Geo‐Pragmatics for the Geospatial Semantic Web
Identifieur interne : 000648 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 000647; suivant : 000649Geo‐Pragmatics for the Geospatial Semantic Web
Auteurs : Boyan BrodaricSource :
- Transactions in GIS [ 1361-1682 ] ; 2007-06.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
Abstract
Geo‐Pragmatics is introduced here as an enhanced representation for ontologies in which geospatial, geographical and geoscientific concepts are not only defined, but their pragmatic context is also captured and potentially reasoned with. A framework for representing such context is developed using three core aspects: dimensions, agents and roles. Dimensions consist of a concept's origins, uses and effects; these are generated by the interaction of human, machine and natural agents, and involve entities with roles developed from method‐driven perspectives and epistemic‐driven versions. The relationship between these core aspects is explored conceptually and implications for geoscientific ontologies are discussed, including identification of a basic ontological type, the situated concept, whose meaning is defined by its geographical‐historical context. Geo‐pragmatics should help geoscientists evaluate the scientific merit, and fitness for scientific use, of geoscientific ontologies in emerging e‐science initiatives.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9671.2007.01055.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:E262D618449298CC42918DB9439F6C8F1A6E3747Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Geo‐Pragmatics for the Geospatial Semantic Web</title><author><name sortKey="Brodaric, Boyan" sort="Brodaric, Boyan" uniqKey="Brodaric B" first="Boyan" last="Brodaric">Boyan Brodaric</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Geological Survey of Canada Ottawa, Canada</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:E262D618449298CC42918DB9439F6C8F1A6E3747</idno><date when="2007" year="2007">2007</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1467-9671.2007.01055.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/E262D618449298CC42918DB9439F6C8F1A6E3747/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000648</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Geo‐Pragmatics for the Geospatial Semantic Web</title><author><name sortKey="Brodaric, Boyan" sort="Brodaric, Boyan" uniqKey="Brodaric B" first="Boyan" last="Brodaric">Boyan Brodaric</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Geological Survey of Canada Ottawa, Canada</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">Transactions in GIS</title><idno type="ISSN">1361-1682</idno><idno type="eISSN">1467-9671</idno><imprint><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2007-06">2007-06</date><biblScope unit="volume">11</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">3</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="453">453</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="477">477</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">1361-1682</idno></series><idno type="istex">E262D618449298CC42918DB9439F6C8F1A6E3747</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1467-9671.2007.01055.x</idno><idno type="ArticleID">TGIS1055</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">1361-1682</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Semantic web</term><term>geoscience</term><term>geospatial ontologies</term><term>pragmatics</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Geo‐Pragmatics is introduced here as an enhanced representation for ontologies in which geospatial, geographical and geoscientific concepts are not only defined, but their pragmatic context is also captured and potentially reasoned with. A framework for representing such context is developed using three core aspects: dimensions, agents and roles. Dimensions consist of a concept's origins, uses and effects; these are generated by the interaction of human, machine and natural agents, and involve entities with roles developed from method‐driven perspectives and epistemic‐driven versions. The relationship between these core aspects is explored conceptually and implications for geoscientific ontologies are discussed, including identification of a basic ontological type, the situated concept, whose meaning is defined by its geographical‐historical context. Geo‐pragmatics should help geoscientists evaluate the scientific merit, and fitness for scientific use, of geoscientific ontologies in emerging e‐science initiatives.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><author><json:item><name>Boyan Brodaric</name><affiliations><json:string>Geological Survey of Canada Ottawa, Canada</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>Semantic web</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>pragmatics</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>geospatial ontologies</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>geoscience</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>TGIS1055</json:string></articleId><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Geo‐Pragmatics is introduced here as an enhanced representation for ontologies in which geospatial, geographical and geoscientific concepts are not only defined, but their pragmatic context is also captured and potentially reasoned with. A framework for representing such context is developed using three core aspects: dimensions, agents and roles. Dimensions consist of a concept's origins, uses and effects; these are generated by the interaction of human, machine and natural agents, and involve entities with roles developed from method‐driven perspectives and epistemic‐driven versions. The relationship between these core aspects is explored conceptually and implications for geoscientific ontologies are discussed, including identification of a basic ontological type, the situated concept, whose meaning is defined by its geographical‐historical context. Geo‐pragmatics should help geoscientists evaluate the scientific merit, and fitness for scientific use, of geoscientific ontologies in emerging e‐science initiatives.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>6.62</score><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageSize>485 x 697 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><keywordCount>4</keywordCount><abstractCharCount>1029</abstractCharCount><pdfWordCount>10158</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>63784</pdfCharCount><pdfPageCount>26</pdfPageCount><abstractWordCount>135</abstractWordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Geo‐Pragmatics for the Geospatial Semantic Web</title><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><volume>11</volume><publisherId><json:string>TGIS</json:string></publisherId><pages><total>25</total><last>477</last><first>453</first></pages><issn><json:string>1361-1682</json:string></issn><issue>3</issue><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><eissn><json:string>1467-9671</json:string></eissn><title>Transactions in GIS</title><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1467-9671</json:string></doi></host><publicationDate>2007</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2007</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1467-9671.2007.01055.x</json:string></doi><id>E262D618449298CC42918DB9439F6C8F1A6E3747</id><score>0.11150959</score><fulltext><json:item><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><extension>pdf</extension><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/E262D618449298CC42918DB9439F6C8F1A6E3747/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><extension>zip</extension><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/E262D618449298CC42918DB9439F6C8F1A6E3747/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/E262D618449298CC42918DB9439F6C8F1A6E3747/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Geo‐Pragmatics for the Geospatial Semantic Web</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><availability><p>WILEY</p></availability><date>2007</date></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="inbook"><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Geo‐Pragmatics for the Geospatial Semantic Web</title><author xml:id="author-1"><persName><forename type="first">Boyan</forename><surname>Brodaric</surname></persName><affiliation>Geological Survey of Canada Ottawa, Canada</affiliation></author></analytic><monogr><title level="j">Transactions in GIS</title><idno type="pISSN">1361-1682</idno><idno type="eISSN">1467-9671</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1467-9671</idno><imprint><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2007-06"></date><biblScope unit="volume">11</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">3</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="453">453</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="477">477</biblScope></imprint></monogr><idno type="istex">E262D618449298CC42918DB9439F6C8F1A6E3747</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1467-9671.2007.01055.x</idno><idno type="ArticleID">TGIS1055</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><creation><date>2007</date></creation><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Geo‐Pragmatics is introduced here as an enhanced representation for ontologies in which geospatial, geographical and geoscientific concepts are not only defined, but their pragmatic context is also captured and potentially reasoned with. A framework for representing such context is developed using three core aspects: dimensions, agents and roles. Dimensions consist of a concept's origins, uses and effects; these are generated by the interaction of human, machine and natural agents, and involve entities with roles developed from method‐driven perspectives and epistemic‐driven versions. The relationship between these core aspects is explored conceptually and implications for geoscientific ontologies are discussed, including identification of a basic ontological type, the situated concept, whose meaning is defined by its geographical‐historical context. Geo‐pragmatics should help geoscientists evaluate the scientific merit, and fitness for scientific use, of geoscientific ontologies in emerging e‐science initiatives.</p></abstract><textClass xml:lang="en"><keywords scheme="keyword"><list><head>keywords</head><item><term>Semantic web</term></item><item><term>pragmatics</term></item><item><term>geospatial ontologies</term></item><item><term>geoscience</term></item></list></keywords></textClass></profileDesc><revisionDesc><change when="2007-06">Published</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><extension>txt</extension><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/E262D618449298CC42918DB9439F6C8F1A6E3747/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisherName><publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1467-9671</doi><issn type="print">1361-1682</issn><issn type="electronic">1467-9671</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="TGIS"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="TRANSACTIONS IN GIS">Transactions in GIS</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="06003"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/tgis.2007.11.issue-3</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="11">11</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="3">3</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2007-06">June 2007</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="9" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1467-9671.2007.01055.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="TGIS1055"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="25"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">Research Articles</title></titleGroup><eventGroup><event type="firstOnline" date="2007-06-12"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2007-06-12"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.3.2 mode:FullText source:FullText result:FullText" date="2010-03-04"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.8.8" date="2014-02-10"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-11-04"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="453">453</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="477">477</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo><b>Address for correspondence:</b> Boyan Brodaric, Geological Survey of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K1A 0E9. E‐mail: <email>brodaric@nrcan.gc.ca</email></correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:TGIS.TGIS1055.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="7"></count><count type="tableTotal" number="2"></count><count type="formulaTotal" number="0"></count><count type="referenceTotal" number="69"></count><count type="wordTotal" number="10652"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">Geo‐Pragmatics for the Geospatial Semantic Web</title><title type="shortAuthors"><i>B Brodaric</i></title><title type="short"><i>Geo‐Pragmatics for the Geospatial Semantic Web</i></title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Boyan</givenNames><familyName>Brodaric</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1" countryCode="CA"><unparsedAffiliation>Geological Survey of Canada Ottawa, Canada</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup xml:lang="en"><keyword xml:id="k1">Semantic web</keyword><keyword xml:id="k2">pragmatics</keyword><keyword xml:id="k3">geospatial ontologies</keyword><keyword xml:id="k4">geoscience </keyword></keywordGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><title type="main">Abstract</title><p>Geo‐Pragmatics is introduced here as an enhanced representation for ontologies in which geospatial, geographical and geoscientific concepts are not only defined, but their pragmatic context is also captured and potentially reasoned with. A framework for representing such context is developed using three core aspects: dimensions, agents and roles. Dimensions consist of a concept's origins, uses and effects; these are generated by the interaction of human, machine and natural agents, and involve entities with roles developed from method‐driven perspectives and epistemic‐driven versions. The relationship between these core aspects is explored conceptually and implications for geoscientific ontologies are discussed, including identification of a basic ontological type, the situated concept, whose meaning is defined by its geographical‐historical context. Geo‐pragmatics should help geoscientists evaluate the scientific merit, and fitness for scientific use, of geoscientific ontologies in emerging e‐science initiatives.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Geo‐Pragmatics for the Geospatial Semantic Web</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en"><title>Geo‐Pragmatics for the Geospatial Semantic Web</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Geo‐Pragmatics for the Geospatial Semantic Web</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Boyan</namePart><namePart type="family">Brodaric</namePart><affiliation>Geological Survey of Canada Ottawa, Canada</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article"></genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2007-06</dateIssued><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2007</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><internetMediaType>text/html</internetMediaType><extent unit="figures">7</extent><extent unit="tables">2</extent><extent unit="references">69</extent><extent unit="words">10652</extent></physicalDescription><abstract lang="en">Geo‐Pragmatics is introduced here as an enhanced representation for ontologies in which geospatial, geographical and geoscientific concepts are not only defined, but their pragmatic context is also captured and potentially reasoned with. A framework for representing such context is developed using three core aspects: dimensions, agents and roles. Dimensions consist of a concept's origins, uses and effects; these are generated by the interaction of human, machine and natural agents, and involve entities with roles developed from method‐driven perspectives and epistemic‐driven versions. The relationship between these core aspects is explored conceptually and implications for geoscientific ontologies are discussed, including identification of a basic ontological type, the situated concept, whose meaning is defined by its geographical‐historical context. Geo‐pragmatics should help geoscientists evaluate the scientific merit, and fitness for scientific use, of geoscientific ontologies in emerging e‐science initiatives.</abstract><subject lang="en"><genre>keywords</genre><topic>Semantic web</topic><topic>pragmatics</topic><topic>geospatial ontologies</topic><topic>geoscience</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Transactions in GIS</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">1361-1682</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1467-9671</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1467-9671</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">TGIS</identifier><part><date>2007</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>11</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>3</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>453</start><end>477</end><total>25</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">E262D618449298CC42918DB9439F6C8F1A6E3747</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1467-9671.2007.01055.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">TGIS1055</identifier><recordInfo><recordContentSource>WILEY</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods></metadata><enrichments><json:item><type>multicat</type><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/E262D618449298CC42918DB9439F6C8F1A6E3747/enrichments/multicat</uri></json:item></enrichments><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/CyberinfraV1/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000648 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000648 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Ticri/CIDE
|area= CyberinfraV1
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:E262D618449298CC42918DB9439F6C8F1A6E3747
|texte= Geo‐Pragmatics for the Geospatial Semantic Web
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.25. |  |