The influence of robotic guidance on different types of motor timing.
Identifieur interne : 000961 ( PubMed/Corpus ); précédent : 000960; suivant : 000962The influence of robotic guidance on different types of motor timing.
Auteurs : Jenna Lüttgen ; Herbert HeuerSource :
- Journal of motor behavior [ 1940-1027 ] ; 2013.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- MESH :
- physiology : Attention, Motor Skills, Movement, Psychomotor Performance, Reaction Time.
- Adolescent, Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Robotics.
Abstract
Robotic guidance as a means to facilitate motor learning and rehabilitation has received considerable attention during the last few years. However, mixed outcomes suggest that the benefits might be restricted to certain movement characteristics. The authors investigate the effects of robotic guidance on different kinds of motor timing. Two groups of participants performed 2 variants of a circle drawing task in a synchronization-continuation paradigm. One variant was continuous circle drawing (emergent timing), the other variant was intermittent circle drawing (event-based timing). The total duration of movement cycles (absolute timing) and the relative duration of submovements (relative timing) were measured. Half of the participants in each group were guided by a robot device during synchronization (robot-guided group), the other half of the participants received no guidance (control group). Guided participants had superior performance during the synchronization phase with both timing tasks. During continuation there were no benefits of haptic guidance anymore with the continuous circle drawing task. In contrast, with the intermittent circle drawing task guided participants were more accurate in their relative timing than control participants already in the first few trials, and this advantage did not increase in the course of practice. The benefit is thus rather immediate and not cumulative. This finding is consistent with the notion that movement characteristics such as relative timing, which are hard to demonstrate visually or verbally, profit from robotic guidance because of the more accurate demonstrations of the correct movements.
DOI: 10.1080/00222895.2013.785926
PubMed: 23663189
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:23663189Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">The influence of robotic guidance on different types of motor timing.</title><author><name sortKey="Luttgen, Jenna" sort="Luttgen, Jenna" uniqKey="Luttgen J" first="Jenna" last="Lüttgen">Jenna Lüttgen</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>IfADo, Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors, Dortmund, Germany. luettgen@ifado.de</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Heuer, Herbert" sort="Heuer, Herbert" uniqKey="Heuer H" first="Herbert" last="Heuer">Herbert Heuer</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2013">2013</date><idno type="doi">10.1080/00222895.2013.785926</idno><idno type="RBID">pubmed:23663189</idno><idno type="pmid">23663189</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">000961</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">The influence of robotic guidance on different types of motor timing.</title><author><name sortKey="Luttgen, Jenna" sort="Luttgen, Jenna" uniqKey="Luttgen J" first="Jenna" last="Lüttgen">Jenna Lüttgen</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>IfADo, Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors, Dortmund, Germany. luettgen@ifado.de</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Heuer, Herbert" sort="Heuer, Herbert" uniqKey="Heuer H" first="Herbert" last="Heuer">Herbert Heuer</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Journal of motor behavior</title><idno type="eISSN">1940-1027</idno><imprint><date when="2013" type="published">2013</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Adolescent</term><term>Adult</term><term>Attention (physiology)</term><term>Female</term><term>Humans</term><term>Male</term><term>Motor Skills (physiology)</term><term>Movement (physiology)</term><term>Psychomotor Performance (physiology)</term><term>Reaction Time (physiology)</term><term>Robotics</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="physiology" xml:lang="en"><term>Attention</term><term>Motor Skills</term><term>Movement</term><term>Psychomotor Performance</term><term>Reaction Time</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Adolescent</term><term>Adult</term><term>Female</term><term>Humans</term><term>Male</term><term>Robotics</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Robotic guidance as a means to facilitate motor learning and rehabilitation has received considerable attention during the last few years. However, mixed outcomes suggest that the benefits might be restricted to certain movement characteristics. The authors investigate the effects of robotic guidance on different kinds of motor timing. Two groups of participants performed 2 variants of a circle drawing task in a synchronization-continuation paradigm. One variant was continuous circle drawing (emergent timing), the other variant was intermittent circle drawing (event-based timing). The total duration of movement cycles (absolute timing) and the relative duration of submovements (relative timing) were measured. Half of the participants in each group were guided by a robot device during synchronization (robot-guided group), the other half of the participants received no guidance (control group). Guided participants had superior performance during the synchronization phase with both timing tasks. During continuation there were no benefits of haptic guidance anymore with the continuous circle drawing task. In contrast, with the intermittent circle drawing task guided participants were more accurate in their relative timing than control participants already in the first few trials, and this advantage did not increase in the course of practice. The benefit is thus rather immediate and not cumulative. This finding is consistent with the notion that movement characteristics such as relative timing, which are hard to demonstrate visually or verbally, profit from robotic guidance because of the more accurate demonstrations of the correct movements.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Owner="NLM" Status="MEDLINE"><PMID Version="1">23663189</PMID><DateCreated><Year>2013</Year><Month>05</Month><Day>13</Day></DateCreated><DateCompleted><Year>2013</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>19</Day></DateCompleted><Article PubModel="Print"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1940-1027</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><Volume>45</Volume><Issue>3</Issue><PubDate><Year>2013</Year></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Journal of motor behavior</Title><ISOAbbreviation>J Mot Behav</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>The influence of robotic guidance on different types of motor timing.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>249-58</MedlinePgn></Pagination><ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1080/00222895.2013.785926</ELocationID><Abstract><AbstractText>Robotic guidance as a means to facilitate motor learning and rehabilitation has received considerable attention during the last few years. However, mixed outcomes suggest that the benefits might be restricted to certain movement characteristics. The authors investigate the effects of robotic guidance on different kinds of motor timing. Two groups of participants performed 2 variants of a circle drawing task in a synchronization-continuation paradigm. One variant was continuous circle drawing (emergent timing), the other variant was intermittent circle drawing (event-based timing). The total duration of movement cycles (absolute timing) and the relative duration of submovements (relative timing) were measured. Half of the participants in each group were guided by a robot device during synchronization (robot-guided group), the other half of the participants received no guidance (control group). Guided participants had superior performance during the synchronization phase with both timing tasks. During continuation there were no benefits of haptic guidance anymore with the continuous circle drawing task. In contrast, with the intermittent circle drawing task guided participants were more accurate in their relative timing than control participants already in the first few trials, and this advantage did not increase in the course of practice. The benefit is thus rather immediate and not cumulative. This finding is consistent with the notion that movement characteristics such as relative timing, which are hard to demonstrate visually or verbally, profit from robotic guidance because of the more accurate demonstrations of the correct movements.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Lüttgen</LastName><ForeName>Jenna</ForeName><Initials>J</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>IfADo, Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors, Dortmund, Germany. luettgen@ifado.de</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Heuer</LastName><ForeName>Herbert</ForeName><Initials>H</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D013485">Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>United States</Country><MedlineTA>J Mot Behav</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>0236512</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0022-2895</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D000293">Adolescent</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D000328">Adult</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D001288">Attention</DescriptorName><QualifierName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="Q000502">physiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D005260">Female</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D006801">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D008297">Male</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D009048">Motor Skills</DescriptorName><QualifierName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="Q000502">physiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D009068">Movement</DescriptorName><QualifierName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="Q000502">physiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D011597">Psychomotor Performance</DescriptorName><QualifierName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="Q000502">physiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D011930">Reaction Time</DescriptorName><QualifierName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="Q000502">physiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="D012371">Robotics</DescriptorName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2013</Year><Month>5</Month><Day>14</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2013</Year><Month>5</Month><Day>15</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2013</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>20</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1080/00222895.2013.785926</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">23663189</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/HapticV1/Data/PubMed/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000961 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000961 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Ticri/CIDE
|area= HapticV1
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:23663189
|texte= The influence of robotic guidance on different types of motor timing.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:23663189" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a HapticV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23. |  |