Effects of visual-haptic asynchronies and loading-unloading movements on compliance perception.
Identifieur interne : 001133 ( PubMed/Corpus ); précédent : 001132; suivant : 001134Effects of visual-haptic asynchronies and loading-unloading movements on compliance perception.
Auteurs : M. Di Luca ; B. Knörlein ; M O Ernst ; M. HardersSource :
- Brain research bulletin [ 1873-2747 ] ; 2011.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- MESH :
Abstract
Spring compliance is perceived by combining the sensed force exerted by the spring with the displacement caused by the action (sensed through vision and proprioception). We investigated the effect of delay of visual and force information with respect to proprioception to understand how visual-haptic perception of compliance is achieved. First, we confirm an earlier result that force delay increases perceived compliance. Furthermore, we find that perceived compliance decreases with a delay in the visual information. These effects of delay on perceived compliance would not be present if the perceptual system would utilize all force-displacement information available during the interaction. Both delays generate a bias in compliance which is opposite in the loading and unloading phases of the interaction. To explain these findings, we propose that information during the loading phase of the spring displacement is weighted more than information obtained during unloading. We confirm this hypothesis by showing that sensitivity to compliance during loading movements is much higher than during unloading movements. Moreover, we show that visual and proprioceptive information about the hand position are used for compliance perception depending on the sensitivity to compliance. Finally, by analyzing participants' movements we show that these two factors (loading/unloading and reliability) account for the change in perceived compliance due to visual and force delays.
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2010.02.009
PubMed: 20193747
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:20193747Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Effects of visual-haptic asynchronies and loading-unloading movements on compliance perception.</title><author><name sortKey="Di Luca, M" sort="Di Luca, M" uniqKey="Di Luca M" first="M" last="Di Luca">M. Di Luca</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Spemannstrasse 38, 72076 Tübingen, Germany. max@tuebingen.mpg.de</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Knorlein, B" sort="Knorlein, B" uniqKey="Knorlein B" first="B" last="Knörlein">B. Knörlein</name></author><author><name sortKey="Ernst, M O" sort="Ernst, M O" uniqKey="Ernst M" first="M O" last="Ernst">M O Ernst</name></author><author><name sortKey="Harders, M" sort="Harders, M" uniqKey="Harders M" first="M" last="Harders">M. Harders</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2011">2011</date><idno type="doi">10.1016/j.brainresbull.2010.02.009</idno><idno type="RBID">pubmed:20193747</idno><idno type="pmid">20193747</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">001133</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Effects of visual-haptic asynchronies and loading-unloading movements on compliance perception.</title><author><name sortKey="Di Luca, M" sort="Di Luca, M" uniqKey="Di Luca M" first="M" last="Di Luca">M. Di Luca</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Spemannstrasse 38, 72076 Tübingen, Germany. max@tuebingen.mpg.de</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Knorlein, B" sort="Knorlein, B" uniqKey="Knorlein B" first="B" last="Knörlein">B. Knörlein</name></author><author><name sortKey="Ernst, M O" sort="Ernst, M O" uniqKey="Ernst M" first="M O" last="Ernst">M O Ernst</name></author><author><name sortKey="Harders, M" sort="Harders, M" uniqKey="Harders M" first="M" last="Harders">M. Harders</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Brain research bulletin</title><idno type="eISSN">1873-2747</idno><imprint><date when="2011" type="published">2011</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Adult</term><term>Compliance</term><term>Female</term><term>Hand (physiology)</term><term>Humans</term><term>Male</term><term>Models, Theoretical</term><term>Movement</term><term>Proprioception (physiology)</term><term>Psychomotor Performance (physiology)</term><term>Stress, Mechanical</term><term>User-Computer Interface</term><term>Visual Perception (physiology)</term><term>Young Adult</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="physiology" xml:lang="en"><term>Hand</term><term>Proprioception</term><term>Psychomotor Performance</term><term>Visual Perception</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Adult</term><term>Compliance</term><term>Female</term><term>Humans</term><term>Male</term><term>Models, Theoretical</term><term>Movement</term><term>Stress, Mechanical</term><term>User-Computer Interface</term><term>Young Adult</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Spring compliance is perceived by combining the sensed force exerted by the spring with the displacement caused by the action (sensed through vision and proprioception). We investigated the effect of delay of visual and force information with respect to proprioception to understand how visual-haptic perception of compliance is achieved. First, we confirm an earlier result that force delay increases perceived compliance. Furthermore, we find that perceived compliance decreases with a delay in the visual information. These effects of delay on perceived compliance would not be present if the perceptual system would utilize all force-displacement information available during the interaction. Both delays generate a bias in compliance which is opposite in the loading and unloading phases of the interaction. To explain these findings, we propose that information during the loading phase of the spring displacement is weighted more than information obtained during unloading. We confirm this hypothesis by showing that sensitivity to compliance during loading movements is much higher than during unloading movements. Moreover, we show that visual and proprioceptive information about the hand position are used for compliance perception depending on the sensitivity to compliance. Finally, by analyzing participants' movements we show that these two factors (loading/unloading and reliability) account for the change in perceived compliance due to visual and force delays.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Owner="NLM" Status="MEDLINE"><PMID Version="1">20193747</PMID><DateCreated><Year>2011</Year><Month>06</Month><Day>14</Day></DateCreated><DateCompleted><Year>2011</Year><Month>09</Month><Day>30</Day></DateCompleted><Article PubModel="Print-Electronic"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1873-2747</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><Volume>85</Volume><Issue>5</Issue><PubDate><Year>2011</Year><Month>Jun</Month><Day>30</Day></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Brain research bulletin</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Brain Res. Bull.</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Effects of visual-haptic asynchronies and loading-unloading movements on compliance perception.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>245-59</MedlinePgn></Pagination><ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1016/j.brainresbull.2010.02.009</ELocationID><Abstract><AbstractText>Spring compliance is perceived by combining the sensed force exerted by the spring with the displacement caused by the action (sensed through vision and proprioception). We investigated the effect of delay of visual and force information with respect to proprioception to understand how visual-haptic perception of compliance is achieved. First, we confirm an earlier result that force delay increases perceived compliance. Furthermore, we find that perceived compliance decreases with a delay in the visual information. These effects of delay on perceived compliance would not be present if the perceptual system would utilize all force-displacement information available during the interaction. Both delays generate a bias in compliance which is opposite in the loading and unloading phases of the interaction. To explain these findings, we propose that information during the loading phase of the spring displacement is weighted more than information obtained during unloading. We confirm this hypothesis by showing that sensitivity to compliance during loading movements is much higher than during unloading movements. Moreover, we show that visual and proprioceptive information about the hand position are used for compliance perception depending on the sensitivity to compliance. Finally, by analyzing participants' movements we show that these two factors (loading/unloading and reliability) account for the change in perceived compliance due to visual and force delays.</AbstractText><CopyrightInformation>Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</CopyrightInformation></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Di Luca</LastName><ForeName>M</ForeName><Initials>M</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Spemannstrasse 38, 72076 Tübingen, Germany. max@tuebingen.mpg.de</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Knörlein</LastName><ForeName>B</ForeName><Initials>B</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Ernst</LastName><ForeName>M O</ForeName><Initials>MO</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Harders</LastName><ForeName>M</ForeName><Initials>M</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D013485">Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList><ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2010</Year><Month>03</Month><Day>01</Day></ArticleDate></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>United States</Country><MedlineTA>Brain Res Bull</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>7605818</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0361-9230</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D000328">Adult</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D003187">Compliance</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D005260">Female</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D006225">Hand</DescriptorName><QualifierName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="Q000502">physiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D006801">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D008297">Male</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D008962">Models, Theoretical</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="D009068">Movement</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D011434">Proprioception</DescriptorName><QualifierName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="Q000502">physiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D011597">Psychomotor Performance</DescriptorName><QualifierName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="Q000502">physiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D013314">Stress, Mechanical</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="D014584">User-Computer Interface</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D014796">Visual Perception</DescriptorName><QualifierName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="Q000502">physiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D055815">Young Adult</DescriptorName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="received"><Year>2009</Year><Month>6</Month><Day>27</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="accepted"><Year>2010</Year><Month>2</Month><Day>19</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="aheadofprint"><Year>2010</Year><Month>3</Month><Day>1</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2010</Year><Month>3</Month><Day>3</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2010</Year><Month>3</Month><Day>3</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2011</Year><Month>10</Month><Day>1</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pii">S0361-9230(10)00053-5</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1016/j.brainresbull.2010.02.009</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">20193747</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/HapticV1/Data/PubMed/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001133 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 001133 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Ticri/CIDE
|area= HapticV1
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:20193747
|texte= Effects of visual-haptic asynchronies and loading-unloading movements on compliance perception.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:20193747" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a HapticV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23. |  |