Spatial memory by blind and sighted children.
Identifieur interne : 002421 ( PubMed/Corpus ); précédent : 002420; suivant : 002422Spatial memory by blind and sighted children.
Auteurs : S. MillarSource :
- British journal of psychology (London, England : 1953) [ 0007-1269 ] ; 1975.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- MESH :
Abstract
Non-verbal recall of haptically presented spatial positions by three age groups of blind and sighted children was tested under conditions varying cueing, recall type and stimulus position in a within-subject design. Slighted status was not only significant, but interacted significantly with recall type, and further with stimulus position, consistent with sequential haptic by blind and quasi-simultaneous visual processing by sighted children. Age was significant, but its only significant interaction was a relatively small one with cueing conditions and stimulus position, suggesting that the oldest group, regardless of sightedness, used verbal strategies in pre-cued conditions. The findings support the hypothesis that visual and haptic modalities of representation have demonstrably different effects on processing and efficiency in spatial recall, but counterindicate the hypothesis that these relate differentially to age. Results also suggest that a combination of cue utilization and verbal strategies is a significant, but relatively minor, factor in improvements in spatial recall.
PubMed: 1203644
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:1203644Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Spatial memory by blind and sighted children.</title><author><name sortKey="Millar, S" sort="Millar, S" uniqKey="Millar S" first="S" last="Millar">S. Millar</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="1975">1975</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:1203644</idno><idno type="pmid">1203644</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">002421</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Spatial memory by blind and sighted children.</title><author><name sortKey="Millar, S" sort="Millar, S" uniqKey="Millar S" first="S" last="Millar">S. Millar</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">British journal of psychology (London, England : 1953)</title><idno type="ISSN">0007-1269</idno><imprint><date when="1975" type="published">1975</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Age Factors</term><term>Blindness</term><term>Child</term><term>Cues</term><term>Female</term><term>Humans</term><term>Imagination</term><term>Information Theory</term><term>Male</term><term>Memory</term><term>Mental Recall</term><term>Orientation</term><term>Space Perception</term><term>Time Factors</term><term>Touch</term><term>Verbal Behavior</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Age Factors</term><term>Blindness</term><term>Child</term><term>Cues</term><term>Female</term><term>Humans</term><term>Imagination</term><term>Information Theory</term><term>Male</term><term>Memory</term><term>Mental Recall</term><term>Orientation</term><term>Space Perception</term><term>Time Factors</term><term>Touch</term><term>Verbal Behavior</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Non-verbal recall of haptically presented spatial positions by three age groups of blind and sighted children was tested under conditions varying cueing, recall type and stimulus position in a within-subject design. Slighted status was not only significant, but interacted significantly with recall type, and further with stimulus position, consistent with sequential haptic by blind and quasi-simultaneous visual processing by sighted children. Age was significant, but its only significant interaction was a relatively small one with cueing conditions and stimulus position, suggesting that the oldest group, regardless of sightedness, used verbal strategies in pre-cued conditions. The findings support the hypothesis that visual and haptic modalities of representation have demonstrably different effects on processing and efficiency in spatial recall, but counterindicate the hypothesis that these relate differentially to age. Results also suggest that a combination of cue utilization and verbal strategies is a significant, but relatively minor, factor in improvements in spatial recall.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Owner="NLM" Status="MEDLINE"><PMID Version="1">1203644</PMID><DateCreated><Year>1976</Year><Month>03</Month><Day>11</Day></DateCreated><DateCompleted><Year>1976</Year><Month>03</Month><Day>11</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2006</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>15</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Print">0007-1269</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print"><Volume>66</Volume><Issue>4</Issue><PubDate><Year>1975</Year><Month>Nov</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>British journal of psychology (London, England : 1953)</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Br J Psychol</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Spatial memory by blind and sighted children.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>449-59</MedlinePgn></Pagination><Abstract><AbstractText>Non-verbal recall of haptically presented spatial positions by three age groups of blind and sighted children was tested under conditions varying cueing, recall type and stimulus position in a within-subject design. Slighted status was not only significant, but interacted significantly with recall type, and further with stimulus position, consistent with sequential haptic by blind and quasi-simultaneous visual processing by sighted children. Age was significant, but its only significant interaction was a relatively small one with cueing conditions and stimulus position, suggesting that the oldest group, regardless of sightedness, used verbal strategies in pre-cued conditions. The findings support the hypothesis that visual and haptic modalities of representation have demonstrably different effects on processing and efficiency in spatial recall, but counterindicate the hypothesis that these relate differentially to age. Results also suggest that a combination of cue utilization and verbal strategies is a significant, but relatively minor, factor in improvements in spatial recall.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Millar</LastName><ForeName>S</ForeName><Initials>S</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D003160">Comparative Study</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>ENGLAND</Country><MedlineTA>Br J Psychol</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>0373124</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0007-1269</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D000367">Age Factors</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="D001766">Blindness</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D002648">Child</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D003463">Cues</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D005260">Female</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D006801">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D007092">Imagination</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D007257">Information Theory</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D008297">Male</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="D008568">Memory</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D011939">Mental Recall</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D009949">Orientation</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="D013028">Space Perception</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D013997">Time Factors</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="D014110">Touch</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D014705">Verbal Behavior</DescriptorName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>1975</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>1</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>1975</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>1</Day><Hour>0</Hour><Minute>1</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>1975</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>1</Day><Hour>0</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">1203644</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/HapticV1/Data/PubMed/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 002421 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 002421 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Ticri/CIDE
|area= HapticV1
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:1203644
|texte= Spatial memory by blind and sighted children.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:1203644" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a HapticV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23. |  |