Posterior chamber IOLs inside or outside the capsular bag: a cytopathologic comparison of two eyes in one patient.
Identifieur interne : 002025 ( PubMed/Checkpoint ); précédent : 002024; suivant : 002026Posterior chamber IOLs inside or outside the capsular bag: a cytopathologic comparison of two eyes in one patient.
Auteurs : J R WolterSource :
- Ophthalmic surgery [ 0022-023X ] ; 1987.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- MESH :
- pathology : Eye.
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Humans, Lenses, Intraocular.
Abstract
We compare the intraocular reaction to posterior chamber lens implants placed inside, with the reaction to implants placed outside the capsular bag during uncomplicated cataract extraction. Two otherwise normal eyes were obtained postmortem from a 93-year-old woman with clinically successful posterior chamber lens implants--one mostly in and the other outside of the capsular bag. While all parts of one implant in the bag were found to be free of reactive elements on their surface, the other whole implant and the one haptic outside of the bag were covered by a well-developed reactive membrane composed of a proteinaceous film with sessile macrophages and a few giant cells. Despite these remarkably different surface reactions, both eyes showed about equal pathologic evidence of associated chronic uveitus.
PubMed: 3431803
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:3431803Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Posterior chamber IOLs inside or outside the capsular bag: a cytopathologic comparison of two eyes in one patient.</title><author><name sortKey="Wolter, J R" sort="Wolter, J R" uniqKey="Wolter J" first="J R" last="Wolter">J R Wolter</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Ophthalmology, University of Michigan Hospitals, Ann Arbor 48109-0602.</nlm:affiliation><wicri:noCountry code="subField">Ann Arbor 48109-0602</wicri:noCountry></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="1987">1987</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:3431803</idno><idno type="pmid">3431803</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">002304</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Curation">002304</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Checkpoint">002025</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Posterior chamber IOLs inside or outside the capsular bag: a cytopathologic comparison of two eyes in one patient.</title><author><name sortKey="Wolter, J R" sort="Wolter, J R" uniqKey="Wolter J" first="J R" last="Wolter">J R Wolter</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Ophthalmology, University of Michigan Hospitals, Ann Arbor 48109-0602.</nlm:affiliation><wicri:noCountry code="subField">Ann Arbor 48109-0602</wicri:noCountry></affiliation></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Ophthalmic surgery</title><idno type="ISSN">0022-023X</idno><imprint><date when="1987" type="published">1987</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Aged</term><term>Aged, 80 and over</term><term>Eye (pathology)</term><term>Female</term><term>Humans</term><term>Lenses, Intraocular</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="pathology" xml:lang="en"><term>Eye</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Aged</term><term>Aged, 80 and over</term><term>Female</term><term>Humans</term><term>Lenses, Intraocular</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">We compare the intraocular reaction to posterior chamber lens implants placed inside, with the reaction to implants placed outside the capsular bag during uncomplicated cataract extraction. Two otherwise normal eyes were obtained postmortem from a 93-year-old woman with clinically successful posterior chamber lens implants--one mostly in and the other outside of the capsular bag. While all parts of one implant in the bag were found to be free of reactive elements on their surface, the other whole implant and the one haptic outside of the bag were covered by a well-developed reactive membrane composed of a proteinaceous film with sessile macrophages and a few giant cells. Despite these remarkably different surface reactions, both eyes showed about equal pathologic evidence of associated chronic uveitus.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Owner="NLM" Status="MEDLINE"><PMID Version="1">3431803</PMID><DateCreated><Year>1988</Year><Month>02</Month><Day>26</Day></DateCreated><DateCompleted><Year>1988</Year><Month>02</Month><Day>26</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2006</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>15</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Print">0022-023X</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print"><Volume>18</Volume><Issue>10</Issue><PubDate><Year>1987</Year><Month>Oct</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Ophthalmic surgery</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Ophthalmic Surg</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Posterior chamber IOLs inside or outside the capsular bag: a cytopathologic comparison of two eyes in one patient.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>745-50</MedlinePgn></Pagination><Abstract><AbstractText>We compare the intraocular reaction to posterior chamber lens implants placed inside, with the reaction to implants placed outside the capsular bag during uncomplicated cataract extraction. Two otherwise normal eyes were obtained postmortem from a 93-year-old woman with clinically successful posterior chamber lens implants--one mostly in and the other outside of the capsular bag. While all parts of one implant in the bag were found to be free of reactive elements on their surface, the other whole implant and the one haptic outside of the bag were covered by a well-developed reactive membrane composed of a proteinaceous film with sessile macrophages and a few giant cells. Despite these remarkably different surface reactions, both eyes showed about equal pathologic evidence of associated chronic uveitus.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Wolter</LastName><ForeName>J R</ForeName><Initials>JR</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Ophthalmology, University of Michigan Hospitals, Ann Arbor 48109-0602.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D002363">Case Reports</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D003160">Comparative Study</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D013485">Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>UNITED STATES</Country><MedlineTA>Ophthalmic Surg</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>0241035</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0022-023X</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D000368">Aged</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D000369">Aged, 80 and over</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D005123">Eye</DescriptorName><QualifierName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="Q000473">pathology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D005260">Female</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D006801">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="D007910">Lenses, Intraocular</DescriptorName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>1987</Year><Month>10</Month><Day>1</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>1987</Year><Month>10</Month><Day>1</Day><Hour>0</Hour><Minute>1</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>1987</Year><Month>10</Month><Day>1</Day><Hour>0</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">3431803</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed><affiliations><list></list><tree><noCountry><name sortKey="Wolter, J R" sort="Wolter, J R" uniqKey="Wolter J" first="J R" last="Wolter">J R Wolter</name></noCountry></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/HapticV1/Data/PubMed/Checkpoint
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 002025 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Checkpoint/biblio.hfd -nk 002025 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Ticri/CIDE
|area= HapticV1
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Checkpoint
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:3431803
|texte= Posterior chamber IOLs inside or outside the capsular bag: a cytopathologic comparison of two eyes in one patient.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Checkpoint/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:3431803" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Checkpoint/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a HapticV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23. |  |