Serveur d'exploration sur les dispositifs haptiques

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Memory for curvature of objects: haptic touch vs. vision.

Identifieur interne : 001408 ( PubMed/Checkpoint ); précédent : 001407; suivant : 001409

Memory for curvature of objects: haptic touch vs. vision.

Auteurs : Miriam Ittyerah [Inde] ; Lawrence E. Marks

Source :

RBID : pubmed:17535462

English descriptors

Abstract

The present study examined the role of vision and haptics in memory for stimulus objects that vary along the dimension of curvature. Experiment 1 measured haptic-haptic (T-T) and haptic-visual (T-V) discrimination of curvature in a short-term memory paradigm, using 30-second retention intervals containing five different interpolated tasks. Results showed poorest performance when the interpolated tasks required spatial processing or movement, thereby suggesting that haptic information about shape is encoded in a spatial-motor representation. Experiment 2 compared visual-visual (V-V) and visual-haptic (V-T) short-term memory, again using 30-second delay intervals. The results of the ANOVA failed to show a significant effect of intervening activity. Intra-modal visual performance and cross-modal performance were similar. Comparing the four modality conditions (inter-modal V-T, T-V; intra-modal V-V, T-T, by combining the data of Experiments 1 and 2), in a global analysis, showed a reliable interaction between intervening activity and experiment (modality). Although there appears to be a general tendency for spatial and movement activities to exert the most deleterious effects overall, the patterns are not identical when the initial stimulus is encoded haptically (Experiment 1) and visually (Experiment 2).

DOI: 10.1348/000712606X171531
PubMed: 17535462


Affiliations:


Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)


Links to Exploration step

pubmed:17535462

Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI>
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en">Memory for curvature of objects: haptic touch vs. vision.</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Ittyerah, Miriam" sort="Ittyerah, Miriam" uniqKey="Ittyerah M" first="Miriam" last="Ittyerah">Miriam Ittyerah</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<nlm:affiliation>Department of Psychology, University of Delhi, Delhi, India. miriamittyerah7@yahoo.co.in</nlm:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">Inde</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of Psychology, University of Delhi, Delhi</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>Delhi</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Marks, Lawrence E" sort="Marks, Lawrence E" uniqKey="Marks L" first="Lawrence E" last="Marks">Lawrence E. Marks</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno>
<date when="2007">2007</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1348/000712606X171531</idno>
<idno type="RBID">pubmed:17535462</idno>
<idno type="pmid">17535462</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">001626</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Curation">001626</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Checkpoint">001408</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title xml:lang="en">Memory for curvature of objects: haptic touch vs. vision.</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Ittyerah, Miriam" sort="Ittyerah, Miriam" uniqKey="Ittyerah M" first="Miriam" last="Ittyerah">Miriam Ittyerah</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<nlm:affiliation>Department of Psychology, University of Delhi, Delhi, India. miriamittyerah7@yahoo.co.in</nlm:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">Inde</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of Psychology, University of Delhi, Delhi</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>Delhi</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Marks, Lawrence E" sort="Marks, Lawrence E" uniqKey="Marks L" first="Lawrence E" last="Marks">Lawrence E. Marks</name>
</author>
</analytic>
<series>
<title level="j">British journal of psychology (London, England : 1953)</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0007-1269</idno>
<imprint>
<date when="2007" type="published">2007</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass>
<keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en">
<term>Adolescent</term>
<term>Female</term>
<term>Form Perception (physiology)</term>
<term>Humans</term>
<term>Male</term>
<term>Memory</term>
<term>Pattern Recognition, Physiological (physiology)</term>
<term>Pattern Recognition, Visual (physiology)</term>
<term>Space Perception</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="physiology" xml:lang="en">
<term>Form Perception</term>
<term>Pattern Recognition, Physiological</term>
<term>Pattern Recognition, Visual</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en">
<term>Adolescent</term>
<term>Female</term>
<term>Humans</term>
<term>Male</term>
<term>Memory</term>
<term>Space Perception</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">The present study examined the role of vision and haptics in memory for stimulus objects that vary along the dimension of curvature. Experiment 1 measured haptic-haptic (T-T) and haptic-visual (T-V) discrimination of curvature in a short-term memory paradigm, using 30-second retention intervals containing five different interpolated tasks. Results showed poorest performance when the interpolated tasks required spatial processing or movement, thereby suggesting that haptic information about shape is encoded in a spatial-motor representation. Experiment 2 compared visual-visual (V-V) and visual-haptic (V-T) short-term memory, again using 30-second delay intervals. The results of the ANOVA failed to show a significant effect of intervening activity. Intra-modal visual performance and cross-modal performance were similar. Comparing the four modality conditions (inter-modal V-T, T-V; intra-modal V-V, T-T, by combining the data of Experiments 1 and 2), in a global analysis, showed a reliable interaction between intervening activity and experiment (modality). Although there appears to be a general tendency for spatial and movement activities to exert the most deleterious effects overall, the patterns are not identical when the initial stimulus is encoded haptically (Experiment 1) and visually (Experiment 2).</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<pubmed>
<MedlineCitation Owner="NLM" Status="MEDLINE">
<PMID Version="1">17535462</PMID>
<DateCreated>
<Year>2007</Year>
<Month>10</Month>
<Day>12</Day>
</DateCreated>
<DateCompleted>
<Year>2008</Year>
<Month>02</Month>
<Day>04</Day>
</DateCompleted>
<DateRevised>
<Year>2014</Year>
<Month>09</Month>
<Day>04</Day>
</DateRevised>
<Article PubModel="Print">
<Journal>
<ISSN IssnType="Print">0007-1269</ISSN>
<JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print">
<Volume>98</Volume>
<Issue>Pt 4</Issue>
<PubDate>
<Year>2007</Year>
<Month>Nov</Month>
</PubDate>
</JournalIssue>
<Title>British journal of psychology (London, England : 1953)</Title>
<ISOAbbreviation>Br J Psychol</ISOAbbreviation>
</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Memory for curvature of objects: haptic touch vs. vision.</ArticleTitle>
<Pagination>
<MedlinePgn>589-610</MedlinePgn>
</Pagination>
<Abstract>
<AbstractText>The present study examined the role of vision and haptics in memory for stimulus objects that vary along the dimension of curvature. Experiment 1 measured haptic-haptic (T-T) and haptic-visual (T-V) discrimination of curvature in a short-term memory paradigm, using 30-second retention intervals containing five different interpolated tasks. Results showed poorest performance when the interpolated tasks required spatial processing or movement, thereby suggesting that haptic information about shape is encoded in a spatial-motor representation. Experiment 2 compared visual-visual (V-V) and visual-haptic (V-T) short-term memory, again using 30-second delay intervals. The results of the ANOVA failed to show a significant effect of intervening activity. Intra-modal visual performance and cross-modal performance were similar. Comparing the four modality conditions (inter-modal V-T, T-V; intra-modal V-V, T-T, by combining the data of Experiments 1 and 2), in a global analysis, showed a reliable interaction between intervening activity and experiment (modality). Although there appears to be a general tendency for spatial and movement activities to exert the most deleterious effects overall, the patterns are not identical when the initial stimulus is encoded haptically (Experiment 1) and visually (Experiment 2).</AbstractText>
</Abstract>
<AuthorList CompleteYN="Y">
<Author ValidYN="Y">
<LastName>Ittyerah</LastName>
<ForeName>Miriam</ForeName>
<Initials>M</Initials>
<AffiliationInfo>
<Affiliation>Department of Psychology, University of Delhi, Delhi, India. miriamittyerah7@yahoo.co.in</Affiliation>
</AffiliationInfo>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y">
<LastName>Marks</LastName>
<ForeName>Lawrence E</ForeName>
<Initials>LE</Initials>
</Author>
</AuthorList>
<Language>eng</Language>
<GrantList CompleteYN="Y">
<Grant>
<GrantID>DC00271-13</GrantID>
<Acronym>DC</Acronym>
<Agency>NIDCD NIH HHS</Agency>
<Country>United States</Country>
</Grant>
<Grant>
<GrantID>R01 DC000271</GrantID>
<Acronym>DC</Acronym>
<Agency>NIDCD NIH HHS</Agency>
<Country>United States</Country>
</Grant>
<Grant>
<GrantID>R01 DC000271-14</GrantID>
<Acronym>DC</Acronym>
<Agency>NIDCD NIH HHS</Agency>
<Country>United States</Country>
</Grant>
</GrantList>
<PublicationTypeList>
<PublicationType UI="D003160">Comparative Study</PublicationType>
<PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType>
<PublicationType UI="D016449">Randomized Controlled Trial</PublicationType>
<PublicationType UI="D052061">Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural</PublicationType>
<PublicationType UI="D013485">Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't</PublicationType>
</PublicationTypeList>
</Article>
<MedlineJournalInfo>
<Country>England</Country>
<MedlineTA>Br J Psychol</MedlineTA>
<NlmUniqueID>0373124</NlmUniqueID>
<ISSNLinking>0007-1269</ISSNLinking>
</MedlineJournalInfo>
<CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset>
<CommentsCorrectionsList>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Percept Psychophys. 1999 Jul;61(5):874-94</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">10499001</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Perception. 1998;27(7):869-80</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">10209649</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Psychol Rev. 1962 Nov;69:477-91</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">13947730</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Science. 1963 Oct 25;142(3591):455-62</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">14064442</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Science. 1964 Feb 7;143(3606):594-6</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">14080333</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>J Exp Psychol. 1959 Sep;58:193-8</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">14432252</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Child Dev. 1965 Jun;36:367-77</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">14300860</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Brain Cogn. 2005 Dec;59(3):258-68</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">16154677</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Perception. 2000;29(2):135-48</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">10820597</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Exp Brain Res. 2000 Jun;132(3):369-74</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">10883385</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Nat Neurosci. 2001 Mar;4(3):324-30</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">11224551</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Vision Res. 2001;41(10-11):1409-22</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">11322983</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Curr Biol. 2001 Aug 7;11(15):1188-91</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">11516950</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Perception. 2001;30(10):1263-74</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">11721826</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Memory. 2002 Jan;10(1):7-20</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">11747572</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Neuropsychologia. 2002;40(10):1706-14</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">11992658</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Curr Biol. 2002 Oct 1;12(19):1661-4</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">12361568</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Cereb Cortex. 2002 Nov;12(11):1202-12</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">12379608</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Exp Brain Res. 2003 Apr;149(3):320-30</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">12632234</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Br J Psychol. 2004 Feb;95(Pt 1):57-79</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">15005868</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Percept Psychophys. 2004 Feb;66(2):342-51</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">15129753</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2004 Jun;4(2):260-9</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">15460932</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Can J Psychol. 1965 Sep;19(3):175-87</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">5824958</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Sci Am. 1965 Nov;213(5):84-94</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">5828465</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>J Exp Psychol. 1966 Feb;71(2):314-8</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">5903019</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>J Exp Psychol. 1967 Sep;75(1):103-7</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">6065822</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Q J Exp Psychol. 1969 May;21(2):180-4</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">5787977</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>J Exp Psychol. 1969 Aug;81(2):216-22</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">5811799</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Q J Exp Psychol. 1972 Aug;24(3):253-61</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">5049927</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>J Exp Psychol. 1973 Sep;100(1):168-77</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">4744492</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Br J Psychol. 1974 May;65(2):253-63</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">4841319</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Percept Psychophys. 1982 May;31(5):446-50</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">7110903</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Q J Exp Psychol A. 1986 May;38(2):229-47</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">3737975</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>J Neurosci. 1987 Jun;7(6):1682-97</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">3598642</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Acta Psychol (Amst). 1993 Oct;84(1):41-51</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">8237455</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Brain. 1996 Jun;119 ( Pt 3):875-88</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">8673499</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Perception. 1997;26(3):313-20</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">9282228</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Percept Psychophys. 1997 Nov;59(8):1225-40</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">9401457</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Acta Psychol (Amst). 1999 Jan;100(3):267-89</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">9894690</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites">
<RefSource>Percept Psychophys. 1999 Jul;61(5):895-908</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">10499002</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
</CommentsCorrectionsList>
<MeshHeadingList>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D000293">Adolescent</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D005260">Female</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D005556">Form Perception</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="Q000502">physiology</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D006801">Humans</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D008297">Male</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="D008568">Memory</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D046709">Pattern Recognition, Physiological</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="Q000502">physiology</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D010364">Pattern Recognition, Visual</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="Q000502">physiology</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D013028">Space Perception</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
</MeshHeadingList>
<OtherID Source="NLM">NIHMS40414</OtherID>
<OtherID Source="NLM">PMC2258210</OtherID>
</MedlineCitation>
<PubmedData>
<History>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed">
<Year>2007</Year>
<Month>5</Month>
<Day>31</Day>
<Hour>9</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline">
<Year>2008</Year>
<Month>2</Month>
<Day>5</Day>
<Hour>9</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez">
<Year>2007</Year>
<Month>5</Month>
<Day>31</Day>
<Hour>9</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
</History>
<PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1348/000712606X171531</ArticleId>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">17535462</ArticleId>
<ArticleId IdType="pmc">PMC2258210</ArticleId>
<ArticleId IdType="mid">NIHMS40414</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</PubmedData>
</pubmed>
<affiliations>
<list>
<country>
<li>Inde</li>
</country>
</list>
<tree>
<noCountry>
<name sortKey="Marks, Lawrence E" sort="Marks, Lawrence E" uniqKey="Marks L" first="Lawrence E" last="Marks">Lawrence E. Marks</name>
</noCountry>
<country name="Inde">
<noRegion>
<name sortKey="Ittyerah, Miriam" sort="Ittyerah, Miriam" uniqKey="Ittyerah M" first="Miriam" last="Ittyerah">Miriam Ittyerah</name>
</noRegion>
</country>
</tree>
</affiliations>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/HapticV1/Data/PubMed/Checkpoint
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001408 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Checkpoint/biblio.hfd -nk 001408 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Ticri/CIDE
   |area=    HapticV1
   |flux=    PubMed
   |étape=   Checkpoint
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     pubmed:17535462
   |texte=   Memory for curvature of objects: haptic touch vs. vision.
}}

Pour générer des pages wiki

HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Checkpoint/RBID.i   -Sk "pubmed:17535462" \
       | HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Checkpoint/biblio.hfd   \
       | NlmPubMed2Wicri -a HapticV1 

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23.
Data generation: Mon Jun 13 01:09:46 2016. Site generation: Wed Mar 6 09:54:07 2024