Effect of a single-piece and a three-piece acrylic sharp-edged IOL on posterior capsule opacification.
Identifieur interne : 000B41 ( PubMed/Corpus ); précédent : 000B40; suivant : 000B42Effect of a single-piece and a three-piece acrylic sharp-edged IOL on posterior capsule opacification.
Auteurs : Georgios Mylonas ; Martin Prskavec ; Ramin Baradaran-Dilmaghani ; Nadja Karnik ; Wolf Buehl ; Matthias WirtitschSource :
- Current eye research [ 1460-2202 ] ; 2013.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Acrylates, Aged, Cataract (physiopathology), Cataract Extraction, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Interactions, Lenses, Intraocular, Male, Posterior Capsule of the Lens (pathology), Postoperative Complications (prevention & control), Prospective Studies, Prosthesis Design, Treatment Outcome, Visual Acuity.
- MESH :
- chemical : Acrylates.
- pathology : Posterior Capsule of the Lens.
- physiopathology : Cataract.
- prevention & control : Postoperative Complications.
- Aged, Cataract Extraction, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Interactions, Lenses, Intraocular, Male, Prospective Studies, Prosthesis Design, Treatment Outcome, Visual Acuity.
Abstract
To compare the intensity of posterior capsule opacification (PCO) between two intraocular lenses (IOLs) of the same optic material, but with different haptic design (1-piece vs. 3-piece).
DOI: 10.3109/02713683.2012.717242
PubMed: 22938910
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:22938910Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Effect of a single-piece and a three-piece acrylic sharp-edged IOL on posterior capsule opacification.</title><author><name sortKey="Mylonas, Georgios" sort="Mylonas, Georgios" uniqKey="Mylonas G" first="Georgios" last="Mylonas">Georgios Mylonas</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Prskavec, Martin" sort="Prskavec, Martin" uniqKey="Prskavec M" first="Martin" last="Prskavec">Martin Prskavec</name></author><author><name sortKey="Baradaran Dilmaghani, Ramin" sort="Baradaran Dilmaghani, Ramin" uniqKey="Baradaran Dilmaghani R" first="Ramin" last="Baradaran-Dilmaghani">Ramin Baradaran-Dilmaghani</name></author><author><name sortKey="Karnik, Nadja" sort="Karnik, Nadja" uniqKey="Karnik N" first="Nadja" last="Karnik">Nadja Karnik</name></author><author><name sortKey="Buehl, Wolf" sort="Buehl, Wolf" uniqKey="Buehl W" first="Wolf" last="Buehl">Wolf Buehl</name></author><author><name sortKey="Wirtitsch, Matthias" sort="Wirtitsch, Matthias" uniqKey="Wirtitsch M" first="Matthias" last="Wirtitsch">Matthias Wirtitsch</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2013">2013</date><idno type="doi">10.3109/02713683.2012.717242</idno><idno type="RBID">pubmed:22938910</idno><idno type="pmid">22938910</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">000B41</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Effect of a single-piece and a three-piece acrylic sharp-edged IOL on posterior capsule opacification.</title><author><name sortKey="Mylonas, Georgios" sort="Mylonas, Georgios" uniqKey="Mylonas G" first="Georgios" last="Mylonas">Georgios Mylonas</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Prskavec, Martin" sort="Prskavec, Martin" uniqKey="Prskavec M" first="Martin" last="Prskavec">Martin Prskavec</name></author><author><name sortKey="Baradaran Dilmaghani, Ramin" sort="Baradaran Dilmaghani, Ramin" uniqKey="Baradaran Dilmaghani R" first="Ramin" last="Baradaran-Dilmaghani">Ramin Baradaran-Dilmaghani</name></author><author><name sortKey="Karnik, Nadja" sort="Karnik, Nadja" uniqKey="Karnik N" first="Nadja" last="Karnik">Nadja Karnik</name></author><author><name sortKey="Buehl, Wolf" sort="Buehl, Wolf" uniqKey="Buehl W" first="Wolf" last="Buehl">Wolf Buehl</name></author><author><name sortKey="Wirtitsch, Matthias" sort="Wirtitsch, Matthias" uniqKey="Wirtitsch M" first="Matthias" last="Wirtitsch">Matthias Wirtitsch</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Current eye research</title><idno type="eISSN">1460-2202</idno><imprint><date when="2013" type="published">2013</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Acrylates</term><term>Aged</term><term>Cataract (physiopathology)</term><term>Cataract Extraction</term><term>Female</term><term>Follow-Up Studies</term><term>Humans</term><term>Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Interactions</term><term>Lenses, Intraocular</term><term>Male</term><term>Posterior Capsule of the Lens (pathology)</term><term>Postoperative Complications (prevention & control)</term><term>Prospective Studies</term><term>Prosthesis Design</term><term>Treatment Outcome</term><term>Visual Acuity</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" xml:lang="en"><term>Acrylates</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="pathology" xml:lang="en"><term>Posterior Capsule of the Lens</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="physiopathology" xml:lang="en"><term>Cataract</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="prevention & control" xml:lang="en"><term>Postoperative Complications</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Aged</term><term>Cataract Extraction</term><term>Female</term><term>Follow-Up Studies</term><term>Humans</term><term>Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Interactions</term><term>Lenses, Intraocular</term><term>Male</term><term>Prospective Studies</term><term>Prosthesis Design</term><term>Treatment Outcome</term><term>Visual Acuity</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">To compare the intensity of posterior capsule opacification (PCO) between two intraocular lenses (IOLs) of the same optic material, but with different haptic design (1-piece vs. 3-piece).</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Owner="NLM" Status="MEDLINE"><PMID Version="1">22938910</PMID><DateCreated><Year>2013</Year><Month>01</Month><Day>07</Day></DateCreated><DateCompleted><Year>2013</Year><Month>06</Month><Day>04</Day></DateCompleted><Article PubModel="Print-Electronic"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1460-2202</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><Volume>38</Volume><Issue>1</Issue><PubDate><Year>2013</Year><Month>Jan</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Current eye research</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Curr. Eye Res.</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Effect of a single-piece and a three-piece acrylic sharp-edged IOL on posterior capsule opacification.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>86-90</MedlinePgn></Pagination><ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.3109/02713683.2012.717242</ELocationID><Abstract><AbstractText Label="BACKGROUND" NlmCategory="BACKGROUND">To compare the intensity of posterior capsule opacification (PCO) between two intraocular lenses (IOLs) of the same optic material, but with different haptic design (1-piece vs. 3-piece).</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="METHODS" NlmCategory="METHODS">This prospective intraindividual controlled cohort study comprised eighty eyes of 40 patients with bilateral age-related cataract. Each patient received a Polylens Y10 (Polytech, Germany) 1-piece IOL in 1 eye and a Polylens Y30 (Polytech, Germany) 3-piece IOL in the contralateral eye. The IOL type in the first operated eye was randomly assigned before patient recruitment. Digital slitlamp photographs were taken 1 year postoperatively using a standardized photographic technique for regeneratory PCO. The amount of PCO was assessed subjectively at the slitlamp and objectively using automated image-analysis software.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="RESULTS" NlmCategory="RESULTS">The Polylens Y10 (1-piece) group showed significantly higher regeneratory and fibrotic PCO scores 1 year after surgery in subjective slitlamp evaluation, however not with objective evaluation using automated image-analysis software. Subjective PCO assessment resulted in a mean PCO score (scale = 0-10) of 1.6 in the Polylens Y10 group and 0.6 in the Polylens Y30 group at 1 year (p < 0.05). The mean automated image-analysis software PCO score was 1.5 in the Polylens Y10 group and 0.9 in the Polylens Y30 group (p = 0.6).</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="CONCLUSION" NlmCategory="CONCLUSIONS">Both investigated IOLs showed good clinical performance regarding PCO, BCVA and IOL-centration. The Polylens Y10 IOL showed slightly more regeneratory PCO than the 3-piece acrylic IOL 1 year after surgery.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Mylonas</LastName><ForeName>Georgios</ForeName><Initials>G</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Prskavec</LastName><ForeName>Martin</ForeName><Initials>M</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Baradaran-Dilmaghani</LastName><ForeName>Ramin</ForeName><Initials>R</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Karnik</LastName><ForeName>Nadja</ForeName><Initials>N</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Buehl</LastName><ForeName>Wolf</ForeName><Initials>W</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Wirtitsch</LastName><ForeName>Matthias</ForeName><Initials>M</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D003160">Comparative Study</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D016449">Randomized Controlled Trial</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList><ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2012</Year><Month>08</Month><Day>31</Day></ArticleDate></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>England</Country><MedlineTA>Curr Eye Res</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>8104312</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0271-3683</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><ChemicalList><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D000179">Acrylates</NameOfSubstance></Chemical></ChemicalList><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="D000179">Acrylates</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D000368">Aged</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D002386">Cataract</DescriptorName><QualifierName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="Q000503">physiopathology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="D002387">Cataract Extraction</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D005260">Female</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D005500">Follow-Up Studies</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D006801">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D057927">Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Interactions</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="D007910">Lenses, Intraocular</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D008297">Male</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D057852">Posterior Capsule of the Lens</DescriptorName><QualifierName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="Q000473">pathology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D011183">Postoperative Complications</DescriptorName><QualifierName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="Q000517">prevention & control</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D011446">Prospective Studies</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D011474">Prosthesis Design</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D016896">Treatment Outcome</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D014792">Visual Acuity</DescriptorName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="aheadofprint"><Year>2012</Year><Month>8</Month><Day>31</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2012</Year><Month>9</Month><Day>4</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2012</Year><Month>9</Month><Day>4</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2013</Year><Month>6</Month><Day>5</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.3109/02713683.2012.717242</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">22938910</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/HapticV1/Data/PubMed/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000B41 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000B41 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Ticri/CIDE
|area= HapticV1
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:22938910
|texte= Effect of a single-piece and a three-piece acrylic sharp-edged IOL on posterior capsule opacification.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:22938910" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a HapticV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23. |  |