Effect of sensory substitution on suture-manipulation forces for robotic surgical systems.
Identifieur interne : 001999 ( PubMed/Corpus ); précédent : 001998; suivant : 001A00Effect of sensory substitution on suture-manipulation forces for robotic surgical systems.
Auteurs : Masaya Kitagawa ; Daniell Dokko ; Allison M. Okamura ; David D. YuhSource :
- The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery [ 0022-5223 ] ; 2005.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Anastomosis, Surgical (instrumentation), Anastomosis, Surgical (methods), Cardiac Surgical Procedures (instrumentation), Cardiac Surgical Procedures (methods), Confidence Intervals, Feedback, Humans, Man-Machine Systems, Probability, Risk Factors, Robotics, Sensitivity and Specificity, Surgery, Computer-Assisted, Suture Techniques (instrumentation), Tensile Strength, Touch.
- MESH :
- instrumentation : Anastomosis, Surgical, Cardiac Surgical Procedures, Suture Techniques.
- methods : Anastomosis, Surgical, Cardiac Surgical Procedures.
- Confidence Intervals, Feedback, Humans, Man-Machine Systems, Probability, Risk Factors, Robotics, Sensitivity and Specificity, Surgery, Computer-Assisted, Tensile Strength, Touch.
Abstract
Direct haptic (force or tactile) feedback is not yet available in commercial robotic surgical systems. Previous work by our group and others suggests that haptic feedback might significantly enhance the execution of surgical tasks requiring fine suture manipulation, specifically those encountered in cardiothoracic surgery. We studied the effects of substituting direct haptic feedback with visual and auditory cues to provide the operating surgeon with a representation of the forces he or she is applying with robotic telemanipulators.
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2004.05.029
PubMed: 15632837
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:15632837Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Effect of sensory substitution on suture-manipulation forces for robotic surgical systems.</title><author><name sortKey="Kitagawa, Masaya" sort="Kitagawa, Masaya" uniqKey="Kitagawa M" first="Masaya" last="Kitagawa">Masaya Kitagawa</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Mechanical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Dokko, Daniell" sort="Dokko, Daniell" uniqKey="Dokko D" first="Daniell" last="Dokko">Daniell Dokko</name></author><author><name sortKey="Okamura, Allison M" sort="Okamura, Allison M" uniqKey="Okamura A" first="Allison M" last="Okamura">Allison M. Okamura</name></author><author><name sortKey="Yuh, David D" sort="Yuh, David D" uniqKey="Yuh D" first="David D" last="Yuh">David D. Yuh</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2005">2005</date><idno type="doi">10.1016/j.jtcvs.2004.05.029</idno><idno type="RBID">pubmed:15632837</idno><idno type="pmid">15632837</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">001999</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Effect of sensory substitution on suture-manipulation forces for robotic surgical systems.</title><author><name sortKey="Kitagawa, Masaya" sort="Kitagawa, Masaya" uniqKey="Kitagawa M" first="Masaya" last="Kitagawa">Masaya Kitagawa</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Mechanical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Dokko, Daniell" sort="Dokko, Daniell" uniqKey="Dokko D" first="Daniell" last="Dokko">Daniell Dokko</name></author><author><name sortKey="Okamura, Allison M" sort="Okamura, Allison M" uniqKey="Okamura A" first="Allison M" last="Okamura">Allison M. Okamura</name></author><author><name sortKey="Yuh, David D" sort="Yuh, David D" uniqKey="Yuh D" first="David D" last="Yuh">David D. Yuh</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery</title><idno type="ISSN">0022-5223</idno><imprint><date when="2005" type="published">2005</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Anastomosis, Surgical (instrumentation)</term><term>Anastomosis, Surgical (methods)</term><term>Cardiac Surgical Procedures (instrumentation)</term><term>Cardiac Surgical Procedures (methods)</term><term>Confidence Intervals</term><term>Feedback</term><term>Humans</term><term>Man-Machine Systems</term><term>Probability</term><term>Risk Factors</term><term>Robotics</term><term>Sensitivity and Specificity</term><term>Surgery, Computer-Assisted</term><term>Suture Techniques (instrumentation)</term><term>Tensile Strength</term><term>Touch</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="instrumentation" xml:lang="en"><term>Anastomosis, Surgical</term><term>Cardiac Surgical Procedures</term><term>Suture Techniques</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="methods" xml:lang="en"><term>Anastomosis, Surgical</term><term>Cardiac Surgical Procedures</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Confidence Intervals</term><term>Feedback</term><term>Humans</term><term>Man-Machine Systems</term><term>Probability</term><term>Risk Factors</term><term>Robotics</term><term>Sensitivity and Specificity</term><term>Surgery, Computer-Assisted</term><term>Tensile Strength</term><term>Touch</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Direct haptic (force or tactile) feedback is not yet available in commercial robotic surgical systems. Previous work by our group and others suggests that haptic feedback might significantly enhance the execution of surgical tasks requiring fine suture manipulation, specifically those encountered in cardiothoracic surgery. We studied the effects of substituting direct haptic feedback with visual and auditory cues to provide the operating surgeon with a representation of the forces he or she is applying with robotic telemanipulators.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Owner="NLM" Status="MEDLINE"><PMID Version="1">15632837</PMID><DateCreated><Year>2005</Year><Month>01</Month><Day>05</Day></DateCreated><DateCompleted><Year>2005</Year><Month>03</Month><Day>10</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2007</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>14</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Print">0022-5223</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print"><Volume>129</Volume><Issue>1</Issue><PubDate><Year>2005</Year><Month>Jan</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery</Title><ISOAbbreviation>J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Effect of sensory substitution on suture-manipulation forces for robotic surgical systems.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>151-8</MedlinePgn></Pagination><Abstract><AbstractText Label="OBJECTIVES" NlmCategory="OBJECTIVE">Direct haptic (force or tactile) feedback is not yet available in commercial robotic surgical systems. Previous work by our group and others suggests that haptic feedback might significantly enhance the execution of surgical tasks requiring fine suture manipulation, specifically those encountered in cardiothoracic surgery. We studied the effects of substituting direct haptic feedback with visual and auditory cues to provide the operating surgeon with a representation of the forces he or she is applying with robotic telemanipulators.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="METHODS" NlmCategory="METHODS">Using the robotic da Vinci surgical system (Intuitive Surgical, Inc, Sunnyvale, Calif), we compared applied forces during a standardized surgical knot-tying task under 4 different sensory-substitution scenarios: no feedback, auditory feedback, visual feedback, and combined auditory-visual feedback.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="RESULTS" NlmCategory="RESULTS">The forces applied with these sensory-substitution modes more closely approximate suture tensions achieved under ideal haptic conditions (ie, hand ties) than forces applied without such sensory feedback. The consistency of applied forces during robot-assisted suture tying aided by visual feedback or combined auditory-visual feedback sensory substitution is superior to that achieved with hand ties. Robot-assisted ties aided with auditory feedback revealed levels of consistency that were generally equivalent or superior to those attained with hand ties. Visual feedback and auditory feedback improve the consistency of robotically applied forces.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="CONCLUSIONS" NlmCategory="CONCLUSIONS">Sensory substitution, in the form of visual feedback, auditory feedback, or both, confers quantifiable advantages in applied force accuracy and consistency during the performance of a simple surgical task.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Kitagawa</LastName><ForeName>Masaya</ForeName><Initials>M</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Mechanical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Dokko</LastName><ForeName>Daniell</ForeName><Initials>D</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Okamura</LastName><ForeName>Allison M</ForeName><Initials>AM</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Yuh</LastName><ForeName>David D</ForeName><Initials>DD</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><GrantList CompleteYN="Y"><Grant><GrantID>R01 EB002004-02</GrantID><Acronym>EB</Acronym><Agency>NIBIB NIH HHS</Agency><Country>United States</Country></Grant><Grant><GrantID>R01 EB00204</GrantID><Acronym>EB</Acronym><Agency>NIBIB NIH HHS</Agency><Country>United States</Country></Grant></GrantList><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D003160">Comparative Study</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D013485">Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D013486">Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D013487">Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>United States</Country><MedlineTA>J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>0376343</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0022-5223</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><CitationSubset>AIM</CitationSubset><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D000714">Anastomosis, Surgical</DescriptorName><QualifierName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="Q000295">instrumentation</QualifierName><QualifierName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="Q000379">methods</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D006348">Cardiac Surgical Procedures</DescriptorName><QualifierName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="Q000295">instrumentation</QualifierName><QualifierName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="Q000379">methods</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D016001">Confidence Intervals</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D005246">Feedback</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D006801">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D008328">Man-Machine Systems</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D011336">Probability</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D012307">Risk Factors</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="D012371">Robotics</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D012680">Sensitivity and Specificity</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="D025321">Surgery, Computer-Assisted</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D013536">Suture Techniques</DescriptorName><QualifierName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="Q000295">instrumentation</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D013718">Tensile Strength</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D014110">Touch</DescriptorName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2005</Year><Month>1</Month><Day>6</Day><Hour>9</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2005</Year><Month>3</Month><Day>11</Day><Hour>9</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2005</Year><Month>1</Month><Day>6</Day><Hour>9</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pii">S0022522304008876</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1016/j.jtcvs.2004.05.029</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">15632837</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/HapticV1/Data/PubMed/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001999 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 001999 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Ticri/CIDE
|area= HapticV1
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:15632837
|texte= Effect of sensory substitution on suture-manipulation forces for robotic surgical systems.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:15632837" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a HapticV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23. |  |