OpenAccessBelV2, PascalFrancis, Corpus, bibRecord, 000120

Balancing individual interests and quality of the profession in the formulation of professional standards. Commentary

Identifieur interne : 000120 ( PascalFrancis/Corpus ); précédent : 000119; suivant : 000121

Balancing individual interests and quality of the profession in the formulation of professional standards. Commentary

Auteurs : Ype H. Poortinga ; Rudolf Fisch ; Norah Frederickson ; Ingrid Lunt

Source :

European psychologist [ 1016-9040 ] ; 2005.

RBID : Pascal:05-0295374

Descripteurs français

Pascal (Inist)
- Profession, Etude critique, Ethique, Qualification professionnelle, Formation professionnelle, Accréditation, Europe, Homme.

English descriptors

KwdEn :
- Accreditation, Critical study, Ethics, Europe, Human, Occupational training, Profession, Professional qualification.

Abstract

In the EU-funded working group that has been developing a European Diploma of Psychology several issues arose where a balance had to be found between individual interests of practicing psychologists and standards of professional quality. These issues included: an accredited curriculum or individual on-the-job performance as requirement for entry to the profession; open access of diploma holders to all areas of practice or access limited to a specific area defined by previous training and experience; time-limited or life-long validity of the diploma and low vs. high continued education requirements for revalidation; and the use of the register of diploma holders for the profession as a marketing tool for the individual psychologist.

Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)

Pour connaître la documentation sur le format Inist Standard.

A01	`01`	`1`		`@0 1016-9040`
A03		`1`		`@0 Eur. psychol.`
A05				`@2 10`
A06				`@2 2`
A08	`01`	`1`	`ENG`	`@1 Balancing individual interests and quality of the profession in the formulation of professional standards. Commentary`
A11	`01`	`1`		`@1 POORTINGA (Ype H.)`
A11	`02`	`1`		`@1 FISCH (Rudolf) @9 comment.`
A11	`03`	`1`		`@1 FREDERICKSON (Norah) @9 comment.`
A11	`04`	`1`		`@1 LUNT (Ingrid) @9 comment.`
A14	`01`			`@1 Tilburg University, Netherlands Et Catholic University of Leuven @3 BEL @Z 1 aut.`
A14	`02`			`@1 German University of Administrative Science Speyer @3 DEU @Z 2 aut.`
A14	`03`			`@1 Educational Psychology Group, University College London @3 GBR @Z 3 aut.`
A14	`04`			`@1 Institute of Education, University of London @3 GBR @Z 4 aut.`
A20				`@2 103-109, 110-115 [13 p.]`
A21				`@1 2005`
A23	`01`			`@0 ENG`
A43	`01`			`@1 INIST @2 26732 @5 354000138152880030`
A44				`@0 0000 @1 © 2005 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.`
A45				`@0 dissem.`
A47	`01`	`1`		`@0 05-0295374`
A60				`@1 P @3 AR @3 CT`
A61				`@0 A`
A64	`01`	`1`		`@0 European psychologist`
A66	`01`			`@0 DEU`
C01	`01`		`ENG`	@0 In the EU-funded working group that has been developing a European Diploma of Psychology several issues arose where a balance had to be found between individual interests of practicing psychologists and standards of professional quality. These issues included: an accredited curriculum or individual on-the-job performance as requirement for entry to the profession; open access of diploma holders to all areas of practice or access limited to a specific area defined by previous training and experience; time-limited or life-long validity of the diploma and low vs. high continued education requirements for revalidation; and the use of the register of diploma holders for the profession as a marketing tool for the individual psychologist.
C02	`01`	`X`		`@0 002A26A`
C03	`01`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Profession @5 01`
C03	`01`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Profession @5 01`
C03	`01`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Profesión @5 01`
C03	`02`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Etude critique @5 02`
C03	`02`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Critical study @5 02`
C03	`02`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Estudio crítico @5 02`
C03	`03`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Ethique @5 03`
C03	`03`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Ethics @5 03`
C03	`03`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Etica @5 03`
C03	`04`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Qualification professionnelle @5 04`
C03	`04`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Professional qualification @5 04`
C03	`04`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Cualificación (profesional) @5 04`
C03	`05`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Formation professionnelle @5 05`
C03	`05`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Occupational training @5 05`
C03	`05`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Formación profesional @5 05`
C03	`06`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Accréditation @5 06`
C03	`06`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Accreditation @5 06`
C03	`06`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Acreditación @5 06`
C03	`07`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Europe @2 NG @5 07`
C03	`07`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Europe @2 NG @5 07`
C03	`07`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Europa @2 NG @5 07`
C03	`08`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Homme @5 18`
C03	`08`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Human @5 18`
C03	`08`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Hombre @5 18`
N21				`@1 206`

Format Inist (serveur)

NO :	PASCAL 05-0295374 INIST
ET :	Balancing individual interests and quality of the profession in the formulation of professional standards. Commentary
AU :	POORTINGA (Ype H.); FISCH (Rudolf); FREDERICKSON (Norah); LUNT (Ingrid)
AF :	Tilburg University, Netherlands Et Catholic University of Leuven/Belgique (1 aut.); German University of Administrative Science Speyer/Allemagne (2 aut.); Educational Psychology Group, University College London/Royaume-Uni (3 aut.); Institute of Education, University of London/Royaume-Uni (4 aut.)
DT :	Publication en série; Article; Commentaire; Niveau analytique
SO :	European psychologist; ISSN 1016-9040; Allemagne; Da. 2005; Vol. 10; No. 2; 103-109, 110-115 [13 p.]; Bibl. dissem.
LA :	Anglais
EA :	In the EU-funded working group that has been developing a European Diploma of Psychology several issues arose where a balance had to be found between individual interests of practicing psychologists and standards of professional quality. These issues included: an accredited curriculum or individual on-the-job performance as requirement for entry to the profession; open access of diploma holders to all areas of practice or access limited to a specific area defined by previous training and experience; time-limited or life-long validity of the diploma and low vs. high continued education requirements for revalidation; and the use of the register of diploma holders for the profession as a marketing tool for the individual psychologist.
CC :	002A26A
FD :	Profession; Etude critique; Ethique; Qualification professionnelle; Formation professionnelle; Accréditation; Europe; Homme
ED :	Profession; Critical study; Ethics; Professional qualification; Occupational training; Accreditation; Europe; Human
SD :	Profesión; Estudio crítico; Etica; Cualificación (profesional); Formación profesional; Acreditación; Europa; Hombre
LO :	INIST-26732.354000138152880030
ID :	05-0295374

Links to Exploration step

Pascal:05-0295374

Le document en format XML

<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Balancing individual interests and quality of the profession in the formulation of professional standards. Commentary</title>
<author><name sortKey="Poortinga, Ype H" sort="Poortinga, Ype H" uniqKey="Poortinga Y" first="Ype H." last="Poortinga">Ype H. Poortinga</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Tilburg University, Netherlands Et Catholic University of Leuven</s1>
<s3>BEL</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Fisch, Rudolf" sort="Fisch, Rudolf" uniqKey="Fisch R" first="Rudolf" last="Fisch">Rudolf Fisch</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>German University of Administrative Science Speyer</s1>
<s3>DEU</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Frederickson, Norah" sort="Frederickson, Norah" uniqKey="Frederickson N" first="Norah" last="Frederickson">Norah Frederickson</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="03"><s1>Educational Psychology Group, University College London</s1>
<s3>GBR</s3>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Lunt, Ingrid" sort="Lunt, Ingrid" uniqKey="Lunt I" first="Ingrid" last="Lunt">Ingrid Lunt</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="04"><s1>Institute of Education, University of London</s1>
<s3>GBR</s3>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno>
<idno type="inist">05-0295374</idno>
<date when="2005">2005</date>
<idno type="stanalyst">PASCAL 05-0295374 INIST</idno>
<idno type="RBID">Pascal:05-0295374</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">000120</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Balancing individual interests and quality of the profession in the formulation of professional standards. Commentary</title>
<author><name sortKey="Poortinga, Ype H" sort="Poortinga, Ype H" uniqKey="Poortinga Y" first="Ype H." last="Poortinga">Ype H. Poortinga</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Tilburg University, Netherlands Et Catholic University of Leuven</s1>
<s3>BEL</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Fisch, Rudolf" sort="Fisch, Rudolf" uniqKey="Fisch R" first="Rudolf" last="Fisch">Rudolf Fisch</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>German University of Administrative Science Speyer</s1>
<s3>DEU</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Frederickson, Norah" sort="Frederickson, Norah" uniqKey="Frederickson N" first="Norah" last="Frederickson">Norah Frederickson</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="03"><s1>Educational Psychology Group, University College London</s1>
<s3>GBR</s3>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Lunt, Ingrid" sort="Lunt, Ingrid" uniqKey="Lunt I" first="Ingrid" last="Lunt">Ingrid Lunt</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="04"><s1>Institute of Education, University of London</s1>
<s3>GBR</s3>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series><title level="j" type="main">European psychologist</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Eur. psychol.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">1016-9040</idno>
<imprint><date when="2005">2005</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><title level="j" type="main">European psychologist</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Eur. psychol.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">1016-9040</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Accreditation</term>
<term>Critical study</term>
<term>Ethics</term>
<term>Europe</term>
<term>Human</term>
<term>Occupational training</term>
<term>Profession</term>
<term>Professional qualification</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr"><term>Profession</term>
<term>Etude critique</term>
<term>Ethique</term>
<term>Qualification professionnelle</term>
<term>Formation professionnelle</term>
<term>Accréditation</term>
<term>Europe</term>
<term>Homme</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">In the EU-funded working group that has been developing a European Diploma of Psychology several issues arose where a balance had to be found between individual interests of practicing psychologists and standards of professional quality. These issues included: an accredited curriculum or individual on-the-job performance as requirement for entry to the profession; open access of diploma holders to all areas of practice or access limited to a specific area defined by previous training and experience; time-limited or life-long validity of the diploma and low vs. high continued education requirements for revalidation; and the use of the register of diploma holders for the profession as a marketing tool for the individual psychologist.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<inist><standard h6="B"><pA><fA01 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>1016-9040</s0>
</fA01>
<fA03 i2="1"><s0>Eur. psychol.</s0>
</fA03>
<fA05><s2>10</s2>
</fA05>
<fA06><s2>2</s2>
</fA06>
<fA08 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG"><s1>Balancing individual interests and quality of the profession in the formulation of professional standards. Commentary</s1>
</fA08>
<fA11 i1="01" i2="1"><s1>POORTINGA (Ype H.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="02" i2="1"><s1>FISCH (Rudolf)</s1>
<s9>comment.</s9>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="03" i2="1"><s1>FREDERICKSON (Norah)</s1>
<s9>comment.</s9>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="04" i2="1"><s1>LUNT (Ingrid)</s1>
<s9>comment.</s9>
</fA11>
<fA14 i1="01"><s1>Tilburg University, Netherlands Et Catholic University of Leuven</s1>
<s3>BEL</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA14 i1="02"><s1>German University of Administrative Science Speyer</s1>
<s3>DEU</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA14 i1="03"><s1>Educational Psychology Group, University College London</s1>
<s3>GBR</s3>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA14 i1="04"><s1>Institute of Education, University of London</s1>
<s3>GBR</s3>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA20><s2>103-109, 110-115 [13 p.]</s2>
</fA20>
<fA21><s1>2005</s1>
</fA21>
<fA23 i1="01"><s0>ENG</s0>
</fA23>
<fA43 i1="01"><s1>INIST</s1>
<s2>26732</s2>
<s5>354000138152880030</s5>
</fA43>
<fA44><s0>0000</s0>
<s1>© 2005 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.</s1>
</fA44>
<fA45><s0>dissem.</s0>
</fA45>
<fA47 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>05-0295374</s0>
</fA47>
<fA60><s1>P</s1>
<s3>AR</s3>
<s3>CT</s3>
</fA60>
<fA61><s0>A</s0>
</fA61>
<fA64 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>European psychologist</s0>
</fA64>
<fA66 i1="01"><s0>DEU</s0>
</fA66>
<fC01 i1="01" l="ENG"><s0>In the EU-funded working group that has been developing a European Diploma of Psychology several issues arose where a balance had to be found between individual interests of practicing psychologists and standards of professional quality. These issues included: an accredited curriculum or individual on-the-job performance as requirement for entry to the profession; open access of diploma holders to all areas of practice or access limited to a specific area defined by previous training and experience; time-limited or life-long validity of the diploma and low vs. high continued education requirements for revalidation; and the use of the register of diploma holders for the profession as a marketing tool for the individual psychologist.</s0>
</fC01>
<fC02 i1="01" i2="X"><s0>002A26A</s0>
</fC02>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Profession</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Profession</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Profesión</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Etude critique</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Critical study</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Estudio crítico</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Ethique</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Ethics</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Etica</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Qualification professionnelle</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Professional qualification</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Cualificación (profesional)</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Formation professionnelle</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Occupational training</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Formación profesional</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Accréditation</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Accreditation</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Acreditación</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Europe</s0>
<s2>NG</s2>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Europe</s0>
<s2>NG</s2>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Europa</s0>
<s2>NG</s2>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Homme</s0>
<s5>18</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Human</s0>
<s5>18</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Hombre</s0>
<s5>18</s5>
</fC03>
<fN21><s1>206</s1>
</fN21>
</pA>
</standard>
<server><NO>PASCAL 05-0295374 INIST</NO>
<ET>Balancing individual interests and quality of the profession in the formulation of professional standards. Commentary</ET>
<AU>POORTINGA (Ype H.); FISCH (Rudolf); FREDERICKSON (Norah); LUNT (Ingrid)</AU>
<AF>Tilburg University, Netherlands Et Catholic University of Leuven/Belgique (1 aut.); German University of Administrative Science Speyer/Allemagne (2 aut.); Educational Psychology Group, University College London/Royaume-Uni (3 aut.); Institute of Education, University of London/Royaume-Uni (4 aut.)</AF>
<DT>Publication en série; Article; Commentaire; Niveau analytique</DT>
<SO>European psychologist; ISSN 1016-9040; Allemagne; Da. 2005; Vol. 10; No. 2; 103-109, 110-115 [13 p.]; Bibl. dissem.</SO>
<LA>Anglais</LA>
<EA>In the EU-funded working group that has been developing a European Diploma of Psychology several issues arose where a balance had to be found between individual interests of practicing psychologists and standards of professional quality. These issues included: an accredited curriculum or individual on-the-job performance as requirement for entry to the profession; open access of diploma holders to all areas of practice or access limited to a specific area defined by previous training and experience; time-limited or life-long validity of the diploma and low vs. high continued education requirements for revalidation; and the use of the register of diploma holders for the profession as a marketing tool for the individual psychologist.</EA>
<CC>002A26A</CC>
<FD>Profession; Etude critique; Ethique; Qualification professionnelle; Formation professionnelle; Accréditation; Europe; Homme</FD>
<ED>Profession; Critical study; Ethics; Professional qualification; Occupational training; Accreditation; Europe; Human</ED>
<SD>Profesión; Estudio crítico; Etica; Cualificación (profesional); Formación profesional; Acreditación; Europa; Hombre</SD>
<LO>INIST-26732.354000138152880030</LO>
<ID>05-0295374</ID>
</server>
</inist>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Belgique/explor/OpenAccessBelV2/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000120 | SxmlIndent | more

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000120 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Belgique
   |area=    OpenAccessBelV2
   |flux=    PascalFrancis
   |étape=   Corpus
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     Pascal:05-0295374
   |texte=   Balancing individual interests and quality of the profession in the formulation of professional standards. Commentary
}}

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.25.
Data generation: Thu Dec 1 00:43:49 2016. Site generation: Wed Mar 6 14:51:30 2024

	Serveur d'exploration autour du libre accès en Belgique
	Attention, ce site est en cours de développement ! Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts. Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Serveur d'exploration autour du libre accès en Belgique

Balancing individual interests and quality of the profession in the formulation of professional standards. Commentary

Balancing individual interests and quality of the profession in the formulation of professional standards. Commentary

Source :

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

Abstract

Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)

Format Inist (serveur)

Links to Exploration step

Le document en format XML

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri