Reframing the action and perception dissociation in DF: haptics matters, but how?
Identifieur interne : 000B51 ( PubMed/Corpus ); précédent : 000B50; suivant : 000B52Reframing the action and perception dissociation in DF: haptics matters, but how?
Auteurs : Robert L. Whitwell ; Gavin BuckinghamSource :
- Journal of neurophysiology [ 1522-1598 ] ; 2013.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- MESH :
- physiopathology : Agnosia.
- Cues, Female, Hand Strength, Humans, Photic Stimulation, Posture, Psychomotor Performance, Size Perception, Touch, Touch Perception, Visual Perception.
Abstract
Goodale and Milner's (1992) "vision-for-action" and "vision-for-perception" account of the division of labor between the dorsal and ventral "streams" has come to dominate contemporary views of the functional roles of these two pathways. Nevertheless, some lines of evidence for the model remain controversial. Recently, Thomas Schenk reexamined visual form agnosic patient DF's spared anticipatory grip scaling to object size, one of the principal empirical pillars of the model. Based on this new evidence, Schenk rejects the original interpretation of DF's spared ability that was based on segregated processing of object size and argues that DF's spared grip scaling relies on haptic feedback to calibrate visual egocentric cues that relate the posture of the hand to the visible edges of the goal-object. However, a careful consideration of the tasks that Schenk employed reveals some problems with his claim. We suspect that the core issues of this controversy will require a closer examination of the role that cognition plays in the operation of the dorsal and ventral streams in healthy controls and in patient DF.
DOI: 10.1152/jn.00396.2012
PubMed: 22855778
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:22855778Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Reframing the action and perception dissociation in DF: haptics matters, but how?</title><author><name sortKey="Whitwell, Robert L" sort="Whitwell, Robert L" uniqKey="Whitwell R" first="Robert L" last="Whitwell">Robert L. Whitwell</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Graduate Program in Neuroscience, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada. rwhitwel@gmail.com</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Buckingham, Gavin" sort="Buckingham, Gavin" uniqKey="Buckingham G" first="Gavin" last="Buckingham">Gavin Buckingham</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2013">2013</date><idno type="doi">10.1152/jn.00396.2012</idno><idno type="RBID">pubmed:22855778</idno><idno type="pmid">22855778</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">000B51</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Reframing the action and perception dissociation in DF: haptics matters, but how?</title><author><name sortKey="Whitwell, Robert L" sort="Whitwell, Robert L" uniqKey="Whitwell R" first="Robert L" last="Whitwell">Robert L. Whitwell</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Graduate Program in Neuroscience, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada. rwhitwel@gmail.com</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Buckingham, Gavin" sort="Buckingham, Gavin" uniqKey="Buckingham G" first="Gavin" last="Buckingham">Gavin Buckingham</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Journal of neurophysiology</title><idno type="eISSN">1522-1598</idno><imprint><date when="2013" type="published">2013</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Agnosia (physiopathology)</term><term>Cues</term><term>Female</term><term>Hand Strength</term><term>Humans</term><term>Photic Stimulation</term><term>Posture</term><term>Psychomotor Performance</term><term>Size Perception</term><term>Touch</term><term>Touch Perception</term><term>Visual Perception</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="physiopathology" xml:lang="en"><term>Agnosia</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Cues</term><term>Female</term><term>Hand Strength</term><term>Humans</term><term>Photic Stimulation</term><term>Posture</term><term>Psychomotor Performance</term><term>Size Perception</term><term>Touch</term><term>Touch Perception</term><term>Visual Perception</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Goodale and Milner's (1992) "vision-for-action" and "vision-for-perception" account of the division of labor between the dorsal and ventral "streams" has come to dominate contemporary views of the functional roles of these two pathways. Nevertheless, some lines of evidence for the model remain controversial. Recently, Thomas Schenk reexamined visual form agnosic patient DF's spared anticipatory grip scaling to object size, one of the principal empirical pillars of the model. Based on this new evidence, Schenk rejects the original interpretation of DF's spared ability that was based on segregated processing of object size and argues that DF's spared grip scaling relies on haptic feedback to calibrate visual egocentric cues that relate the posture of the hand to the visible edges of the goal-object. However, a careful consideration of the tasks that Schenk employed reveals some problems with his claim. We suspect that the core issues of this controversy will require a closer examination of the role that cognition plays in the operation of the dorsal and ventral streams in healthy controls and in patient DF.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Owner="NLM" Status="MEDLINE"><PMID Version="1">22855778</PMID><DateCreated><Year>2013</Year><Month>02</Month><Day>04</Day></DateCreated><DateCompleted><Year>2013</Year><Month>07</Month><Day>16</Day></DateCompleted><Article PubModel="Print-Electronic"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1522-1598</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><Volume>109</Volume><Issue>3</Issue><PubDate><Year>2013</Year><Month>Feb</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Journal of neurophysiology</Title><ISOAbbreviation>J. Neurophysiol.</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Reframing the action and perception dissociation in DF: haptics matters, but how?</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>621-4</MedlinePgn></Pagination><ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1152/jn.00396.2012</ELocationID><Abstract><AbstractText>Goodale and Milner's (1992) "vision-for-action" and "vision-for-perception" account of the division of labor between the dorsal and ventral "streams" has come to dominate contemporary views of the functional roles of these two pathways. Nevertheless, some lines of evidence for the model remain controversial. Recently, Thomas Schenk reexamined visual form agnosic patient DF's spared anticipatory grip scaling to object size, one of the principal empirical pillars of the model. Based on this new evidence, Schenk rejects the original interpretation of DF's spared ability that was based on segregated processing of object size and argues that DF's spared grip scaling relies on haptic feedback to calibrate visual egocentric cues that relate the posture of the hand to the visible edges of the goal-object. However, a careful consideration of the tasks that Schenk employed reveals some problems with his claim. We suspect that the core issues of this controversy will require a closer examination of the role that cognition plays in the operation of the dorsal and ventral streams in healthy controls and in patient DF.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Whitwell</LastName><ForeName>Robert L</ForeName><Initials>RL</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Graduate Program in Neuroscience, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada. rwhitwel@gmail.com</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Buckingham</LastName><ForeName>Gavin</ForeName><Initials>G</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D002363">Case Reports</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D013485">Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList><ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2012</Year><Month>08</Month><Day>01</Day></ArticleDate></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>United States</Country><MedlineTA>J Neurophysiol</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>0375404</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0022-3077</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D000377">Agnosia</DescriptorName><QualifierName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="Q000503">physiopathology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D003463">Cues</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D005260">Female</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="D018737">Hand Strength</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D006801">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D010775">Photic Stimulation</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D011187">Posture</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="D011597">Psychomotor Performance</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D012858">Size Perception</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D014110">Touch</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="D055698">Touch Perception</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="D014796">Visual Perception</DescriptorName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="aheadofprint"><Year>2012</Year><Month>8</Month><Day>1</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2012</Year><Month>8</Month><Day>3</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2012</Year><Month>8</Month><Day>3</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2013</Year><Month>7</Month><Day>17</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pii">jn.00396.2012</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1152/jn.00396.2012</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">22855778</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/HapticV1/Data/PubMed/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000B51 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000B51 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Ticri/CIDE
|area= HapticV1
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:22855778
|texte= Reframing the action and perception dissociation in DF: haptics matters, but how?
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:22855778" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a HapticV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23. |  |