Evaluation of the first 100 consecutive PhacoFlex silicone lenses implanted in the bag through a self-sealing tunnel incision using the Prodigy inserter.
Identifieur interne : 002129 ( PubMed/Corpus ); précédent : 002128; suivant : 002130Evaluation of the first 100 consecutive PhacoFlex silicone lenses implanted in the bag through a self-sealing tunnel incision using the Prodigy inserter.
Auteurs : R. Menapace ; M. Amon ; P. Papapanos ; U. RadaxSource :
- Journal of cataract and refractive surgery [ 0886-3350 ] ; 1994.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cataract Extraction (instrumentation), Disposable Equipment, Evaluation Studies as Topic, Female, Humans, Intraoperative Complications, Lens Capsule, Crystalline (surgery), Lenses, Intraocular, Male, Middle Aged, Postoperative Complications, Silicone Elastomers, Sutures, Visual Acuity.
- MESH :
- chemical : Silicone Elastomers.
- instrumentation : Cataract Extraction.
- surgery : Lens Capsule, Crystalline.
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Disposable Equipment, Evaluation Studies as Topic, Female, Humans, Intraoperative Complications, Lenses, Intraocular, Male, Middle Aged, Postoperative Complications, Sutures, Visual Acuity.
Abstract
We evaluated the performance of the PhacoFlex silicone lens with open polypropylene loops and the disposable Prodigy inserter in a series of 100 consecutive no-stitch cases. Loading the lens into the PRO-1A inserter model was easy, as was inserting it through a 4 x 4 mm self-sealing sclerocorneal tunnel incision. If the chamber was deep and the capsular fornix expanded, unfolding the polypropylene loops was safe and direct bag placement was always possible. If the capsular bag was insufficiently distended, however, the posterior loop tended to entangle with wrinkles in the posterior capsule, jeopardizing the capsule's integrity. With a round and well-centered 4 mm to 5 mm capsulorhexis, centration was good provided the lens was completely within the bag. Even with proper bag placement of the haptics, however, the optic occasionally decentered slightly and tilted because of secondary capture in the capsulorhexis opening. With an incomplete capsulorhexis or a jagged-edged capsulotomy, malpositioning was not uncommon. This was due to secondary displacement of one haptic into the sulcus or partial capture of the optic by the anterior capsule leaf. Because of the flexibility of the polypropylene loops, the lenses tended to decenter and tilt following capsular shrinkage.
PubMed: 8064607
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:8064607Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Evaluation of the first 100 consecutive PhacoFlex silicone lenses implanted in the bag through a self-sealing tunnel incision using the Prodigy inserter.</title><author><name sortKey="Menapace, R" sort="Menapace, R" uniqKey="Menapace R" first="R" last="Menapace">R. Menapace</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>First University Eye Hospital, Vienna, Austria.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Amon, M" sort="Amon, M" uniqKey="Amon M" first="M" last="Amon">M. Amon</name></author><author><name sortKey="Papapanos, P" sort="Papapanos, P" uniqKey="Papapanos P" first="P" last="Papapanos">P. Papapanos</name></author><author><name sortKey="Radax, U" sort="Radax, U" uniqKey="Radax U" first="U" last="Radax">U. Radax</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="1994">1994</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:8064607</idno><idno type="pmid">8064607</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">002129</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Evaluation of the first 100 consecutive PhacoFlex silicone lenses implanted in the bag through a self-sealing tunnel incision using the Prodigy inserter.</title><author><name sortKey="Menapace, R" sort="Menapace, R" uniqKey="Menapace R" first="R" last="Menapace">R. Menapace</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>First University Eye Hospital, Vienna, Austria.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Amon, M" sort="Amon, M" uniqKey="Amon M" first="M" last="Amon">M. Amon</name></author><author><name sortKey="Papapanos, P" sort="Papapanos, P" uniqKey="Papapanos P" first="P" last="Papapanos">P. Papapanos</name></author><author><name sortKey="Radax, U" sort="Radax, U" uniqKey="Radax U" first="U" last="Radax">U. Radax</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Journal of cataract and refractive surgery</title><idno type="ISSN">0886-3350</idno><imprint><date when="1994" type="published">1994</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Aged</term><term>Aged, 80 and over</term><term>Cataract Extraction (instrumentation)</term><term>Disposable Equipment</term><term>Evaluation Studies as Topic</term><term>Female</term><term>Humans</term><term>Intraoperative Complications</term><term>Lens Capsule, Crystalline (surgery)</term><term>Lenses, Intraocular</term><term>Male</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Postoperative Complications</term><term>Silicone Elastomers</term><term>Sutures</term><term>Visual Acuity</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" xml:lang="en"><term>Silicone Elastomers</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="instrumentation" xml:lang="en"><term>Cataract Extraction</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="surgery" xml:lang="en"><term>Lens Capsule, Crystalline</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Aged</term><term>Aged, 80 and over</term><term>Disposable Equipment</term><term>Evaluation Studies as Topic</term><term>Female</term><term>Humans</term><term>Intraoperative Complications</term><term>Lenses, Intraocular</term><term>Male</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Postoperative Complications</term><term>Sutures</term><term>Visual Acuity</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">We evaluated the performance of the PhacoFlex silicone lens with open polypropylene loops and the disposable Prodigy inserter in a series of 100 consecutive no-stitch cases. Loading the lens into the PRO-1A inserter model was easy, as was inserting it through a 4 x 4 mm self-sealing sclerocorneal tunnel incision. If the chamber was deep and the capsular fornix expanded, unfolding the polypropylene loops was safe and direct bag placement was always possible. If the capsular bag was insufficiently distended, however, the posterior loop tended to entangle with wrinkles in the posterior capsule, jeopardizing the capsule's integrity. With a round and well-centered 4 mm to 5 mm capsulorhexis, centration was good provided the lens was completely within the bag. Even with proper bag placement of the haptics, however, the optic occasionally decentered slightly and tilted because of secondary capture in the capsulorhexis opening. With an incomplete capsulorhexis or a jagged-edged capsulotomy, malpositioning was not uncommon. This was due to secondary displacement of one haptic into the sulcus or partial capture of the optic by the anterior capsule leaf. Because of the flexibility of the polypropylene loops, the lenses tended to decenter and tilt following capsular shrinkage.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Owner="NLM" Status="MEDLINE"><PMID Version="1">8064607</PMID><DateCreated><Year>1994</Year><Month>09</Month><Day>22</Day></DateCreated><DateCompleted><Year>1994</Year><Month>09</Month><Day>22</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2007</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>15</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Print">0886-3350</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print"><Volume>20</Volume><Issue>3</Issue><PubDate><Year>1994</Year><Month>May</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Journal of cataract and refractive surgery</Title><ISOAbbreviation>J Cataract Refract Surg</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Evaluation of the first 100 consecutive PhacoFlex silicone lenses implanted in the bag through a self-sealing tunnel incision using the Prodigy inserter.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>299-309</MedlinePgn></Pagination><Abstract><AbstractText>We evaluated the performance of the PhacoFlex silicone lens with open polypropylene loops and the disposable Prodigy inserter in a series of 100 consecutive no-stitch cases. Loading the lens into the PRO-1A inserter model was easy, as was inserting it through a 4 x 4 mm self-sealing sclerocorneal tunnel incision. If the chamber was deep and the capsular fornix expanded, unfolding the polypropylene loops was safe and direct bag placement was always possible. If the capsular bag was insufficiently distended, however, the posterior loop tended to entangle with wrinkles in the posterior capsule, jeopardizing the capsule's integrity. With a round and well-centered 4 mm to 5 mm capsulorhexis, centration was good provided the lens was completely within the bag. Even with proper bag placement of the haptics, however, the optic occasionally decentered slightly and tilted because of secondary capture in the capsulorhexis opening. With an incomplete capsulorhexis or a jagged-edged capsulotomy, malpositioning was not uncommon. This was due to secondary displacement of one haptic into the sulcus or partial capture of the optic by the anterior capsule leaf. Because of the flexibility of the polypropylene loops, the lenses tended to decenter and tilt following capsular shrinkage.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Menapace</LastName><ForeName>R</ForeName><Initials>R</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>First University Eye Hospital, Vienna, Austria.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Amon</LastName><ForeName>M</ForeName><Initials>M</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Papapanos</LastName><ForeName>P</ForeName><Initials>P</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Radax</LastName><ForeName>U</ForeName><Initials>U</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>UNITED STATES</Country><MedlineTA>J Cataract Refract Surg</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>8604171</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0886-3350</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><ChemicalList><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D012826">Silicone Elastomers</NameOfSubstance></Chemical></ChemicalList><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D000368">Aged</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D000369">Aged, 80 and over</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D002387">Cataract Extraction</DescriptorName><QualifierName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="Q000295">instrumentation</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D004209">Disposable Equipment</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D005069">Evaluation Studies as Topic</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D005260">Female</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D006801">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D007431">Intraoperative Complications</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D007903">Lens Capsule, Crystalline</DescriptorName><QualifierName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="Q000601">surgery</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="D007910">Lenses, Intraocular</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D008297">Male</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D008875">Middle Aged</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D011183">Postoperative Complications</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="D012826">Silicone Elastomers</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="D013537">Sutures</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D014792">Visual Acuity</DescriptorName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>1994</Year><Month>5</Month><Day>1</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>1994</Year><Month>5</Month><Day>1</Day><Hour>0</Hour><Minute>1</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>1994</Year><Month>5</Month><Day>1</Day><Hour>0</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">8064607</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/HapticV1/Data/PubMed/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 002129 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 002129 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Ticri/CIDE
|area= HapticV1
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:8064607
|texte= Evaluation of the first 100 consecutive PhacoFlex silicone lenses implanted in the bag through a self-sealing tunnel incision using the Prodigy inserter.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:8064607" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a HapticV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23. |  |