Serveur d'exploration sur les dispositifs haptiques

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Visual, haptic and bimodal scene perception: evidence for a unitary representation.

Identifieur interne : 000403 ( PubMed/Curation ); précédent : 000402; suivant : 000404

Visual, haptic and bimodal scene perception: evidence for a unitary representation.

Auteurs : Helene Intraub [États-Unis] ; Frank Morelli [États-Unis] ; Kristin M. Gagnier [États-Unis]

Source :

RBID : pubmed:25725370

Abstract

Participants studied seven meaningful scene-regions bordered by removable boundaries (30s each). In Experiment 1 (N = 80) participants used visual or haptic exploration and then minutes later, reconstructed boundary position using the same or the alternate modality. Participants in all groups shifted boundary placement outward (boundary extension), but visual study yielded the greater error. Critically, this modality-specific difference in boundary extension transferred without cost in the cross-modal conditions, suggesting a functionally unitary scene representation. In Experiment 2 (N = 20), bimodal study led to boundary extension that did not differ from haptic exploration alone, suggesting that bimodal spatial memory was constrained by the more "conservative" haptic modality. In Experiment 3 (N = 20), as in picture studies, boundary memory was tested 30s after viewing each scene-region and as with pictures, boundary extension still occurred. Results suggest that scene representation is organized around an amodal spatial core that organizes bottom-up information from multiple modalities in combination with top-down expectations about the surrounding world.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2015.01.010
PubMed: 25725370

Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)


Links to Exploration step

pubmed:25725370

Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI>
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en">Visual, haptic and bimodal scene perception: evidence for a unitary representation.</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Intraub, Helene" sort="Intraub, Helene" uniqKey="Intraub H" first="Helene" last="Intraub">Helene Intraub</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<nlm:affiliation>University of Delaware, USA. Electronic address: intraub@udel.edu.</nlm:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country>
<wicri:regionArea>University of Delaware</wicri:regionArea>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Morelli, Frank" sort="Morelli, Frank" uniqKey="Morelli F" first="Frank" last="Morelli">Frank Morelli</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<nlm:affiliation>University of Delaware, USA.</nlm:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country>
<wicri:regionArea>University of Delaware</wicri:regionArea>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Gagnier, Kristin M" sort="Gagnier, Kristin M" uniqKey="Gagnier K" first="Kristin M" last="Gagnier">Kristin M. Gagnier</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<nlm:affiliation>University of Delaware, USA.</nlm:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country>
<wicri:regionArea>University of Delaware</wicri:regionArea>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno>
<date when="2015">2015</date>
<idno type="RBID">pubmed:25725370</idno>
<idno type="pmid">25725370</idno>
<idno type="doi">10.1016/j.cognition.2015.01.010</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">000403</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Curation">000403</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title xml:lang="en">Visual, haptic and bimodal scene perception: evidence for a unitary representation.</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Intraub, Helene" sort="Intraub, Helene" uniqKey="Intraub H" first="Helene" last="Intraub">Helene Intraub</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<nlm:affiliation>University of Delaware, USA. Electronic address: intraub@udel.edu.</nlm:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country>
<wicri:regionArea>University of Delaware</wicri:regionArea>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Morelli, Frank" sort="Morelli, Frank" uniqKey="Morelli F" first="Frank" last="Morelli">Frank Morelli</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<nlm:affiliation>University of Delaware, USA.</nlm:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country>
<wicri:regionArea>University of Delaware</wicri:regionArea>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Gagnier, Kristin M" sort="Gagnier, Kristin M" uniqKey="Gagnier K" first="Kristin M" last="Gagnier">Kristin M. Gagnier</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<nlm:affiliation>University of Delaware, USA.</nlm:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country>
<wicri:regionArea>University of Delaware</wicri:regionArea>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series>
<title level="j">Cognition</title>
<idno type="eISSN">1873-7838</idno>
<imprint>
<date when="2015" type="published">2015</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass></textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Participants studied seven meaningful scene-regions bordered by removable boundaries (30s each). In Experiment 1 (N = 80) participants used visual or haptic exploration and then minutes later, reconstructed boundary position using the same or the alternate modality. Participants in all groups shifted boundary placement outward (boundary extension), but visual study yielded the greater error. Critically, this modality-specific difference in boundary extension transferred without cost in the cross-modal conditions, suggesting a functionally unitary scene representation. In Experiment 2 (N = 20), bimodal study led to boundary extension that did not differ from haptic exploration alone, suggesting that bimodal spatial memory was constrained by the more "conservative" haptic modality. In Experiment 3 (N = 20), as in picture studies, boundary memory was tested 30s after viewing each scene-region and as with pictures, boundary extension still occurred. Results suggest that scene representation is organized around an amodal spatial core that organizes bottom-up information from multiple modalities in combination with top-down expectations about the surrounding world.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<pubmed>
<MedlineCitation Owner="NLM" Status="In-Process">
<PMID Version="1">25725370</PMID>
<DateCreated>
<Year>2015</Year>
<Month>03</Month>
<Day>18</Day>
</DateCreated>
<DateRevised>
<Year>2016</Year>
<Month>05</Month>
<Day>01</Day>
</DateRevised>
<Article PubModel="Print-Electronic">
<Journal>
<ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1873-7838</ISSN>
<JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet">
<Volume>138</Volume>
<PubDate>
<Year>2015</Year>
<Month>May</Month>
</PubDate>
</JournalIssue>
<Title>Cognition</Title>
<ISOAbbreviation>Cognition</ISOAbbreviation>
</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Visual, haptic and bimodal scene perception: evidence for a unitary representation.</ArticleTitle>
<Pagination>
<MedlinePgn>132-47</MedlinePgn>
</Pagination>
<ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1016/j.cognition.2015.01.010</ELocationID>
<ELocationID EIdType="pii" ValidYN="Y">S0010-0277(15)00019-0</ELocationID>
<Abstract>
<AbstractText>Participants studied seven meaningful scene-regions bordered by removable boundaries (30s each). In Experiment 1 (N = 80) participants used visual or haptic exploration and then minutes later, reconstructed boundary position using the same or the alternate modality. Participants in all groups shifted boundary placement outward (boundary extension), but visual study yielded the greater error. Critically, this modality-specific difference in boundary extension transferred without cost in the cross-modal conditions, suggesting a functionally unitary scene representation. In Experiment 2 (N = 20), bimodal study led to boundary extension that did not differ from haptic exploration alone, suggesting that bimodal spatial memory was constrained by the more "conservative" haptic modality. In Experiment 3 (N = 20), as in picture studies, boundary memory was tested 30s after viewing each scene-region and as with pictures, boundary extension still occurred. Results suggest that scene representation is organized around an amodal spatial core that organizes bottom-up information from multiple modalities in combination with top-down expectations about the surrounding world.</AbstractText>
<CopyrightInformation>Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</CopyrightInformation>
</Abstract>
<AuthorList CompleteYN="Y">
<Author ValidYN="Y">
<LastName>Intraub</LastName>
<ForeName>Helene</ForeName>
<Initials>H</Initials>
<AffiliationInfo>
<Affiliation>University of Delaware, USA. Electronic address: intraub@udel.edu.</Affiliation>
</AffiliationInfo>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y">
<LastName>Morelli</LastName>
<ForeName>Frank</ForeName>
<Initials>F</Initials>
<AffiliationInfo>
<Affiliation>University of Delaware, USA.</Affiliation>
</AffiliationInfo>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y">
<LastName>Gagnier</LastName>
<ForeName>Kristin M</ForeName>
<Initials>KM</Initials>
<AffiliationInfo>
<Affiliation>University of Delaware, USA.</Affiliation>
</AffiliationInfo>
</Author>
</AuthorList>
<Language>eng</Language>
<GrantList CompleteYN="Y">
<Grant>
<GrantID>MH54688</GrantID>
<Acronym>MH</Acronym>
<Agency>NIMH NIH HHS</Agency>
<Country>United States</Country>
</Grant>
<Grant>
<GrantID>R01 MH054688</GrantID>
<Acronym>MH</Acronym>
<Agency>NIMH NIH HHS</Agency>
<Country>United States</Country>
</Grant>
</GrantList>
<PublicationTypeList>
<PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType>
<PublicationType UI="D052061">Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural</PublicationType>
</PublicationTypeList>
<ArticleDate DateType="Electronic">
<Year>2015</Year>
<Month>02</Month>
<Day>25</Day>
</ArticleDate>
</Article>
<MedlineJournalInfo>
<Country>Netherlands</Country>
<MedlineTA>Cognition</MedlineTA>
<NlmUniqueID>0367541</NlmUniqueID>
<ISSNLinking>0010-0277</ISSNLinking>
</MedlineJournalInfo>
<CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset>
<CommentsCorrectionsList>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Cortex. 2013 Sep;49(8):2067-79</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">23276398</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Cognition. 2013 Nov;129(2):447-56</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">24007919</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>J Exp Psychol Gen. 2013 Nov;142(4):1180-9</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">23855494</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2013;66(11):2161-86</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">23547787</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Am J Psychol. 2002 Summer;115(2):151-67</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">12041005</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2002 Jan;28(1):162-70</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">11827078</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2011 Apr;37(2):382-95</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">21463084</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Q J Exp Psychol A. 2002 Oct;55(4):1057-80</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">12420984</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Trends Cogn Sci. 2008 Oct;12(10):388-96</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">18760955</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Percept Psychophys. 2008 Oct;70(7):1337-49</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">18927017</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Psychol Bull. 1993 Jul;114(1):3-28</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">8346328</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1993 Nov;19(6):1387-97</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">8270890</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Psychol Sci. 2008 Oct;19(10):1007-14</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">19000211</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Cogn Psychol. 2009 Mar;58(2):137-76</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">18762289</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2003 Jun;17(1):154-63</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">12763201</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Nat Rev Neurosci. 2004 Aug;5(8):617-29</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">15263892</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Cognition. 2004 Nov;94(1):19-37</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">15302326</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>J Exp Psychol. 1969 Aug;81(2):376-80</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">5811814</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>J Exp Psychol. 1970 Jan;83(1):172-3</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">5436478</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1989 Mar;15(2):179-87</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">2522508</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Psychol Rev. 1991 Jul;98(3):352-76</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">1891523</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Can J Psychol. 1992 Sep;46(3):461-88</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">1486554</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Psychol Bull. 1998 Sep;124(2):123-64</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">9747184</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Cognition. 1999 Mar 1;70(2):191-210</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">10349763</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Trends Cogn Sci. 2004 Apr;8(4):162-9</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">15050512</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Exp Brain Res. 2005 Feb;161(2):233-42</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">15490135</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Mem Cognit. 2005 Jan;33(1):140-50</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">15915800</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Exp Brain Res. 2005 Oct;166(3-4):481-8</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">16034564</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Neuron. 2007 Apr 19;54(2):335-42</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">17442252</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2008 Jun;34(3):543-55</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">18505322</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>J Vis. 2008;8(7):29.1-19</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">19146261</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2010 Aug;63(8):1467-94</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">20432178</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2011 May;37(3):621-34</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">21299331</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Curr Biol. 2011 Jun 7;21(11):984-9</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">21620708</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Curr Biol. 2011 Jun 7;21(11):R437-8</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">21640904</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2011 Aug;64(8):1632-45</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">21563019</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Psychon Bull Rev. 2011 Dec;18(6):1119-25</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">21956382</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Curr Biol. 2012 Feb 21;22(4):261-8</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">22264610</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Atten Percept Psychophys. 2012 Aug;74(6):1260-7</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">22552825</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Cognition. 2011 Mar;118(3):444-50</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">21227408</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
</CommentsCorrectionsList>
<OtherID Source="NLM">NIHMS668050</OtherID>
<OtherID Source="NLM">PMC4551396</OtherID>
<KeywordList Owner="NOTNLM">
<Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Boundary extension</Keyword>
<Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Cross-modal representation</Keyword>
<Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Multisensory (visual and haptic)</Keyword>
<Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Scene representation</Keyword>
<Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Spatial memory</Keyword>
</KeywordList>
</MedlineCitation>
<PubmedData>
<History>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="received">
<Year>2014</Year>
<Month>7</Month>
<Day>3</Day>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="revised">
<Year>2015</Year>
<Month>1</Month>
<Day>21</Day>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="accepted">
<Year>2015</Year>
<Month>1</Month>
<Day>25</Day>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="aheadofprint">
<Year>2015</Year>
<Month>2</Month>
<Day>25</Day>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez">
<Year>2015</Year>
<Month>3</Month>
<Day>1</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed">
<Year>2015</Year>
<Month>3</Month>
<Day>1</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline">
<Year>2015</Year>
<Month>3</Month>
<Day>1</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
</History>
<PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">25725370</ArticleId>
<ArticleId IdType="pii">S0010-0277(15)00019-0</ArticleId>
<ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1016/j.cognition.2015.01.010</ArticleId>
<ArticleId IdType="pmc">PMC4551396</ArticleId>
<ArticleId IdType="mid">NIHMS668050</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</PubmedData>
</pubmed>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/HapticV1/Data/PubMed/Curation
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000403 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Curation/biblio.hfd -nk 000403 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Ticri/CIDE
   |area=    HapticV1
   |flux=    PubMed
   |étape=   Curation
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     pubmed:25725370
   |texte=   Visual, haptic and bimodal scene perception: evidence for a unitary representation.
}}

Pour générer des pages wiki

HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Curation/RBID.i   -Sk "pubmed:25725370" \
       | HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Curation/biblio.hfd   \
       | NlmPubMed2Wicri -a HapticV1 

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23.
Data generation: Mon Jun 13 01:09:46 2016. Site generation: Wed Mar 6 09:54:07 2024