Clinical effects of primary posterior continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis in eyes with single-piece hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lenses with and without haptic angulation.
Identifieur interne : 001697 ( PubMed/Corpus ); précédent : 001696; suivant : 001698Clinical effects of primary posterior continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis in eyes with single-piece hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lenses with and without haptic angulation.
Auteurs : Lorenz Vock ; Rupert Menapace ; Eva Stifter ; Oliver Findl ; Michael GeorgopoulosSource :
- Journal of cataract and refractive surgery [ 0886-3350 ] ; 2007.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Acrylic Resins, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Capsulorhexis (methods), Contrast Sensitivity (physiology), Female, Humans, Lens Implantation, Intraocular, Lenses, Intraocular, Male, Middle Aged, Phacoemulsification, Prospective Studies, Prosthesis Design, Pseudophakia (physiopathology), Visual Acuity (physiology).
- MESH :
- chemical : Acrylic Resins.
- methods : Capsulorhexis.
- physiology : Contrast Sensitivity, Visual Acuity.
- physiopathology : Pseudophakia.
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Humans, Lens Implantation, Intraocular, Lenses, Intraocular, Male, Middle Aged, Phacoemulsification, Prospective Studies, Prosthesis Design.
Abstract
To evaluate the clinical effects of a primary posterior continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis (PCCC) on the intraocular performance of hydrophilic acrylic single-piece intraocular lenses (IOLs) with and without haptic angulation.
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2006.10.030
PubMed: 17276267
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:17276267Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Clinical effects of primary posterior continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis in eyes with single-piece hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lenses with and without haptic angulation.</title><author><name sortKey="Vock, Lorenz" sort="Vock, Lorenz" uniqKey="Vock L" first="Lorenz" last="Vock">Lorenz Vock</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Ophthalmology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Menapace, Rupert" sort="Menapace, Rupert" uniqKey="Menapace R" first="Rupert" last="Menapace">Rupert Menapace</name></author><author><name sortKey="Stifter, Eva" sort="Stifter, Eva" uniqKey="Stifter E" first="Eva" last="Stifter">Eva Stifter</name></author><author><name sortKey="Findl, Oliver" sort="Findl, Oliver" uniqKey="Findl O" first="Oliver" last="Findl">Oliver Findl</name></author><author><name sortKey="Georgopoulos, Michael" sort="Georgopoulos, Michael" uniqKey="Georgopoulos M" first="Michael" last="Georgopoulos">Michael Georgopoulos</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2007">2007</date><idno type="doi">10.1016/j.jcrs.2006.10.030</idno><idno type="RBID">pubmed:17276267</idno><idno type="pmid">17276267</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">001697</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Clinical effects of primary posterior continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis in eyes with single-piece hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lenses with and without haptic angulation.</title><author><name sortKey="Vock, Lorenz" sort="Vock, Lorenz" uniqKey="Vock L" first="Lorenz" last="Vock">Lorenz Vock</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Ophthalmology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Menapace, Rupert" sort="Menapace, Rupert" uniqKey="Menapace R" first="Rupert" last="Menapace">Rupert Menapace</name></author><author><name sortKey="Stifter, Eva" sort="Stifter, Eva" uniqKey="Stifter E" first="Eva" last="Stifter">Eva Stifter</name></author><author><name sortKey="Findl, Oliver" sort="Findl, Oliver" uniqKey="Findl O" first="Oliver" last="Findl">Oliver Findl</name></author><author><name sortKey="Georgopoulos, Michael" sort="Georgopoulos, Michael" uniqKey="Georgopoulos M" first="Michael" last="Georgopoulos">Michael Georgopoulos</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Journal of cataract and refractive surgery</title><idno type="ISSN">0886-3350</idno><imprint><date when="2007" type="published">2007</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Acrylic Resins</term><term>Aged</term><term>Aged, 80 and over</term><term>Capsulorhexis (methods)</term><term>Contrast Sensitivity (physiology)</term><term>Female</term><term>Humans</term><term>Lens Implantation, Intraocular</term><term>Lenses, Intraocular</term><term>Male</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Phacoemulsification</term><term>Prospective Studies</term><term>Prosthesis Design</term><term>Pseudophakia (physiopathology)</term><term>Visual Acuity (physiology)</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" xml:lang="en"><term>Acrylic Resins</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="methods" xml:lang="en"><term>Capsulorhexis</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="physiology" xml:lang="en"><term>Contrast Sensitivity</term><term>Visual Acuity</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="physiopathology" xml:lang="en"><term>Pseudophakia</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Aged</term><term>Aged, 80 and over</term><term>Female</term><term>Humans</term><term>Lens Implantation, Intraocular</term><term>Lenses, Intraocular</term><term>Male</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Phacoemulsification</term><term>Prospective Studies</term><term>Prosthesis Design</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">To evaluate the clinical effects of a primary posterior continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis (PCCC) on the intraocular performance of hydrophilic acrylic single-piece intraocular lenses (IOLs) with and without haptic angulation.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Owner="NLM" Status="MEDLINE"><PMID Version="1">17276267</PMID><DateCreated><Year>2007</Year><Month>02</Month><Day>05</Day></DateCreated><DateCompleted><Year>2007</Year><Month>03</Month><Day>13</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2008</Year><Month>01</Month><Day>17</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Print">0886-3350</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print"><Volume>33</Volume><Issue>2</Issue><PubDate><Year>2007</Year><Month>Feb</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Journal of cataract and refractive surgery</Title><ISOAbbreviation>J Cataract Refract Surg</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Clinical effects of primary posterior continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis in eyes with single-piece hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lenses with and without haptic angulation.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>258-64</MedlinePgn></Pagination><Abstract><AbstractText Label="PURPOSE" NlmCategory="OBJECTIVE">To evaluate the clinical effects of a primary posterior continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis (PCCC) on the intraocular performance of hydrophilic acrylic single-piece intraocular lenses (IOLs) with and without haptic angulation.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="SETTING" NlmCategory="METHODS">Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="METHODS" NlmCategory="METHODS">A prospective study comprised 52 patients with bilateral age-related cataract who had standard cataract surgery including a PCCC. One eye of each patient was randomized to receive a hydrophilic acrylic IOL with haptic angulation (ACR6D SE, Laboratoires Cornéal) and the contralateral eye, a hydrophilic acrylic IOL without haptic angulation (C-flex 570C, Rayner). The following parameters were assessed: regeneratory posterior opacification (RPO) in the central, intermediate, and peripheral areas (scale 0 to 10); anterior capsule opacification (ACO); best corrected visual acuity (BCVA); and contrast sensitivity (CSF).</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="RESULTS" NlmCategory="RESULTS">Thirty-one patients completed the 1(1/2)-year follow-up. In both IOL groups, RPO within the PCCC was slight in the central area, with a mean score of 0.33 +/- 0.84 (SD) in the angulated IOL group and 0.16 +/- 0.57 in the nonangulated IOL group (P = .29). The mean RPO score in the peripheral area was 2.07 +/- 1.37 and 2.35 +/- 1.45, respectively (P = .12). The difference between the central and peripheral areas was 1.74 in the angulated IOL group (P<.00001) and 2.19 in the nonangulated IOL group (P<.00001). Haptic deformation occurred in 9 eyes (29%) with an angulated IOL and no eye with a nonangulated IOL. There was significantly more ACO in the nonangulated IOL group (P = .012). There were no significant differences in BCVA or CSF between the 2 groups.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="CONCLUSIONS" NlmCategory="CONCLUSIONS">Creating a PCCC led to significantly lower RPO intensity within the PCCC area than in the peripheral area in eyes with hydrophilic acrylic IOLs with and without haptic angulation. Haptic angulation had no apparent significant influence on the intensity of RPO or on BCVA and CSF. Haptic deformation may occur in hydrophilic IOLs with angulated haptics.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Vock</LastName><ForeName>Lorenz</ForeName><Initials>L</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Ophthalmology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Menapace</LastName><ForeName>Rupert</ForeName><Initials>R</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Stifter</LastName><ForeName>Eva</ForeName><Initials>E</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Findl</LastName><ForeName>Oliver</ForeName><Initials>O</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Georgopoulos</LastName><ForeName>Michael</ForeName><Initials>M</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D016449">Randomized Controlled Trial</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>United States</Country><MedlineTA>J Cataract Refract Surg</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>8604171</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0886-3350</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><ChemicalList><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D000180">Acrylic Resins</NameOfSubstance></Chemical></ChemicalList><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><CommentsCorrectionsList><CommentsCorrections RefType="CommentIn"><RefSource>J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007 Dec;33(12):2004-5; author reply 2005-7</RefSource><PMID Version="1">18053880</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="CommentIn"><RefSource>J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007 Dec;33(12):2002; author reply 2002-4</RefSource><PMID Version="1">18053879</PMID></CommentsCorrections></CommentsCorrectionsList><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="D000180">Acrylic Resins</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D000368">Aged</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D000369">Aged, 80 and over</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D019923">Capsulorhexis</DescriptorName><QualifierName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="Q000379">methods</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D015350">Contrast Sensitivity</DescriptorName><QualifierName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="Q000502">physiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D005260">Female</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D006801">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D019654">Lens Implantation, Intraocular</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="D007910">Lenses, Intraocular</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D008297">Male</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D008875">Middle Aged</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D018918">Phacoemulsification</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D011446">Prospective Studies</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D011474">Prosthesis Design</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D019591">Pseudophakia</DescriptorName><QualifierName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="Q000503">physiopathology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D014792">Visual Acuity</DescriptorName><QualifierName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="Q000502">physiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="received"><Year>2006</Year><Month>7</Month><Day>21</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="accepted"><Year>2006</Year><Month>10</Month><Day>1</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2007</Year><Month>2</Month><Day>6</Day><Hour>9</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2007</Year><Month>3</Month><Day>14</Day><Hour>9</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2007</Year><Month>2</Month><Day>6</Day><Hour>9</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pii">S0886-3350(06)01371-X</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1016/j.jcrs.2006.10.030</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">17276267</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/HapticV1/Data/PubMed/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001697 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 001697 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Ticri/CIDE
|area= HapticV1
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:17276267
|texte= Clinical effects of primary posterior continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis in eyes with single-piece hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lenses with and without haptic angulation.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:17276267" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a HapticV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23. |  |