Frames, A Unified Model for the Representation of Reference and Space in a Man-Machine Dialogue
Identifieur interne : 001522 ( Crin/Corpus ); précédent : 001521; suivant : 001523Frames, A Unified Model for the Representation of Reference and Space in a Man-Machine Dialogue
Auteurs : D. Schang ; L. RomarySource :
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
Abstract
This paper aims at instanciating the notion of ``frames" (from now on ``reference context"). This change of the name concept has been done to avoid confusion with other domains of A.I. in wich the notion of frame appears.) which seems to emerge from recent work on space modeling but has until now been essentially seen as a too general concept to be usable within an understanding system. This notion, which may be subsumed by Langacker's ``cognitive domains", still places itself at a more general level than what he introduces as ``search domains". We will show that a reference context is essential for any general view of spatial reasoning, especially when considering the classical distinction between {\em landmark} and {\em trajector} which really takes its meaning within a surrounding ``portion" of space such as the one we will present here.
Links to Exploration step
CRIN:schang94aLe document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en" wicri:score="320">Frames, A Unified Model for the Representation of Reference and Space in a Man-Machine Dialogue</title>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="RBID">CRIN:schang94a</idno>
<date when="1994" year="1994">1994</date>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Crin/Corpus">001522</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Frames, A Unified Model for the Representation of Reference and Space in a Man-Machine Dialogue</title>
<author><name sortKey="Schang, D" sort="Schang, D" uniqKey="Schang D" first="D." last="Schang">D. Schang</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Romary, L" sort="Romary, L" uniqKey="Romary L" first="L." last="Romary">L. Romary</name>
</author>
</analytic>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>man-machine dialogue</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en" wicri:score="3378">This paper aims at instanciating the notion of ``frames" (from now on ``reference context"). This change of the name concept has been done to avoid confusion with other domains of A.I. in wich the notion of frame appears.) which seems to emerge from recent work on space modeling but has until now been essentially seen as a too general concept to be usable within an understanding system. This notion, which may be subsumed by Langacker's ``cognitive domains", still places itself at a more general level than what he introduces as ``search domains". We will show that a reference context is essential for any general view of spatial reasoning, especially when considering the classical distinction between {\em landmark} and {\em trajector} which really takes its meaning within a surrounding ``portion" of space such as the one we will present here.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<BibTex type="inproceedings"><ref>schang94a</ref>
<crinnumber>94-R-145</crinnumber>
<category>3</category>
<equipe>DIALOGUE</equipe>
<author><e>Schang, D.</e>
<e>Romary, L.</e>
</author>
<title>Frames, A Unified Model for the Representation of Reference and Space in a Man-Machine Dialogue</title>
<booktitle>{Proceedings 3rd International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, Yokohama (Japan)}</booktitle>
<year>1994</year>
<keywords><e>man-machine dialogue</e>
</keywords>
<abstract>This paper aims at instanciating the notion of ``frames" (from now on ``reference context"). This change of the name concept has been done to avoid confusion with other domains of A.I. in wich the notion of frame appears.) which seems to emerge from recent work on space modeling but has until now been essentially seen as a too general concept to be usable within an understanding system. This notion, which may be subsumed by Langacker's ``cognitive domains", still places itself at a more general level than what he introduces as ``search domains". We will show that a reference context is essential for any general view of spatial reasoning, especially when considering the classical distinction between {\em landmark} and {\em trajector} which really takes its meaning within a surrounding ``portion" of space such as the one we will present here.</abstract>
</BibTex>
</record>
Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Lorraine/explor/InforLorV4/Data/Crin/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001522 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Crin/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 001522 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien |wiki= Wicri/Lorraine |area= InforLorV4 |flux= Crin |étape= Corpus |type= RBID |clé= CRIN:schang94a |texte= Frames, A Unified Model for the Representation of Reference and Space in a Man-Machine Dialogue }}
![]() | This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.33. | ![]() |