The effects of aging on haptic 2D shape recognition.
Identifieur interne : 000888 ( PubMed/Corpus ); précédent : 000887; suivant : 000889The effects of aging on haptic 2D shape recognition.
Auteurs : Krista E. Overvliet ; J. Wagemans ; Ralf T. KrampeSource :
- Psychology and aging [ 1939-1498 ] ; 2013.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- MESH :
Abstract
We use the image-mediation model (Klatzky & Lederman, 1987) as a framework to investigate potential sources of adult age differences in the haptic recognition of two-dimensional (2D) shapes. This model states that the low-resolution, temporally sequential, haptic input is translated into a visual image, which is then reperceived through the visual processors, before it is matched against a long-term memory representation and named. In three experiments we tested groups of 12 older (mean age 73.11) and three groups of 12 young adults (mean age 22.80) each. In Experiment 1 we confirm age-related differences in haptic 2D shape recognition, and we show the typical age × complexity interaction. In Experiment 2 we show that if we facilitate the visual translation process, age differences become smaller, but only with simple shapes and not with the more complex everyday objects. In Experiment 3 we target the last step in the model (matching and naming) for complex stimuli. We found that age differences in exploration time were considerably reduced when this component process was facilitated by providing a category name. We conclude that the image-mediation model can explain adult-age differences in haptic recognition, particularly if the role of working memory in forming the transient visual image is considered. Our findings suggest that sensorimotor skills thought to rely on peripheral processes for the most part are critically constrained by age-related changes in central processing capacity in later adulthood.
DOI: 10.1037/a0033415
PubMed: 23978010
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:23978010Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">The effects of aging on haptic 2D shape recognition.</title><author><name sortKey="Overvliet, Krista E" sort="Overvliet, Krista E" uniqKey="Overvliet K" first="Krista E" last="Overvliet">Krista E. Overvliet</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Laboratory of Experimental Psychology.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Wagemans, J" sort="Wagemans, J" uniqKey="Wagemans J" first="J" last="Wagemans">J. Wagemans</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Laboratory of Experimental Psychology.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Krampe, Ralf T" sort="Krampe, Ralf T" uniqKey="Krampe R" first="Ralf T" last="Krampe">Ralf T. Krampe</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Laboratory of Experimental Psychology.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2013">2013</date><idno type="doi">10.1037/a0033415</idno><idno type="RBID">pubmed:23978010</idno><idno type="pmid">23978010</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">000888</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">The effects of aging on haptic 2D shape recognition.</title><author><name sortKey="Overvliet, Krista E" sort="Overvliet, Krista E" uniqKey="Overvliet K" first="Krista E" last="Overvliet">Krista E. Overvliet</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Laboratory of Experimental Psychology.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Wagemans, J" sort="Wagemans, J" uniqKey="Wagemans J" first="J" last="Wagemans">J. Wagemans</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Laboratory of Experimental Psychology.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Krampe, Ralf T" sort="Krampe, Ralf T" uniqKey="Krampe R" first="Ralf T" last="Krampe">Ralf T. Krampe</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Laboratory of Experimental Psychology.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Psychology and aging</title><idno type="eISSN">1939-1498</idno><imprint><date when="2013" type="published">2013</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Adult</term><term>Aged</term><term>Aging</term><term>Discrimination Learning</term><term>Female</term><term>Humans</term><term>Male</term><term>Memory, Long-Term</term><term>Memory, Short-Term</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Names</term><term>Pattern Recognition, Visual</term><term>Recognition (Psychology)</term><term>Visual Perception</term><term>Young Adult</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Adult</term><term>Aged</term><term>Aging</term><term>Discrimination Learning</term><term>Female</term><term>Humans</term><term>Male</term><term>Memory, Long-Term</term><term>Memory, Short-Term</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Names</term><term>Pattern Recognition, Visual</term><term>Recognition (Psychology)</term><term>Visual Perception</term><term>Young Adult</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">We use the image-mediation model (Klatzky & Lederman, 1987) as a framework to investigate potential sources of adult age differences in the haptic recognition of two-dimensional (2D) shapes. This model states that the low-resolution, temporally sequential, haptic input is translated into a visual image, which is then reperceived through the visual processors, before it is matched against a long-term memory representation and named. In three experiments we tested groups of 12 older (mean age 73.11) and three groups of 12 young adults (mean age 22.80) each. In Experiment 1 we confirm age-related differences in haptic 2D shape recognition, and we show the typical age × complexity interaction. In Experiment 2 we show that if we facilitate the visual translation process, age differences become smaller, but only with simple shapes and not with the more complex everyday objects. In Experiment 3 we target the last step in the model (matching and naming) for complex stimuli. We found that age differences in exploration time were considerably reduced when this component process was facilitated by providing a category name. We conclude that the image-mediation model can explain adult-age differences in haptic recognition, particularly if the role of working memory in forming the transient visual image is considered. Our findings suggest that sensorimotor skills thought to rely on peripheral processes for the most part are critically constrained by age-related changes in central processing capacity in later adulthood.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Owner="NLM" Status="MEDLINE"><PMID Version="1">23978010</PMID><DateCreated><Year>2013</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>24</Day></DateCreated><DateCompleted><Year>2014</Year><Month>05</Month><Day>19</Day></DateCompleted><Article PubModel="Print-Electronic"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1939-1498</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><Volume>28</Volume><Issue>4</Issue><PubDate><Year>2013</Year><Month>Dec</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Psychology and aging</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Psychol Aging</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>The effects of aging on haptic 2D shape recognition.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>1057-69</MedlinePgn></Pagination><ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1037/a0033415</ELocationID><Abstract><AbstractText>We use the image-mediation model (Klatzky & Lederman, 1987) as a framework to investigate potential sources of adult age differences in the haptic recognition of two-dimensional (2D) shapes. This model states that the low-resolution, temporally sequential, haptic input is translated into a visual image, which is then reperceived through the visual processors, before it is matched against a long-term memory representation and named. In three experiments we tested groups of 12 older (mean age 73.11) and three groups of 12 young adults (mean age 22.80) each. In Experiment 1 we confirm age-related differences in haptic 2D shape recognition, and we show the typical age × complexity interaction. In Experiment 2 we show that if we facilitate the visual translation process, age differences become smaller, but only with simple shapes and not with the more complex everyday objects. In Experiment 3 we target the last step in the model (matching and naming) for complex stimuli. We found that age differences in exploration time were considerably reduced when this component process was facilitated by providing a category name. We conclude that the image-mediation model can explain adult-age differences in haptic recognition, particularly if the role of working memory in forming the transient visual image is considered. Our findings suggest that sensorimotor skills thought to rely on peripheral processes for the most part are critically constrained by age-related changes in central processing capacity in later adulthood.</AbstractText><CopyrightInformation>PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2013 APA, all rights reserved.</CopyrightInformation></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Overvliet</LastName><ForeName>Krista E</ForeName><Initials>KE</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Laboratory of Experimental Psychology.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Wagemans</LastName><ForeName>J</ForeName><Initials>J</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Laboratory of Experimental Psychology.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Krampe</LastName><ForeName>Ralf T</ForeName><Initials>RT</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Laboratory of Experimental Psychology.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D013485">Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList><ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2013</Year><Month>08</Month><Day>26</Day></ArticleDate></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>United States</Country><MedlineTA>Psychol Aging</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>8904079</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0882-7974</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D000328">Adult</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D000368">Aged</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="D000375">Aging</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="D004193">Discrimination Learning</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D005260">Female</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D006801">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D008297">Male</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="D057567">Memory, Long-Term</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D008570">Memory, Short-Term</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D008875">Middle Aged</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D009275">Names</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="D010364">Pattern Recognition, Visual</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="D021641">Recognition (Psychology)</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="D014796">Visual Perception</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D055815">Young Adult</DescriptorName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="aheadofprint"><Year>2013</Year><Month>8</Month><Day>26</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2013</Year><Month>8</Month><Day>28</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2013</Year><Month>8</Month><Day>28</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2014</Year><Month>5</Month><Day>20</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pii">2013-29999-001</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1037/a0033415</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">23978010</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/HapticV1/Data/PubMed/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000888 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000888 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Ticri/CIDE
|area= HapticV1
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:23978010
|texte= The effects of aging on haptic 2D shape recognition.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:23978010" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a HapticV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23. |  |