Reaching in reality and virtual reality: a comparison of movement kinematics in healthy subjects and in adults with hemiparesis.
Identifieur interne : 001996 ( PubMed/Corpus ); précédent : 001995; suivant : 001997Reaching in reality and virtual reality: a comparison of movement kinematics in healthy subjects and in adults with hemiparesis.
Auteurs : Antonin Viau ; Anatol G. Feldman ; Bradford J. Mcfadyen ; Mindy F. LevinSource :
- Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation [ 1743-0003 ] ; 2004.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Virtual reality (VR) is an innovative tool for sensorimotor rehabilitation increasingly being employed in clinical and community settings. Despite the growing interest in VR, few studies have determined the validity of movements made in VR environments with respect to real physical environments. The goal of this study was to compare movements done in physical and virtual environments in adults with motor deficits to those in healthy individuals. METHODS: The participants were 8 healthy adults and 7 adults with mild left hemiparesis due to stroke. Kinematics of functional arm movements involving reaching, grasping and releasing made in physical and virtual environments were analyzed in two phases: 1) reaching and grasping the ball and 2) ball transport and release. The virtual environment included interaction with an object on a 2D computer screen and haptic force feedback from a virtual ball. Temporal and spatial parameters of reaching and grasping were determined for each phase. RESULTS: Individuals in both groups were able to reach, grasp, transport, place and release the virtual and real ball using similar movement strategies. In healthy subjects, reaching and grasping movements in both environments were similar but these subjects used less wrist extension and more elbow extension to place the ball on the virtual vertical surface. Participants with hemiparesis made slower movements in both environments compared to healthy subjects and during transport and placing of the ball, trajectories were more curved and interjoint coordination was altered. Despite these differences, patients with hemiparesis also tended to use less wrist extension during the whole movement and more elbow extension at the end of the placing phase. CONCLUSION: Differences in movements made by healthy subjects in the two environments may be explained by the use of a 2D instead of a 3D virtual environment and the absence of haptic feedback from the VR target. Despite these differences, our findings suggest that both healthy subjects and individuals with motor deficits used similar movement strategies when grasping and placing a ball in the two reality conditions. This suggests that training of arm movements in VR environments may be a valid approach to the rehabilitation of patients with motor disorders.
DOI: 10.1186/1743-0003-1-11
PubMed: 15679937
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:15679937Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Reaching in reality and virtual reality: a comparison of movement kinematics in healthy subjects and in adults with hemiparesis.</title><author><name sortKey="Viau, Antonin" sort="Viau, Antonin" uniqKey="Viau A" first="Antonin" last="Viau">Antonin Viau</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation (CRIR), 6300 Darlington, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. mindy.levin@mcgill.ca.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Feldman, Anatol G" sort="Feldman, Anatol G" uniqKey="Feldman A" first="Anatol G" last="Feldman">Anatol G. Feldman</name></author><author><name sortKey="Mcfadyen, Bradford J" sort="Mcfadyen, Bradford J" uniqKey="Mcfadyen B" first="Bradford J" last="Mcfadyen">Bradford J. Mcfadyen</name></author><author><name sortKey="Levin, Mindy F" sort="Levin, Mindy F" uniqKey="Levin M" first="Mindy F" last="Levin">Mindy F. Levin</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2004">2004</date><idno type="doi">10.1186/1743-0003-1-11</idno><idno type="RBID">pubmed:15679937</idno><idno type="pmid">15679937</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">001996</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Reaching in reality and virtual reality: a comparison of movement kinematics in healthy subjects and in adults with hemiparesis.</title><author><name sortKey="Viau, Antonin" sort="Viau, Antonin" uniqKey="Viau A" first="Antonin" last="Viau">Antonin Viau</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation (CRIR), 6300 Darlington, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. mindy.levin@mcgill.ca.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Feldman, Anatol G" sort="Feldman, Anatol G" uniqKey="Feldman A" first="Anatol G" last="Feldman">Anatol G. Feldman</name></author><author><name sortKey="Mcfadyen, Bradford J" sort="Mcfadyen, Bradford J" uniqKey="Mcfadyen B" first="Bradford J" last="Mcfadyen">Bradford J. Mcfadyen</name></author><author><name sortKey="Levin, Mindy F" sort="Levin, Mindy F" uniqKey="Levin M" first="Mindy F" last="Levin">Mindy F. Levin</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation</title><idno type="eISSN">1743-0003</idno><imprint><date when="2004" type="published">2004</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">BACKGROUND: Virtual reality (VR) is an innovative tool for sensorimotor rehabilitation increasingly being employed in clinical and community settings. Despite the growing interest in VR, few studies have determined the validity of movements made in VR environments with respect to real physical environments. The goal of this study was to compare movements done in physical and virtual environments in adults with motor deficits to those in healthy individuals. METHODS: The participants were 8 healthy adults and 7 adults with mild left hemiparesis due to stroke. Kinematics of functional arm movements involving reaching, grasping and releasing made in physical and virtual environments were analyzed in two phases: 1) reaching and grasping the ball and 2) ball transport and release. The virtual environment included interaction with an object on a 2D computer screen and haptic force feedback from a virtual ball. Temporal and spatial parameters of reaching and grasping were determined for each phase. RESULTS: Individuals in both groups were able to reach, grasp, transport, place and release the virtual and real ball using similar movement strategies. In healthy subjects, reaching and grasping movements in both environments were similar but these subjects used less wrist extension and more elbow extension to place the ball on the virtual vertical surface. Participants with hemiparesis made slower movements in both environments compared to healthy subjects and during transport and placing of the ball, trajectories were more curved and interjoint coordination was altered. Despite these differences, patients with hemiparesis also tended to use less wrist extension during the whole movement and more elbow extension at the end of the placing phase. CONCLUSION: Differences in movements made by healthy subjects in the two environments may be explained by the use of a 2D instead of a 3D virtual environment and the absence of haptic feedback from the VR target. Despite these differences, our findings suggest that both healthy subjects and individuals with motor deficits used similar movement strategies when grasping and placing a ball in the two reality conditions. This suggests that training of arm movements in VR environments may be a valid approach to the rehabilitation of patients with motor disorders.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="Publisher" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">15679937</PMID><DateCreated><Year>2005</Year><Month>1</Month><Day>31</Day></DateCreated><Article PubModel="Electronic"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1743-0003</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><Volume>1</Volume><Issue>1</Issue><PubDate><Year>2004</Year><Month>Dec</Month><Day>14</Day></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation</Title><ISOAbbreviation>J Neuroeng Rehabil</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Reaching in reality and virtual reality: a comparison of movement kinematics in healthy subjects and in adults with hemiparesis.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>11</MedlinePgn></Pagination><Abstract><AbstractText>BACKGROUND: Virtual reality (VR) is an innovative tool for sensorimotor rehabilitation increasingly being employed in clinical and community settings. Despite the growing interest in VR, few studies have determined the validity of movements made in VR environments with respect to real physical environments. The goal of this study was to compare movements done in physical and virtual environments in adults with motor deficits to those in healthy individuals. METHODS: The participants were 8 healthy adults and 7 adults with mild left hemiparesis due to stroke. Kinematics of functional arm movements involving reaching, grasping and releasing made in physical and virtual environments were analyzed in two phases: 1) reaching and grasping the ball and 2) ball transport and release. The virtual environment included interaction with an object on a 2D computer screen and haptic force feedback from a virtual ball. Temporal and spatial parameters of reaching and grasping were determined for each phase. RESULTS: Individuals in both groups were able to reach, grasp, transport, place and release the virtual and real ball using similar movement strategies. In healthy subjects, reaching and grasping movements in both environments were similar but these subjects used less wrist extension and more elbow extension to place the ball on the virtual vertical surface. Participants with hemiparesis made slower movements in both environments compared to healthy subjects and during transport and placing of the ball, trajectories were more curved and interjoint coordination was altered. Despite these differences, patients with hemiparesis also tended to use less wrist extension during the whole movement and more elbow extension at the end of the placing phase. CONCLUSION: Differences in movements made by healthy subjects in the two environments may be explained by the use of a 2D instead of a 3D virtual environment and the absence of haptic feedback from the VR target. Despite these differences, our findings suggest that both healthy subjects and individuals with motor deficits used similar movement strategies when grasping and placing a ball in the two reality conditions. This suggests that training of arm movements in VR environments may be a valid approach to the rehabilitation of patients with motor disorders.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Viau</LastName><ForeName>Antonin</ForeName><Initials>A</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation (CRIR), 6300 Darlington, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. mindy.levin@mcgill.ca.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Feldman</LastName><ForeName>Anatol G</ForeName><Initials>AG</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>McFadyen</LastName><ForeName>Bradford J</ForeName><Initials>BJ</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Levin</LastName><ForeName>Mindy F</ForeName><Initials>MF</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>ENG</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="">JOURNAL ARTICLE</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList><ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2004</Year><Month>Dec</Month><Day>14</Day></ArticleDate></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><MedlineTA>J Neuroeng Rehabil</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>101232233</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>1743-0003</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="received"><Year>2004</Year><Month>Nov</Month><Day>29</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="accepted"><Year>2004</Year><Month>Dec</Month><Day>14</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="aheadofprint"><Year>2004</Year><Month>Dec</Month><Day>14</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2005</Year><Month>2</Month><Day>1</Day><Hour>9</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2005</Year><Month>2</Month><Day>1</Day><Hour>9</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2005</Year><Month>2</Month><Day>1</Day><Hour>9</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>epublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pii">1743-0003-1-11</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1186/1743-0003-1-11</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">15679937</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pmc">PMC546398</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/HapticV1/Data/PubMed/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001996 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 001996 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Ticri/CIDE
|area= HapticV1
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:15679937
|texte= Reaching in reality and virtual reality: a comparison of movement kinematics in healthy subjects and in adults with hemiparesis.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:15679937" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a HapticV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23. |  |