Historical geography and the society/nature “problematic”: the perspective of J. F. Schouw, G. P. Marsh and E. Reclus
Identifieur interne : 001217 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 001216; suivant : 001218Historical geography and the society/nature “problematic”: the perspective of J. F. Schouw, G. P. Marsh and E. Reclus
Auteurs : Kenneth Robert OlwigSource :
- Journal of Historical Geography [ 0305-7488 ] ; 1980.
Abstract
The “retreat” of the recent past within geography to a conception of the discipline as an ahistoric science which is either spatial or ecological is seen to be an atavism—a throwback to a disciplinary framework or “problematic” which dichotomizes human society and nature into fixed exclusive categories. This essay explores an alternative “problematic” which integrates society's spatial and ecological dimensions in a study of the historical process of “dialectical” interaction between society and its geographic environment, and the political and economic consequences of this interaction. The significance of this alternative approach is elucidated through an examination of its emergence, at the time of the origins of modern geography in the early nineteenth century. Its developing importance for the present-day position of the discipline is exemplified in the work of three prominent, socially engaged, nineteenth-century geographers. Although these geographers have tended to be either ignored or misunderstood in the recent literature, their approach has much to offer the field at a time when its division into ahistoric spatial and ecological disciplines is being questioned.
Url:
DOI: 10.1016/0305-7488(80)90042-0
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:5370CC1BC6FC61A559B4C62EE77A96BA375362F9Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title>Historical geography and the society/nature “problematic”: the perspective of J. F. Schouw, G. P. Marsh and E. Reclus</title><author><name sortKey="Olwig, Kenneth Robert" sort="Olwig, Kenneth Robert" uniqKey="Olwig K" first="Kenneth Robert" last="Olwig">Kenneth Robert Olwig</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:5370CC1BC6FC61A559B4C62EE77A96BA375362F9</idno><date when="1980" year="1980">1980</date><idno type="doi">10.1016/0305-7488(80)90042-0</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/5370CC1BC6FC61A559B4C62EE77A96BA375362F9/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">001217</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">001217</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a">Historical geography and the society/nature “problematic”: the perspective of J. F. Schouw, G. P. Marsh and E. Reclus</title><author><name sortKey="Olwig, Kenneth Robert" sort="Olwig, Kenneth Robert" uniqKey="Olwig K" first="Kenneth Robert" last="Olwig">Kenneth Robert Olwig</name></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">Journal of Historical Geography</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">YJHGE</title><idno type="ISSN">0305-7488</idno><imprint><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><date type="published" when="1980">1980</date><biblScope unit="volume">6</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="29">29</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="45">45</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0305-7488</idno></series><idno type="istex">5370CC1BC6FC61A559B4C62EE77A96BA375362F9</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1016/0305-7488(80)90042-0</idno><idno type="PII">0305-7488(80)90042-0</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0305-7488</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">The “retreat” of the recent past within geography to a conception of the discipline as an ahistoric science which is either spatial or ecological is seen to be an atavism—a throwback to a disciplinary framework or “problematic” which dichotomizes human society and nature into fixed exclusive categories. This essay explores an alternative “problematic” which integrates society's spatial and ecological dimensions in a study of the historical process of “dialectical” interaction between society and its geographic environment, and the political and economic consequences of this interaction. The significance of this alternative approach is elucidated through an examination of its emergence, at the time of the origins of modern geography in the early nineteenth century. Its developing importance for the present-day position of the discipline is exemplified in the work of three prominent, socially engaged, nineteenth-century geographers. Although these geographers have tended to be either ignored or misunderstood in the recent literature, their approach has much to offer the field at a time when its division into ahistoric spatial and ecological disciplines is being questioned.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>elsevier</corpusName><author><json:item><name>Kenneth Robert Olwig</name></json:item></author><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>Full-length article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>The “retreat” of the recent past within geography to a conception of the discipline as an ahistoric science which is either spatial or ecological is seen to be an atavism—a throwback to a disciplinary framework or “problematic” which dichotomizes human society and nature into fixed exclusive categories. This essay explores an alternative “problematic” which integrates society's spatial and ecological dimensions in a study of the historical process of “dialectical” interaction between society and its geographic environment, and the political and economic consequences of this interaction. The significance of this alternative approach is elucidated through an examination of its emergence, at the time of the origins of modern geography in the early nineteenth century. Its developing importance for the present-day position of the discipline is exemplified in the work of three prominent, socially engaged, nineteenth-century geographers. Although these geographers have tended to be either ignored or misunderstood in the recent literature, their approach has much to offer the field at a time when its division into ahistoric spatial and ecological disciplines is being questioned.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>7.076</score><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageSize>522 x 734 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><keywordCount>0</keywordCount><abstractCharCount>1189</abstractCharCount><pdfWordCount>8791</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>51365</pdfCharCount><pdfPageCount>17</pdfPageCount><abstractWordCount>173</abstractWordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Historical geography and the society/nature “problematic”: the perspective of J. F. Schouw, G. P. Marsh and E. Reclus</title><pii><json:string>0305-7488(80)90042-0</json:string></pii><genre><json:string>research-article</json:string></genre><serie><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><title>Copenhagen</title></serie><host><volume>6</volume><pii><json:string>S0305-7488(00)X0045-X</json:string></pii><pages><last>45</last><first>29</first></pages><issn><json:string>0305-7488</json:string></issn><issue>1</issue><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><title>Journal of Historical Geography</title><publicationDate>1980</publicationDate></host><categories><wos><json:string>HISTORY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES</json:string><json:string>GEOGRAPHY</json:string></wos></categories><publicationDate>1980</publicationDate><copyrightDate>1980</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1016/0305-7488(80)90042-0</json:string></doi><id>5370CC1BC6FC61A559B4C62EE77A96BA375362F9</id><score>0.088172905</score><fulltext><json:item><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><extension>pdf</extension><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/5370CC1BC6FC61A559B4C62EE77A96BA375362F9/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><extension>zip</extension><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/5370CC1BC6FC61A559B4C62EE77A96BA375362F9/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/5370CC1BC6FC61A559B4C62EE77A96BA375362F9/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a">Historical geography and the society/nature “problematic”: the perspective of J. F. Schouw, G. P. Marsh and E. Reclus</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><availability><p>ELSEVIER</p></availability><date>1980</date></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="inbook"><analytic><title level="a">Historical geography and the society/nature “problematic”: the perspective of J. F. Schouw, G. P. Marsh and E. Reclus</title><author><persName><forename type="first">Kenneth Robert</forename><surname>Olwig</surname></persName></author></analytic><monogr><title level="j">Journal of Historical Geography</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">YJHGE</title><idno type="pISSN">0305-7488</idno><idno type="PII">S0305-7488(00)X0045-X</idno><imprint><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><date type="published" when="1980"></date><biblScope unit="volume">6</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="29">29</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="45">45</biblScope></imprint></monogr><idno type="istex">5370CC1BC6FC61A559B4C62EE77A96BA375362F9</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1016/0305-7488(80)90042-0</idno><idno type="PII">0305-7488(80)90042-0</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><creation><date>1980</date></creation><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The “retreat” of the recent past within geography to a conception of the discipline as an ahistoric science which is either spatial or ecological is seen to be an atavism—a throwback to a disciplinary framework or “problematic” which dichotomizes human society and nature into fixed exclusive categories. This essay explores an alternative “problematic” which integrates society's spatial and ecological dimensions in a study of the historical process of “dialectical” interaction between society and its geographic environment, and the political and economic consequences of this interaction. The significance of this alternative approach is elucidated through an examination of its emergence, at the time of the origins of modern geography in the early nineteenth century. Its developing importance for the present-day position of the discipline is exemplified in the work of three prominent, socially engaged, nineteenth-century geographers. Although these geographers have tended to be either ignored or misunderstood in the recent literature, their approach has much to offer the field at a time when its division into ahistoric spatial and ecological disciplines is being questioned.</p></abstract></profileDesc><revisionDesc><change when="1980">Published</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><extension>txt</extension><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/5370CC1BC6FC61A559B4C62EE77A96BA375362F9/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Elsevier, elements deleted: tail"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:docType PUBLIC="-//ES//DTD journal article DTD version 4.5.2//EN//XML" URI="art452.dtd" name="istex:docType"></istex:docType><istex:document><converted-article version="4.5.2" docsubtype="fla"><item-info><jid>YJHGE</jid><aid>80900420</aid><ce:pii>0305-7488(80)90042-0</ce:pii><ce:doi>10.1016/0305-7488(80)90042-0</ce:doi><ce:copyright type="unknown" year="1980"></ce:copyright></item-info><head><ce:title>Historical geography and the society/nature “problematic”: the perspective of J. F. Schouw, G. P. Marsh and E. Reclus</ce:title><ce:author-group><ce:author><ce:given-name>Kenneth Robert</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Olwig</ce:surname></ce:author></ce:author-group><ce:abstract><ce:section-title>Abstract</ce:section-title><ce:abstract-sec><ce:simple-para>The “retreat” of the recent past within geography to a conception of the discipline as an ahistoric science which is either <ce:italic>spatial</ce:italic> or <ce:italic>ecological</ce:italic> is seen to be an atavism—a throwback to a disciplinary framework or “problematic” which dichotomizes human society and nature into fixed exclusive categories. This essay explores an alternative “problematic” which integrates society's spatial and ecological dimensions in a study of the historical process of “dialectical” interaction between society and its geographic environment, and the political and economic consequences of this interaction. The significance of this alternative approach is elucidated through an examination of its emergence, at the time of the origins of modern geography in the early nineteenth century. Its developing importance for the present-day position of the discipline is exemplified in the work of three prominent, socially engaged, nineteenth-century geographers. Although these geographers have tended to be either ignored or misunderstood in the recent literature, their approach has much to offer the field at a time when its division into ahistoric spatial and ecological disciplines is being questioned.</ce:simple-para></ce:abstract-sec></ce:abstract></head></converted-article></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo><title>Historical geography and the society/nature “problematic”: the perspective of J. F. Schouw, G. P. Marsh and E. Reclus</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA"><title>Historical geography and the society/nature “problematic”: the perspective of J. F. Schouw, G. P. Marsh and E. Reclus</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Kenneth Robert</namePart><namePart type="family">Olwig</namePart><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="research-article" displayLabel="Full-length article"></genre><originInfo><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1980</dateIssued><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">1980</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><internetMediaType>text/html</internetMediaType></physicalDescription><abstract lang="en">The “retreat” of the recent past within geography to a conception of the discipline as an ahistoric science which is either spatial or ecological is seen to be an atavism—a throwback to a disciplinary framework or “problematic” which dichotomizes human society and nature into fixed exclusive categories. This essay explores an alternative “problematic” which integrates society's spatial and ecological dimensions in a study of the historical process of “dialectical” interaction between society and its geographic environment, and the political and economic consequences of this interaction. The significance of this alternative approach is elucidated through an examination of its emergence, at the time of the origins of modern geography in the early nineteenth century. Its developing importance for the present-day position of the discipline is exemplified in the work of three prominent, socially engaged, nineteenth-century geographers. Although these geographers have tended to be either ignored or misunderstood in the recent literature, their approach has much to offer the field at a time when its division into ahistoric spatial and ecological disciplines is being questioned.</abstract><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Journal of Historical Geography</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated"><title>YJHGE</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal">journal</genre><originInfo><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">198001</dateIssued></originInfo><identifier type="ISSN">0305-7488</identifier><identifier type="PII">S0305-7488(00)X0045-X</identifier><part><date>198001</date><detail type="volume"><number>6</number><caption>vol.</caption></detail><detail type="issue"><number>1</number><caption>no.</caption></detail><extent unit="issue pages"><start>1</start><end>114</end></extent><extent unit="pages"><start>29</start><end>45</end></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">5370CC1BC6FC61A559B4C62EE77A96BA375362F9</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1016/0305-7488(80)90042-0</identifier><identifier type="PII">0305-7488(80)90042-0</identifier><recordInfo><recordContentSource>ELSEVIER</recordContentSource></recordInfo></mods></metadata></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/EpistemeV1/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001217 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 001217 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Ticri/CIDE
|area= EpistemeV1
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:5370CC1BC6FC61A559B4C62EE77A96BA375362F9
|texte= Historical geography and the society/nature “problematic”: the perspective of J. F. Schouw, G. P. Marsh and E. Reclus
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.31. |  |