Effect of primary posterior continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis on clinical performance of ACR6D SE single-piece hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lenses.
Identifieur interne : 001649 ( PubMed/Corpus ); précédent : 001648; suivant : 001650Effect of primary posterior continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis on clinical performance of ACR6D SE single-piece hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lenses.
Auteurs : Lorenz Vock ; Rupert Menapace ; Eva Stifter ; Wolf Bühl ; Michael GeorgopoulosSource :
- Journal of cataract and refractive surgery [ 0886-3350 ] ; 2007.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Acrylic Resins, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Capsulorhexis (methods), Cataract (prevention & control), Contrast Sensitivity (physiology), Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Lens Capsule, Crystalline (pathology), Lens Implantation, Intraocular, Lenses, Intraocular, Male, Middle Aged, Postoperative Complications (prevention & control), Prospective Studies, Pseudophakia (physiopathology), Visual Acuity (physiology).
- MESH :
- chemical : Acrylic Resins.
- methods : Capsulorhexis.
- pathology : Lens Capsule, Crystalline.
- physiology : Contrast Sensitivity, Visual Acuity.
- physiopathology : Pseudophakia.
- prevention & control : Cataract, Postoperative Complications.
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Lens Implantation, Intraocular, Lenses, Intraocular, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies.
Abstract
To evaluate the effects of a primary posterior continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis (PCCC) on the clinical performance of a single-piece hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lens (IOL) with haptic angulation.
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.01.007
PubMed: 17397735
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:17397735Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Effect of primary posterior continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis on clinical performance of ACR6D SE single-piece hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lenses.</title><author><name sortKey="Vock, Lorenz" sort="Vock, Lorenz" uniqKey="Vock L" first="Lorenz" last="Vock">Lorenz Vock</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Menapace, Rupert" sort="Menapace, Rupert" uniqKey="Menapace R" first="Rupert" last="Menapace">Rupert Menapace</name></author><author><name sortKey="Stifter, Eva" sort="Stifter, Eva" uniqKey="Stifter E" first="Eva" last="Stifter">Eva Stifter</name></author><author><name sortKey="Buhl, Wolf" sort="Buhl, Wolf" uniqKey="Buhl W" first="Wolf" last="Bühl">Wolf Bühl</name></author><author><name sortKey="Georgopoulos, Michael" sort="Georgopoulos, Michael" uniqKey="Georgopoulos M" first="Michael" last="Georgopoulos">Michael Georgopoulos</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2007">2007</date><idno type="doi">10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.01.007</idno><idno type="RBID">pubmed:17397735</idno><idno type="pmid">17397735</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">001649</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Effect of primary posterior continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis on clinical performance of ACR6D SE single-piece hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lenses.</title><author><name sortKey="Vock, Lorenz" sort="Vock, Lorenz" uniqKey="Vock L" first="Lorenz" last="Vock">Lorenz Vock</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Menapace, Rupert" sort="Menapace, Rupert" uniqKey="Menapace R" first="Rupert" last="Menapace">Rupert Menapace</name></author><author><name sortKey="Stifter, Eva" sort="Stifter, Eva" uniqKey="Stifter E" first="Eva" last="Stifter">Eva Stifter</name></author><author><name sortKey="Buhl, Wolf" sort="Buhl, Wolf" uniqKey="Buhl W" first="Wolf" last="Bühl">Wolf Bühl</name></author><author><name sortKey="Georgopoulos, Michael" sort="Georgopoulos, Michael" uniqKey="Georgopoulos M" first="Michael" last="Georgopoulos">Michael Georgopoulos</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Journal of cataract and refractive surgery</title><idno type="ISSN">0886-3350</idno><imprint><date when="2007" type="published">2007</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Acrylic Resins</term><term>Aged</term><term>Aged, 80 and over</term><term>Capsulorhexis (methods)</term><term>Cataract (prevention & control)</term><term>Contrast Sensitivity (physiology)</term><term>Female</term><term>Follow-Up Studies</term><term>Humans</term><term>Lens Capsule, Crystalline (pathology)</term><term>Lens Implantation, Intraocular</term><term>Lenses, Intraocular</term><term>Male</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Postoperative Complications (prevention & control)</term><term>Prospective Studies</term><term>Pseudophakia (physiopathology)</term><term>Visual Acuity (physiology)</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" xml:lang="en"><term>Acrylic Resins</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="methods" xml:lang="en"><term>Capsulorhexis</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="pathology" xml:lang="en"><term>Lens Capsule, Crystalline</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="physiology" xml:lang="en"><term>Contrast Sensitivity</term><term>Visual Acuity</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="physiopathology" xml:lang="en"><term>Pseudophakia</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="prevention & control" xml:lang="en"><term>Cataract</term><term>Postoperative Complications</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Aged</term><term>Aged, 80 and over</term><term>Female</term><term>Follow-Up Studies</term><term>Humans</term><term>Lens Implantation, Intraocular</term><term>Lenses, Intraocular</term><term>Male</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Prospective Studies</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">To evaluate the effects of a primary posterior continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis (PCCC) on the clinical performance of a single-piece hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lens (IOL) with haptic angulation.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Owner="NLM" Status="MEDLINE"><PMID Version="1">17397735</PMID><DateCreated><Year>2007</Year><Month>04</Month><Day>02</Day></DateCreated><DateCompleted><Year>2007</Year><Month>06</Month><Day>12</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2008</Year><Month>01</Month><Day>17</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Print">0886-3350</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print"><Volume>33</Volume><Issue>4</Issue><PubDate><Year>2007</Year><Month>Apr</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Journal of cataract and refractive surgery</Title><ISOAbbreviation>J Cataract Refract Surg</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Effect of primary posterior continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis on clinical performance of ACR6D SE single-piece hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lenses.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>628-34</MedlinePgn></Pagination><Abstract><AbstractText Label="PURPOSE" NlmCategory="OBJECTIVE">To evaluate the effects of a primary posterior continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis (PCCC) on the clinical performance of a single-piece hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lens (IOL) with haptic angulation.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="SETTING" NlmCategory="METHODS">Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="METHODS" NlmCategory="METHODS">A prospective study of 52 patients with bilateral age-related cataract was conducted. Patients had standard cataract surgery with implantation of the same IOL in both eyes. Randomly, a PCCC was created in 1 eye and the posterior capsule was left intact in the fellow eye. Assessed parameters were visual axis opacification (VAO) in eyes with a PCCC or regeneratory posterior capsule opacification (PCO) in eyes without PCCC (scale 0 to 10) in the central (3.0 mm eccentricity), intermediate (3.0 to 4.5 mm eccentricity), and peripheral (>4.5 mm eccentricity [capsulorhexis edge]) areas; neodymium:YAG (Nd:YAG) laser capsulotomy or laser polishing of ongrowing lens epithelium; anterior capsule opacification (ACO); best corrected visual acuity (BCVA); and contrast sensitivity.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="RESULTS" NlmCategory="RESULTS">Thirty patients completed the 2(1/2)-year follow-up. Visual axis opacification was significantly lower in the central region in the PCCC group (mean 0.5 +/- 0.7 [SD]) than PCO in the central region of the non-PCCC group (mean 1.1 +/- 1.1) (P = .02). Forty percent in the non-PCCC group had an Nd:YAG laser capsulotomy during the follow-up period; none in the PCCC group had laser polishing. There were no significant differences in ACO, SE, BCVA, or contrast sensitivity. There was no additional gain in BCVA or contrast sensitivity in eyes with a PCCC compared with eyes without a PCCC when VAO and PCO were low.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="CONCLUSION" NlmCategory="CONCLUSIONS">A PCCC significantly reduced PCO formation within the central 3.0 mm eccentricity as well as the need for Nd:YAG laser capsulotomy in eyes with a single-piece hydrophilic acrylic IOL with angulated haptics.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Vock</LastName><ForeName>Lorenz</ForeName><Initials>L</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Menapace</LastName><ForeName>Rupert</ForeName><Initials>R</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Stifter</LastName><ForeName>Eva</ForeName><Initials>E</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Bühl</LastName><ForeName>Wolf</ForeName><Initials>W</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Georgopoulos</LastName><ForeName>Michael</ForeName><Initials>M</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D016449">Randomized Controlled Trial</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>United States</Country><MedlineTA>J Cataract Refract Surg</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>8604171</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0886-3350</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><ChemicalList><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D000180">Acrylic Resins</NameOfSubstance></Chemical></ChemicalList><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><CommentsCorrectionsList><CommentsCorrections RefType="CommentIn"><RefSource>J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007 Dec;33(12):2004-5; author reply 2005-7</RefSource><PMID Version="1">18053880</PMID></CommentsCorrections></CommentsCorrectionsList><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="D000180">Acrylic Resins</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D000368">Aged</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D000369">Aged, 80 and over</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D019923">Capsulorhexis</DescriptorName><QualifierName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="Q000379">methods</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D002386">Cataract</DescriptorName><QualifierName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="Q000517">prevention & control</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D015350">Contrast Sensitivity</DescriptorName><QualifierName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="Q000502">physiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D005260">Female</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D005500">Follow-Up Studies</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D006801">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D007903">Lens Capsule, Crystalline</DescriptorName><QualifierName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="Q000473">pathology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="D019654">Lens Implantation, Intraocular</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="D007910">Lenses, Intraocular</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D008297">Male</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D008875">Middle Aged</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D011183">Postoperative Complications</DescriptorName><QualifierName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="Q000517">prevention & control</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D011446">Prospective Studies</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D019591">Pseudophakia</DescriptorName><QualifierName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="Q000503">physiopathology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D014792">Visual Acuity</DescriptorName><QualifierName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="Q000502">physiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="received"><Year>2006</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>4</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="accepted"><Year>2007</Year><Month>1</Month><Day>3</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2007</Year><Month>4</Month><Day>3</Day><Hour>9</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2007</Year><Month>6</Month><Day>15</Day><Hour>9</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2007</Year><Month>4</Month><Day>3</Day><Hour>9</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pii">S0886-3350(07)00084-3</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.01.007</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">17397735</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/HapticV1/Data/PubMed/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001649 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 001649 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Ticri/CIDE
|area= HapticV1
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:17397735
|texte= Effect of primary posterior continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis on clinical performance of ACR6D SE single-piece hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lenses.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:17397735" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a HapticV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23. |  |