The effect of haptic guidance, aging, and initial skill level on motor learning of a steering task.
Identifieur interne : 001209 ( PubMed/Corpus ); précédent : 001208; suivant : 001210The effect of haptic guidance, aging, and initial skill level on motor learning of a steering task.
Auteurs : Laura Marchal-Crespo ; Stephanie Mchughen ; Steven C. Cramer ; David J. ReinkensmeyerSource :
- Experimental brain research [ 1432-1106 ] ; 2010.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- MESH :
- physiology : Feedback, Psychological, Learning, Motor Skills, Psychomotor Performance.
- psychology : Aging.
- Adult, Aged, Algorithms, Computer Graphics, Computer Simulation, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Female, Humans, Male, Wheelchairs, Young Adult.
Abstract
In a previous study, we found that haptic guidance from a robotic steering wheel can improve short-term learning of steering of a simulated vehicle, in contrast to several studies of other tasks that had found that the guidance either impairs or does not aid motor learning. In this study, we examined whether haptic guidance-as-needed can improve long-term retention (across 1 week) of the steering task, with age and initial skill level as independent variables. Training with guidance-as-needed allowed all participants to learn to steer without experiencing large errors. For young participants (age 18-30), training with guidance-as-needed produced better long-term retention of driving skill than did training without guidance. For older participants (age 65-92), training with guidance-as-needed improved long-term retention in tracking error, but not significantly. However, for a subset of less skilled, older subjects, training with guidance-as-needed significantly improved long-term retention. The benefits of guidance-based training were most evident as an improved ability to straighten the vehicle direction when coming out of turns. In general, older participants not only systematically performed worse at the task than younger subjects (errors approximately 3 times greater), but also apparently learned more slowly, forgetting a greater percentage of the learned task during the 1 week layoffs between the experimental sessions. This study demonstrates that training with haptic guidance can benefit long-term retention of a driving skill for young and for some old drivers. Training with haptic guidance is more useful for people with less initial skill.
DOI: 10.1007/s00221-009-2026-8
PubMed: 19820920
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:19820920Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">The effect of haptic guidance, aging, and initial skill level on motor learning of a steering task.</title><author><name sortKey="Marchal Crespo, Laura" sort="Marchal Crespo, Laura" uniqKey="Marchal Crespo L" first="Laura" last="Marchal-Crespo">Laura Marchal-Crespo</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Henry Samueli School of Engineering, 4200 Engineering Gateway Building, Irvine, CA 92697-3975, USA. lmarchal@uci.edu</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Mchughen, Stephanie" sort="Mchughen, Stephanie" uniqKey="Mchughen S" first="Stephanie" last="Mchughen">Stephanie Mchughen</name></author><author><name sortKey="Cramer, Steven C" sort="Cramer, Steven C" uniqKey="Cramer S" first="Steven C" last="Cramer">Steven C. Cramer</name></author><author><name sortKey="Reinkensmeyer, David J" sort="Reinkensmeyer, David J" uniqKey="Reinkensmeyer D" first="David J" last="Reinkensmeyer">David J. Reinkensmeyer</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2010">2010</date><idno type="doi">10.1007/s00221-009-2026-8</idno><idno type="RBID">pubmed:19820920</idno><idno type="pmid">19820920</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">001209</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">The effect of haptic guidance, aging, and initial skill level on motor learning of a steering task.</title><author><name sortKey="Marchal Crespo, Laura" sort="Marchal Crespo, Laura" uniqKey="Marchal Crespo L" first="Laura" last="Marchal-Crespo">Laura Marchal-Crespo</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Henry Samueli School of Engineering, 4200 Engineering Gateway Building, Irvine, CA 92697-3975, USA. lmarchal@uci.edu</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Mchughen, Stephanie" sort="Mchughen, Stephanie" uniqKey="Mchughen S" first="Stephanie" last="Mchughen">Stephanie Mchughen</name></author><author><name sortKey="Cramer, Steven C" sort="Cramer, Steven C" uniqKey="Cramer S" first="Steven C" last="Cramer">Steven C. Cramer</name></author><author><name sortKey="Reinkensmeyer, David J" sort="Reinkensmeyer, David J" uniqKey="Reinkensmeyer D" first="David J" last="Reinkensmeyer">David J. Reinkensmeyer</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Experimental brain research</title><idno type="eISSN">1432-1106</idno><imprint><date when="2010" type="published">2010</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Adult</term><term>Aged</term><term>Aging (psychology)</term><term>Algorithms</term><term>Computer Graphics</term><term>Computer Simulation</term><term>Data Interpretation, Statistical</term><term>Feedback, Psychological (physiology)</term><term>Female</term><term>Humans</term><term>Learning (physiology)</term><term>Male</term><term>Motor Skills (physiology)</term><term>Psychomotor Performance (physiology)</term><term>Wheelchairs</term><term>Young Adult</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="physiology" xml:lang="en"><term>Feedback, Psychological</term><term>Learning</term><term>Motor Skills</term><term>Psychomotor Performance</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="psychology" xml:lang="en"><term>Aging</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Adult</term><term>Aged</term><term>Algorithms</term><term>Computer Graphics</term><term>Computer Simulation</term><term>Data Interpretation, Statistical</term><term>Female</term><term>Humans</term><term>Male</term><term>Wheelchairs</term><term>Young Adult</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">In a previous study, we found that haptic guidance from a robotic steering wheel can improve short-term learning of steering of a simulated vehicle, in contrast to several studies of other tasks that had found that the guidance either impairs or does not aid motor learning. In this study, we examined whether haptic guidance-as-needed can improve long-term retention (across 1 week) of the steering task, with age and initial skill level as independent variables. Training with guidance-as-needed allowed all participants to learn to steer without experiencing large errors. For young participants (age 18-30), training with guidance-as-needed produced better long-term retention of driving skill than did training without guidance. For older participants (age 65-92), training with guidance-as-needed improved long-term retention in tracking error, but not significantly. However, for a subset of less skilled, older subjects, training with guidance-as-needed significantly improved long-term retention. The benefits of guidance-based training were most evident as an improved ability to straighten the vehicle direction when coming out of turns. In general, older participants not only systematically performed worse at the task than younger subjects (errors approximately 3 times greater), but also apparently learned more slowly, forgetting a greater percentage of the learned task during the 1 week layoffs between the experimental sessions. This study demonstrates that training with haptic guidance can benefit long-term retention of a driving skill for young and for some old drivers. Training with haptic guidance is more useful for people with less initial skill.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Owner="NLM" Status="MEDLINE"><PMID Version="1">19820920</PMID><DateCreated><Year>2010</Year><Month>03</Month><Day>05</Day></DateCreated><DateCompleted><Year>2010</Year><Month>05</Month><Day>25</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2014</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>07</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print-Electronic"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1432-1106</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><Volume>201</Volume><Issue>2</Issue><PubDate><Year>2010</Year><Month>Mar</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Experimental brain research</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Exp Brain Res</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>The effect of haptic guidance, aging, and initial skill level on motor learning of a steering task.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>209-20</MedlinePgn></Pagination><ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1007/s00221-009-2026-8</ELocationID><Abstract><AbstractText>In a previous study, we found that haptic guidance from a robotic steering wheel can improve short-term learning of steering of a simulated vehicle, in contrast to several studies of other tasks that had found that the guidance either impairs or does not aid motor learning. In this study, we examined whether haptic guidance-as-needed can improve long-term retention (across 1 week) of the steering task, with age and initial skill level as independent variables. Training with guidance-as-needed allowed all participants to learn to steer without experiencing large errors. For young participants (age 18-30), training with guidance-as-needed produced better long-term retention of driving skill than did training without guidance. For older participants (age 65-92), training with guidance-as-needed improved long-term retention in tracking error, but not significantly. However, for a subset of less skilled, older subjects, training with guidance-as-needed significantly improved long-term retention. The benefits of guidance-based training were most evident as an improved ability to straighten the vehicle direction when coming out of turns. In general, older participants not only systematically performed worse at the task than younger subjects (errors approximately 3 times greater), but also apparently learned more slowly, forgetting a greater percentage of the learned task during the 1 week layoffs between the experimental sessions. This study demonstrates that training with haptic guidance can benefit long-term retention of a driving skill for young and for some old drivers. Training with haptic guidance is more useful for people with less initial skill.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Marchal-Crespo</LastName><ForeName>Laura</ForeName><Initials>L</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Henry Samueli School of Engineering, 4200 Engineering Gateway Building, Irvine, CA 92697-3975, USA. lmarchal@uci.edu</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>McHughen</LastName><ForeName>Stephanie</ForeName><Initials>S</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Cramer</LastName><ForeName>Steven C</ForeName><Initials>SC</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Reinkensmeyer</LastName><ForeName>David J</ForeName><Initials>DJ</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><GrantList CompleteYN="Y"><Grant><GrantID>N01-HD-3-3352</GrantID><Acronym>HD</Acronym><Agency>NICHD NIH HHS</Agency><Country>United States</Country></Grant></GrantList><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D003160">Comparative Study</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D052061">Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList><ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2009</Year><Month>10</Month><Day>10</Day></ArticleDate></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>Germany</Country><MedlineTA>Exp Brain Res</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>0043312</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0014-4819</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><CommentsCorrectionsList><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Acta Psychol (Amst). 2002 Jun;110(2-3):247-63</RefSource><PMID Version="1">12102108</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Mot Behav. 2008 Nov;40(6):545-56</RefSource><PMID Version="1">18980907</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Res Q Exerc Sport. 2003 Mar;74(1):104-9</RefSource><PMID Version="1">12659481</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Mot Behav. 2004 Jun;36(2):212-24</RefSource><PMID Version="1">15130871</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Clin Neurophysiol. 2004 Sep;115(9):2134-43</RefSource><PMID Version="1">15294216</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1983 Apr;9(2):334-45</RefSource><PMID Version="1">6222149</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Psychol Bull. 1984 May;95(3):355-86</RefSource><PMID Version="1">6399752</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Gerontol. 1992 Nov;47(6):P406-11</RefSource><PMID Version="1">1430863</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Res Q Exerc Sport. 1994 Dec;65(4):316-23</RefSource><PMID Version="1">7886280</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Res Q Exerc Sport. 1996 Sep;67(3):280-7</RefSource><PMID Version="1">8888416</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Percept Mot Skills. 1997 Jun;84(3 Pt 1):1107-22</RefSource><PMID Version="1">9172230</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Res Q Exerc Sport. 1998 Jun;69(2):136-46</RefSource><PMID Version="1">9635328</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Exp Brain Res. 2006 Jan;168(3):368-83</RefSource><PMID Version="1">16249912</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Curr Opin Neurol. 2006 Feb;19(1):84-90</RefSource><PMID Version="1">16415682</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Hum Factors. 2005 Fall;47(3):574-90</RefSource><PMID Version="1">16435698</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Physiol Paris. 2006 Jun;99(4-6):414-24</RefSource><PMID Version="1">16730432</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Age Ageing. 2006 Jul;35(4):422-7</RefSource><PMID Version="1">16690635</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2007;4:8</RefSource><PMID Version="1">17391527</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Exp Aging Res. 2007 Jul-Sep;33(3):341-53</RefSource><PMID Version="1">17497374</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Dev Neuropsychol. 2007;32(1):597-613</RefSource><PMID Version="1">17650996</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Neurophysiol. 2007 Sep;98(3):1392-404</RefSource><PMID Version="1">17615136</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>PLoS One. 2008;3(3):e1775</RefSource><PMID Version="1">18335049</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Hum Factors. 2008 Feb;50(1):90-111</RefSource><PMID Version="1">18354974</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Sports Sci. 2002 Jun;20(6):495-506</RefSource><PMID Version="1">12137179</PMID></CommentsCorrections></CommentsCorrectionsList><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D000328">Adult</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D000368">Aged</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D000375">Aging</DescriptorName><QualifierName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="Q000523">psychology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D000465">Algorithms</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D003196">Computer Graphics</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D003198">Computer Simulation</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D003627">Data Interpretation, Statistical</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D030141">Feedback, Psychological</DescriptorName><QualifierName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="Q000502">physiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D005260">Female</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D006801">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D007858">Learning</DescriptorName><QualifierName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="Q000502">physiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D008297">Male</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D009048">Motor Skills</DescriptorName><QualifierName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="Q000502">physiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D011597">Psychomotor Performance</DescriptorName><QualifierName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="Q000502">physiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D014910">Wheelchairs</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D055815">Young Adult</DescriptorName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList><OtherID Source="NLM">PMC2832903</OtherID></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="received"><Year>2009</Year><Month>4</Month><Day>3</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="accepted"><Year>2009</Year><Month>9</Month><Day>18</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="aheadofprint"><Year>2009</Year><Month>10</Month><Day>10</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2009</Year><Month>10</Month><Day>13</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2009</Year><Month>10</Month><Day>13</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2010</Year><Month>5</Month><Day>26</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1007/s00221-009-2026-8</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">19820920</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pmc">PMC2832903</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/HapticV1/Data/PubMed/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001209 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 001209 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Ticri/CIDE
|area= HapticV1
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:19820920
|texte= The effect of haptic guidance, aging, and initial skill level on motor learning of a steering task.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:19820920" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a HapticV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23. |  |