Grasping without sight: insights from the congenitally blind.
Identifieur interne : 000526 ( PubMed/Curation ); précédent : 000525; suivant : 000527Grasping without sight: insights from the congenitally blind.
Auteurs : Kayla D. Stone [Canada] ; Claudia L R. Gonzalez [Canada]Source :
- PloS one [ 1932-6203 ] ; 2014.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- MESH :
- congenital : Blindness.
- Adult, Aged, Analysis of Variance, Hand Strength, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Physical Stimulation, Psychomotor Performance, Reaction Time, Young Adult.
Abstract
We reach for and grasp different sized objects numerous times per day. Most of these movements are visually-guided, but some are guided by the sense of touch (i.e. haptically-guided), such as reaching for your keys in a bag, or for an object in a dark room. A marked right-hand preference has been reported during visually-guided grasping, particularly for small objects. However, little is known about hand preference for haptically-guided grasping. Recently, a study has shown a reduction in right-hand use in blindfolded individuals, and an absence of hand preference if grasping was preceded by a short haptic experience. These results suggest that vision plays a major role in hand preference for grasping. If this were the case, then one might expect congenitally blind (CB) individuals, who have never had a visual experience, to exhibit no hand preference. Two novel findings emerge from the current study: first, the results showed that contrary to our expectation, CB individuals used their right hand during haptically-guided grasping to the same extent as visually-unimpaired (VU) individuals did during visually-guided grasping. And second, object size affected hand use in an opposite manner for haptically- versus visually-guided grasping. Big objects were more often picked up with the right hand during haptically-guided, but less often during visually-guided grasping. This result highlights the different demands that object features pose on the two sensory systems. Overall the results demonstrate that hand preference for grasping is independent of visual experience, and they suggest a left-hemisphere specialization for the control of grasping that goes beyond sensory modality.
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0110175
PubMed: 25303211
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream PubMed, to step Corpus: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :000526
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:25303211Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Grasping without sight: insights from the congenitally blind.</title><author><name sortKey="Stone, Kayla D" sort="Stone, Kayla D" uniqKey="Stone K" first="Kayla D" last="Stone">Kayla D. Stone</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>The Brain in Action Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology, University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Canada</country><wicri:regionArea>The Brain in Action Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology, University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, Alberta</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Gonzalez, Claudia L R" sort="Gonzalez, Claudia L R" uniqKey="Gonzalez C" first="Claudia L R" last="Gonzalez">Claudia L R. Gonzalez</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>The Brain in Action Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology, University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Canada</country><wicri:regionArea>The Brain in Action Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology, University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, Alberta</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2014">2014</date><idno type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0110175</idno><idno type="RBID">pubmed:25303211</idno><idno type="pmid">25303211</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">000526</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Curation">000526</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Grasping without sight: insights from the congenitally blind.</title><author><name sortKey="Stone, Kayla D" sort="Stone, Kayla D" uniqKey="Stone K" first="Kayla D" last="Stone">Kayla D. Stone</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>The Brain in Action Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology, University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Canada</country><wicri:regionArea>The Brain in Action Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology, University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, Alberta</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Gonzalez, Claudia L R" sort="Gonzalez, Claudia L R" uniqKey="Gonzalez C" first="Claudia L R" last="Gonzalez">Claudia L R. Gonzalez</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>The Brain in Action Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology, University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Canada</country><wicri:regionArea>The Brain in Action Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology, University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, Alberta</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author></analytic><series><title level="j">PloS one</title><idno type="eISSN">1932-6203</idno><imprint><date when="2014" type="published">2014</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Adult</term><term>Aged</term><term>Analysis of Variance</term><term>Blindness (congenital)</term><term>Hand Strength</term><term>Humans</term><term>Male</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Physical Stimulation</term><term>Psychomotor Performance</term><term>Reaction Time</term><term>Young Adult</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="congenital" xml:lang="en"><term>Blindness</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Adult</term><term>Aged</term><term>Analysis of Variance</term><term>Hand Strength</term><term>Humans</term><term>Male</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Physical Stimulation</term><term>Psychomotor Performance</term><term>Reaction Time</term><term>Young Adult</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">We reach for and grasp different sized objects numerous times per day. Most of these movements are visually-guided, but some are guided by the sense of touch (i.e. haptically-guided), such as reaching for your keys in a bag, or for an object in a dark room. A marked right-hand preference has been reported during visually-guided grasping, particularly for small objects. However, little is known about hand preference for haptically-guided grasping. Recently, a study has shown a reduction in right-hand use in blindfolded individuals, and an absence of hand preference if grasping was preceded by a short haptic experience. These results suggest that vision plays a major role in hand preference for grasping. If this were the case, then one might expect congenitally blind (CB) individuals, who have never had a visual experience, to exhibit no hand preference. Two novel findings emerge from the current study: first, the results showed that contrary to our expectation, CB individuals used their right hand during haptically-guided grasping to the same extent as visually-unimpaired (VU) individuals did during visually-guided grasping. And second, object size affected hand use in an opposite manner for haptically- versus visually-guided grasping. Big objects were more often picked up with the right hand during haptically-guided, but less often during visually-guided grasping. This result highlights the different demands that object features pose on the two sensory systems. Overall the results demonstrate that hand preference for grasping is independent of visual experience, and they suggest a left-hemisphere specialization for the control of grasping that goes beyond sensory modality.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Owner="NLM" Status="MEDLINE"><PMID Version="1">25303211</PMID><DateCreated><Year>2014</Year><Month>10</Month><Day>11</Day></DateCreated><DateCompleted><Year>2015</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>17</Day></DateCompleted><Article PubModel="Electronic-eCollection"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1932-6203</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><Volume>9</Volume><Issue>10</Issue><PubDate><Year>2014</Year></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>PloS one</Title><ISOAbbreviation>PLoS ONE</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Grasping without sight: insights from the congenitally blind.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>e110175</MedlinePgn></Pagination><ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1371/journal.pone.0110175</ELocationID><Abstract><AbstractText>We reach for and grasp different sized objects numerous times per day. Most of these movements are visually-guided, but some are guided by the sense of touch (i.e. haptically-guided), such as reaching for your keys in a bag, or for an object in a dark room. A marked right-hand preference has been reported during visually-guided grasping, particularly for small objects. However, little is known about hand preference for haptically-guided grasping. Recently, a study has shown a reduction in right-hand use in blindfolded individuals, and an absence of hand preference if grasping was preceded by a short haptic experience. These results suggest that vision plays a major role in hand preference for grasping. If this were the case, then one might expect congenitally blind (CB) individuals, who have never had a visual experience, to exhibit no hand preference. Two novel findings emerge from the current study: first, the results showed that contrary to our expectation, CB individuals used their right hand during haptically-guided grasping to the same extent as visually-unimpaired (VU) individuals did during visually-guided grasping. And second, object size affected hand use in an opposite manner for haptically- versus visually-guided grasping. Big objects were more often picked up with the right hand during haptically-guided, but less often during visually-guided grasping. This result highlights the different demands that object features pose on the two sensory systems. Overall the results demonstrate that hand preference for grasping is independent of visual experience, and they suggest a left-hemisphere specialization for the control of grasping that goes beyond sensory modality.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Stone</LastName><ForeName>Kayla D</ForeName><Initials>KD</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>The Brain in Action Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology, University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Gonzalez</LastName><ForeName>Claudia L R</ForeName><Initials>CL</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>The Brain in Action Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology, University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D013485">Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList><ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2014</Year><Month>10</Month><Day>10</Day></ArticleDate></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>United States</Country><MedlineTA>PLoS One</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>101285081</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>1932-6203</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><CommentsCorrectionsList><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Exp Brain Res. 1997 Dec;117(3):457-64</RefSource><PMID Version="1">9438714</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Exp Brain Res. 1999 Apr;125(3):281-6</RefSource><PMID Version="1">10229019</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Laterality. 2006 Jan;11(1):1-14</RefSource><PMID Version="1">16414911</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Dev Psychobiol. 2006 Mar;48(2):121-32</RefSource><PMID Version="1">16489592</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Brain Cogn. 2006 Aug;61(3):255-61</RefSource><PMID Version="1">16513237</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Exp Brain Res. 2006 Aug;173(3):395-406</RefSource><PMID Version="1">16489431</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Neuropsychologia. 1991;29(5):361-78</RefSource><PMID Version="1">1886680</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2014 Apr;41:64-77</RefSource><PMID Version="1">24157726</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Brain Cogn. 1993 Mar;21(2):212-25</RefSource><PMID Version="1">8442937</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Q J Exp Psychol A. 1993 Feb;46(1):35-50</RefSource><PMID Version="1">8446765</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Percept Psychophys. 1993 Apr;53(4):422-8</RefSource><PMID Version="1">8483705</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Exp Brain Res. 1993;96(1):152-62</RefSource><PMID Version="1">8243577</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Perception. 1993;22(7):847-53</RefSource><PMID Version="1">8115242</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Percept Psychophys. 1994 Sep;56(3):347-55</RefSource><PMID Version="1">7971134</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Exp Brain Res. 1995;102(3):519-30</RefSource><PMID Version="1">7737398</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Trends Neurosci. 1995 Jul;18(7):314-20</RefSource><PMID Version="1">7571012</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Br J Psychol. 1996 May;87 ( Pt 2):269-85</RefSource><PMID Version="1">8673359</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Percept Psychophys. 1996 Feb;58(2):310-23</RefSource><PMID Version="1">8838173</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Psychol Bull. 1997 Jan;121(1):20-42</RefSource><PMID Version="1">9064698</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Exp Brain Res. 1997 Apr;114(2):226-34</RefSource><PMID Version="1">9166912</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Exp Brain Res. 2007 Aug;181(3):447-60</RefSource><PMID Version="1">17476491</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Exp Brain Res. 2007 Sep;182(2):275-9</RefSource><PMID Version="1">17717653</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>PLoS One. 2008;3(10):e3388</RefSource><PMID Version="1">18846222</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Cereb Cortex. 2009 Jan;19(1):1-12</RefSource><PMID Version="1">18448452</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Laterality. 2009 Mar;14(2):205-13</RefSource><PMID Version="1">19142794</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Exp Brain Res. 2009 May;195(3):473-9</RefSource><PMID Version="1">19404627</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Neuropsychologia. 2009 Dec;47(14):3182-9</RefSource><PMID Version="1">19654015</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Can J Exp Psychol. 2009 Dec;63(4):287-93</RefSource><PMID Version="1">20025387</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Exp Brain Res. 2011 Jan;208(2):245-55</RefSource><PMID Version="1">21080157</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Neuropsychologia. 2011 Jul;49(9):2703-10</RefSource><PMID Version="1">21658397</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Neurophysiol. 2012 Jan;107(2):544-50</RefSource><PMID Version="1">22031771</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>PLoS One. 2012;7(6):e40251</RefSource><PMID Version="1">22761961</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Infant Behav Dev. 2012 Jun;35(3):543-60</RefSource><PMID Version="1">22728335</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Exp Brain Res. 2013 Feb;224(3):455-67</RefSource><PMID Version="1">23161156</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Exp Brain Res. 2013 Apr;225(4):465-77</RefSource><PMID Version="1">23288327</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Laterality. 2013;18(3):365-83</RefSource><PMID Version="1">22746101</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Exp Psychol Appl. 2013 Sep;19(3):233-40</RefSource><PMID Version="1">24059824</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Dev Neuropsychol. 2001;19(1):41-51</RefSource><PMID Version="1">11411421</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Int J Neurosci. 2003 Feb;113(2):143-52</RefSource><PMID Version="1">12751428</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Exp Brain Res. 2003 Jul;151(2):158-66</RefSource><PMID Version="1">12783144</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Exp Brain Res. 2003 Oct;152(4):489-98</RefSource><PMID Version="1">12898088</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Apr 13;101(15):5658-63</RefSource><PMID Version="1">15064396</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Neurosci. 2004 Aug 25;24(34):7524-30</RefSource><PMID Version="1">15329399</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Physiol Paris. 2004 Jan-Jun;98(1-3):147-59</RefSource><PMID Version="1">15477029</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Neuropsychologia. 1971 Mar;9(1):97-113</RefSource><PMID Version="1">5146491</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Neuropsychologia. 1972 Apr;10(1):1-15</RefSource><PMID Version="1">5036287</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Neurology. 1973 Nov;23(11):1248-50</RefSource><PMID Version="1">4795742</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Neuropsychologia. 1971 Dec;9(4):431-5</RefSource><PMID Version="1">5164377</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Neuropsychologia. 1975 Oct;13(4):449-54</RefSource><PMID Version="1">1196480</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Cortex. 1977 Mar;13(1):55-61</RefSource><PMID Version="1">844308</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Neuropsychologia. 1978;16(1):109-14</RefSource><PMID Version="1">634455</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Neuropsychologia. 1978;16(2):247-50</RefSource><PMID Version="1">692852</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Neuropsychologia. 1980;18(6):707-10</RefSource><PMID Version="1">7465032</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Cortex. 1987 Mar;23(1):111-22</RefSource><PMID Version="1">3568700</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Brain Cogn. 1987 Oct;6(4):474-94</RefSource><PMID Version="1">3663386</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Percept Psychophys. 1990 Jan;47(1):54-64</RefSource><PMID Version="1">2300424</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Atten Percept Psychophys. 2013 Oct;75(7):1451-64</RefSource><PMID Version="1">23757045</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Percept Psychophys. 2000 Feb;62(2):301-12</RefSource><PMID Version="1">10723209</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Exp Brain Res. 2014 Feb;232(2):385-93</RefSource><PMID Version="1">24162864</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Exp Brain Res. 1991;86(1):199-208</RefSource><PMID Version="1">1756790</PMID></CommentsCorrections></CommentsCorrectionsList><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D000328">Adult</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D000368">Aged</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D000704">Analysis of Variance</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="D001766">Blindness</DescriptorName><QualifierName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="Q000151">congenital</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="D018737">Hand Strength</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D006801">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D008297">Male</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D008875">Middle Aged</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D010812">Physical Stimulation</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="D011597">Psychomotor Performance</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D011930">Reaction Time</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D055815">Young Adult</DescriptorName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList><OtherID Source="NLM">PMC4193874</OtherID></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="ecollection"><Year>2014</Year><Month></Month><Day></Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="received"><Year>2014</Year><Month>6</Month><Day>13</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="accepted"><Year>2014</Year><Month>9</Month><Day>18</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="epublish"><Year>2014</Year><Month>10</Month><Day>10</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2014</Year><Month>10</Month><Day>11</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2014</Year><Month>10</Month><Day>11</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2015</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>19</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>epublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0110175</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pii">PONE-D-14-25940</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">25303211</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pmc">PMC4193874</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/HapticV1/Data/PubMed/Curation
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000526 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Curation/biblio.hfd -nk 000526 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Ticri/CIDE
|area= HapticV1
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Curation
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:25303211
|texte= Grasping without sight: insights from the congenitally blind.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Curation/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:25303211" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Curation/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a HapticV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23. |  |