Object manipulation improvements due to single session training outweigh the differences among stimulation sites during vibrotactile feedback.
Identifieur interne : 000D94 ( PubMed/Corpus ); précédent : 000D93; suivant : 000D95Object manipulation improvements due to single session training outweigh the differences among stimulation sites during vibrotactile feedback.
Auteurs : Cara E. Stepp ; Yoky MatsuokaSource :
- IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society [ 1558-0210 ] ; 2011.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Adult, Arm (physiology), Cognition (physiology), Feedback, Physiological (physiology), Female, Fingers (physiology), Foot (physiology), Humans, Learning (physiology), Male, Motor Skills (physiology), Neck (physiology), Physical Stimulation, Psychomotor Performance (physiology), Robotics, Software, Touch (physiology), User-Computer Interface, Vibration, Young Adult.
- MESH :
- physiology : Arm, Cognition, Feedback, Physiological, Fingers, Foot, Learning, Motor Skills, Neck, Psychomotor Performance, Touch.
- Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Physical Stimulation, Robotics, Software, User-Computer Interface, Vibration, Young Adult.
Abstract
Most hand prostheses do not provide intentional haptic feedback about movement performance; thus users must rely almost completely on visual feedback. This paper focuses on understanding the effects of learning and different stimulation sites when vibrotactile stimulation is used as the intentional haptic feedback. Eighteen unimpaired individuals participated in this study with a robotic interface to manipulate a virtual object with visual and vibrotactile feedback at four body sites (finger, arm, neck, and foot) presented in a random order. All participants showed improvements in object manipulation performance with the addition of vibrotactile feedback. Specifically, performance showed a strong learning effect across time, with learning transferring across different sites of vibrotactile stimulation. The effects of learning over the experiment overshadowed the effects of different stimulation sites. The addition of a cognitive task slowed participants and increased the subjective difficulty. User preference ratings showed no difference in their preference among vibrotactile stimulation sites. These findings indicate that the stimulation site may not be as critical as ensuring adequate training with vibrotactile feedback during object manipulation. Future research to identify improvements in vibrotactile-based feedback parameters with amputees is warranted.
DOI: 10.1109/TNSRE.2011.2168981
PubMed: 21984521
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:21984521Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Object manipulation improvements due to single session training outweigh the differences among stimulation sites during vibrotactile feedback.</title><author><name sortKey="Stepp, Cara E" sort="Stepp, Cara E" uniqKey="Stepp C" first="Cara E" last="Stepp">Cara E. Stepp</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Boston University, MA 02215, USA. cstepp@bu.edu</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Matsuoka, Yoky" sort="Matsuoka, Yoky" uniqKey="Matsuoka Y" first="Yoky" last="Matsuoka">Yoky Matsuoka</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2011">2011</date><idno type="doi">10.1109/TNSRE.2011.2168981</idno><idno type="RBID">pubmed:21984521</idno><idno type="pmid">21984521</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">000D94</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Object manipulation improvements due to single session training outweigh the differences among stimulation sites during vibrotactile feedback.</title><author><name sortKey="Stepp, Cara E" sort="Stepp, Cara E" uniqKey="Stepp C" first="Cara E" last="Stepp">Cara E. Stepp</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Boston University, MA 02215, USA. cstepp@bu.edu</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Matsuoka, Yoky" sort="Matsuoka, Yoky" uniqKey="Matsuoka Y" first="Yoky" last="Matsuoka">Yoky Matsuoka</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society</title><idno type="eISSN">1558-0210</idno><imprint><date when="2011" type="published">2011</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Adult</term><term>Arm (physiology)</term><term>Cognition (physiology)</term><term>Feedback, Physiological (physiology)</term><term>Female</term><term>Fingers (physiology)</term><term>Foot (physiology)</term><term>Humans</term><term>Learning (physiology)</term><term>Male</term><term>Motor Skills (physiology)</term><term>Neck (physiology)</term><term>Physical Stimulation</term><term>Psychomotor Performance (physiology)</term><term>Robotics</term><term>Software</term><term>Touch (physiology)</term><term>User-Computer Interface</term><term>Vibration</term><term>Young Adult</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="physiology" xml:lang="en"><term>Arm</term><term>Cognition</term><term>Feedback, Physiological</term><term>Fingers</term><term>Foot</term><term>Learning</term><term>Motor Skills</term><term>Neck</term><term>Psychomotor Performance</term><term>Touch</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Adult</term><term>Female</term><term>Humans</term><term>Male</term><term>Physical Stimulation</term><term>Robotics</term><term>Software</term><term>User-Computer Interface</term><term>Vibration</term><term>Young Adult</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Most hand prostheses do not provide intentional haptic feedback about movement performance; thus users must rely almost completely on visual feedback. This paper focuses on understanding the effects of learning and different stimulation sites when vibrotactile stimulation is used as the intentional haptic feedback. Eighteen unimpaired individuals participated in this study with a robotic interface to manipulate a virtual object with visual and vibrotactile feedback at four body sites (finger, arm, neck, and foot) presented in a random order. All participants showed improvements in object manipulation performance with the addition of vibrotactile feedback. Specifically, performance showed a strong learning effect across time, with learning transferring across different sites of vibrotactile stimulation. The effects of learning over the experiment overshadowed the effects of different stimulation sites. The addition of a cognitive task slowed participants and increased the subjective difficulty. User preference ratings showed no difference in their preference among vibrotactile stimulation sites. These findings indicate that the stimulation site may not be as critical as ensuring adequate training with vibrotactile feedback during object manipulation. Future research to identify improvements in vibrotactile-based feedback parameters with amputees is warranted.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Owner="NLM" Status="MEDLINE"><PMID Version="1">21984521</PMID><DateCreated><Year>2011</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>14</Day></DateCreated><DateCompleted><Year>2012</Year><Month>04</Month><Day>10</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2015</Year><Month>01</Month><Day>29</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print-Electronic"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1558-0210</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><Volume>19</Volume><Issue>6</Issue><PubDate><Year>2011</Year><Month>Dec</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society</Title><ISOAbbreviation>IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Object manipulation improvements due to single session training outweigh the differences among stimulation sites during vibrotactile feedback.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>677-85</MedlinePgn></Pagination><ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1109/TNSRE.2011.2168981</ELocationID><Abstract><AbstractText>Most hand prostheses do not provide intentional haptic feedback about movement performance; thus users must rely almost completely on visual feedback. This paper focuses on understanding the effects of learning and different stimulation sites when vibrotactile stimulation is used as the intentional haptic feedback. Eighteen unimpaired individuals participated in this study with a robotic interface to manipulate a virtual object with visual and vibrotactile feedback at four body sites (finger, arm, neck, and foot) presented in a random order. All participants showed improvements in object manipulation performance with the addition of vibrotactile feedback. Specifically, performance showed a strong learning effect across time, with learning transferring across different sites of vibrotactile stimulation. The effects of learning over the experiment overshadowed the effects of different stimulation sites. The addition of a cognitive task slowed participants and increased the subjective difficulty. User preference ratings showed no difference in their preference among vibrotactile stimulation sites. These findings indicate that the stimulation site may not be as critical as ensuring adequate training with vibrotactile feedback during object manipulation. Future research to identify improvements in vibrotactile-based feedback parameters with amputees is warranted.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Stepp</LastName><ForeName>Cara E</ForeName><Initials>CE</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Boston University, MA 02215, USA. cstepp@bu.edu</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Matsuoka</LastName><ForeName>Yoky</ForeName><Initials>Y</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><GrantList CompleteYN="Y"><Grant><GrantID>5T32HD007424</GrantID><Acronym>HD</Acronym><Agency>NICHD NIH HHS</Agency><Country>United States</Country></Grant><Grant><GrantID>T32 HD007424</GrantID><Acronym>HD</Acronym><Agency>NICHD NIH HHS</Agency><Country>United States</Country></Grant></GrantList><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D052061">Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D013485">Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList><ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2011</Year><Month>10</Month><Day>06</Day></ArticleDate></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>United States</Country><MedlineTA>IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>101097023</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>1534-4320</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><CommentsCorrectionsList><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Technol Health Care. 1999;7(6):401-9</RefSource><PMID Version="1">10665673</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2010;2010:2089-92</RefSource><PMID Version="1">21095683</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>South Med J. 2002 Aug;95(8):875-83</RefSource><PMID Version="1">12190225</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Somatosens Mot Res. 2002;19(3):238-44</RefSource><PMID Version="1">12396581</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2003 Aug;58(8):680-6</RefSource><PMID Version="1">12902525</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Neurosci. 2003 Aug 6;23(18):6982-92</RefSource><PMID Version="1">12904459</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Lancet. 2003 Oct 4;362(9390):1123-4</RefSource><PMID Version="1">14550702</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 2004;38(2):106-11</RefSource><PMID Version="1">15202668</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Med Biol Eng. 1976 May;14(3):289-94</RefSource><PMID Version="1">940388</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Prosthet Orthot Int. 1977 Apr;1(1):21-4</RefSource><PMID Version="1">615983</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Med Biol Eng Comput. 1979 Jan;17(1):73-80</RefSource><PMID Version="1">312386</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Med Biol Eng Comput. 1980 Jan;18(1):65-9</RefSource><PMID Version="1">7382591</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Am J Occup Ther. 1981 Nov;35(11):722-7</RefSource><PMID Version="1">7325194</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Acta Neurol Scand. 1986 Sep;74(3):210-7</RefSource><PMID Version="1">3788484</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Acoust Soc Am. 1988 Nov;84(5):1680-94</RefSource><PMID Version="1">3209773</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1991 Jan;17(1):26-35</RefSource><PMID Version="1">2002305</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1991 Jan;38(1):1-16</RefSource><PMID Version="1">2026426</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Rehabil Res Dev. 1992 Winter;29(1):1-8</RefSource><PMID Version="1">1740774</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Behav Brain Res. 1996 Sep;79(1-2):137-43</RefSource><PMID Version="1">8883825</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng. 1997 Jun;5(2):140-7</RefSource><PMID Version="1">9184900</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Acta Physiol Scand. 1954 Jul 18;31(2-3):284-9</RefSource><PMID Version="1">13197098</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Exp Psychol. 1958 Apr;55(4):352-8</RefSource><PMID Version="1">13539317</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Brain. 2005 Mar;128(Pt 3):606-14</RefSource><PMID Version="1">15634727</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Nat Neurosci. 2005 Apr;8(4):490-7</RefSource><PMID Version="1">15793578</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Neurophysiol. 2005 Nov;94(5):3037-45</RefSource><PMID Version="1">16222071</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Neurophysiol. 2006 Mar;95(3):1442-50</RefSource><PMID Version="1">16319219</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Biol Cybern. 2006 Dec;95(6):629-44</RefSource><PMID Version="1">17149592</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Int J Med Robot. 2005 Jan;1(2):53-63</RefSource><PMID Version="1">17518379</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Mot Behav. 2007 May;39(3):179-93</RefSource><PMID Version="1">17550870</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Prosthet Orthot Int. 2007 Dec;31(4):362-70</RefSource><PMID Version="1">18050007</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Somatosens Mot Res. 2008;25(2):101-12</RefSource><PMID Version="1">18570014</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008 Nov;89(11):2057-65</RefSource><PMID Version="1">18996233</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Brain. 2008 Dec;131(Pt 12):3443-52</RefSource><PMID Version="1">19074189</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2007 Nov;2(6):346-57</RefSource><PMID Version="1">19263565</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Physiol. 2001 Jul 1;534(Pt 1):303-12</RefSource><PMID Version="1">11433011</PMID></CommentsCorrections></CommentsCorrectionsList><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D000328">Adult</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D001132">Arm</DescriptorName><QualifierName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="Q000502">physiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D003071">Cognition</DescriptorName><QualifierName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="Q000502">physiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D025461">Feedback, Physiological</DescriptorName><QualifierName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="Q000502">physiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D005260">Female</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D005385">Fingers</DescriptorName><QualifierName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="Q000502">physiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D005528">Foot</DescriptorName><QualifierName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="Q000502">physiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D006801">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D007858">Learning</DescriptorName><QualifierName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="Q000502">physiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D008297">Male</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D009048">Motor Skills</DescriptorName><QualifierName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="Q000502">physiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D009333">Neck</DescriptorName><QualifierName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="Q000502">physiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D010812">Physical Stimulation</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D011597">Psychomotor Performance</DescriptorName><QualifierName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="Q000502">physiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D012371">Robotics</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D012984">Software</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D014110">Touch</DescriptorName><QualifierName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="Q000502">physiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D014584">User-Computer Interface</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="D014732">Vibration</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D055815">Young Adult</DescriptorName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList><OtherID Source="NLM">NIHMS387741</OtherID><OtherID Source="NLM">PMC3401581</OtherID></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="aheadofprint"><Year>2011</Year><Month>10</Month><Day>06</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2011</Year><Month>10</Month><Day>11</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2011</Year><Month>10</Month><Day>11</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2012</Year><Month>4</Month><Day>11</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1109/TNSRE.2011.2168981</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">21984521</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pmc">PMC3401581</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="mid">NIHMS387741</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/HapticV1/Data/PubMed/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000D94 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000D94 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Ticri/CIDE
|area= HapticV1
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:21984521
|texte= Object manipulation improvements due to single session training outweigh the differences among stimulation sites during vibrotactile feedback.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:21984521" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a HapticV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23. |  |