Opposite haptic and visual induction effects observed with Titchener's [perp].
Identifieur interne : 001262 ( PubMed/Corpus ); précédent : 001261; suivant : 001263Opposite haptic and visual induction effects observed with Titchener's [perp].
Auteurs : Klaus LandwehrSource :
- Attention, perception & psychophysics [ 1943-3921 ] ; 2009.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- MESH :
Abstract
Nineteen psychology undergraduates were requested to "grasp" the lines of a computer image of Titchener's perpendicular with a thumb and index finger pincer grip immediately after the line to be grasped had been indicated and the whole figure extinguished. The hand remained visible. Lines were of three different lengths (6.5, 7, and 7.5 cm), and perpendiculars were presented at eight different orientations (rotated in steps of 45 degrees ). Lines also had to be judged longer, shorter, or equal, relative to one another. Haptically, subjects responded correctly to the perpendiculars' undivided lines, but scaled their responses to the divided ones according to the undivided ones. Categorical judgments yielded comparable psychometric functions for both kinds of lines, with a significant shift of points of subjective equality from a difference in length between lines of 9.8% to 13.5% when the divided or the undivided line was target. Haptic sensitivity, therefore, appears to be constrained by context, whereas the classical "visual illusion," associated with Titchener's perpendicular, may be regarded a mere decisional criterion shift.
DOI: 10.3758/APP.71.5.1197
PubMed: 19525548
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:19525548Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Opposite haptic and visual induction effects observed with Titchener's [perp].</title>
<author><name sortKey="Landwehr, Klaus" sort="Landwehr, Klaus" uniqKey="Landwehr K" first="Klaus" last="Landwehr">Klaus Landwehr</name>
<affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-Universität Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany. landweh@uni-mainz.de</nlm:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno>
<date when="2009">2009</date>
<idno type="doi">10.3758/APP.71.5.1197</idno>
<idno type="RBID">pubmed:19525548</idno>
<idno type="pmid">19525548</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">001262</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Opposite haptic and visual induction effects observed with Titchener's [perp].</title>
<author><name sortKey="Landwehr, Klaus" sort="Landwehr, Klaus" uniqKey="Landwehr K" first="Klaus" last="Landwehr">Klaus Landwehr</name>
<affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-Universität Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany. landweh@uni-mainz.de</nlm:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series><title level="j">Attention, perception & psychophysics</title>
<idno type="ISSN">1943-3921</idno>
<imprint><date when="2009" type="published">2009</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Discrimination (Psychology)</term>
<term>Hand Strength</term>
<term>Humans</term>
<term>Optical Illusions</term>
<term>Orientation</term>
<term>Pattern Recognition, Visual</term>
<term>Reaction Time</term>
<term>Size Perception</term>
<term>Touch</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Discrimination (Psychology)</term>
<term>Hand Strength</term>
<term>Humans</term>
<term>Optical Illusions</term>
<term>Orientation</term>
<term>Pattern Recognition, Visual</term>
<term>Reaction Time</term>
<term>Size Perception</term>
<term>Touch</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Nineteen psychology undergraduates were requested to "grasp" the lines of a computer image of Titchener's perpendicular with a thumb and index finger pincer grip immediately after the line to be grasped had been indicated and the whole figure extinguished. The hand remained visible. Lines were of three different lengths (6.5, 7, and 7.5 cm), and perpendiculars were presented at eight different orientations (rotated in steps of 45 degrees ). Lines also had to be judged longer, shorter, or equal, relative to one another. Haptically, subjects responded correctly to the perpendiculars' undivided lines, but scaled their responses to the divided ones according to the undivided ones. Categorical judgments yielded comparable psychometric functions for both kinds of lines, with a significant shift of points of subjective equality from a difference in length between lines of 9.8% to 13.5% when the divided or the undivided line was target. Haptic sensitivity, therefore, appears to be constrained by context, whereas the classical "visual illusion," associated with Titchener's perpendicular, may be regarded a mere decisional criterion shift.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<pubmed><MedlineCitation Owner="NLM" Status="MEDLINE"><PMID Version="1">19525548</PMID>
<DateCreated><Year>2009</Year>
<Month>06</Month>
<Day>15</Day>
</DateCreated>
<DateCompleted><Year>2009</Year>
<Month>08</Month>
<Day>21</Day>
</DateCompleted>
<DateRevised><Year>2011</Year>
<Month>02</Month>
<Day>24</Day>
</DateRevised>
<Article PubModel="Print"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Print">1943-3921</ISSN>
<JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print"><Volume>71</Volume>
<Issue>5</Issue>
<PubDate><Year>2009</Year>
<Month>Jul</Month>
</PubDate>
</JournalIssue>
<Title>Attention, perception & psychophysics</Title>
<ISOAbbreviation>Atten Percept Psychophys</ISOAbbreviation>
</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Opposite haptic and visual induction effects observed with Titchener's [perp].</ArticleTitle>
<Pagination><MedlinePgn>1197-202</MedlinePgn>
</Pagination>
<ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.3758/APP.71.5.1197</ELocationID>
<Abstract><AbstractText>Nineteen psychology undergraduates were requested to "grasp" the lines of a computer image of Titchener's perpendicular with a thumb and index finger pincer grip immediately after the line to be grasped had been indicated and the whole figure extinguished. The hand remained visible. Lines were of three different lengths (6.5, 7, and 7.5 cm), and perpendiculars were presented at eight different orientations (rotated in steps of 45 degrees ). Lines also had to be judged longer, shorter, or equal, relative to one another. Haptically, subjects responded correctly to the perpendiculars' undivided lines, but scaled their responses to the divided ones according to the undivided ones. Categorical judgments yielded comparable psychometric functions for both kinds of lines, with a significant shift of points of subjective equality from a difference in length between lines of 9.8% to 13.5% when the divided or the undivided line was target. Haptic sensitivity, therefore, appears to be constrained by context, whereas the classical "visual illusion," associated with Titchener's perpendicular, may be regarded a mere decisional criterion shift.</AbstractText>
</Abstract>
<AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Landwehr</LastName>
<ForeName>Klaus</ForeName>
<Initials>K</Initials>
<AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-Universität Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany. landweh@uni-mainz.de</Affiliation>
</AffiliationInfo>
</Author>
</AuthorList>
<Language>eng</Language>
<PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType>
</PublicationTypeList>
</Article>
<MedlineJournalInfo><Country>United States</Country>
<MedlineTA>Atten Percept Psychophys</MedlineTA>
<NlmUniqueID>101495384</NlmUniqueID>
<ISSNLinking>1943-3921</ISSNLinking>
</MedlineJournalInfo>
<CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset>
<MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D004192">Discrimination (Psychology)</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="D018737">Hand Strength</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D006801">Humans</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="D009903">Optical Illusions</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="D009949">Orientation</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="D010364">Pattern Recognition, Visual</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D011930">Reaction Time</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="D012858">Size Perception</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="D014110">Touch</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
</MeshHeadingList>
</MedlineCitation>
<PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2009</Year>
<Month>6</Month>
<Day>16</Day>
<Hour>9</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2009</Year>
<Month>6</Month>
<Day>16</Day>
<Hour>9</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2009</Year>
<Month>8</Month>
<Day>22</Day>
<Hour>9</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
</History>
<PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pii">71/5/1197</ArticleId>
<ArticleId IdType="doi">10.3758/APP.71.5.1197</ArticleId>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">19525548</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</PubmedData>
</pubmed>
</record>
Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/HapticV1/Data/PubMed/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001262 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 001262 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien |wiki= Ticri/CIDE |area= HapticV1 |flux= PubMed |étape= Corpus |type= RBID |clé= pubmed:19525548 |texte= Opposite haptic and visual induction effects observed with Titchener's [perp]. }}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:19525548" \ | HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd \ | NlmPubMed2Wicri -a HapticV1
This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23. |