Visual and haptic influence on perception of stimulus size.
Identifieur interne : 001121 ( PubMed/Corpus ); précédent : 001120; suivant : 001122Visual and haptic influence on perception of stimulus size.
Auteurs : George H. Van Doorn ; Barry L. Richardson ; Dianne B. Wuillemin ; Mark A. SymmonsSource :
- Attention, perception & psychophysics [ 1943-393X ] ; 2010.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- MESH :
- physiology : Discrimination (Psychology), Sensory Thresholds.
- Adolescent, Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Photic Stimulation, Touch, Visual Perception, Young Adult.
Abstract
In six experiments, subjects judged the sizes of squares that were presented visually and/or haptically, in unimodal or bimodal conditions. We were interested in which mode most affected size judgments in the bimodal condition when the squares presented to each mode actually differed in size. Three factors varied: whether haptic exploration was passive or active, whether the choice set from which the subjects selected their responses was visual or haptic, and whether cutaneous information was provided in addition to kinesthetic information. To match the task for each mode, visual presentations consisted of a cursor that moved along a square pathway to correspond to the haptic experience of successive segments revealed during exploration. We found that the visual influence on size judgments was greater than the influence of haptics when the haptic experience involved only kinesthesis, passive movement, and a visual choice set. However, when cutaneous input was added to kinesthetic information, size judgments were most influenced by the haptic mode. The results support hypotheses of sensory integration, rather than capture of one sense by the other.
DOI: 10.3758/APP.72.3.813
PubMed: 20348585
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:20348585Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Visual and haptic influence on perception of stimulus size.</title><author><name sortKey="Van Doorn, George H" sort="Van Doorn, George H" uniqKey="Van Doorn G" first="George H" last="Van Doorn">George H. Van Doorn</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Monash University, Churchill, Victoria, Australia. george.vandoorn@arts.monash.edu.au</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Richardson, Barry L" sort="Richardson, Barry L" uniqKey="Richardson B" first="Barry L" last="Richardson">Barry L. Richardson</name></author><author><name sortKey="Wuillemin, Dianne B" sort="Wuillemin, Dianne B" uniqKey="Wuillemin D" first="Dianne B" last="Wuillemin">Dianne B. Wuillemin</name></author><author><name sortKey="Symmons, Mark A" sort="Symmons, Mark A" uniqKey="Symmons M" first="Mark A" last="Symmons">Mark A. Symmons</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2010">2010</date><idno type="doi">10.3758/APP.72.3.813</idno><idno type="RBID">pubmed:20348585</idno><idno type="pmid">20348585</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">001121</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Visual and haptic influence on perception of stimulus size.</title><author><name sortKey="Van Doorn, George H" sort="Van Doorn, George H" uniqKey="Van Doorn G" first="George H" last="Van Doorn">George H. Van Doorn</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Monash University, Churchill, Victoria, Australia. george.vandoorn@arts.monash.edu.au</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Richardson, Barry L" sort="Richardson, Barry L" uniqKey="Richardson B" first="Barry L" last="Richardson">Barry L. Richardson</name></author><author><name sortKey="Wuillemin, Dianne B" sort="Wuillemin, Dianne B" uniqKey="Wuillemin D" first="Dianne B" last="Wuillemin">Dianne B. Wuillemin</name></author><author><name sortKey="Symmons, Mark A" sort="Symmons, Mark A" uniqKey="Symmons M" first="Mark A" last="Symmons">Mark A. Symmons</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Attention, perception & psychophysics</title><idno type="eISSN">1943-393X</idno><imprint><date when="2010" type="published">2010</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Adolescent</term><term>Adult</term><term>Discrimination (Psychology) (physiology)</term><term>Female</term><term>Humans</term><term>Male</term><term>Photic Stimulation</term><term>Sensory Thresholds (physiology)</term><term>Touch</term><term>Visual Perception</term><term>Young Adult</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="physiology" xml:lang="en"><term>Discrimination (Psychology)</term><term>Sensory Thresholds</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Adolescent</term><term>Adult</term><term>Female</term><term>Humans</term><term>Male</term><term>Photic Stimulation</term><term>Touch</term><term>Visual Perception</term><term>Young Adult</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">In six experiments, subjects judged the sizes of squares that were presented visually and/or haptically, in unimodal or bimodal conditions. We were interested in which mode most affected size judgments in the bimodal condition when the squares presented to each mode actually differed in size. Three factors varied: whether haptic exploration was passive or active, whether the choice set from which the subjects selected their responses was visual or haptic, and whether cutaneous information was provided in addition to kinesthetic information. To match the task for each mode, visual presentations consisted of a cursor that moved along a square pathway to correspond to the haptic experience of successive segments revealed during exploration. We found that the visual influence on size judgments was greater than the influence of haptics when the haptic experience involved only kinesthesis, passive movement, and a visual choice set. However, when cutaneous input was added to kinesthetic information, size judgments were most influenced by the haptic mode. The results support hypotheses of sensory integration, rather than capture of one sense by the other.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Owner="NLM" Status="MEDLINE"><PMID Version="1">20348585</PMID><DateCreated><Year>2010</Year><Month>03</Month><Day>29</Day></DateCreated><DateCompleted><Year>2010</Year><Month>08</Month><Day>09</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2011</Year><Month>02</Month><Day>24</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1943-393X</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><Volume>72</Volume><Issue>3</Issue><PubDate><Year>2010</Year><Month>Apr</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Attention, perception & psychophysics</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Atten Percept Psychophys</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Visual and haptic influence on perception of stimulus size.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>813-22</MedlinePgn></Pagination><ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.3758/APP.72.3.813</ELocationID><Abstract><AbstractText>In six experiments, subjects judged the sizes of squares that were presented visually and/or haptically, in unimodal or bimodal conditions. We were interested in which mode most affected size judgments in the bimodal condition when the squares presented to each mode actually differed in size. Three factors varied: whether haptic exploration was passive or active, whether the choice set from which the subjects selected their responses was visual or haptic, and whether cutaneous information was provided in addition to kinesthetic information. To match the task for each mode, visual presentations consisted of a cursor that moved along a square pathway to correspond to the haptic experience of successive segments revealed during exploration. We found that the visual influence on size judgments was greater than the influence of haptics when the haptic experience involved only kinesthesis, passive movement, and a visual choice set. However, when cutaneous input was added to kinesthetic information, size judgments were most influenced by the haptic mode. The results support hypotheses of sensory integration, rather than capture of one sense by the other.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Van Doorn</LastName><ForeName>George H</ForeName><Initials>GH</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Monash University, Churchill, Victoria, Australia. george.vandoorn@arts.monash.edu.au</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Richardson</LastName><ForeName>Barry L</ForeName><Initials>BL</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Wuillemin</LastName><ForeName>Dianne B</ForeName><Initials>DB</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Symmons</LastName><ForeName>Mark A</ForeName><Initials>MA</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>United States</Country><MedlineTA>Atten Percept Psychophys</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>101495384</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>1943-3921</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D000293">Adolescent</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D000328">Adult</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D004192">Discrimination (Psychology)</DescriptorName><QualifierName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="Q000502">physiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D005260">Female</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D006801">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D008297">Male</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="D010775">Photic Stimulation</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D012684">Sensory Thresholds</DescriptorName><QualifierName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="Q000502">physiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="D014110">Touch</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="D014796">Visual Perception</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D055815">Young Adult</DescriptorName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2010</Year><Month>3</Month><Day>30</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2010</Year><Month>3</Month><Day>30</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2010</Year><Month>8</Month><Day>10</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pii">72/3/813</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.3758/APP.72.3.813</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">20348585</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/HapticV1/Data/PubMed/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001121 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 001121 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Ticri/CIDE
|area= HapticV1
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:20348585
|texte= Visual and haptic influence on perception of stimulus size.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:20348585" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a HapticV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23. |  |