string>[32]</json:string><json:string>[33-38]</json:string><json:string>[27]</json:string><json:string>[3]</json:string><json:string>[13,14]</json:string><json:string>[21-23]</json:string><json:string>B. Boulet et al.</json:string><json:string>[1,2]</json:string><json:string>[11,12]</json:string><json:string>[24]</json:string><json:string>[3-10]</json:string><json:string>B. Boulet et aL</json:string><json:string>[19]</json:string></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/6H6-3GP7HL75-5</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - science</json:string><json:string>2 - computer science, interdisciplinary applications</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - applied sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - engineering</json:string><json:string>3 - operations research</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Physical Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Engineering</json:string><json:string>3 - General Engineering</json:string><json:string>1 - Physical Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Computer Science</json:string><json:string>3 - General Computer Science</json:string></scopus><inist><json:string>1 - sciences appliquees, technologies et medecines</json:string><json:string>2 - sciences exactes et technologie</json:string><json:string>3 - sciences appliquees</json:string><json:string>4 - pollution</json:string></inist></categories><publicationDate>1991</publicationDate><copyrightDate>1991</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1016/0166-3615(91)90062-E</json:string></doi><id>6FF00F7B2E6623DE90CD9E7AC25B92E742C8962B</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/6H6-3GP7HL75-5/fulltext.pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/6H6-3GP7HL75-5/bundle.zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/6H6-3GP7HL75-5/fulltext.tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a">Cell controllers: Analysis and comparison of three major projects</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher scheme="https://scientific-publisher.data.istex.fr">ELSEVIER</publisher><availability><licence><p>elsevier</p></licence></availability><p scheme="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-HKKZVM7B-M"></p><date>1991</date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="research-article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-1JC4F85T-7">research-article</note><note type="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note><note type="content">Section title: Survey</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="inbook"><analytic><title level="a">Cell controllers: Analysis and comparison of three major projects</title><author xml:id="author-0000"><persName><forename type="first">B.</forename><surname>Boulet</surname></persName><affiliation>Systems Research Center, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">B.</forename><surname>Chhabra</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0002"><persName><forename type="first">G.</forename><surname>Harhalakis</surname></persName><affiliation>To whom correspondence should be addressed.</affiliation><affiliation>Systems Research Center & Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0003"><persName><forename type="first">I.</forename><surname>Minis</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0004"><persName><forename type="first">J.M.</forename><surname>Proth</surname></persName><affiliation>INRIA—Lorraine, CESCOM, Technopole Metz 2000, 4, rue Marconi, 57070 Metz, France</affiliation></author><idno type="istex">6FF00F7B2E6623DE90CD9E7AC25B92E742C8962B</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/6H6-3GP7HL75-5</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1016/0166-3615(91)90062-E</idno><idno type="PII">0166-3615(91)90062-E</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j">Computers in Industry</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">COMIND</title><idno type="pISSN">0166-3615</idno><idno type="PII">S0166-3615(00)X0119-4</idno><imprint><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><date type="published" when="1991"></date><biblScope unit="volume">16</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">3</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="239">239</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="254">254</biblScope></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><creation><date>1991</date></creation><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Abstract: There is a critical need to achieve Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, to link the factory-level functions (Product Design, Process Planning and Manufacturing Resource Planning) with the manufacturing functions (Parts Manufacturing, Product Assembly, and Quality Control). The primary functions performed by this link for all jobs issued to the shop floor (i.e. all the parts to be manufactured in a specified period of time) include: (i) the allocation of resources (machines, material handling devices, etc.); and (ii) the scheduling of tasks (manufacturing operations, material transfers, etc.). This paper defines these functions and presents the different methods that have been proposed to solve the associated problems. It provides analysis and a critical comparison of the current research at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST, formerly NBS), European Strategic Program for Research and Development in Information Technology (ESPRIT, Project 932), and Computer Aided Manufacturing International (CAM-i) concerning planning, scheduling and control at the shop floor level.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords scheme="keyword"><list><head>Keywords</head><item><term>Computer-integrated manufacturing</term></item><item><term>Cell controllers</term></item><item><term>Scheduling</term></item></list></keywords></textClass></profileDesc><revisionDesc><change when="1991">Published</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/6H6-3GP7HL75-5/fulltext.txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Elsevier, elements deleted: tail"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:docType PUBLIC="-//ES//DTD journal article DTD version 4.5.2//EN//XML" URI="art452.dtd" name="istex:docType"></istex:docType><istex:document><converted-article version="4.5.2" docsubtype="fla"><item-info><jid>COMIND</jid><aid>9190062E</aid><ce:pii>0166-3615(91)90062-E</ce:pii><ce:doi>10.1016/0166-3615(91)90062-E</ce:doi><ce:copyright type="unknown" year="1991"></ce:copyright></item-info><head><ce:dochead><ce:textfn>Survey</ce:textfn></ce:dochead><ce:title>Cell controllers: Analysis and comparison of three major projects</ce:title><ce:author-group><ce:author><ce:given-name>B.</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Boulet</ce:surname><ce:cross-ref refid="AFF1"><ce:sup>a</ce:sup></ce:cross-ref></ce:author><ce:author><ce:given-name>B.</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Chhabra</ce:surname><ce:cross-ref refid="AFF2"><ce:sup>b</ce:sup></ce:cross-ref></ce:author><ce:author><ce:given-name>G.</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Harhalakis</ce:surname><ce:cross-ref refid="COR1"><ce:sup>∗</ce:sup></ce:cross-ref><ce:cross-ref refid="AFF3"><ce:sup>c</ce:sup></ce:cross-ref></ce:author><ce:author><ce:given-name>I.</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Minis</ce:surname><ce:cross-ref refid="AFF2"><ce:sup>b</ce:sup></ce:cross-ref></ce:author><ce:author><ce:given-name>J.M.</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Proth</ce:surname><ce:cross-ref refid="AFF4"><ce:sup>d</ce:sup></ce:cross-ref></ce:author><ce:affiliation id="AFF1"><ce:label>a</ce:label><ce:textfn>Systems Research Center, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA</ce:textfn></ce:affiliation><ce:affiliation id="AFF2"><ce:label>b</ce:label><ce:textfn>Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA</ce:textfn></ce:affiliation><ce:affiliation id="AFF3"><ce:label>c</ce:label><ce:textfn>Systems Research Center & Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA</ce:textfn></ce:affiliation><ce:affiliation id="AFF4"><ce:label>d</ce:label><ce:textfn>INRIA—Lorraine, CESCOM, Technopole Metz 2000, 4, rue Marconi, 57070 Metz, France</ce:textfn></ce:affiliation><ce:correspondence id="COR1"><ce:label>∗</ce:label><ce:text>To whom correspondence should be addressed.</ce:text></ce:correspondence></ce:author-group><ce:abstract><ce:section-title>Abstract</ce:section-title><ce:abstract-sec><ce:simple-para>There is a critical need to achieve Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, to link the factory-level functions (Product Design, Process Planning and Manufacturing Resource Planning) with the manufacturing functions (Parts Manufacturing, Product Assembly, and Quality Control). The primary functions performed by this link for all jobs issued to the shop floor (i.e. all the parts to be manufactured in a specified period of time) include: (i) the allocation of resources (machines, material handling devices, etc.); and (ii) the scheduling of tasks (manufacturing operations, material transfers, etc.). This paper defines these functions and presents the different methods that have been proposed to solve the associated problems. It provides analysis and a critical comparison of the current research at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST, formerly NBS), European Strategic Program for Research and Development in Information Technology (ESPRIT, Project 932), and Computer Aided Manufacturing International (CAM-i) concerning planning, scheduling and control at the shop floor level.</ce:simple-para></ce:abstract-sec></ce:abstract><ce:keywords><ce:section-title>Keywords</ce:section-title><ce:keyword><ce:text>Computer-integrated manufacturing</ce:text></ce:keyword><ce:keyword><ce:text>Cell controllers</ce:text></ce:keyword><ce:keyword><ce:text>Scheduling</ce:text></ce:keyword></ce:keywords></head></converted-article></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo><title>Cell controllers: Analysis and comparison of three major projects</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA"><title>Cell controllers: Analysis and comparison of three major projects</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">B.</namePart><namePart type="family">Boulet</namePart><affiliation>Systems Research Center, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">B.</namePart><namePart type="family">Chhabra</namePart><affiliation>Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">G.</namePart><namePart type="family">Harhalakis</namePart><affiliation>To whom correspondence should be addressed.</affiliation><affiliation>Systems Research Center & Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">I.</namePart><namePart type="family">Minis</namePart><affiliation>Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">J.M.</namePart><namePart type="family">Proth</namePart><affiliation>INRIA—Lorraine, CESCOM, Technopole Metz 2000, 4, rue Marconi, 57070 Metz, France</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="research-article" displayLabel="Full-length article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-1JC4F85T-7">research-article</genre><originInfo><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1991</dateIssued><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">1991</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm></language><abstract lang="en">Abstract: There is a critical need to achieve Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, to link the factory-level functions (Product Design, Process Planning and Manufacturing Resource Planning) with the manufacturing functions (Parts Manufacturing, Product Assembly, and Quality Control). The primary functions performed by this link for all jobs issued to the shop floor (i.e. all the parts to be manufactured in a specified period of time) include: (i) the allocation of resources (machines, material handling devices, etc.); and (ii) the scheduling of tasks (manufacturing operations, material transfers, etc.). This paper defines these functions and presents the different methods that have been proposed to solve the associated problems. It provides analysis and a critical comparison of the current research at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST, formerly NBS), European Strategic Program for Research and Development in Information Technology (ESPRIT, Project 932), and Computer Aided Manufacturing International (CAM-i) concerning planning, scheduling and control at the shop floor level.</abstract><note type="content">Section title: Survey</note><subject><genre>Keywords</genre><topic>Computer-integrated manufacturing</topic><topic>Cell controllers</topic><topic>Scheduling</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Computers in Industry</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated"><title>COMIND</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><originInfo><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1991</dateIssued></originInfo><identifier type="ISSN">0166-3615</identifier><identifier type="PII">S0166-3615(00)X0119-4</identifier><part><date>1991</date><detail type="volume"><number>16</number><caption>vol.</caption></detail><detail type="issue"><number>3</number><caption>no.</caption></detail><extent unit="issue-pages"><start>225</start><end>314</end></extent><extent unit="pages"><start>239</start><end>254</end></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">6FF00F7B2E6623DE90CD9E7AC25B92E742C8962B</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/6H6-3GP7HL75-5</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1016/0166-3615(91)90062-E</identifier><identifier type="PII">0166-3615(91)90062-E</identifier><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-HKKZVM7B-M">elsevier</recordContentSource></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/6H6-3GP7HL75-5/record.json</uri></json:item></metadata></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Lorraine/explor/InforLorV4/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001A08 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 001A08 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Lorraine
|area= InforLorV4
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:6FF00F7B2E6623DE90CD9E7AC25B92E742C8962B
|texte= Cell controllers: Analysis and comparison of three major projects
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.33. |  |