Transscleral Suture-Fixated Versus Intrascleral Haptic-Fixated Intraocular Lens: A Comparative Study.
Identifieur interne : 000009 ( PubMed/Corpus ); précédent : 000008; suivant : 000010Transscleral Suture-Fixated Versus Intrascleral Haptic-Fixated Intraocular Lens: A Comparative Study.
Auteurs : Rajesh Sinha ; Mayank Bansal ; Namrata Sharma ; Tanuj Dada ; Radhika Tandon ; Jeewan S. TitiyalSource :
- Eye & contact lens [ 1542-233X ] ; 2016.
Abstract
To compare the clinical outcomes between sutured transscleral-fixated and intrascleral haptic-fixated posterior chamber intraocular lens (IOL).
DOI: 10.1097/ICL.0000000000000287
PubMed: 27243351
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:27243351Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Transscleral Suture-Fixated Versus Intrascleral Haptic-Fixated Intraocular Lens: A Comparative Study.</title><author><name sortKey="Sinha, Rajesh" sort="Sinha, Rajesh" uniqKey="Sinha R" first="Rajesh" last="Sinha">Rajesh Sinha</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Dr. Rajendra Prasad Centre for Ophthalmic Sciences, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Bansal, Mayank" sort="Bansal, Mayank" uniqKey="Bansal M" first="Mayank" last="Bansal">Mayank Bansal</name></author><author><name sortKey="Sharma, Namrata" sort="Sharma, Namrata" uniqKey="Sharma N" first="Namrata" last="Sharma">Namrata Sharma</name></author><author><name sortKey="Dada, Tanuj" sort="Dada, Tanuj" uniqKey="Dada T" first="Tanuj" last="Dada">Tanuj Dada</name></author><author><name sortKey="Tandon, Radhika" sort="Tandon, Radhika" uniqKey="Tandon R" first="Radhika" last="Tandon">Radhika Tandon</name></author><author><name sortKey="Titiyal, Jeewan S" sort="Titiyal, Jeewan S" uniqKey="Titiyal J" first="Jeewan S" last="Titiyal">Jeewan S. Titiyal</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2016">2016</date><idno type="doi">10.1097/ICL.0000000000000287</idno><idno type="RBID">pubmed:27243351</idno><idno type="pmid">27243351</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">000009</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Transscleral Suture-Fixated Versus Intrascleral Haptic-Fixated Intraocular Lens: A Comparative Study.</title><author><name sortKey="Sinha, Rajesh" sort="Sinha, Rajesh" uniqKey="Sinha R" first="Rajesh" last="Sinha">Rajesh Sinha</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Dr. Rajendra Prasad Centre for Ophthalmic Sciences, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Bansal, Mayank" sort="Bansal, Mayank" uniqKey="Bansal M" first="Mayank" last="Bansal">Mayank Bansal</name></author><author><name sortKey="Sharma, Namrata" sort="Sharma, Namrata" uniqKey="Sharma N" first="Namrata" last="Sharma">Namrata Sharma</name></author><author><name sortKey="Dada, Tanuj" sort="Dada, Tanuj" uniqKey="Dada T" first="Tanuj" last="Dada">Tanuj Dada</name></author><author><name sortKey="Tandon, Radhika" sort="Tandon, Radhika" uniqKey="Tandon R" first="Radhika" last="Tandon">Radhika Tandon</name></author><author><name sortKey="Titiyal, Jeewan S" sort="Titiyal, Jeewan S" uniqKey="Titiyal J" first="Jeewan S" last="Titiyal">Jeewan S. Titiyal</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Eye & contact lens</title><idno type="eISSN">1542-233X</idno><imprint><date when="2016" type="published">2016</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">To compare the clinical outcomes between sutured transscleral-fixated and intrascleral haptic-fixated posterior chamber intraocular lens (IOL).</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="Publisher" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">27243351</PMID><DateCreated><Year>2016</Year><Month>5</Month><Day>31</Day></DateCreated><DateRevised><Year>2016</Year><Month>5</Month><Day>31</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print-Electronic"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1542-233X</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><PubDate><Year>2016</Year><Month>May</Month><Day>26</Day></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Eye & contact lens</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Eye Contact Lens</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Transscleral Suture-Fixated Versus Intrascleral Haptic-Fixated Intraocular Lens: A Comparative Study.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn></MedlinePgn></Pagination><Abstract><AbstractText Label="PURPOSE" NlmCategory="OBJECTIVE">To compare the clinical outcomes between sutured transscleral-fixated and intrascleral haptic-fixated posterior chamber intraocular lens (IOL).</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="SETTING" NlmCategory="METHODS">Dr Rajendra Prasad Centre for Ophthalmic Sciences, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="DESIGN" NlmCategory="METHODS">A comparative case series.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="METHODS" NlmCategory="METHODS">Forty eyes of 40 patients were included; 20 in each group. Patients in group 1 underwent sutured transscleral-fixated IOL and those in group 2 underwent intrascleral haptic-fixated IOL augmented by fibrin glue. Parameters evaluated were uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), intraocular pressure (IOP), central macular thickness (CMT), IOL tilt on ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM), and pseudophakodonesis on slitlamp and UBM.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="RESULTS" NlmCategory="RESULTS">The most common cause of aphakia was complicated cataract surgery (50%). The mean preoperative UCVA in logarithm of minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) was 1.59±0.24 and 1.63±0.26 in group 1 and 2, respectively (P=0.45). There was significant improvement in UCVA in both groups (P=0.001) at 6 months (group 1: 0.33±0.17; group 2: 0.22±0.10); the improvement being greater in group 2 (P<0.05). Mean percentage endothelial cell loss and IOP change were comparable. Mean CMT (μm) was 250.95±23.98 and 225.85±21.13 in group 1 and 2, respectively (P=0.009). Pseudophakodonesis was more in group 1 as assessed on slitlamp (P=0.037) and as assessed on UBM (P=0.046). Macular edema was the most common complication seen more in group 1.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="CONCLUSIONS" NlmCategory="CONCLUSIONS">Intrascleral haptic-fixated IOL provides more stable fixation, better visual outcome, and lesser complication in comparison with sutured transscleral-fixated IOL.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList><Author><LastName>Sinha</LastName><ForeName>Rajesh</ForeName><Initials>R</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Dr. Rajendra Prasad Centre for Ophthalmic Sciences, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author><LastName>Bansal</LastName><ForeName>Mayank</ForeName><Initials>M</Initials></Author><Author><LastName>Sharma</LastName><ForeName>Namrata</ForeName><Initials>N</Initials></Author><Author><LastName>Dada</LastName><ForeName>Tanuj</ForeName><Initials>T</Initials></Author><Author><LastName>Tandon</LastName><ForeName>Radhika</ForeName><Initials>R</Initials></Author><Author><LastName>Titiyal</LastName><ForeName>Jeewan S</ForeName><Initials>JS</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>ENG</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="">JOURNAL ARTICLE</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList><ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2016</Year><Month>5</Month><Day>26</Day></ArticleDate></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><MedlineTA>Eye Contact Lens</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>101160941</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>1542-2321</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2016</Year><Month>6</Month><Day>1</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2016</Year><Month>6</Month><Day>1</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2016</Year><Month>6</Month><Day>1</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>aheadofprint</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1097/ICL.0000000000000287</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">27243351</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/HapticV1/Data/PubMed/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000009 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000009 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Ticri/CIDE
|area= HapticV1
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:27243351
|texte= Transscleral Suture-Fixated Versus Intrascleral Haptic-Fixated Intraocular Lens: A Comparative Study.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:27243351" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a HapticV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23. |  |