HapticV1, PubMed, Corpus, bibRecord, 001196

Object familiarity modulates the relationship between visual object imagery and haptic shape perception.

Identifieur interne : 001196 ( PubMed/Corpus ); précédent : 001195; suivant : 001197

Object familiarity modulates the relationship between visual object imagery and haptic shape perception.

Auteurs : Simon Lacey ; Peter Flueckiger ; Randall Stilla ; Michael Lava ; K. Sathian

Source :

NeuroImage [ 1095-9572 ] ; 2010.

RBID : pubmed:19896540

English descriptors

KwdEn :
- Adolescent, Adult, Brain Mapping, Female, Form Perception (physiology), Humans, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Imagination (physiology), Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Recognition (Psychology) (physiology), Somatosensory Cortex (physiology), Young Adult.
MESH :
- physiology : Form Perception, Imagination, Recognition (Psychology), Somatosensory Cortex.
- Adolescent, Adult, Brain Mapping, Female, Humans, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Young Adult.

Abstract

Although visual cortical engagement in haptic shape perception is well established, its relationship with visual imagery remains controversial. We addressed this using functional magnetic resonance imaging during separate visual object imagery and haptic shape perception tasks. Two experiments were conducted. In the first experiment, the haptic shape task employed unfamiliar, meaningless objects, whereas familiar objects were used in the second experiment. The activations evoked by visual object imagery overlapped more extensively, and their magnitudes were more correlated, with those evoked during haptic shape perception of familiar, compared to unfamiliar, objects. In the companion paper (Deshpande et al., this issue), we used task-specific functional and effective connectivity analyses to provide convergent evidence: these analyses showed that the neural networks underlying visual imagery were similar to those underlying haptic shape perception of familiar, but not unfamiliar, objects. We conclude that visual object imagery is more closely linked to haptic shape perception when objects are familiar, compared to when they are unfamiliar.

DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.10.081
PubMed: 19896540

Links to Exploration step

pubmed:19896540

Le document en format XML

<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Object familiarity modulates the relationship between visual object imagery and haptic shape perception.</title>
<author><name sortKey="Lacey, Simon" sort="Lacey, Simon" uniqKey="Lacey S" first="Simon" last="Lacey">Simon Lacey</name>
<affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Neurology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.</nlm:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Flueckiger, Peter" sort="Flueckiger, Peter" uniqKey="Flueckiger P" first="Peter" last="Flueckiger">Peter Flueckiger</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Stilla, Randall" sort="Stilla, Randall" uniqKey="Stilla R" first="Randall" last="Stilla">Randall Stilla</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Lava, Michael" sort="Lava, Michael" uniqKey="Lava M" first="Michael" last="Lava">Michael Lava</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Sathian, K" sort="Sathian, K" uniqKey="Sathian K" first="K" last="Sathian">K. Sathian</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno>
<date when="2010">2010</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.10.081</idno>
<idno type="RBID">pubmed:19896540</idno>
<idno type="pmid">19896540</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">001196</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Object familiarity modulates the relationship between visual object imagery and haptic shape perception.</title>
<author><name sortKey="Lacey, Simon" sort="Lacey, Simon" uniqKey="Lacey S" first="Simon" last="Lacey">Simon Lacey</name>
<affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Neurology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.</nlm:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Flueckiger, Peter" sort="Flueckiger, Peter" uniqKey="Flueckiger P" first="Peter" last="Flueckiger">Peter Flueckiger</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Stilla, Randall" sort="Stilla, Randall" uniqKey="Stilla R" first="Randall" last="Stilla">Randall Stilla</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Lava, Michael" sort="Lava, Michael" uniqKey="Lava M" first="Michael" last="Lava">Michael Lava</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Sathian, K" sort="Sathian, K" uniqKey="Sathian K" first="K" last="Sathian">K. Sathian</name>
</author>
</analytic>
<series><title level="j">NeuroImage</title>
<idno type="eISSN">1095-9572</idno>
<imprint><date when="2010" type="published">2010</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Adolescent</term>
<term>Adult</term>
<term>Brain Mapping</term>
<term>Female</term>
<term>Form Perception (physiology)</term>
<term>Humans</term>
<term>Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted</term>
<term>Imagination (physiology)</term>
<term>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</term>
<term>Male</term>
<term>Recognition (Psychology) (physiology)</term>
<term>Somatosensory Cortex (physiology)</term>
<term>Young Adult</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="physiology" xml:lang="en"><term>Form Perception</term>
<term>Imagination</term>
<term>Recognition (Psychology)</term>
<term>Somatosensory Cortex</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Adolescent</term>
<term>Adult</term>
<term>Brain Mapping</term>
<term>Female</term>
<term>Humans</term>
<term>Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted</term>
<term>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</term>
<term>Male</term>
<term>Young Adult</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Although visual cortical engagement in haptic shape perception is well established, its relationship with visual imagery remains controversial. We addressed this using functional magnetic resonance imaging during separate visual object imagery and haptic shape perception tasks. Two experiments were conducted. In the first experiment, the haptic shape task employed unfamiliar, meaningless objects, whereas familiar objects were used in the second experiment. The activations evoked by visual object imagery overlapped more extensively, and their magnitudes were more correlated, with those evoked during haptic shape perception of familiar, compared to unfamiliar, objects. In the companion paper (Deshpande et al., this issue), we used task-specific functional and effective connectivity analyses to provide convergent evidence: these analyses showed that the neural networks underlying visual imagery were similar to those underlying haptic shape perception of familiar, but not unfamiliar, objects. We conclude that visual object imagery is more closely linked to haptic shape perception when objects are familiar, compared to when they are unfamiliar.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<pubmed><MedlineCitation Owner="NLM" Status="MEDLINE"><PMID Version="1">19896540</PMID>
<DateCreated><Year>2010</Year>
<Month>02</Month>
<Day>03</Day>
</DateCreated>
<DateCompleted><Year>2010</Year>
<Month>04</Month>
<Day>13</Day>
</DateCompleted>
<DateRevised><Year>2014</Year>
<Month>12</Month>
<Day>04</Day>
</DateRevised>
<Article PubModel="Print-Electronic"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1095-9572</ISSN>
<JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><Volume>49</Volume>
<Issue>3</Issue>
<PubDate><Year>2010</Year>
<Month>Feb</Month>
<Day>1</Day>
</PubDate>
</JournalIssue>
<Title>NeuroImage</Title>
<ISOAbbreviation>Neuroimage</ISOAbbreviation>
</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Object familiarity modulates the relationship between visual object imagery and haptic shape perception.</ArticleTitle>
<Pagination><MedlinePgn>1977-90</MedlinePgn>
</Pagination>
<ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.10.081</ELocationID>
<Abstract><AbstractText>Although visual cortical engagement in haptic shape perception is well established, its relationship with visual imagery remains controversial. We addressed this using functional magnetic resonance imaging during separate visual object imagery and haptic shape perception tasks. Two experiments were conducted. In the first experiment, the haptic shape task employed unfamiliar, meaningless objects, whereas familiar objects were used in the second experiment. The activations evoked by visual object imagery overlapped more extensively, and their magnitudes were more correlated, with those evoked during haptic shape perception of familiar, compared to unfamiliar, objects. In the companion paper (Deshpande et al., this issue), we used task-specific functional and effective connectivity analyses to provide convergent evidence: these analyses showed that the neural networks underlying visual imagery were similar to those underlying haptic shape perception of familiar, but not unfamiliar, objects. We conclude that visual object imagery is more closely linked to haptic shape perception when objects are familiar, compared to when they are unfamiliar.</AbstractText>
<CopyrightInformation>Copyright (c) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</CopyrightInformation>
</Abstract>
<AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Lacey</LastName>
<ForeName>Simon</ForeName>
<Initials>S</Initials>
<AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Neurology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.</Affiliation>
</AffiliationInfo>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Flueckiger</LastName>
<ForeName>Peter</ForeName>
<Initials>P</Initials>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Stilla</LastName>
<ForeName>Randall</ForeName>
<Initials>R</Initials>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Lava</LastName>
<ForeName>Michael</ForeName>
<Initials>M</Initials>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Sathian</LastName>
<ForeName>K</ForeName>
<Initials>K</Initials>
</Author>
</AuthorList>
<Language>eng</Language>
<GrantList CompleteYN="Y"><Grant><GrantID>K24 EY017332</GrantID>
<Acronym>EY</Acronym>
<Agency>NEI NIH HHS</Agency>
<Country>United States</Country>
</Grant>
<Grant><GrantID>K24 EY017332-05</GrantID>
<Acronym>EY</Acronym>
<Agency>NEI NIH HHS</Agency>
<Country>United States</Country>
</Grant>
<Grant><GrantID>K24 EY17332</GrantID>
<Acronym>EY</Acronym>
<Agency>NEI NIH HHS</Agency>
<Country>United States</Country>
</Grant>
<Grant><GrantID>R01 EB002009</GrantID>
<Acronym>EB</Acronym>
<Agency>NIBIB NIH HHS</Agency>
<Country>United States</Country>
</Grant>
<Grant><GrantID>R01 EB002009</GrantID>
<Acronym>EB</Acronym>
<Agency>NIBIB NIH HHS</Agency>
<Country>United States</Country>
</Grant>
<Grant><GrantID>R01 EB002009-09</GrantID>
<Acronym>EB</Acronym>
<Agency>NIBIB NIH HHS</Agency>
<Country>United States</Country>
</Grant>
<Grant><GrantID>R01 EY012440</GrantID>
<Acronym>EY</Acronym>
<Agency>NEI NIH HHS</Agency>
<Country>United States</Country>
</Grant>
<Grant><GrantID>R01 EY012440-09</GrantID>
<Acronym>EY</Acronym>
<Agency>NEI NIH HHS</Agency>
<Country>United States</Country>
</Grant>
<Grant><GrantID>R01 EY12440</GrantID>
<Acronym>EY</Acronym>
<Agency>NEI NIH HHS</Agency>
<Country>United States</Country>
</Grant>
</GrantList>
<PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType>
<PublicationType UI="D052061">Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural</PublicationType>
<PublicationType UI="D013486">Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.</PublicationType>
</PublicationTypeList>
<ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2009</Year>
<Month>11</Month>
<Day>04</Day>
</ArticleDate>
</Article>
<MedlineJournalInfo><Country>United States</Country>
<MedlineTA>Neuroimage</MedlineTA>
<NlmUniqueID>9215515</NlmUniqueID>
<ISSNLinking>1053-8119</ISSNLinking>
</MedlineJournalInfo>
<CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset>
<CommentsCorrectionsList><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Can J Exp Psychol. 2007 Sep;61(3):254-64</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">17974319</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>PLoS One. 2007;2(9):e890</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">17849019</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Hum Brain Mapp. 2008 Apr;29(4):411-21</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">17497631</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Hum Brain Mapp. 2008 Oct;29(10):1123-38</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">17924535</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Brain Topogr. 2009 May;21(3-4):269-74</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">19330441</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Neuroimage. 2010 Feb 1;49(3):1991-2000</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">19732841</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2010;28(2):271-81</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">20404414</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Neuropsychologia. 1992 Jul;30(7):645-55</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">1528412</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Brain Cogn. 1994 May;25(1):67-78</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">8043267</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Neuropsychologia. 1995 Feb;33(2):181-201</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">7746363</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Magn Reson Med. 1995 May;33(5):636-47</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">7596267</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 Aug 29;92(18):8135-9</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">7667258</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Percept Psychophys. 1995 Nov;57(8):1111-23</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">8539087</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Neuropsychologia. 1995 Nov;33(11):1485-510</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">8584182</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Neurophysiol. 1997 May;77(5):2268-92</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">9163357</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Neuropsychologia. 2000;38(7):985-94</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">10775709</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2001 Jan;27(1):139-56</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">11204094</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Neuron. 2000 Dec;28(3):979-90</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">11163281</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Nat Neurosci. 2001 Mar;4(3):324-30</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">11224551</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Cereb Cortex. 2001 Feb;11(2):114-21</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">11208666</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Neuroimage. 2001 Apr;13(4):577-88</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">11305887</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Neuron. 2001 Aug 2;31(2):317-28</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">11502261</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Neuroimage. 2001 Jul;14(1 Pt 1):129-39</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">11525322</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Neuroimage. 2002 Apr;15(4):870-8</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">11906227</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Neuropsychologia. 2002;40(10):1706-14</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">11992658</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Cereb Cortex. 2002 Nov;12(11):1202-12</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">12379608</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2003 Jun;17(1):14-25</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">12763188</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Nat Neurosci. 2003 Jul;6(7):758-66</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">12808458</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Int J Psychophysiol. 2003 Oct;50(1-2):41-9</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">14511835</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Eur J Neurosci. 2004 Feb;19(4):1067-72</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">15009154</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Apr 13;101(15):5658-63</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">15064396</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Annu Rev Neurosci. 2004;27:169-92</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">15217330</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Science. 2004 Aug 6;305(5685):875-7</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">15232072</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2004 Jun;4(2):251-9</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">15460931</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Cereb Cortex. 2004 Nov;14(11):1256-65</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">15192010</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Exp Psychol. 1968 Jan;76(1):Suppl:1-25</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">5672258</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Neuropsychologia. 1974 Jan;12(1):43-7</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">4821188</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Percept Psychophys. 1985 Apr;37(4):299-302</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">4034346</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Cogn Psychol. 1987 Jul;19(3):342-68</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">3608405</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Cogn Psychol. 1988 Jul;20(3):319-43</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">3208506</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Cogn Psychol. 1990 Oct;22(4):421-59</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">2253454</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1998 Aug;24(4):1162-87</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">9706712</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Neuroimage. 2004 Dec;23(4):1494-506</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">15589113</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Behav Brain Sci. 2004 Jun;27(3):377-96; discussion 396-442</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">15736871</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2005 May;23(2-3):235-46</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">15820631</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Anat. 2005 Jul;207(1):3-17</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">16011542</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Cereb Cortex. 2005 Oct;15(10):1570-83</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">15689519</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Exp Brain Res. 2005 Oct;166(3-4):559-71</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">16028028</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Mem Cognit. 2005 Jun;33(4):710-26</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">16248335</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2005 Sep;31(5):1043-68</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">16248750</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Neuron. 2005 Dec 8;48(5):859-72</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">16337922</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Jan 10;103(2):449-54</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">16407167</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2006 Feb;59(2):361-76</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">16618639</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Brain Res. 2007 Jan 12;1128(1):130-8</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">17141747</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Neurosci. 2007 May 16;27(20):5326-37</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">17507555</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Nat Neurosci. 2007 Jun;10(6):687-9</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">17515898</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Trends Cogn Sci. 2007 Jul;11(7):280-9</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">17548232</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Cereb Cortex. 2007 Aug;17(8):1800-11</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">17032710</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Perception. 2007;36(10):1513-21</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">18265834</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
</CommentsCorrectionsList>
<MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D000293">Adolescent</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D000328">Adult</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="D001931">Brain Mapping</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D005260">Female</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D005556">Form Perception</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="Q000502">physiology</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D006801">Humans</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D007090">Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D007092">Imagination</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="Q000502">physiology</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D008279">Magnetic Resonance Imaging</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D008297">Male</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D021641">Recognition (Psychology)</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="Q000502">physiology</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D013003">Somatosensory Cortex</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="Q000502">physiology</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D055815">Young Adult</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
</MeshHeadingList>
<OtherID Source="NLM">NIHMS160656</OtherID>
<OtherID Source="NLM">PMC3073774</OtherID>
</MedlineCitation>
<PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="received"><Year>2009</Year>
<Month>6</Month>
<Day>16</Day>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="revised"><Year>2009</Year>
<Month>10</Month>
<Day>23</Day>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="accepted"><Year>2009</Year>
<Month>10</Month>
<Day>29</Day>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="aheadofprint"><Year>2009</Year>
<Month>11</Month>
<Day>4</Day>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2009</Year>
<Month>11</Month>
<Day>10</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2009</Year>
<Month>11</Month>
<Day>10</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2010</Year>
<Month>4</Month>
<Day>14</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
</History>
<PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pii">S1053-8119(09)01153-7</ArticleId>
<ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.10.081</ArticleId>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">19896540</ArticleId>
<ArticleId IdType="pmc">PMC3073774</ArticleId>
<ArticleId IdType="mid">NIHMS160656</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</PubmedData>
</pubmed>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/HapticV1/Data/PubMed/Corpus

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001196 | SxmlIndent | more

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 001196 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Ticri/CIDE
   |area=    HapticV1
   |flux=    PubMed
   |étape=   Corpus
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     pubmed:19896540
   |texte=   Object familiarity modulates the relationship between visual object imagery and haptic shape perception.
}}

Pour générer des pages wiki

HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/RBID.i   -Sk "pubmed:19896540" \
       | HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd   \
       | NlmPubMed2Wicri -a HapticV1

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23.
Data generation: Mon Jun 13 01:09:46 2016. Site generation: Wed Mar 6 09:54:07 2024

	Serveur d'exploration sur les dispositifs haptiques
	Attention, ce site est en cours de développement ! Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts. Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Serveur d'exploration sur les dispositifs haptiques

Object familiarity modulates the relationship between visual object imagery and haptic shape perception.

Object familiarity modulates the relationship between visual object imagery and haptic shape perception.

Source :

English descriptors

Abstract

Links to Exploration step

Le document en format XML

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

Pour générer des pages wiki