HapticV1, PubMed, Corpus, bibRecord, 000B26

Moving the weber fraction: the perceptual precision for moment of inertia increases with exploration force.

Identifieur interne : 000B26 ( PubMed/Corpus ); précédent : 000B25; suivant : 000B27

Moving the weber fraction: the perceptual precision for moment of inertia increases with exploration force.

Auteurs : Nienke B. Debats ; Idsart Kingma ; Peter J. Beek ; Jeroen B J. Smeets

Source :

PloS one [ 1932-6203 ] ; 2012.

RBID : pubmed:23028437

English descriptors

KwdEn :
- Adult, Exploratory Behavior, Female, Humans, Male, Perception, Psychometrics, Young Adult.
MESH :
- Adult, Exploratory Behavior, Female, Humans, Male, Perception, Psychometrics, Young Adult.

Abstract

How does the magnitude of the exploration force influence the precision of haptic perceptual estimates? To address this question, we examined the perceptual precision for moment of inertia (i.e., an object's "angular mass") under different force conditions, using the Weber fraction to quantify perceptual precision. Participants rotated a rod around a fixed axis and judged its moment of inertia in a two-alternative forced-choice task. We instructed different levels of exploration force, thereby manipulating the magnitude of both the exploration force and the angular acceleration. These are the two signals that are needed by the nervous system to estimate moment of inertia. Importantly, one can assume that the absolute noise on both signals increases with an increase in the signals' magnitudes, while the relative noise (i.e., noise/signal) decreases with an increase in signal magnitude. We examined how the perceptual precision for moment of inertia was affected by this neural noise. In a first experiment we found that a low exploration force caused a higher Weber fraction (22%) than a high exploration force (13%), which suggested that the perceptual precision was constrained by the relative noise. This hypothesis was supported by the result of a second experiment, in which we found that the relationship between exploration force and Weber fraction had a similar shape as the theoretical relationship between signal magnitude and relative noise. The present study thus demonstrated that the amount of force used to explore an object can profoundly influence the precision by which its properties are perceived.

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0042941
PubMed: 23028437

Links to Exploration step

pubmed:23028437

Le document en format XML

<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Moving the weber fraction: the perceptual precision for moment of inertia increases with exploration force.</title>
<author><name sortKey="Debats, Nienke B" sort="Debats, Nienke B" uniqKey="Debats N" first="Nienke B" last="Debats">Nienke B. Debats</name>
<affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Research Institute Move, Faculty of Human Movement Sciences, VU University Amsterdam, The Netherlands. N.B.Debats@vu.nl</nlm:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Kingma, Idsart" sort="Kingma, Idsart" uniqKey="Kingma I" first="Idsart" last="Kingma">Idsart Kingma</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Beek, Peter J" sort="Beek, Peter J" uniqKey="Beek P" first="Peter J" last="Beek">Peter J. Beek</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Smeets, Jeroen B J" sort="Smeets, Jeroen B J" uniqKey="Smeets J" first="Jeroen B J" last="Smeets">Jeroen B J. Smeets</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno>
<date when="2012">2012</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0042941</idno>
<idno type="RBID">pubmed:23028437</idno>
<idno type="pmid">23028437</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">000B26</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Moving the weber fraction: the perceptual precision for moment of inertia increases with exploration force.</title>
<author><name sortKey="Debats, Nienke B" sort="Debats, Nienke B" uniqKey="Debats N" first="Nienke B" last="Debats">Nienke B. Debats</name>
<affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Research Institute Move, Faculty of Human Movement Sciences, VU University Amsterdam, The Netherlands. N.B.Debats@vu.nl</nlm:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Kingma, Idsart" sort="Kingma, Idsart" uniqKey="Kingma I" first="Idsart" last="Kingma">Idsart Kingma</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Beek, Peter J" sort="Beek, Peter J" uniqKey="Beek P" first="Peter J" last="Beek">Peter J. Beek</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Smeets, Jeroen B J" sort="Smeets, Jeroen B J" uniqKey="Smeets J" first="Jeroen B J" last="Smeets">Jeroen B J. Smeets</name>
</author>
</analytic>
<series><title level="j">PloS one</title>
<idno type="eISSN">1932-6203</idno>
<imprint><date when="2012" type="published">2012</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Adult</term>
<term>Exploratory Behavior</term>
<term>Female</term>
<term>Humans</term>
<term>Male</term>
<term>Perception</term>
<term>Psychometrics</term>
<term>Young Adult</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Adult</term>
<term>Exploratory Behavior</term>
<term>Female</term>
<term>Humans</term>
<term>Male</term>
<term>Perception</term>
<term>Psychometrics</term>
<term>Young Adult</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">How does the magnitude of the exploration force influence the precision of haptic perceptual estimates? To address this question, we examined the perceptual precision for moment of inertia (i.e., an object's "angular mass") under different force conditions, using the Weber fraction to quantify perceptual precision. Participants rotated a rod around a fixed axis and judged its moment of inertia in a two-alternative forced-choice task. We instructed different levels of exploration force, thereby manipulating the magnitude of both the exploration force and the angular acceleration. These are the two signals that are needed by the nervous system to estimate moment of inertia. Importantly, one can assume that the absolute noise on both signals increases with an increase in the signals' magnitudes, while the relative noise (i.e., noise/signal) decreases with an increase in signal magnitude. We examined how the perceptual precision for moment of inertia was affected by this neural noise. In a first experiment we found that a low exploration force caused a higher Weber fraction (22%) than a high exploration force (13%), which suggested that the perceptual precision was constrained by the relative noise. This hypothesis was supported by the result of a second experiment, in which we found that the relationship between exploration force and Weber fraction had a similar shape as the theoretical relationship between signal magnitude and relative noise. The present study thus demonstrated that the amount of force used to explore an object can profoundly influence the precision by which its properties are perceived.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<pubmed><MedlineCitation Owner="NLM" Status="MEDLINE"><PMID Version="1">23028437</PMID>
<DateCreated><Year>2012</Year>
<Month>10</Month>
<Day>02</Day>
</DateCreated>
<DateCompleted><Year>2013</Year>
<Month>03</Month>
<Day>19</Day>
</DateCompleted>
<DateRevised><Year>2015</Year>
<Month>02</Month>
<Day>22</Day>
</DateRevised>
<Article PubModel="Print-Electronic"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1932-6203</ISSN>
<JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><Volume>7</Volume>
<Issue>9</Issue>
<PubDate><Year>2012</Year>
</PubDate>
</JournalIssue>
<Title>PloS one</Title>
<ISOAbbreviation>PLoS ONE</ISOAbbreviation>
</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Moving the weber fraction: the perceptual precision for moment of inertia increases with exploration force.</ArticleTitle>
<Pagination><MedlinePgn>e42941</MedlinePgn>
</Pagination>
<ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1371/journal.pone.0042941</ELocationID>
<Abstract><AbstractText>How does the magnitude of the exploration force influence the precision of haptic perceptual estimates? To address this question, we examined the perceptual precision for moment of inertia (i.e., an object's "angular mass") under different force conditions, using the Weber fraction to quantify perceptual precision. Participants rotated a rod around a fixed axis and judged its moment of inertia in a two-alternative forced-choice task. We instructed different levels of exploration force, thereby manipulating the magnitude of both the exploration force and the angular acceleration. These are the two signals that are needed by the nervous system to estimate moment of inertia. Importantly, one can assume that the absolute noise on both signals increases with an increase in the signals' magnitudes, while the relative noise (i.e., noise/signal) decreases with an increase in signal magnitude. We examined how the perceptual precision for moment of inertia was affected by this neural noise. In a first experiment we found that a low exploration force caused a higher Weber fraction (22%) than a high exploration force (13%), which suggested that the perceptual precision was constrained by the relative noise. This hypothesis was supported by the result of a second experiment, in which we found that the relationship between exploration force and Weber fraction had a similar shape as the theoretical relationship between signal magnitude and relative noise. The present study thus demonstrated that the amount of force used to explore an object can profoundly influence the precision by which its properties are perceived.</AbstractText>
</Abstract>
<AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Debats</LastName>
<ForeName>Nienke B</ForeName>
<Initials>NB</Initials>
<AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Research Institute Move, Faculty of Human Movement Sciences, VU University Amsterdam, The Netherlands. N.B.Debats@vu.nl</Affiliation>
</AffiliationInfo>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Kingma</LastName>
<ForeName>Idsart</ForeName>
<Initials>I</Initials>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Beek</LastName>
<ForeName>Peter J</ForeName>
<Initials>PJ</Initials>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Smeets</LastName>
<ForeName>Jeroen B J</ForeName>
<Initials>JB</Initials>
</Author>
</AuthorList>
<Language>eng</Language>
<PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType>
<PublicationType UI="D013485">Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't</PublicationType>
</PublicationTypeList>
<ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2012</Year>
<Month>09</Month>
<Day>17</Day>
</ArticleDate>
</Article>
<MedlineJournalInfo><Country>United States</Country>
<MedlineTA>PLoS One</MedlineTA>
<NlmUniqueID>101285081</NlmUniqueID>
<ISSNLinking>1932-6203</ISSNLinking>
</MedlineJournalInfo>
<CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset>
<CommentsCorrectionsList><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Percept Psychophys. 2001 Nov;63(8):1293-313</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">11800458</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>PLoS Comput Biol. 2012;8(5):e1002508</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">22615548</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Neurophysiol. 2002 Sep;88(3):1533-44</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">12205173</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2002 Aug 29;357(1424):1137-45</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">12217180</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Neurophysiol. 2004 Feb;91(2):1050-63</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">14561687</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2004 Apr;30(2):346-54</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">15053693</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Hum Factors. 1966 Jun;8(3):209-15</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">5965873</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Am J Psychol. 1974 Mar-Jun;87(1-2):255-9</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">4451209</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Science. 1979 Nov 2;206(4418):588-90</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">493965</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Percept Psychophys. 1982 May;31(5):429-36</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">7110901</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Am J Psychol. 1985 Fall;98(3):469-71</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">4051042</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Cogn Psychol. 1987 Jul;19(3):342-68</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">3608405</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Q J Exp Psychol A. 1987 Feb;39(1):77-88</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">3615942</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1988 Aug;14(3):404-27</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">2971770</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Acta Psychol (Amst). 1993 Oct;84(1):29-40</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">8237454</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Science. 1995 Sep 29;269(5232):1880-2</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">7569931</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Am Psychol. 1996 Nov;51(11):1134-52</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">8937263</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Nature. 1998 Aug 20;394(6695):780-4</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">9723616</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Neurophysiol. 1999 Mar;81(3):1355-64</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">10085361</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2006 Oct;32(5):1093-106</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">17002524</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Nat Rev Neurosci. 2008 Apr;9(4):292-303</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">18319728</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Atten Percept Psychophys. 2010 Apr;72(3):823-38</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">20348586</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Atten Percept Psychophys. 2010 May;72(4):1144-54</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">20436207</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Neurophysiol. 2010 Nov;104(5):2821-30</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">20810690</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2011 Feb;37(1):193-206</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">21077721</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Nature. 2002 Jan 24;415(6870):429-33</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">11807554</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
</CommentsCorrectionsList>
<MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D000328">Adult</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="D005106">Exploratory Behavior</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D005260">Female</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D006801">Humans</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D008297">Male</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="D010465">Perception</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D011594">Psychometrics</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D055815">Young Adult</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
</MeshHeadingList>
<OtherID Source="NLM">PMC3444459</OtherID>
</MedlineCitation>
<PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="received"><Year>2012</Year>
<Month>1</Month>
<Day>27</Day>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="accepted"><Year>2012</Year>
<Month>7</Month>
<Day>16</Day>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="epublish"><Year>2012</Year>
<Month>9</Month>
<Day>17</Day>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2012</Year>
<Month>10</Month>
<Day>3</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2012</Year>
<Month>10</Month>
<Day>3</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2013</Year>
<Month>3</Month>
<Day>21</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
</History>
<PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0042941</ArticleId>
<ArticleId IdType="pii">PONE-D-12-02707</ArticleId>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">23028437</ArticleId>
<ArticleId IdType="pmc">PMC3444459</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</PubmedData>
</pubmed>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/HapticV1/Data/PubMed/Corpus

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000B26 | SxmlIndent | more

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000B26 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Ticri/CIDE
   |area=    HapticV1
   |flux=    PubMed
   |étape=   Corpus
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     pubmed:23028437
   |texte=   Moving the weber fraction: the perceptual precision for moment of inertia increases with exploration force.
}}

Pour générer des pages wiki

HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/RBID.i   -Sk "pubmed:23028437" \
       | HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd   \
       | NlmPubMed2Wicri -a HapticV1

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23.
Data generation: Mon Jun 13 01:09:46 2016. Site generation: Wed Mar 6 09:54:07 2024

	Serveur d'exploration sur les dispositifs haptiques
	Attention, ce site est en cours de développement ! Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts. Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Serveur d'exploration sur les dispositifs haptiques

Moving the weber fraction: the perceptual precision for moment of inertia increases with exploration force.

Moving the weber fraction: the perceptual precision for moment of inertia increases with exploration force.

Source :

English descriptors

Abstract

Links to Exploration step

Le document en format XML

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

Pour générer des pages wiki