ODA and SGML: An assessment of co-existence possibilities
Identifieur interne : 001C75 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 001C74; suivant : 001C76ODA and SGML: An assessment of co-existence possibilities
Auteurs : Bradley C. Watson ; Robert J. DavisSource :
- Computer Standards & Interfaces [ 0920-5489 ] ; 1991.
English descriptors
- Teeft :
- Common functions, Current situation, Disjoint functions, Dsssl, English literature, Fundamental incompatibilities, Hierarchical structure, Ideal form, Information processing systems text, Jacques derrida, Layout, Logical layout, Many commentators, Markup, Markup language, Markup orientation, Object orientation, Office document architecture, Office systems, Ohio state university, Optical character recognition, Other hand, Page layout, Physical layout, Physical layout support, Publishing systems, Relative merits, Several forms, Sgml, Software, Specification language, Text processing standards, Text processing systems, Unified approach.
Abstract
Abstract: Given the existence of two standards for text processing systems that accomplish similar goals, with similar means, but dissimilar results, the authors seek to reconcile the two. Office Document Architecture (ODA) and Standard Generalized Markup Language (SGML) are found to have no fundamental incompatibilities, opening the way to either formally melding them into a single internationally recognized standard or through practical implementations forming a de facto standard that encompasses both. The conclusion is that the latter is most likely to occur, but in any case either is preferable to the current situation.
Url:
DOI: 10.1016/0920-5489(91)90068-B
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:6DCF58F35AD1A498B9B5C64E4895C9282301469BLe document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title>ODA and SGML: An assessment of co-existence possibilities</title><author><name sortKey="Watson, Bradley C" sort="Watson, Bradley C" uniqKey="Watson B" first="Bradley C" last="Watson">Bradley C. Watson</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>OCLC Online Computer Library Center, Inc., Technology Assessment Department, 6565 Frantz Road, Dublin, OH 43017-0702, USA</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Davis, Robert J" sort="Davis, Robert J" uniqKey="Davis R" first="Robert J" last="Davis">Robert J. Davis</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>OCLC Online Computer Library Center, Inc., Technology Assessment Department, 6565 Frantz Road, Dublin, OH 43017-0702, USA</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:6DCF58F35AD1A498B9B5C64E4895C9282301469B</idno><date when="1991" year="1991">1991</date><idno type="doi">10.1016/0920-5489(91)90068-B</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/6H6-72ZJ02J3-C/fulltext.pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">001C75</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">001C75</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a">ODA and SGML: An assessment of co-existence possibilities</title><author><name sortKey="Watson, Bradley C" sort="Watson, Bradley C" uniqKey="Watson B" first="Bradley C" last="Watson">Bradley C. Watson</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>OCLC Online Computer Library Center, Inc., Technology Assessment Department, 6565 Frantz Road, Dublin, OH 43017-0702, USA</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Davis, Robert J" sort="Davis, Robert J" uniqKey="Davis R" first="Robert J" last="Davis">Robert J. Davis</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>OCLC Online Computer Library Center, Inc., Technology Assessment Department, 6565 Frantz Road, Dublin, OH 43017-0702, USA</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">Computer Standards & Interfaces</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">CSI</title><idno type="ISSN">0920-5489</idno><imprint><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><date type="published" when="1991">1991</date><biblScope unit="volume">11</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">3</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="169">169</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="176">176</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0920-5489</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0920-5489</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Common functions</term><term>Current situation</term><term>Disjoint functions</term><term>Dsssl</term><term>English literature</term><term>Fundamental incompatibilities</term><term>Hierarchical structure</term><term>Ideal form</term><term>Information processing systems text</term><term>Jacques derrida</term><term>Layout</term><term>Logical layout</term><term>Many commentators</term><term>Markup</term><term>Markup language</term><term>Markup orientation</term><term>Object orientation</term><term>Office document architecture</term><term>Office systems</term><term>Ohio state university</term><term>Optical character recognition</term><term>Other hand</term><term>Page layout</term><term>Physical layout</term><term>Physical layout support</term><term>Publishing systems</term><term>Relative merits</term><term>Several forms</term><term>Sgml</term><term>Software</term><term>Specification language</term><term>Text processing standards</term><term>Text processing systems</term><term>Unified approach</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Abstract: Given the existence of two standards for text processing systems that accomplish similar goals, with similar means, but dissimilar results, the authors seek to reconcile the two. Office Document Architecture (ODA) and Standard Generalized Markup Language (SGML) are found to have no fundamental incompatibilities, opening the way to either formally melding them into a single internationally recognized standard or through practical implementations forming a de facto standard that encompasses both. The conclusion is that the latter is most likely to occur, but in any case either is preferable to the current situation.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>elsevier</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>sgml</json:string><json:string>markup</json:string><json:string>software</json:string><json:string>dsssl</json:string><json:string>physical layout</json:string><json:string>office document architecture</json:string><json:string>object orientation</json:string><json:string>text processing systems</json:string><json:string>markup language</json:string><json:string>logical layout</json:string><json:string>other hand</json:string><json:string>relative merits</json:string><json:string>markup orientation</json:string><json:string>publishing systems</json:string><json:string>fundamental incompatibilities</json:string><json:string>optical character recognition</json:string><json:string>ideal form</json:string><json:string>ohio state university</json:string><json:string>several forms</json:string><json:string>office systems</json:string><json:string>jacques derrida</json:string><json:string>unified approach</json:string><json:string>information processing systems text</json:string><json:string>page layout</json:string><json:string>current situation</json:string><json:string>hierarchical structure</json:string><json:string>physical layout support</json:string><json:string>specification language</json:string><json:string>english literature</json:string><json:string>common functions</json:string><json:string>disjoint functions</json:string><json:string>many commentators</json:string><json:string>text processing standards</json:string><json:string>layout</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>Bradley C Watson</name><affiliations><json:string>OCLC Online Computer Library Center, Inc., Technology Assessment Department, 6565 Frantz Road, Dublin, OH 43017-0702, USA</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Robert J Davis</name><affiliations><json:string>OCLC Online Computer Library Center, Inc., Technology Assessment Department, 6565 Frantz Road, Dublin, OH 43017-0702, USA</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>Office Document Architecture</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>Standard Generalized Markup Language</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>Standards compatibility</value></json:item></subject><arkIstex>ark:/67375/6H6-72ZJ02J3-C</arkIstex><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>Full-length article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Abstract: Given the existence of two standards for text processing systems that accomplish similar goals, with similar means, but dissimilar results, the authors seek to reconcile the two. Office Document Architecture (ODA) and Standard Generalized Markup Language (SGML) are found to have no fundamental incompatibilities, opening the way to either formally melding them into a single internationally recognized standard or through practical implementations forming a de facto standard that encompasses both. The conclusion is that the latter is most likely to occur, but in any case either is preferable to the current situation.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>8.116</score><pdfWordCount>5455</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>27501</pdfCharCount><pdfVersion>1.2</pdfVersion><pdfPageCount>8</pdfPageCount><pdfPageSize>612 x 864 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractWordCount>93</abstractWordCount><abstractCharCount>631</abstractCharCount><keywordCount>3</keywordCount></qualityIndicators><title>ODA and SGML: An assessment of co-existence possibilities</title><pii><json:string>0920-5489(91)90068-B</json:string></pii><genre><json:string>research-article</json:string></genre><host><title>Computer Standards & Interfaces</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><publicationDate>1991</publicationDate><issn><json:string>0920-5489</json:string></issn><pii><json:string>S0920-5489(00)X0064-5</json:string></pii><volume>11</volume><issue>3</issue><pages><first>169</first><last>176</last></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre></host><namedEntities><unitex><date><json:string>1986</json:string><json:string>1991</json:string></date><geogName></geogName><orgName><json:string>Co-Existence Defined Co</json:string><json:string>The Co</json:string><json:string>The Ohio State University</json:string><json:string>N C R , Inc.</json:string></orgName><orgName_funder></orgName_funder><orgName_provider></orgName_provider><persName><json:string>Jacques Derrida</json:string><json:string>C. Watson</json:string><json:string>Theory</json:string><json:string>R.J. Davis</json:string><json:string>Frantz Road</json:string><json:string>Literature</json:string><json:string>B.C. Watson</json:string></persName><placeName><json:string>OH</json:string></placeName><ref_url></ref_url><ref_bibl><json:string>[1,7,8]</json:string><json:string>[4]</json:string><json:string>[6]</json:string><json:string>[8]</json:string><json:string>[3]</json:string><json:string>[5]</json:string><json:string>[2]</json:string></ref_bibl><bibl></bibl></unitex></namedEntities><ark><json:string>ark:/67375/6H6-72ZJ02J3-C</json:string></ark><categories><wos><json:string>1 - science</json:string><json:string>2 - computer science, software engineering</json:string><json:string>2 - computer science, hardware & architecture</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>1 - applied sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - information & communication technologies</json:string><json:string>3 - information systems</json:string></scienceMetrix><scopus><json:string>1 - Social Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Social Sciences</json:string><json:string>3 - Law</json:string><json:string>1 - Physical Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Computer Science</json:string><json:string>3 - Hardware and Architecture</json:string><json:string>1 - Physical Sciences</json:string><json:string>2 - Computer Science</json:string><json:string>3 - Software</json:string></scopus><inist><json:string>1 - sciences humaines et sociales</json:string><json:string>2 - histoire et sciences de la litterature</json:string></inist></categories><publicationDate>1991</publicationDate><copyrightDate>1991</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1016/0920-5489(91)90068-B</json:string></doi><id>6DCF58F35AD1A498B9B5C64E4895C9282301469B</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/6H6-72ZJ02J3-C/fulltext.pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/6H6-72ZJ02J3-C/bundle.zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/6H6-72ZJ02J3-C/fulltext.tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a">ODA and SGML: An assessment of co-existence possibilities</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher scheme="https://scientific-publisher.data.istex.fr">ELSEVIER</publisher><availability><licence><p>elsevier</p></licence></availability><p scheme="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-HKKZVM7B-M"></p><date>1991</date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="research-article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-1JC4F85T-7">research-article</note><note type="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note><note type="content">Section title: Paper</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="inbook"><analytic><title level="a">ODA and SGML: An assessment of co-existence possibilities</title><author xml:id="author-0000"><persName><forename type="first">Bradley C</forename><surname>Watson</surname></persName><affiliation>OCLC Online Computer Library Center, Inc., Technology Assessment Department, 6565 Frantz Road, Dublin, OH 43017-0702, USA</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">Robert J</forename><surname>Davis</surname></persName><affiliation>OCLC Online Computer Library Center, Inc., Technology Assessment Department, 6565 Frantz Road, Dublin, OH 43017-0702, USA</affiliation></author><idno type="istex">6DCF58F35AD1A498B9B5C64E4895C9282301469B</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/6H6-72ZJ02J3-C</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1016/0920-5489(91)90068-B</idno><idno type="PII">0920-5489(91)90068-B</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j">Computer Standards & Interfaces</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">CSI</title><idno type="pISSN">0920-5489</idno><idno type="PII">S0920-5489(00)X0064-5</idno><imprint><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><date type="published" when="1991"></date><biblScope unit="volume">11</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">3</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="169">169</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="176">176</biblScope></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><creation><date>1991</date></creation><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Abstract: Given the existence of two standards for text processing systems that accomplish similar goals, with similar means, but dissimilar results, the authors seek to reconcile the two. Office Document Architecture (ODA) and Standard Generalized Markup Language (SGML) are found to have no fundamental incompatibilities, opening the way to either formally melding them into a single internationally recognized standard or through practical implementations forming a de facto standard that encompasses both. The conclusion is that the latter is most likely to occur, but in any case either is preferable to the current situation.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords scheme="keyword"><list><head>Keywords</head><item><term>Office Document Architecture</term></item><item><term>Standard Generalized Markup Language</term></item><item><term>Standards compatibility</term></item></list></keywords></textClass></profileDesc><revisionDesc><change when="1991">Published</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/6H6-72ZJ02J3-C/fulltext.txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Elsevier, elements deleted: tail"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:docType PUBLIC="-//ES//DTD journal article DTD version 4.5.2//EN//XML" URI="art452.dtd" name="istex:docType"></istex:docType><istex:document><converted-article version="4.5.2" docsubtype="fla"><item-info><jid>CSI</jid><aid>9190068B</aid><ce:pii>0920-5489(91)90068-B</ce:pii><ce:doi>10.1016/0920-5489(91)90068-B</ce:doi><ce:copyright type="unknown" year="1991"></ce:copyright></item-info><head><ce:dochead><ce:textfn>Paper</ce:textfn></ce:dochead><ce:title>ODA and SGML: An assessment of co-existence possibilities</ce:title><ce:author-group><ce:author><ce:given-name>Bradley C</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Watson</ce:surname></ce:author><ce:author><ce:given-name>Robert J</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Davis</ce:surname></ce:author><ce:affiliation><ce:textfn>OCLC Online Computer Library Center, Inc., Technology Assessment Department, 6565 Frantz Road, Dublin, OH 43017-0702, USA</ce:textfn></ce:affiliation></ce:author-group><ce:abstract><ce:section-title>Abstract</ce:section-title><ce:abstract-sec><ce:simple-para>Given the existence of two standards for text processing systems that accomplish similar goals, with similar means, but dissimilar results, the authors seek to reconcile the two. Office Document Architecture (ODA) and Standard Generalized Markup Language (SGML) are found to have no fundamental incompatibilities, opening the way to either formally melding them into a single internationally recognized standard or through practical implementations forming a de facto standard that encompasses both. The conclusion is that the latter is most likely to occur, but in any case either is preferable to the current situation.</ce:simple-para></ce:abstract-sec></ce:abstract><ce:keywords><ce:section-title>Keywords</ce:section-title><ce:keyword><ce:text>Office Document Architecture</ce:text></ce:keyword><ce:keyword><ce:text>Standard Generalized Markup Language</ce:text></ce:keyword><ce:keyword><ce:text>Standards compatibility</ce:text></ce:keyword></ce:keywords></head></converted-article></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo><title>ODA and SGML: An assessment of co-existence possibilities</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA"><title>ODA and SGML: An assessment of co-existence possibilities</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Bradley C</namePart><namePart type="family">Watson</namePart><affiliation>OCLC Online Computer Library Center, Inc., Technology Assessment Department, 6565 Frantz Road, Dublin, OH 43017-0702, USA</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Robert J</namePart><namePart type="family">Davis</namePart><affiliation>OCLC Online Computer Library Center, Inc., Technology Assessment Department, 6565 Frantz Road, Dublin, OH 43017-0702, USA</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="research-article" displayLabel="Full-length article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-1JC4F85T-7">research-article</genre><originInfo><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1991</dateIssued><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">1991</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm></language><abstract lang="en">Abstract: Given the existence of two standards for text processing systems that accomplish similar goals, with similar means, but dissimilar results, the authors seek to reconcile the two. Office Document Architecture (ODA) and Standard Generalized Markup Language (SGML) are found to have no fundamental incompatibilities, opening the way to either formally melding them into a single internationally recognized standard or through practical implementations forming a de facto standard that encompasses both. The conclusion is that the latter is most likely to occur, but in any case either is preferable to the current situation.</abstract><note type="content">Section title: Paper</note><subject><genre>Keywords</genre><topic>Office Document Architecture</topic><topic>Standard Generalized Markup Language</topic><topic>Standards compatibility</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Computer Standards & Interfaces</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated"><title>CSI</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><originInfo><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1991</dateIssued></originInfo><identifier type="ISSN">0920-5489</identifier><identifier type="PII">S0920-5489(00)X0064-5</identifier><part><date>1991</date><detail type="volume"><number>11</number><caption>vol.</caption></detail><detail type="issue"><number>3</number><caption>no.</caption></detail><extent unit="issue-pages"><start>147</start><end>265</end></extent><extent unit="pages"><start>169</start><end>176</end></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">6DCF58F35AD1A498B9B5C64E4895C9282301469B</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/6H6-72ZJ02J3-C</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1016/0920-5489(91)90068-B</identifier><identifier type="PII">0920-5489(91)90068-B</identifier><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-HKKZVM7B-M">elsevier</recordContentSource></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/6H6-72ZJ02J3-C/record.json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Informatique/explor/SgmlV1/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001C75 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 001C75 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Informatique
|area= SgmlV1
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:6DCF58F35AD1A498B9B5C64E4895C9282301469B
|texte= ODA and SGML: An assessment of co-existence possibilities
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.33. |  |