Haptic over visual information in the distribution of visual attention after tool-use in near and far space.
Identifieur interne : 000309 ( PubMed/Corpus ); précédent : 000308; suivant : 000310Haptic over visual information in the distribution of visual attention after tool-use in near and far space.
Auteurs : George D. Park ; Catherine L. ReedSource :
- Experimental brain research [ 1432-1106 ] ; 2015.
Abstract
Despite attentional prioritization for grasping space near the hands, tool-use appears to transfer attentional bias to the tool's end/functional part. The contributions of haptic and visual inputs to attentional distribution along a tool were investigated as a function of tool-use in near (Experiment 1) and far (Experiment 2) space. Visual attention was assessed with a 50/50, go/no-go, target discrimination task, while a tool was held next to targets appearing near the tool-occupied hand or tool-end. Target response times (RTs) and sensitivity (d-prime) were measured at target locations, before and after functional tool practice for three conditions: (1) open-tool: tool-end visible (visual + haptic inputs), (2) hidden-tool: tool-end visually obscured (haptic input only), and (3) short-tool: stick missing tool's length/end (control condition: hand occupied but no visual/haptic input). In near space, both open- and hidden-tool groups showed a tool-end, attentional bias (faster RTs toward tool-end) before practice; after practice, RTs near the hand improved. In far space, the open-tool group showed no bias before practice; after practice, target RTs near the tool-end improved. However, the hidden-tool group showed a consistent tool-end bias despite practice. Lack of short-tool group results suggested that hidden-tool group results were specific to haptic inputs. In conclusion, (1) allocation of visual attention along a tool due to tool practice differs in near and far space, and (2) visual attention is drawn toward the tool's end even when visually obscured, suggesting haptic input provides sufficient information for directing attention along the tool.
DOI: 10.1007/s00221-015-4368-8
PubMed: 26126805
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:26126805Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Haptic over visual information in the distribution of visual attention after tool-use in near and far space.</title><author><name sortKey="Park, George D" sort="Park, George D" uniqKey="Park G" first="George D" last="Park">George D. Park</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Psychology, Claremont Graduate University, Claremont, CA, USA. george.d.park@gmail.com.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Reed, Catherine L" sort="Reed, Catherine L" uniqKey="Reed C" first="Catherine L" last="Reed">Catherine L. Reed</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Psychology, Claremont Graduate University, Claremont, CA, USA.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2015">2015</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:26126805</idno><idno type="pmid">26126805</idno><idno type="doi">10.1007/s00221-015-4368-8</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">000309</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Haptic over visual information in the distribution of visual attention after tool-use in near and far space.</title><author><name sortKey="Park, George D" sort="Park, George D" uniqKey="Park G" first="George D" last="Park">George D. Park</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Psychology, Claremont Graduate University, Claremont, CA, USA. george.d.park@gmail.com.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Reed, Catherine L" sort="Reed, Catherine L" uniqKey="Reed C" first="Catherine L" last="Reed">Catherine L. Reed</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Psychology, Claremont Graduate University, Claremont, CA, USA.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Experimental brain research</title><idno type="eISSN">1432-1106</idno><imprint><date when="2015" type="published">2015</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Despite attentional prioritization for grasping space near the hands, tool-use appears to transfer attentional bias to the tool's end/functional part. The contributions of haptic and visual inputs to attentional distribution along a tool were investigated as a function of tool-use in near (Experiment 1) and far (Experiment 2) space. Visual attention was assessed with a 50/50, go/no-go, target discrimination task, while a tool was held next to targets appearing near the tool-occupied hand or tool-end. Target response times (RTs) and sensitivity (d-prime) were measured at target locations, before and after functional tool practice for three conditions: (1) open-tool: tool-end visible (visual + haptic inputs), (2) hidden-tool: tool-end visually obscured (haptic input only), and (3) short-tool: stick missing tool's length/end (control condition: hand occupied but no visual/haptic input). In near space, both open- and hidden-tool groups showed a tool-end, attentional bias (faster RTs toward tool-end) before practice; after practice, RTs near the hand improved. In far space, the open-tool group showed no bias before practice; after practice, target RTs near the tool-end improved. However, the hidden-tool group showed a consistent tool-end bias despite practice. Lack of short-tool group results suggested that hidden-tool group results were specific to haptic inputs. In conclusion, (1) allocation of visual attention along a tool due to tool practice differs in near and far space, and (2) visual attention is drawn toward the tool's end even when visually obscured, suggesting haptic input provides sufficient information for directing attention along the tool.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Owner="NLM" Status="In-Process"><PMID Version="1">26126805</PMID><DateCreated><Year>2015</Year><Month>09</Month><Day>19</Day></DateCreated><Article PubModel="Print-Electronic"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1432-1106</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><Volume>233</Volume><Issue>10</Issue><PubDate><Year>2015</Year><Month>Oct</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Experimental brain research</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Exp Brain Res</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Haptic over visual information in the distribution of visual attention after tool-use in near and far space.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>2977-88</MedlinePgn></Pagination><ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1007/s00221-015-4368-8</ELocationID><Abstract><AbstractText>Despite attentional prioritization for grasping space near the hands, tool-use appears to transfer attentional bias to the tool's end/functional part. The contributions of haptic and visual inputs to attentional distribution along a tool were investigated as a function of tool-use in near (Experiment 1) and far (Experiment 2) space. Visual attention was assessed with a 50/50, go/no-go, target discrimination task, while a tool was held next to targets appearing near the tool-occupied hand or tool-end. Target response times (RTs) and sensitivity (d-prime) were measured at target locations, before and after functional tool practice for three conditions: (1) open-tool: tool-end visible (visual + haptic inputs), (2) hidden-tool: tool-end visually obscured (haptic input only), and (3) short-tool: stick missing tool's length/end (control condition: hand occupied but no visual/haptic input). In near space, both open- and hidden-tool groups showed a tool-end, attentional bias (faster RTs toward tool-end) before practice; after practice, RTs near the hand improved. In far space, the open-tool group showed no bias before practice; after practice, target RTs near the tool-end improved. However, the hidden-tool group showed a consistent tool-end bias despite practice. Lack of short-tool group results suggested that hidden-tool group results were specific to haptic inputs. In conclusion, (1) allocation of visual attention along a tool due to tool practice differs in near and far space, and (2) visual attention is drawn toward the tool's end even when visually obscured, suggesting haptic input provides sufficient information for directing attention along the tool.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Park</LastName><ForeName>George D</ForeName><Initials>GD</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Psychology, Claremont Graduate University, Claremont, CA, USA. george.d.park@gmail.com.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Systems Technology, Inc., Hawthorne, CA, USA. george.d.park@gmail.com.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Reed</LastName><ForeName>Catherine L</ForeName><Initials>CL</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Psychology, Claremont Graduate University, Claremont, CA, USA.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Psychology Department, Claremont McKenna College, Claremont, CA, USA.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList><ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2015</Year><Month>07</Month><Day>01</Day></ArticleDate></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>Germany</Country><MedlineTA>Exp Brain Res</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>0043312</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0014-4819</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><KeywordList Owner="NOTNLM"><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Extrapersonal space</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Haptics</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Peripersonal space</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Tool-use</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Vision</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Visual attention</Keyword></KeywordList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="received"><Year>2014</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>5</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="accepted"><Year>2015</Year><Month>6</Month><Day>23</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="aheadofprint"><Year>2015</Year><Month>7</Month><Day>1</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2015</Year><Month>7</Month><Day>2</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2015</Year><Month>7</Month><Day>2</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2015</Year><Month>7</Month><Day>2</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">26126805</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1007/s00221-015-4368-8</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pii">10.1007/s00221-015-4368-8</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/HapticV1/Data/PubMed/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000309 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000309 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Ticri/CIDE
|area= HapticV1
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:26126805
|texte= Haptic over visual information in the distribution of visual attention after tool-use in near and far space.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:26126805" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a HapticV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23. |  |