Remote telepresence surgery: the Canadian experience.
Identifieur interne : 001694 ( PubMed/Corpus ); précédent : 001693; suivant : 001695Remote telepresence surgery: the Canadian experience.
Auteurs : M. AnvariSource :
- Surgical endoscopy [ 1432-2218 ] ; 2007.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Animals, Canada, Clinical Competence, Evaluation Studies as Topic, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Hospitals, Rural, Hospitals, Teaching, Humans, Incidence, Intraoperative Complications (epidemiology), Intraoperative Complications (physiopathology), Laparoscopy (adverse effects), Laparoscopy (methods), Length of Stay, Male, Patient Selection, Postoperative Complications (epidemiology), Postoperative Complications (physiopathology), Program Development, Program Evaluation, Risk Assessment, Robotics, Telemedicine (organization & administration).
- MESH :
- geographic : Canada.
- adverse effects : Laparoscopy.
- epidemiology : Intraoperative Complications, Postoperative Complications.
- methods : Laparoscopy.
- organization & administration : Telemedicine.
- physiopathology : Intraoperative Complications, Postoperative Complications.
- Animals, Clinical Competence, Evaluation Studies as Topic, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Hospitals, Rural, Hospitals, Teaching, Humans, Incidence, Length of Stay, Male, Patient Selection, Program Development, Program Evaluation, Risk Assessment, Robotics.
Abstract
On 28 February 2003, the world's first telerobotic surgical service was established between St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, a teaching hospital affiliated with McMaster University, and North Bay General Hospital, a community hospital 400 km away. The service was designed to provide telerobotic surgery and assistance by expert surgeons to local surgeons in North Bay, and to improve the range and quality of advanced laparoscopic surgeries offered locally. The two surgeons have collaboratively performed 22 remote telepresence surgeries including laparoscopic fundoplications, laparoscopic colon resections, and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repairs. This article describes the important lessons learned, including the telecommunication requirements, the impact from lack of haptic feedback, surgeons' adaptation to latency, and ethical and medicolegal issues. This is currently the largest clinical experience with assisted robotic telepresence surgery (ARTS) in the world, and the lessons learned will help guide the future design and development of telesurgical robotic platforms. It also will guide the establishment of telesurgical networks connecting various centers in the world, allowing for rapid and safe dissemination of new surgical techniques.
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-006-9040-8
PubMed: 17279304
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:17279304Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Remote telepresence surgery: the Canadian experience.</title><author><name sortKey="Anvari, M" sort="Anvari, M" uniqKey="Anvari M" first="M" last="Anvari">M. Anvari</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Centre for Minimal Access Surgery, St. Joseph's Healthcare, McMaster University, 50 Charlton Avenue E., Hamilton, ON, Canada, L8N 4A6. anvari@mcmaster.ca</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2007">2007</date><idno type="doi">10.1007/s00464-006-9040-8</idno><idno type="RBID">pubmed:17279304</idno><idno type="pmid">17279304</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">001694</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Remote telepresence surgery: the Canadian experience.</title><author><name sortKey="Anvari, M" sort="Anvari, M" uniqKey="Anvari M" first="M" last="Anvari">M. Anvari</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Centre for Minimal Access Surgery, St. Joseph's Healthcare, McMaster University, 50 Charlton Avenue E., Hamilton, ON, Canada, L8N 4A6. anvari@mcmaster.ca</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Surgical endoscopy</title><idno type="eISSN">1432-2218</idno><imprint><date when="2007" type="published">2007</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Animals</term><term>Canada</term><term>Clinical Competence</term><term>Evaluation Studies as Topic</term><term>Female</term><term>Follow-Up Studies</term><term>Hospitals, Rural</term><term>Hospitals, Teaching</term><term>Humans</term><term>Incidence</term><term>Intraoperative Complications (epidemiology)</term><term>Intraoperative Complications (physiopathology)</term><term>Laparoscopy (adverse effects)</term><term>Laparoscopy (methods)</term><term>Length of Stay</term><term>Male</term><term>Patient Selection</term><term>Postoperative Complications (epidemiology)</term><term>Postoperative Complications (physiopathology)</term><term>Program Development</term><term>Program Evaluation</term><term>Risk Assessment</term><term>Robotics</term><term>Telemedicine (organization & administration)</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="geographic" xml:lang="en"><term>Canada</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="adverse effects" xml:lang="en"><term>Laparoscopy</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="epidemiology" xml:lang="en"><term>Intraoperative Complications</term><term>Postoperative Complications</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="methods" xml:lang="en"><term>Laparoscopy</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="organization & administration" xml:lang="en"><term>Telemedicine</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="physiopathology" xml:lang="en"><term>Intraoperative Complications</term><term>Postoperative Complications</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Animals</term><term>Clinical Competence</term><term>Evaluation Studies as Topic</term><term>Female</term><term>Follow-Up Studies</term><term>Hospitals, Rural</term><term>Hospitals, Teaching</term><term>Humans</term><term>Incidence</term><term>Length of Stay</term><term>Male</term><term>Patient Selection</term><term>Program Development</term><term>Program Evaluation</term><term>Risk Assessment</term><term>Robotics</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">On 28 February 2003, the world's first telerobotic surgical service was established between St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, a teaching hospital affiliated with McMaster University, and North Bay General Hospital, a community hospital 400 km away. The service was designed to provide telerobotic surgery and assistance by expert surgeons to local surgeons in North Bay, and to improve the range and quality of advanced laparoscopic surgeries offered locally. The two surgeons have collaboratively performed 22 remote telepresence surgeries including laparoscopic fundoplications, laparoscopic colon resections, and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repairs. This article describes the important lessons learned, including the telecommunication requirements, the impact from lack of haptic feedback, surgeons' adaptation to latency, and ethical and medicolegal issues. This is currently the largest clinical experience with assisted robotic telepresence surgery (ARTS) in the world, and the lessons learned will help guide the future design and development of telesurgical robotic platforms. It also will guide the establishment of telesurgical networks connecting various centers in the world, allowing for rapid and safe dissemination of new surgical techniques.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Owner="NLM" Status="MEDLINE"><PMID Version="1">17279304</PMID><DateCreated><Year>2007</Year><Month>03</Month><Day>16</Day></DateCreated><DateCompleted><Year>2007</Year><Month>04</Month><Day>12</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2007</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>15</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print-Electronic"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1432-2218</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><Volume>21</Volume><Issue>4</Issue><PubDate><Year>2007</Year><Month>Apr</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Surgical endoscopy</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Surg Endosc</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Remote telepresence surgery: the Canadian experience.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>537-41</MedlinePgn></Pagination><Abstract><AbstractText>On 28 February 2003, the world's first telerobotic surgical service was established between St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, a teaching hospital affiliated with McMaster University, and North Bay General Hospital, a community hospital 400 km away. The service was designed to provide telerobotic surgery and assistance by expert surgeons to local surgeons in North Bay, and to improve the range and quality of advanced laparoscopic surgeries offered locally. The two surgeons have collaboratively performed 22 remote telepresence surgeries including laparoscopic fundoplications, laparoscopic colon resections, and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repairs. This article describes the important lessons learned, including the telecommunication requirements, the impact from lack of haptic feedback, surgeons' adaptation to latency, and ethical and medicolegal issues. This is currently the largest clinical experience with assisted robotic telepresence surgery (ARTS) in the world, and the lessons learned will help guide the future design and development of telesurgical robotic platforms. It also will guide the establishment of telesurgical networks connecting various centers in the world, allowing for rapid and safe dissemination of new surgical techniques.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Anvari</LastName><ForeName>M</ForeName><Initials>M</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Centre for Minimal Access Surgery, St. Joseph's Healthcare, McMaster University, 50 Charlton Avenue E., Hamilton, ON, Canada, L8N 4A6. anvari@mcmaster.ca</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D016454">Review</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList><ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2007</Year><Month>02</Month><Day>06</Day></ArticleDate></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>Germany</Country><MedlineTA>Surg Endosc</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>8806653</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0930-2794</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D000818">Animals</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" Type="Geographic" UI="D002170">Canada</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D002983">Clinical Competence</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D005069">Evaluation Studies as Topic</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D005260">Female</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D005500">Follow-Up Studies</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="D006780">Hospitals, Rural</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D006784">Hospitals, Teaching</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D006801">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D015994">Incidence</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D007431">Intraoperative Complications</DescriptorName><QualifierName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="Q000453">epidemiology</QualifierName><QualifierName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="Q000503">physiopathology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D010535">Laparoscopy</DescriptorName><QualifierName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="Q000009">adverse effects</QualifierName><QualifierName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="Q000379">methods</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D007902">Length of Stay</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D008297">Male</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D018579">Patient Selection</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D011183">Postoperative Complications</DescriptorName><QualifierName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="Q000453">epidemiology</QualifierName><QualifierName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="Q000503">physiopathology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D016730">Program Development</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D015397">Program Evaluation</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D018570">Risk Assessment</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="D012371">Robotics</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D017216">Telemedicine</DescriptorName><QualifierName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="Q000458">organization & administration</QualifierName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList><NumberOfReferences>9</NumberOfReferences></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="received"><Year>2006</Year><Month>4</Month><Day>10</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="accepted"><Year>2006</Year><Month>4</Month><Day>27</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="revised"><Year>2006</Year><Month>4</Month><Day>10</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="aheadofprint"><Year>2007</Year><Month>2</Month><Day>6</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2007</Year><Month>2</Month><Day>7</Day><Hour>9</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2007</Year><Month>4</Month><Day>14</Day><Hour>9</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2007</Year><Month>2</Month><Day>7</Day><Hour>9</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1007/s00464-006-9040-8</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">17279304</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/HapticV1/Data/PubMed/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001694 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 001694 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Ticri/CIDE
|area= HapticV1
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:17279304
|texte= Remote telepresence surgery: the Canadian experience.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:17279304" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a HapticV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23. |  |