Evidence that tactile stimulation inhibits nociceptive sensations produced by innocuous contact cooling.
Identifieur interne : 001726 ( PubMed/Checkpoint ); précédent : 001725; suivant : 001727Evidence that tactile stimulation inhibits nociceptive sensations produced by innocuous contact cooling.
Auteurs : Barry G. Green [États-Unis] ; Kate L. SchoenSource :
- Behavioural brain research [ 0166-4328 ] ; 2005.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Adult, Analysis of Variance, Body Temperature Regulation, Cold Temperature, Female, Humans, Inhibition (Psychology), Male, Nociceptors (physiology), Pain Measurement (methods), Pain Threshold (physiology), Perceptual Masking (physiology), Physical Stimulation, Psychophysics (methods), Reaction Time (physiology), Skin (innervation), Thermosensing (physiology), Time Factors.
- MESH :
- innervation : Skin.
- methods : Pain Measurement, Psychophysics.
- physiology : Nociceptors, Pain Threshold, Perceptual Masking, Reaction Time, Thermosensing.
- Adult, Analysis of Variance, Body Temperature Regulation, Cold Temperature, Female, Humans, Inhibition (Psychology), Male, Physical Stimulation, Time Factors.
Abstract
It was recently shown that stinging, pricking or burning is reliably perceived by some individuals when the skin is cooled to temperatures as mild as 25-30 degrees C. These seemingly paradoxical sensations, which have been termed innocuous-cold nociception (ICN), were significant only when cooling was produced by a thermode resting statically on the skin (static contact); touching an already cooled thermode to the skin (dynamic contact) produced reports of only coolness and cold. The present study investigated the hypothesis that ICN is inhibited by tactile stimulation produced when a thermode contacts the skin. Experiment 1 pitted the tactile hypothesis against an alternative explanation that inhibition results from higher rates of skin cooling during dynamic contact. ICN was measured at three different cooling rates (-1.0, -2.5, -5.0 degrees C/s) when the thermode was resting on the skin or was touched to the skin at the moment cooling began. The results supported the tactile hypothesis: faster cooling rates during static contact led to stronger rather than weaker nociceptive sensations, and ICN was suppressed even when dynamic contact was coincident with the onset of cooling, and thus could not affect cooling rate. Experiment 2 confirmed the latter result and showed that suppression was greatest at 28 degrees C, less at 24 degrees C, and not significant at 18 degrees C. We conclude that dynamic tactile stimulation produced by contact with a surface inhibits the nociceptive component of innocuous but not noxious cooling. The implications of this conclusion for the role of cold perception in behavioral thermoregulation versus haptic perception, and for theories of cold perception in general, are discussed.
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2005.03.015
PubMed: 15922069
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:15922069Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Evidence that tactile stimulation inhibits nociceptive sensations produced by innocuous contact cooling.</title><author><name sortKey="Green, Barry G" sort="Green, Barry G" uniqKey="Green B" first="Barry G" last="Green">Barry G. Green</name><affiliation wicri:level="2"><nlm:affiliation>The John B. Pierce Laboratory, Yale University School of Medicine, 290 Congress Avenue, New Haven, CT 06519, USA. green@jbpierce.org</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country><wicri:regionArea>The John B. Pierce Laboratory, Yale University School of Medicine, 290 Congress Avenue, New Haven, CT 06519</wicri:regionArea><placeName><region type="state">Connecticut</region></placeName></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Schoen, Kate L" sort="Schoen, Kate L" uniqKey="Schoen K" first="Kate L" last="Schoen">Kate L. Schoen</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2005">2005</date><idno type="doi">10.1016/j.bbr.2005.03.015</idno><idno type="RBID">pubmed:15922069</idno><idno type="pmid">15922069</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">001932</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Curation">001932</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Checkpoint">001726</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Evidence that tactile stimulation inhibits nociceptive sensations produced by innocuous contact cooling.</title><author><name sortKey="Green, Barry G" sort="Green, Barry G" uniqKey="Green B" first="Barry G" last="Green">Barry G. Green</name><affiliation wicri:level="2"><nlm:affiliation>The John B. Pierce Laboratory, Yale University School of Medicine, 290 Congress Avenue, New Haven, CT 06519, USA. green@jbpierce.org</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country><wicri:regionArea>The John B. Pierce Laboratory, Yale University School of Medicine, 290 Congress Avenue, New Haven, CT 06519</wicri:regionArea><placeName><region type="state">Connecticut</region></placeName></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Schoen, Kate L" sort="Schoen, Kate L" uniqKey="Schoen K" first="Kate L" last="Schoen">Kate L. Schoen</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Behavioural brain research</title><idno type="ISSN">0166-4328</idno><imprint><date when="2005" type="published">2005</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Adult</term><term>Analysis of Variance</term><term>Body Temperature Regulation</term><term>Cold Temperature</term><term>Female</term><term>Humans</term><term>Inhibition (Psychology)</term><term>Male</term><term>Nociceptors (physiology)</term><term>Pain Measurement (methods)</term><term>Pain Threshold (physiology)</term><term>Perceptual Masking (physiology)</term><term>Physical Stimulation</term><term>Psychophysics (methods)</term><term>Reaction Time (physiology)</term><term>Skin (innervation)</term><term>Thermosensing (physiology)</term><term>Time Factors</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="innervation" xml:lang="en"><term>Skin</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="methods" xml:lang="en"><term>Pain Measurement</term><term>Psychophysics</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="physiology" xml:lang="en"><term>Nociceptors</term><term>Pain Threshold</term><term>Perceptual Masking</term><term>Reaction Time</term><term>Thermosensing</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Adult</term><term>Analysis of Variance</term><term>Body Temperature Regulation</term><term>Cold Temperature</term><term>Female</term><term>Humans</term><term>Inhibition (Psychology)</term><term>Male</term><term>Physical Stimulation</term><term>Time Factors</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">It was recently shown that stinging, pricking or burning is reliably perceived by some individuals when the skin is cooled to temperatures as mild as 25-30 degrees C. These seemingly paradoxical sensations, which have been termed innocuous-cold nociception (ICN), were significant only when cooling was produced by a thermode resting statically on the skin (static contact); touching an already cooled thermode to the skin (dynamic contact) produced reports of only coolness and cold. The present study investigated the hypothesis that ICN is inhibited by tactile stimulation produced when a thermode contacts the skin. Experiment 1 pitted the tactile hypothesis against an alternative explanation that inhibition results from higher rates of skin cooling during dynamic contact. ICN was measured at three different cooling rates (-1.0, -2.5, -5.0 degrees C/s) when the thermode was resting on the skin or was touched to the skin at the moment cooling began. The results supported the tactile hypothesis: faster cooling rates during static contact led to stronger rather than weaker nociceptive sensations, and ICN was suppressed even when dynamic contact was coincident with the onset of cooling, and thus could not affect cooling rate. Experiment 2 confirmed the latter result and showed that suppression was greatest at 28 degrees C, less at 24 degrees C, and not significant at 18 degrees C. We conclude that dynamic tactile stimulation produced by contact with a surface inhibits the nociceptive component of innocuous but not noxious cooling. The implications of this conclusion for the role of cold perception in behavioral thermoregulation versus haptic perception, and for theories of cold perception in general, are discussed.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Owner="NLM" Status="MEDLINE"><PMID Version="1">15922069</PMID><DateCreated><Year>2005</Year><Month>05</Month><Day>30</Day></DateCreated><DateCompleted><Year>2005</Year><Month>08</Month><Day>12</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2010</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>18</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print-Electronic"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Print">0166-4328</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print"><Volume>162</Volume><Issue>1</Issue><PubDate><Year>2005</Year><Month>Jul</Month><Day>1</Day></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Behavioural brain research</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Behav. Brain Res.</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Evidence that tactile stimulation inhibits nociceptive sensations produced by innocuous contact cooling.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>90-8</MedlinePgn></Pagination><Abstract><AbstractText>It was recently shown that stinging, pricking or burning is reliably perceived by some individuals when the skin is cooled to temperatures as mild as 25-30 degrees C. These seemingly paradoxical sensations, which have been termed innocuous-cold nociception (ICN), were significant only when cooling was produced by a thermode resting statically on the skin (static contact); touching an already cooled thermode to the skin (dynamic contact) produced reports of only coolness and cold. The present study investigated the hypothesis that ICN is inhibited by tactile stimulation produced when a thermode contacts the skin. Experiment 1 pitted the tactile hypothesis against an alternative explanation that inhibition results from higher rates of skin cooling during dynamic contact. ICN was measured at three different cooling rates (-1.0, -2.5, -5.0 degrees C/s) when the thermode was resting on the skin or was touched to the skin at the moment cooling began. The results supported the tactile hypothesis: faster cooling rates during static contact led to stronger rather than weaker nociceptive sensations, and ICN was suppressed even when dynamic contact was coincident with the onset of cooling, and thus could not affect cooling rate. Experiment 2 confirmed the latter result and showed that suppression was greatest at 28 degrees C, less at 24 degrees C, and not significant at 18 degrees C. We conclude that dynamic tactile stimulation produced by contact with a surface inhibits the nociceptive component of innocuous but not noxious cooling. The implications of this conclusion for the role of cold perception in behavioral thermoregulation versus haptic perception, and for theories of cold perception in general, are discussed.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Green</LastName><ForeName>Barry G</ForeName><Initials>BG</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>The John B. Pierce Laboratory, Yale University School of Medicine, 290 Congress Avenue, New Haven, CT 06519, USA. green@jbpierce.org</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Schoen</LastName><ForeName>Kate L</ForeName><Initials>KL</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><GrantList CompleteYN="Y"><Grant><GrantID>R01 NS038463</GrantID><Acronym>NS</Acronym><Agency>NINDS NIH HHS</Agency><Country>United States</Country></Grant></GrantList><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D003160">Comparative Study</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D052061">Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D013487">Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList><ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2005</Year><Month>04</Month><Day>13</Day></ArticleDate></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>Netherlands</Country><MedlineTA>Behav Brain Res</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>8004872</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0166-4328</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D000328">Adult</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D000704">Analysis of Variance</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D001833">Body Temperature Regulation</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="D003080">Cold Temperature</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D005260">Female</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D006801">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="D007266">Inhibition (Psychology)</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D008297">Male</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D009619">Nociceptors</DescriptorName><QualifierName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="Q000502">physiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D010147">Pain Measurement</DescriptorName><QualifierName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="Q000379">methods</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D017288">Pain Threshold</DescriptorName><QualifierName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="Q000502">physiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D010470">Perceptual Masking</DescriptorName><QualifierName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="Q000502">physiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="D010812">Physical Stimulation</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D011601">Psychophysics</DescriptorName><QualifierName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="Q000379">methods</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D011930">Reaction Time</DescriptorName><QualifierName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="Q000502">physiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D012867">Skin</DescriptorName><QualifierName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="Q000294">innervation</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D013697">Thermosensing</DescriptorName><QualifierName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="Q000502">physiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D013997">Time Factors</DescriptorName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="received"><Year>2004</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>19</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="revised"><Year>2005</Year><Month>3</Month><Day>3</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="accepted"><Year>2005</Year><Month>3</Month><Day>6</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="aheadofprint"><Year>2005</Year><Month>4</Month><Day>13</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2005</Year><Month>6</Month><Day>1</Day><Hour>9</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2005</Year><Month>8</Month><Day>13</Day><Hour>9</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2005</Year><Month>6</Month><Day>1</Day><Hour>9</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pii">S0166-4328(05)00109-9</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1016/j.bbr.2005.03.015</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">15922069</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed><affiliations><list><country><li>États-Unis</li></country><region><li>Connecticut</li></region></list><tree><noCountry><name sortKey="Schoen, Kate L" sort="Schoen, Kate L" uniqKey="Schoen K" first="Kate L" last="Schoen">Kate L. Schoen</name></noCountry><country name="États-Unis"><region name="Connecticut"><name sortKey="Green, Barry G" sort="Green, Barry G" uniqKey="Green B" first="Barry G" last="Green">Barry G. Green</name></region></country></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/HapticV1/Data/PubMed/Checkpoint
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001726 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Checkpoint/biblio.hfd -nk 001726 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Ticri/CIDE
|area= HapticV1
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Checkpoint
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:15922069
|texte= Evidence that tactile stimulation inhibits nociceptive sensations produced by innocuous contact cooling.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Checkpoint/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:15922069" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Checkpoint/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a HapticV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23. |  |