Sensorimotor integration during stance: processing time of active or passive addition or withdrawal of visual or haptic information.
Identifieur interne : 000C11 ( PubMed/Corpus ); précédent : 000C10; suivant : 000C12Sensorimotor integration during stance: processing time of active or passive addition or withdrawal of visual or haptic information.
Auteurs : S. Sozzi ; M-C Do ; A. Monti ; M. SchieppatiSource :
- Neuroscience [ 1873-7544 ] ; 2012.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- MESH :
- physiology : Feedback, Sensory, Postural Balance, Reaction Time, Sensory Deprivation, Touch Perception.
- Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Time Factors, Young Adult.
Abstract
Vision (V) and touch (T) help stabilize our standing body, but little is known on the time-interval necessary for the brain to process the sensory inflow (or its removal) and exploit the new information (or counteract its removal). We have estimated the latency of onset and the time-course of the changes in postural control mode following addition or withdrawal of sensory information and the effect of anticipation thereof. Ten subjects stood in tandem position. They wore LCD goggles that allowed or removed vision, or lightly touched (eyes-closed) with the index finger (haptic stimulation) a pad that could be suddenly lowered (passive task). In different sessions, sensory shifts were deliberately produced by opening (or closing) the eyes or touching the pad (or lifting the finger) (active task). We recorded eyelid movement and finger force (<1N), sway of center of foot pressure (CoP), electromyogram (EMG) of soleus, tibialis and peroneus muscle, bilaterally, and of extensor indicis. The latency of the CoP and EMG changes following the shifts were statistically estimated on the averaged traces of 50 repetitions per condition. Muscle activity and sway adaptively decreased in amplitude on adding stabilizing visual or haptic information. The time-interval from the sensory shift to decrease in EMG and sway was ∼0.5-2 s under both conditions. It was shorter for tibialis than peroneus or soleus and shorter for visual than haptic shift. CoP followed the tibialis by ∼0.2 s. Slightly shorter intervals were observed following active sensory shifts. Latencies of EMG and postural changes were the shortest on removal of both haptic and visual information. Subsequently, the time taken to reach the steady-state was ∼1-3 s under both active and passive tasks. A startle response at ∼100 ms could precede EMG changes. Reaction-time contractions in response to sensory shifts appeared at ∼200 ms, earlier than the adaptive changes. Changes in postural behavior require a finite amount of time from visual or haptic shift, much longer than reflexes or rapid voluntary responses, suggesting a time-consuming central integration process. This process is longer on addition than removal of haptic information, indicating a heavier computational load. These findings should be taken into account when considering problems of sensorimotor integration in elderly subjects or patients and when designing simulation models of human balance.
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2012.03.044
PubMed: 22516013
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:22516013Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Sensorimotor integration during stance: processing time of active or passive addition or withdrawal of visual or haptic information.</title><author><name sortKey="Sozzi, S" sort="Sozzi, S" uniqKey="Sozzi S" first="S" last="Sozzi">S. Sozzi</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Centro Studi Attività Motorie (CSAM), Fondazione Salvatore Maugeri (IRCCS) and Dipartimento di Sanità Pubblica, Neuroscienze, Medicina Sperimentale e Forense, University of Pavia, Italy.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Do, M C" sort="Do, M C" uniqKey="Do M" first="M-C" last="Do">M-C Do</name></author><author><name sortKey="Monti, A" sort="Monti, A" uniqKey="Monti A" first="A" last="Monti">A. Monti</name></author><author><name sortKey="Schieppati, M" sort="Schieppati, M" uniqKey="Schieppati M" first="M" last="Schieppati">M. Schieppati</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2012">2012</date><idno type="doi">10.1016/j.neuroscience.2012.03.044</idno><idno type="RBID">pubmed:22516013</idno><idno type="pmid">22516013</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">000C11</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Sensorimotor integration during stance: processing time of active or passive addition or withdrawal of visual or haptic information.</title><author><name sortKey="Sozzi, S" sort="Sozzi, S" uniqKey="Sozzi S" first="S" last="Sozzi">S. Sozzi</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Centro Studi Attività Motorie (CSAM), Fondazione Salvatore Maugeri (IRCCS) and Dipartimento di Sanità Pubblica, Neuroscienze, Medicina Sperimentale e Forense, University of Pavia, Italy.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Do, M C" sort="Do, M C" uniqKey="Do M" first="M-C" last="Do">M-C Do</name></author><author><name sortKey="Monti, A" sort="Monti, A" uniqKey="Monti A" first="A" last="Monti">A. Monti</name></author><author><name sortKey="Schieppati, M" sort="Schieppati, M" uniqKey="Schieppati M" first="M" last="Schieppati">M. Schieppati</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Neuroscience</title><idno type="eISSN">1873-7544</idno><imprint><date when="2012" type="published">2012</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Adult</term><term>Feedback, Sensory (physiology)</term><term>Female</term><term>Humans</term><term>Male</term><term>Postural Balance (physiology)</term><term>Reaction Time (physiology)</term><term>Sensory Deprivation (physiology)</term><term>Time Factors</term><term>Touch Perception (physiology)</term><term>Young Adult</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="physiology" xml:lang="en"><term>Feedback, Sensory</term><term>Postural Balance</term><term>Reaction Time</term><term>Sensory Deprivation</term><term>Touch Perception</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Adult</term><term>Female</term><term>Humans</term><term>Male</term><term>Time Factors</term><term>Young Adult</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Vision (V) and touch (T) help stabilize our standing body, but little is known on the time-interval necessary for the brain to process the sensory inflow (or its removal) and exploit the new information (or counteract its removal). We have estimated the latency of onset and the time-course of the changes in postural control mode following addition or withdrawal of sensory information and the effect of anticipation thereof. Ten subjects stood in tandem position. They wore LCD goggles that allowed or removed vision, or lightly touched (eyes-closed) with the index finger (haptic stimulation) a pad that could be suddenly lowered (passive task). In different sessions, sensory shifts were deliberately produced by opening (or closing) the eyes or touching the pad (or lifting the finger) (active task). We recorded eyelid movement and finger force (<1N), sway of center of foot pressure (CoP), electromyogram (EMG) of soleus, tibialis and peroneus muscle, bilaterally, and of extensor indicis. The latency of the CoP and EMG changes following the shifts were statistically estimated on the averaged traces of 50 repetitions per condition. Muscle activity and sway adaptively decreased in amplitude on adding stabilizing visual or haptic information. The time-interval from the sensory shift to decrease in EMG and sway was ∼0.5-2 s under both conditions. It was shorter for tibialis than peroneus or soleus and shorter for visual than haptic shift. CoP followed the tibialis by ∼0.2 s. Slightly shorter intervals were observed following active sensory shifts. Latencies of EMG and postural changes were the shortest on removal of both haptic and visual information. Subsequently, the time taken to reach the steady-state was ∼1-3 s under both active and passive tasks. A startle response at ∼100 ms could precede EMG changes. Reaction-time contractions in response to sensory shifts appeared at ∼200 ms, earlier than the adaptive changes. Changes in postural behavior require a finite amount of time from visual or haptic shift, much longer than reflexes or rapid voluntary responses, suggesting a time-consuming central integration process. This process is longer on addition than removal of haptic information, indicating a heavier computational load. These findings should be taken into account when considering problems of sensorimotor integration in elderly subjects or patients and when designing simulation models of human balance.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Owner="NLM" Status="MEDLINE"><PMID Version="1">22516013</PMID><DateCreated><Year>2012</Year><Month>06</Month><Day>04</Day></DateCreated><DateCompleted><Year>2013</Year><Month>04</Month><Day>01</Day></DateCompleted><Article PubModel="Print-Electronic"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1873-7544</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><Volume>212</Volume><PubDate><Year>2012</Year><Month>Jun</Month><Day>14</Day></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Neuroscience</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Neuroscience</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Sensorimotor integration during stance: processing time of active or passive addition or withdrawal of visual or haptic information.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>59-76</MedlinePgn></Pagination><ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1016/j.neuroscience.2012.03.044</ELocationID><Abstract><AbstractText>Vision (V) and touch (T) help stabilize our standing body, but little is known on the time-interval necessary for the brain to process the sensory inflow (or its removal) and exploit the new information (or counteract its removal). We have estimated the latency of onset and the time-course of the changes in postural control mode following addition or withdrawal of sensory information and the effect of anticipation thereof. Ten subjects stood in tandem position. They wore LCD goggles that allowed or removed vision, or lightly touched (eyes-closed) with the index finger (haptic stimulation) a pad that could be suddenly lowered (passive task). In different sessions, sensory shifts were deliberately produced by opening (or closing) the eyes or touching the pad (or lifting the finger) (active task). We recorded eyelid movement and finger force (<1N), sway of center of foot pressure (CoP), electromyogram (EMG) of soleus, tibialis and peroneus muscle, bilaterally, and of extensor indicis. The latency of the CoP and EMG changes following the shifts were statistically estimated on the averaged traces of 50 repetitions per condition. Muscle activity and sway adaptively decreased in amplitude on adding stabilizing visual or haptic information. The time-interval from the sensory shift to decrease in EMG and sway was ∼0.5-2 s under both conditions. It was shorter for tibialis than peroneus or soleus and shorter for visual than haptic shift. CoP followed the tibialis by ∼0.2 s. Slightly shorter intervals were observed following active sensory shifts. Latencies of EMG and postural changes were the shortest on removal of both haptic and visual information. Subsequently, the time taken to reach the steady-state was ∼1-3 s under both active and passive tasks. A startle response at ∼100 ms could precede EMG changes. Reaction-time contractions in response to sensory shifts appeared at ∼200 ms, earlier than the adaptive changes. Changes in postural behavior require a finite amount of time from visual or haptic shift, much longer than reflexes or rapid voluntary responses, suggesting a time-consuming central integration process. This process is longer on addition than removal of haptic information, indicating a heavier computational load. These findings should be taken into account when considering problems of sensorimotor integration in elderly subjects or patients and when designing simulation models of human balance.</AbstractText><CopyrightInformation>Copyright © 2012 IBRO. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</CopyrightInformation></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Sozzi</LastName><ForeName>S</ForeName><Initials>S</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Centro Studi Attività Motorie (CSAM), Fondazione Salvatore Maugeri (IRCCS) and Dipartimento di Sanità Pubblica, Neuroscienze, Medicina Sperimentale e Forense, University of Pavia, Italy.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Do</LastName><ForeName>M-C</ForeName><Initials>MC</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Monti</LastName><ForeName>A</ForeName><Initials>A</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Schieppati</LastName><ForeName>M</ForeName><Initials>M</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D013485">Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList><ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2012</Year><Month>04</Month><Day>16</Day></ArticleDate></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>United States</Country><MedlineTA>Neuroscience</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>7605074</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0306-4522</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D000328">Adult</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D056228">Feedback, Sensory</DescriptorName><QualifierName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="Q000502">physiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D005260">Female</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D006801">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D008297">Male</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D004856">Postural Balance</DescriptorName><QualifierName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="Q000502">physiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D011930">Reaction Time</DescriptorName><QualifierName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="Q000502">physiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D012683">Sensory Deprivation</DescriptorName><QualifierName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="Q000502">physiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D013997">Time Factors</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D055698">Touch Perception</DescriptorName><QualifierName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="Q000502">physiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D055815">Young Adult</DescriptorName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="received"><Year>2012</Year><Month>2</Month><Day>27</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="revised"><Year>2012</Year><Month>3</Month><Day>30</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="accepted"><Year>2012</Year><Month>3</Month><Day>30</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="aheadofprint"><Year>2012</Year><Month>4</Month><Day>16</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2012</Year><Month>4</Month><Day>21</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2012</Year><Month>4</Month><Day>21</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2013</Year><Month>4</Month><Day>2</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pii">S0306-4522(12)00313-2</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1016/j.neuroscience.2012.03.044</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">22516013</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/HapticV1/Data/PubMed/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000C11 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000C11 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Ticri/CIDE
|area= HapticV1
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:22516013
|texte= Sensorimotor integration during stance: processing time of active or passive addition or withdrawal of visual or haptic information.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:22516013" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a HapticV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23. |  |