HapticV1, PubMed, Corpus, bibRecord, 000A94

Learning from vision-to-touch is different than learning from touch-to-vision.

Identifieur interne : 000A94 ( PubMed/Corpus ); précédent : 000A93; suivant : 000A95

Learning from vision-to-touch is different than learning from touch-to-vision.

Auteurs : Dagmar A. Wismeijer ; Karl R. Gegenfurtner ; Knut Drewing

Source :

Frontiers in integrative neuroscience [ 1662-5145 ] ; 2012.

RBID : pubmed:23181012

Abstract

We studied whether vision can teach touch to the same extent as touch seems to teach vision. In a 2 × 2 between-participants learning study, we artificially correlated visual gloss cues with haptic compliance cues. In two "natural" tasks, we tested whether visual gloss estimations have an influence on haptic estimations of softness and vice versa. In two "novel" tasks, in which participants were either asked to haptically judge glossiness or to visually judge softness, we investigated how perceptual estimates transfer from one sense to the other. Our results showed that vision does not teach touch as efficient as touch seems to teach vision.

DOI: 10.3389/fnint.2012.00105
PubMed: 23181012

Links to Exploration step

pubmed:23181012

Le document en format XML

<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Learning from vision-to-touch is different than learning from touch-to-vision.</title>
<author><name sortKey="Wismeijer, Dagmar A" sort="Wismeijer, Dagmar A" uniqKey="Wismeijer D" first="Dagmar A" last="Wismeijer">Dagmar A. Wismeijer</name>
<affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Allgemeine Psychologie, Justus-Liebig Universität Gießen Gießen, Germany.</nlm:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Gegenfurtner, Karl R" sort="Gegenfurtner, Karl R" uniqKey="Gegenfurtner K" first="Karl R" last="Gegenfurtner">Karl R. Gegenfurtner</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Drewing, Knut" sort="Drewing, Knut" uniqKey="Drewing K" first="Knut" last="Drewing">Knut Drewing</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno>
<date when="2012">2012</date>
<idno type="doi">10.3389/fnint.2012.00105</idno>
<idno type="RBID">pubmed:23181012</idno>
<idno type="pmid">23181012</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">000A94</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Learning from vision-to-touch is different than learning from touch-to-vision.</title>
<author><name sortKey="Wismeijer, Dagmar A" sort="Wismeijer, Dagmar A" uniqKey="Wismeijer D" first="Dagmar A" last="Wismeijer">Dagmar A. Wismeijer</name>
<affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Allgemeine Psychologie, Justus-Liebig Universität Gießen Gießen, Germany.</nlm:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Gegenfurtner, Karl R" sort="Gegenfurtner, Karl R" uniqKey="Gegenfurtner K" first="Karl R" last="Gegenfurtner">Karl R. Gegenfurtner</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Drewing, Knut" sort="Drewing, Knut" uniqKey="Drewing K" first="Knut" last="Drewing">Knut Drewing</name>
</author>
</analytic>
<series><title level="j">Frontiers in integrative neuroscience</title>
<idno type="eISSN">1662-5145</idno>
<imprint><date when="2012" type="published">2012</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass></textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">We studied whether vision can teach touch to the same extent as touch seems to teach vision. In a 2 × 2 between-participants learning study, we artificially correlated visual gloss cues with haptic compliance cues. In two "natural" tasks, we tested whether visual gloss estimations have an influence on haptic estimations of softness and vice versa. In two "novel" tasks, in which participants were either asked to haptically judge glossiness or to visually judge softness, we investigated how perceptual estimates transfer from one sense to the other. Our results showed that vision does not teach touch as efficient as touch seems to teach vision.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<pubmed><MedlineCitation Owner="NLM" Status="PubMed-not-MEDLINE"><PMID Version="1">23181012</PMID>
<DateCreated><Year>2012</Year>
<Month>11</Month>
<Day>27</Day>
</DateCreated>
<DateCompleted><Year>2012</Year>
<Month>11</Month>
<Day>28</Day>
</DateCompleted>
<DateRevised><Year>2013</Year>
<Month>08</Month>
<Day>13</Day>
</DateRevised>
<Article PubModel="Electronic-eCollection"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1662-5145</ISSN>
<JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><Volume>6</Volume>
<PubDate><Year>2012</Year>
</PubDate>
</JournalIssue>
<Title>Frontiers in integrative neuroscience</Title>
<ISOAbbreviation>Front Integr Neurosci</ISOAbbreviation>
</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Learning from vision-to-touch is different than learning from touch-to-vision.</ArticleTitle>
<Pagination><MedlinePgn>105</MedlinePgn>
</Pagination>
<ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.3389/fnint.2012.00105</ELocationID>
<Abstract><AbstractText>We studied whether vision can teach touch to the same extent as touch seems to teach vision. In a 2 × 2 between-participants learning study, we artificially correlated visual gloss cues with haptic compliance cues. In two "natural" tasks, we tested whether visual gloss estimations have an influence on haptic estimations of softness and vice versa. In two "novel" tasks, in which participants were either asked to haptically judge glossiness or to visually judge softness, we investigated how perceptual estimates transfer from one sense to the other. Our results showed that vision does not teach touch as efficient as touch seems to teach vision.</AbstractText>
</Abstract>
<AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Wismeijer</LastName>
<ForeName>Dagmar A</ForeName>
<Initials>DA</Initials>
<AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Allgemeine Psychologie, Justus-Liebig Universität Gießen Gießen, Germany.</Affiliation>
</AffiliationInfo>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Gegenfurtner</LastName>
<ForeName>Karl R</ForeName>
<Initials>KR</Initials>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Drewing</LastName>
<ForeName>Knut</ForeName>
<Initials>K</Initials>
</Author>
</AuthorList>
<Language>eng</Language>
<PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType>
</PublicationTypeList>
<ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2012</Year>
<Month>11</Month>
<Day>20</Day>
</ArticleDate>
</Article>
<MedlineJournalInfo><Country>Switzerland</Country>
<MedlineTA>Front Integr Neurosci</MedlineTA>
<NlmUniqueID>101477950</NlmUniqueID>
<ISSNLinking>1662-5145</ISSNLinking>
</MedlineJournalInfo>
<CommentsCorrectionsList><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Acta Psychol (Amst). 1993 Oct;84(1):29-40</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">8237454</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Exp Psychol. 2010;57(6):462-9</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">20382626</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Vision Res. 2001 Feb;41(4):449-61</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">11166048</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Science. 2002 Nov 22;298(5598):1627-30</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">12446912</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Trends Cogn Sci. 2004 Apr;8(4):162-9</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">15050512</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Jan 10;103(2):483-8</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">16387858</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Vis. 2007;7(5):7.1-14</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">18217847</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Acta Psychol (Amst). 2008 Jun;128(2):264-73</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">18359467</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Curr Biol. 2008 May 6;18(9):694-8</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">18450446</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Curr Biol. 2008 Nov 25;18(22):1742-7</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">19026545</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Neurophysiol. 2009 Jun;101(6):2789-801</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">19357346</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Neurophysiol. 2009 Dec;102(6):3111-8</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">19793879</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Front Psychol. 2011;2:55</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">21734892</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Vis. 2011;11(10). pii: 20. doi: 10.1167/11.10.20</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">21954298</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Nat Neurosci. 2000 Jan;3(1):69-73</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">10607397</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
</CommentsCorrectionsList>
<OtherID Source="NLM">PMC3501647</OtherID>
<KeywordList Owner="NOTNLM"><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">arbitrary association</Keyword>
<Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">cue-interaction</Keyword>
<Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">gloss</Keyword>
<Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">learning</Keyword>
<Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">multi-sensory</Keyword>
<Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">softness</Keyword>
<Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">touch</Keyword>
<Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">vision</Keyword>
</KeywordList>
</MedlineCitation>
<PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="received"><Year>2012</Year>
<Month>5</Month>
<Day>23</Day>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="accepted"><Year>2012</Year>
<Month>10</Month>
<Day>24</Day>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="epublish"><Year>2012</Year>
<Month>11</Month>
<Day>20</Day>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2012</Year>
<Month>11</Month>
<Day>28</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2012</Year>
<Month>11</Month>
<Day>28</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2012</Year>
<Month>11</Month>
<Day>28</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>1</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
</History>
<PublicationStatus>epublish</PublicationStatus>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.3389/fnint.2012.00105</ArticleId>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">23181012</ArticleId>
<ArticleId IdType="pmc">PMC3501647</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</PubmedData>
</pubmed>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/HapticV1/Data/PubMed/Corpus

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000A94 | SxmlIndent | more

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000A94 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Ticri/CIDE
   |area=    HapticV1
   |flux=    PubMed
   |étape=   Corpus
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     pubmed:23181012
   |texte=   Learning from vision-to-touch is different than learning from touch-to-vision.
}}

Pour générer des pages wiki

HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/RBID.i   -Sk "pubmed:23181012" \
       | HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd   \
       | NlmPubMed2Wicri -a HapticV1

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23.
Data generation: Mon Jun 13 01:09:46 2016. Site generation: Wed Mar 6 09:54:07 2024

	Serveur d'exploration sur les dispositifs haptiques
	Attention, ce site est en cours de développement ! Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts. Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Serveur d'exploration sur les dispositifs haptiques

Learning from vision-to-touch is different than learning from touch-to-vision.

Learning from vision-to-touch is different than learning from touch-to-vision.

Source :

Abstract

Links to Exploration step

Le document en format XML

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

Pour générer des pages wiki