Difference between revisions of "Interview Dusoulier (2000) Rayward/INIST"

From LIS History
(Institut de l’Information Scientifique et Technique (INIST))
(Collaboration with international organizations)
Line 22: Line 22:
 
;{{Smallcaps|Rayward}}:These are the international centers?
 
;{{Smallcaps|Rayward}}:These are the international centers?
 
;{{Smallcaps|Dusoulier}}:International centers and also Centre Scientifique et technique du Bâtiment in France, Fachinformationszentrum in Karlsruhe [Germany], VINITI [All-Russian Institute for Scientific and Technical Information], Wissenchaft für Mathematik, Informationzentrum Sozialwissenschaften in Bonn, Swedoc in Sweden, EGO, Consiplio Nazionale delle Ricerche in Italy, Konin Klijke Bibliotheck in the Netherlands, and Japinfo in Japan. We had a very close relationship with all of them.
 
;{{Smallcaps|Dusoulier}}:International centers and also Centre Scientifique et technique du Bâtiment in France, Fachinformationszentrum in Karlsruhe [Germany], VINITI [All-Russian Institute for Scientific and Technical Information], Wissenchaft für Mathematik, Informationzentrum Sozialwissenschaften in Bonn, Swedoc in Sweden, EGO, Consiplio Nazionale delle Ricerche in Italy, Konin Klijke Bibliotheck in the Netherlands, and Japinfo in Japan. We had a very close relationship with all of them.
;{{Smallcaps|Rayward}}:
+
;{{Smallcaps|Rayward}}:When you say you have a close relationship with these organizations, what does that actually involve?
;{{Smallcaps|Dusoulier}}:
+
;{{Smallcaps|Dusoulier}}:With the Russians, we had been working together, exchanging information, journals, and abstracts. With the Japanese, they had their own officers in our offices, and we had a center in Japan in JICST [Japan Information Center of Science and Technology]. It was a kind of follow-up of DGRST. But it was in the ministry of—well, the name of this ministry has changed very often—it was Ministère de la Recherche and then Ministère de l’Éducation et la Recherche. Then they were separated. But Bureau National de l'Information Scientifique et Technique [BNIST] was created when Jacques Michel, who was the cultural attaché or scientific attaché—I’m really not sure—in Washington came back for reasons unknown. Their goal was like DGRST, to be a kind of hat for all the information activities in France.
 +
:I don’t remember many meetings in BNIST. I remember once we were working with BNIST on how to participate into European databases altogether. I remember, there was a database in metallurgy called SDIM [System für Dokumentation und Information der Metallurgie], and we were working with BNIST to see how France could participate in this European database. Then Jacques Michel went to The Hague. He is one of the directors of information in the European Patent Office. He might have retired by now. But he was a quite important person. When BNIST dissolved, it was replaced by MIDIST [Mission Interministérielle de l’Information Scientifique et Technique]. But their goal was always the same. INIST and CDST, et cetera, were always officially separate—really because we were always so big. BNIST and MIDIST only had four or five people.
 +
;{{Smallcaps|Rayward}}:Where did you, as an organization, get your money?
 +
;{{Smallcaps|Dusoulier}}:CNRS from the Ministry of Research. We were 100 percent from the CNRS budget.
 +
{{Interview Dusoulier (2000) Rayward/Page dec|13}}
 +
;{{Smallcaps|Rayward}}:So, these organizations that we’re talking about really, as you say, just had a broad coordinating function.
 +
;{{Smallcaps|Dusoulier}}:Yes. They only had a coordinating function. An important coordinating
 +
function.
 
;{{Smallcaps|Rayward}}:
 
;{{Smallcaps|Rayward}}:
 
;{{Smallcaps|Dusoulier}}:
 
;{{Smallcaps|Dusoulier}}:

Revision as of 14:07, 14 April 2021

Interview with Nathalie Dusoulier by W. Boyd Rayward in 2000


 
 

LogoSciHistInst.png  
Interview with Nathalie Dusoulier by W. Boyd Rayward in 2000
  NathalieDousoulierInist20ans.png
logo internal link This page is in initialization step in order to assume links consistency in this wiki.
You could use the "What links here" facility of the toobox.

Institut de l’Information Scientifique et Technique (INIST)

11
Rayward
I think that’s interesting, because my sense is that INIST, Institut de l’Information Scientifique et Technique, has a rather different focus.
Dusoulier
Now. But that was not the purpose of its creation. The purpose was to become a European center, in fact. We can have a look at it.
The goal was: “La confirmation de transfer à Nancy. Où la préparation de l’organigramme du futur institut. Afin que celui-ci paisse répondre aux impératifs d’innovation, de productivité, de commercialisation. Tout en évoluant avec les techniques nouvelles.[1]

Commercialization

Rayward
So this is, in a sense, the new bit, the commercialization?
Dusoulier
The commercialization goal is new. This is why we thought — la création d’une filiale de commercialisation. So that we could better sell what we were doing. You know, the goal was la création d’un INIST en ordre de constituer un pôle national, de production et de diffusion de l’information scientifique et technique spécialisé à l’intention de la recherche dans les entreprises.[2]
Rayward
That’s new, too, isn’t it—the entreprises? The businesses.
Dusoulier
It is new. You know, these are physical science, science for engineers. Informatique documentaire indispensable au fonctionnement de tous les centres de documentation modernes.

Collaboration with international organizations

Rayward
So, those are the organizations within France that are cooperating with INIST?
Dusoulier
Yes. This is cooperation with Bibliothèque de France. This is the beginning of research in bibliometry. The first steps to the digitalization. We have organized a close cooperation with a number of centers to try to solve the problems related to the digitalization of documents.
12
Rayward
These are the international centers?
Dusoulier
International centers and also Centre Scientifique et technique du Bâtiment in France, Fachinformationszentrum in Karlsruhe [Germany], VINITI [All-Russian Institute for Scientific and Technical Information], Wissenchaft für Mathematik, Informationzentrum Sozialwissenschaften in Bonn, Swedoc in Sweden, EGO, Consiplio Nazionale delle Ricerche in Italy, Konin Klijke Bibliotheck in the Netherlands, and Japinfo in Japan. We had a very close relationship with all of them.
Rayward
When you say you have a close relationship with these organizations, what does that actually involve?
Dusoulier
With the Russians, we had been working together, exchanging information, journals, and abstracts. With the Japanese, they had their own officers in our offices, and we had a center in Japan in JICST [Japan Information Center of Science and Technology]. It was a kind of follow-up of DGRST. But it was in the ministry of—well, the name of this ministry has changed very often—it was Ministère de la Recherche and then Ministère de l’Éducation et la Recherche. Then they were separated. But Bureau National de l'Information Scientifique et Technique [BNIST] was created when Jacques Michel, who was the cultural attaché or scientific attaché—I’m really not sure—in Washington came back for reasons unknown. Their goal was like DGRST, to be a kind of hat for all the information activities in France.
I don’t remember many meetings in BNIST. I remember once we were working with BNIST on how to participate into European databases altogether. I remember, there was a database in metallurgy called SDIM [System für Dokumentation und Information der Metallurgie], and we were working with BNIST to see how France could participate in this European database. Then Jacques Michel went to The Hague. He is one of the directors of information in the European Patent Office. He might have retired by now. But he was a quite important person. When BNIST dissolved, it was replaced by MIDIST [Mission Interministérielle de l’Information Scientifique et Technique]. But their goal was always the same. INIST and CDST, et cetera, were always officially separate—really because we were always so big. BNIST and MIDIST only had four or five people.
Rayward
Where did you, as an organization, get your money?
Dusoulier
CNRS from the Ministry of Research. We were 100 percent from the CNRS budget.
13
Rayward
So, these organizations that we’re talking about really, as you say, just had a broad coordinating function.
Dusoulier
Yes. They only had a coordinating function. An important coordinating

function.

Rayward
Dusoulier

See also

  1. Dusoulier is referring to written document, which the Chemical Heritage Foundation was unable to locate for proper translation.
  2. Translation: “the creation of a commercialized subsidiary. So that we could better sell what we were doing. You know the goal was the formation of an INIST in order to create a national center for the production and diffusion of scientific and technical information to industrial research laboratories.”