The Role of Modeling in the Resilience of Cyberinfrastructure Systems and Preparedness for Cyber Intrusions
Identifieur interne : 000000 ( Istex/Corpus ); suivant : 000001The Role of Modeling in the Resilience of Cyberinfrastructure Systems and Preparedness for Cyber Intrusions
Auteurs : Clyde G. Chittister ; Yacov Y. HaimesSource :
- Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management [ 1547-7355 ] ; 2011-01-23.
Abstract
The personal computer, and cyber technology in general, opens the doors to the world. Unless an organization can cultivate the flexibility to adapt its processes to the demands of this new technology, it could diminish its capability to execute effective protective and responsive countermeasures against malevolent or unwanted cyber intrusion. In this paper, we define and use the term cyberinfrastructure system to connote a generalized complex, large-scale cyberinfrastructure network that includes hardware, software, organizational policies and procedures, and that is connected to the Internet (e.g., by means of telephone lines, wireless devices, and high-speed technology). Following a malevolent cyber attack, the original cyberinfrastructure security model could have been (unbeknownst to the system’s operators) perturbed and changed, not by its designers, but by adversaries. In other words, the road-map design of the cyberinfrastructure system, which connotes the policies, procedures, methods, connections, and other human and organizational activities that define the functionality of the cyberinfrastructure system, could have been changed following a malevolent cyber attack. Resilience of a cyberinfrastructure system, which is central to its security, is defined as the ability of the system to withstand a major disruption within acceptable degradation parameters and to recover within an acceptable composite cost and time. The central role of systems integration in cyber security is highlighted because it not only connotes the integration of components, but also involves an understanding of the functionality that emerges from that integration. Systems modeling is indispensable in developing awareness when a cyberinfrastructure is intruded and is being violated. Cyberinfrastructure security is essentially multidimensional and of multi-scale compositions—from molecular to macro dimensions—and its wholeness is characterized by multiple and varied paths of interdependence. Thus, this paper advocates a holistic approach as requisite to understanding not only its myriad parts and functionality but also the forced changes imposed upon it both from within and without its domains. Furthermore, models can play a central role in intrusion detection, thus enabling information managers to develop protective and remedial courses of action. They can also be used to answer a wide range of questions, including how to deceive would-be intruders and lead them to believe they are inflicting damage on the real intended system. Through logically organized and systemically executed models, the Phantom System Models (PSM) laboratory, introduced in Section I, is aimed at providing a reasoned experimental modeling framework with which to explore and thus understand the intricate relationships that characterize the nature of multi-scale emergent systems.
Url:
DOI: 10.2202/1547-7355.1577
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:729DCF601F71C52CC0CD39130AE1B7C048B1A344Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">The Role of Modeling in the Resilience of Cyberinfrastructure Systems and Preparedness for Cyber Intrusions</title>
<author><name sortKey="Chittister, Clyde G" sort="Chittister, Clyde G" uniqKey="Chittister C" first="Clyde G" last="Chittister">Clyde G. Chittister</name>
<affiliation><mods:affiliation>Carnegie Mellon University</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Haimes, Yacov Y" sort="Haimes, Yacov Y" uniqKey="Haimes Y" first="Yacov Y." last="Haimes">Yacov Y. Haimes</name>
<affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of Virginia</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:729DCF601F71C52CC0CD39130AE1B7C048B1A344</idno>
<date when="2011" year="2011">2011</date>
<idno type="doi">10.2202/1547-7355.1577</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/729DCF601F71C52CC0CD39130AE1B7C048B1A344/fulltext/pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000000</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">The Role of Modeling in the Resilience of Cyberinfrastructure Systems and Preparedness for Cyber Intrusions</title>
<author><name sortKey="Chittister, Clyde G" sort="Chittister, Clyde G" uniqKey="Chittister C" first="Clyde G" last="Chittister">Clyde G. Chittister</name>
<affiliation><mods:affiliation>Carnegie Mellon University</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Haimes, Yacov Y" sort="Haimes, Yacov Y" uniqKey="Haimes Y" first="Yacov Y." last="Haimes">Yacov Y. Haimes</name>
<affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of Virginia</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series><title level="j">Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management</title>
<idno type="eISSN">1547-7355</idno>
<imprint><publisher>De Gruyter</publisher>
<date type="published" when="2011-01-23">2011-01-23</date>
<biblScope unit="volume">8</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope>
</imprint>
</series>
<idno type="istex">729DCF601F71C52CC0CD39130AE1B7C048B1A344</idno>
<idno type="DOI">10.2202/1547-7355.1577</idno>
<idno type="ArticleID">1547-7355.1577</idno>
<idno type="Related-article-Href">jhsem.2011.8.1.1577.pdf</idno>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass></textClass>
<langUsage><language ident="en">en</language>
</langUsage>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">The personal computer, and cyber technology in general, opens the doors to the world. Unless an organization can cultivate the flexibility to adapt its processes to the demands of this new technology, it could diminish its capability to execute effective protective and responsive countermeasures against malevolent or unwanted cyber intrusion. In this paper, we define and use the term cyberinfrastructure system to connote a generalized complex, large-scale cyberinfrastructure network that includes hardware, software, organizational policies and procedures, and that is connected to the Internet (e.g., by means of telephone lines, wireless devices, and high-speed technology). Following a malevolent cyber attack, the original cyberinfrastructure security model could have been (unbeknownst to the system’s operators) perturbed and changed, not by its designers, but by adversaries. In other words, the road-map design of the cyberinfrastructure system, which connotes the policies, procedures, methods, connections, and other human and organizational activities that define the functionality of the cyberinfrastructure system, could have been changed following a malevolent cyber attack. Resilience of a cyberinfrastructure system, which is central to its security, is defined as the ability of the system to withstand a major disruption within acceptable degradation parameters and to recover within an acceptable composite cost and time. The central role of systems integration in cyber security is highlighted because it not only connotes the integration of components, but also involves an understanding of the functionality that emerges from that integration. Systems modeling is indispensable in developing awareness when a cyberinfrastructure is intruded and is being violated. Cyberinfrastructure security is essentially multidimensional and of multi-scale compositions—from molecular to macro dimensions—and its wholeness is characterized by multiple and varied paths of interdependence. Thus, this paper advocates a holistic approach as requisite to understanding not only its myriad parts and functionality but also the forced changes imposed upon it both from within and without its domains. Furthermore, models can play a central role in intrusion detection, thus enabling information managers to develop protective and remedial courses of action. They can also be used to answer a wide range of questions, including how to deceive would-be intruders and lead them to believe they are inflicting damage on the real intended system. Through logically organized and systemically executed models, the Phantom System Models (PSM) laboratory, introduced in Section I, is aimed at providing a reasoned experimental modeling framework with which to explore and thus understand the intricate relationships that characterize the nature of multi-scale emergent systems.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<istex><corpusName>degruyter-journals</corpusName>
<author><json:item><name>Clyde G Chittister</name>
<affiliations><json:string>Carnegie Mellon University</json:string>
</affiliations>
</json:item>
<json:item><name>Yacov Y. Haimes</name>
<affiliations><json:string>University of Virginia</json:string>
</affiliations>
</json:item>
</author>
<subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string>
</lang>
<value>Systems Engineering</value>
</json:item>
<json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string>
</lang>
<value>cyberinfrastructure</value>
</json:item>
<json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string>
</lang>
<value>resilience</value>
</json:item>
<json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string>
</lang>
<value>modeling</value>
</json:item>
<json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string>
</lang>
<value>forced changes</value>
</json:item>
<json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string>
</lang>
<value>Internet</value>
</json:item>
<json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string>
</lang>
<value>intrusion</value>
</json:item>
</subject>
<articleId><json:string>1547-7355.1577</json:string>
</articleId>
<language><json:string>eng</json:string>
</language>
<originalGenre><json:string>research-article</json:string>
</originalGenre>
<abstract>The personal computer, and cyber technology in general, opens the doors to the world. Unless an organization can cultivate the flexibility to adapt its processes to the demands of this new technology, it could diminish its capability to execute effective protective and responsive countermeasures against malevolent or unwanted cyber intrusion. In this paper, we define and use the term cyberinfrastructure system to connote a generalized complex, large-scale cyberinfrastructure network that includes hardware, software, organizational policies and procedures, and that is connected to the Internet (e.g., by means of telephone lines, wireless devices, and high-speed technology). Following a malevolent cyber attack, the original cyberinfrastructure security model could have been (unbeknownst to the system’s operators) perturbed and changed, not by its designers, but by adversaries. In other words, the road-map design of the cyberinfrastructure system, which connotes the policies, procedures, methods, connections, and other human and organizational activities that define the functionality of the cyberinfrastructure system, could have been changed following a malevolent cyber attack. Resilience of a cyberinfrastructure system, which is central to its security, is defined as the ability of the system to withstand a major disruption within acceptable degradation parameters and to recover within an acceptable composite cost and time. The central role of systems integration in cyber security is highlighted because it not only connotes the integration of components, but also involves an understanding of the functionality that emerges from that integration. Systems modeling is indispensable in developing awareness when a cyberinfrastructure is intruded and is being violated. Cyberinfrastructure security is essentially multidimensional and of multi-scale compositions—from molecular to macro dimensions—and its wholeness is characterized by multiple and varied paths of interdependence. Thus, this paper advocates a holistic approach as requisite to understanding not only its myriad parts and functionality but also the forced changes imposed upon it both from within and without its domains. Furthermore, models can play a central role in intrusion detection, thus enabling information managers to develop protective and remedial courses of action. They can also be used to answer a wide range of questions, including how to deceive would-be intruders and lead them to believe they are inflicting damage on the real intended system. Through logically organized and systemically executed models, the Phantom System Models (PSM) laboratory, introduced in Section I, is aimed at providing a reasoned experimental modeling framework with which to explore and thus understand the intricate relationships that characterize the nature of multi-scale emergent systems.</abstract>
<qualityIndicators><score>8.5</score>
<pdfVersion>1.4</pdfVersion>
<pdfPageSize>612 x 792 pts (letter)</pdfPageSize>
<refBibsNative>false</refBibsNative>
<keywordCount>7</keywordCount>
<abstractCharCount>2878</abstractCharCount>
<pdfWordCount>7472</pdfWordCount>
<pdfCharCount>48279</pdfCharCount>
<pdfPageCount>22</pdfPageCount>
<abstractWordCount>405</abstractWordCount>
</qualityIndicators>
<title>The Role of Modeling in the Resilience of Cyberinfrastructure Systems and Preparedness for Cyber Intrusions</title>
<genre><json:string>research-article</json:string>
</genre>
<host><volume>8</volume>
<publisherId><json:string>jhsem</json:string>
</publisherId>
<issue>1</issue>
<genre><json:string>journal</json:string>
</genre>
<language><json:string>unknown</json:string>
</language>
<eissn><json:string>1547-7355</json:string>
</eissn>
<title>Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management</title>
</host>
<publicationDate>2011</publicationDate>
<copyrightDate>2011</copyrightDate>
<doi><json:string>10.2202/1547-7355.1577</json:string>
</doi>
<id>729DCF601F71C52CC0CD39130AE1B7C048B1A344</id>
<score>0.9888247</score>
<fulltext><json:item><original>true</original>
<mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype>
<extension>pdf</extension>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/729DCF601F71C52CC0CD39130AE1B7C048B1A344/fulltext/pdf</uri>
</json:item>
<json:item><original>false</original>
<mimetype>application/zip</mimetype>
<extension>zip</extension>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/729DCF601F71C52CC0CD39130AE1B7C048B1A344/fulltext/zip</uri>
</json:item>
<istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/729DCF601F71C52CC0CD39130AE1B7C048B1A344/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">The Role of Modeling in the Resilience of Cyberinfrastructure Systems and Preparedness for Cyber Intrusions</title>
<respStmt xml:id="ISTEX-API" resp="Références bibliographiques récupérées via GROBID" name="ISTEX-API (INIST-CNRS)"></respStmt>
<respStmt><resp>Références bibliographiques récupérées via GROBID</resp>
<name resp="ISTEX-API">ISTEX-API (INIST-CNRS)</name>
</respStmt>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority>
<publisher>De Gruyter</publisher>
<availability><p>De Gruyter</p>
</availability>
<date>2011-01-23</date>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct type="inbook"><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">The Role of Modeling in the Resilience of Cyberinfrastructure Systems and Preparedness for Cyber Intrusions</title>
<author><persName><forename type="first">Clyde G</forename>
<surname>Chittister</surname>
</persName>
<affiliation>Carnegie Mellon University</affiliation>
</author>
<author><persName><forename type="first">Yacov Y.</forename>
<surname>Haimes</surname>
</persName>
<affiliation>University of Virginia</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr><title level="j">Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management</title>
<idno type="eISSN">1547-7355</idno>
<imprint><publisher>De Gruyter</publisher>
<date type="published" when="2011-01-23"></date>
<biblScope unit="volume">8</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope>
</imprint>
</monogr>
<idno type="istex">729DCF601F71C52CC0CD39130AE1B7C048B1A344</idno>
<idno type="DOI">10.2202/1547-7355.1577</idno>
<idno type="ArticleID">1547-7355.1577</idno>
<idno type="Related-article-Href">jhsem.2011.8.1.1577.pdf</idno>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><creation><date>2011-01-23</date>
</creation>
<langUsage><language ident="en">en</language>
</langUsage>
<abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The personal computer, and cyber technology in general, opens the doors to the world. Unless an organization can cultivate the flexibility to adapt its processes to the demands of this new technology, it could diminish its capability to execute effective protective and responsive countermeasures against malevolent or unwanted cyber intrusion. In this paper, we define and use the term cyberinfrastructure system to connote a generalized complex, large-scale cyberinfrastructure network that includes hardware, software, organizational policies and procedures, and that is connected to the Internet (e.g., by means of telephone lines, wireless devices, and high-speed technology). Following a malevolent cyber attack, the original cyberinfrastructure security model could have been (unbeknownst to the system’s operators) perturbed and changed, not by its designers, but by adversaries. In other words, the road-map design of the cyberinfrastructure system, which connotes the policies, procedures, methods, connections, and other human and organizational activities that define the functionality of the cyberinfrastructure system, could have been changed following a malevolent cyber attack. Resilience of a cyberinfrastructure system, which is central to its security, is defined as the ability of the system to withstand a major disruption within acceptable degradation parameters and to recover within an acceptable composite cost and time. The central role of systems integration in cyber security is highlighted because it not only connotes the integration of components, but also involves an understanding of the functionality that emerges from that integration. Systems modeling is indispensable in developing awareness when a cyberinfrastructure is intruded and is being violated. Cyberinfrastructure security is essentially multidimensional and of multi-scale compositions—from molecular to macro dimensions—and its wholeness is characterized by multiple and varied paths of interdependence. Thus, this paper advocates a holistic approach as requisite to understanding not only its myriad parts and functionality but also the forced changes imposed upon it both from within and without its domains. Furthermore, models can play a central role in intrusion detection, thus enabling information managers to develop protective and remedial courses of action. They can also be used to answer a wide range of questions, including how to deceive would-be intruders and lead them to believe they are inflicting damage on the real intended system. Through logically organized and systemically executed models, the Phantom System Models (PSM) laboratory, introduced in Section I, is aimed at providing a reasoned experimental modeling framework with which to explore and thus understand the intricate relationships that characterize the nature of multi-scale emergent systems.</p>
</abstract>
<textClass><keywords scheme="keyword"><list><item><term>Systems Engineering</term>
</item>
</list>
</keywords>
</textClass>
<textClass><keywords scheme="keyword"><list><head>Keywords</head>
<item><term>cyberinfrastructure</term>
</item>
<item><term>resilience</term>
</item>
<item><term>modeling</term>
</item>
<item><term>forced changes</term>
</item>
<item><term>Internet</term>
</item>
<item><term>intrusion</term>
</item>
</list>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
<revisionDesc><change when="2011-01-23">Created</change>
<change when="2011-01-23">Published</change>
<change xml:id="refBibs-istex" who="#ISTEX-API" when="2016-3-13">References added</change>
<change xml:id="refBibs-istex" who="#ISTEX-API" when="2016-08-1">References added</change>
</revisionDesc>
</teiHeader>
</istex:fulltextTEI>
<json:item><original>false</original>
<mimetype>text/plain</mimetype>
<extension>txt</extension>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/729DCF601F71C52CC0CD39130AE1B7C048B1A344/fulltext/txt</uri>
</json:item>
</fulltext>
<metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="corpus degruyter-journals" wicri:toSee="no header"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"</istex:xmlDeclaration>
<istex:docType PUBLIC="-//Atypon//DTD Atypon Systems Journal Archiving and Interchange NLM DTD v3.0.2 20101108//EN" URI="atypon_archive-interchange-dtd-3.0.2/atypon-archivearticle3.dtd" name="istex:docType"></istex:docType>
<istex:document><article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="EN"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">jhsem</journal-id>
<journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management</journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1547-7355</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>De Gruyter</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">1547-7355.1577</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2202/1547-7355.1577</article-id>
<article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject>
</subj-group>
<subj-group><subject>Systems Engineering</subject>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group><article-title>The Role of Modeling in the Resilience of Cyberinfrastructure Systems and Preparedness for Cyber Intrusions</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Chittister</surname>
<given-names>Clyde G</given-names>
</name>
<aff id="a1"><italic>Carnegie Mellon University</italic>
</aff>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Haimes</surname>
<given-names>Yacov Y.</given-names>
</name>
<aff id="a2"><italic>University of Virginia</italic>
</aff>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>23</day>
<month>1</month>
<year>2011</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>8</volume>
<issue>1</issue>
<permissions><copyright-statement>©2011 Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG, Berlin/Boston</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2011</copyright-year>
</permissions>
<related-article related-article-type="pdf" xlink:href="jhsem.2011.8.1.1577.pdf"></related-article>
<abstract><p>The personal computer, and cyber technology in general, opens the doors to the world. Unless an organization can cultivate the flexibility to adapt its processes to the demands of this new technology, it could diminish its capability to execute effective protective and responsive countermeasures against malevolent or unwanted cyber intrusion. In this paper, we define and use the term cyberinfrastructure system to connote a generalized complex, large-scale cyberinfrastructure network that includes hardware, software, organizational policies and procedures, and that is connected to the Internet (e.g., by means of telephone lines, wireless devices, and high-speed technology). Following a malevolent cyber attack, the original cyberinfrastructure security model could have been (unbeknownst to the system’s operators) perturbed and changed, not by its designers, but by adversaries. In other words, the road-map design of the cyberinfrastructure system, which connotes the policies, procedures, methods, connections, and other human and organizational activities that define the functionality of the cyberinfrastructure system, could have been changed following a malevolent cyber attack. Resilience of a cyberinfrastructure system, which is central to its security, is defined as the ability of the system to withstand a major disruption within acceptable degradation parameters and to recover within an acceptable composite cost and time. The central role of systems integration in cyber security is highlighted because it not only connotes the integration of components, but also involves an understanding of the functionality that emerges from that integration. Systems modeling is indispensable in developing awareness when a cyberinfrastructure is intruded and is being violated. Cyberinfrastructure security is essentially multidimensional and of multi-scale compositions—from molecular to macro dimensions—and its wholeness is characterized by multiple and varied paths of interdependence. Thus, this paper advocates a holistic approach as requisite to understanding not only its myriad parts and functionality but also the forced changes imposed upon it both from within and without its domains. Furthermore, models can play a central role in intrusion detection, thus enabling information managers to develop protective and remedial courses of action. They can also be used to answer a wide range of questions, including how to deceive would-be intruders and lead them to believe they are inflicting damage on the real intended system. Through logically organized and systemically executed models, the Phantom System Models (PSM) laboratory, introduced in Section I, is aimed at providing a reasoned experimental modeling framework with which to explore and thus understand the intricate relationships that characterize the nature of multi-scale emergent systems.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group><title>Keywords</title>
<kwd>cyberinfrastructure</kwd>
<x>, </x>
<kwd>resilience</kwd>
<x>, </x>
<kwd>modeling</kwd>
<x>, </x>
<kwd>forced changes</kwd>
<x>, </x>
<kwd>Internet</kwd>
<x>, </x>
<kwd>intrusion</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<counts><page-count count="22"></page-count>
</counts>
</article-meta>
</front>
</article>
</istex:document>
</istex:metadataXml>
<mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>The Role of Modeling in the Resilience of Cyberinfrastructure Systems and Preparedness for Cyber Intrusions</title>
</titleInfo>
<titleInfo type="alternative" lang="en" contentType="CDATA"><title>The Role of Modeling in the Resilience of Cyberinfrastructure Systems and Preparedness for Cyber Intrusions</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Clyde G</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Chittister</namePart>
<affiliation>Carnegie Mellon University</affiliation>
<role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Yacov Y.</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Haimes</namePart>
<affiliation>University of Virginia</affiliation>
<role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre type="research-article" displayLabel="research-article"></genre>
<subject><topic>Systems Engineering</topic>
</subject>
<originInfo><publisher>De Gruyter</publisher>
<dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2011-01-23</dateIssued>
<dateCreated encoding="w3cdtf">2011-01-23</dateCreated>
<copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011</copyrightDate>
</originInfo>
<language><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
<languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm>
</language>
<physicalDescription><internetMediaType>text/html</internetMediaType>
</physicalDescription>
<abstract lang="en">The personal computer, and cyber technology in general, opens the doors to the world. Unless an organization can cultivate the flexibility to adapt its processes to the demands of this new technology, it could diminish its capability to execute effective protective and responsive countermeasures against malevolent or unwanted cyber intrusion. In this paper, we define and use the term cyberinfrastructure system to connote a generalized complex, large-scale cyberinfrastructure network that includes hardware, software, organizational policies and procedures, and that is connected to the Internet (e.g., by means of telephone lines, wireless devices, and high-speed technology). Following a malevolent cyber attack, the original cyberinfrastructure security model could have been (unbeknownst to the system’s operators) perturbed and changed, not by its designers, but by adversaries. In other words, the road-map design of the cyberinfrastructure system, which connotes the policies, procedures, methods, connections, and other human and organizational activities that define the functionality of the cyberinfrastructure system, could have been changed following a malevolent cyber attack. Resilience of a cyberinfrastructure system, which is central to its security, is defined as the ability of the system to withstand a major disruption within acceptable degradation parameters and to recover within an acceptable composite cost and time. The central role of systems integration in cyber security is highlighted because it not only connotes the integration of components, but also involves an understanding of the functionality that emerges from that integration. Systems modeling is indispensable in developing awareness when a cyberinfrastructure is intruded and is being violated. Cyberinfrastructure security is essentially multidimensional and of multi-scale compositions—from molecular to macro dimensions—and its wholeness is characterized by multiple and varied paths of interdependence. Thus, this paper advocates a holistic approach as requisite to understanding not only its myriad parts and functionality but also the forced changes imposed upon it both from within and without its domains. Furthermore, models can play a central role in intrusion detection, thus enabling information managers to develop protective and remedial courses of action. They can also be used to answer a wide range of questions, including how to deceive would-be intruders and lead them to believe they are inflicting damage on the real intended system. Through logically organized and systemically executed models, the Phantom System Models (PSM) laboratory, introduced in Section I, is aimed at providing a reasoned experimental modeling framework with which to explore and thus understand the intricate relationships that characterize the nature of multi-scale emergent systems.</abstract>
<subject><genre>Keywords</genre>
<topic>cyberinfrastructure</topic>
<topic>resilience</topic>
<topic>modeling</topic>
<topic>forced changes</topic>
<topic>Internet</topic>
<topic>intrusion</topic>
</subject>
<relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management</title>
</titleInfo>
<genre type="journal">journal</genre>
<identifier type="eISSN">1547-7355</identifier>
<identifier type="PublisherID">jhsem</identifier>
<part><date>2011</date>
<detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption>
<number>8</number>
</detail>
<detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption>
<number>1</number>
</detail>
<extent unit="pages"><total>22</total>
</extent>
</part>
</relatedItem>
<identifier type="istex">729DCF601F71C52CC0CD39130AE1B7C048B1A344</identifier>
<identifier type="DOI">10.2202/1547-7355.1577</identifier>
<identifier type="ArticleID">1547-7355.1577</identifier>
<identifier type="pdf">jhsem.2011.8.1.1577.pdf</identifier>
<accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">©2011 Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG, Berlin/Boston</accessCondition>
<recordInfo><recordContentSource>De Gruyter</recordContentSource>
</recordInfo>
</mods>
</metadata>
<enrichments><json:item><type>refBibs</type>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/729DCF601F71C52CC0CD39130AE1B7C048B1A344/enrichments/refBibs</uri>
</json:item>
</enrichments>
<serie></serie>
</istex>
</record>
Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/CyberinfraV1/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000000 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000000 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien |wiki= Ticri/CIDE |area= CyberinfraV1 |flux= Istex |étape= Corpus |type= RBID |clé= ISTEX:729DCF601F71C52CC0CD39130AE1B7C048B1A344 |texte= The Role of Modeling in the Resilience of Cyberinfrastructure Systems and Preparedness for Cyber Intrusions }}
![]() | This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.25. | ![]() |