Should drivers be operating within an automation-free bandwidth? Evaluating haptic steering support systems with different levels of authority.
Identifieur interne : 000235 ( PubMed/Checkpoint ); précédent : 000234; suivant : 000236Should drivers be operating within an automation-free bandwidth? Evaluating haptic steering support systems with different levels of authority.
Auteurs : Sebastiaan M. Petermeijer ; David A. Abbink ; Joost C F. De WinterSource :
- Human factors [ 0018-7208 ] ; 2015.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- MESH :
- instrumentation : Automation.
- methods : Automation.
- Adult, Automobile Driving, Computer Simulation, Feedback, Female, Humans, Male, Man-Machine Systems, Reaction Time, Task Performance and Analysis, Young Adult.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to compare continuous versus bandwidth haptic steering guidance in terms of lane-keeping behavior, aftereffects, and satisfaction.
PubMed: 25790567
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:25790567Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Should drivers be operating within an automation-free bandwidth? Evaluating haptic steering support systems with different levels of authority.</title><author><name sortKey="Petermeijer, Sebastiaan M" sort="Petermeijer, Sebastiaan M" uniqKey="Petermeijer S" first="Sebastiaan M" last="Petermeijer">Sebastiaan M. Petermeijer</name></author><author><name sortKey="Abbink, David A" sort="Abbink, David A" uniqKey="Abbink D" first="David A" last="Abbink">David A. Abbink</name></author><author><name sortKey="De Winter, Joost C F" sort="De Winter, Joost C F" uniqKey="De Winter J" first="Joost C F" last="De Winter">Joost C F. De Winter</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2015">2015</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:25790567</idno><idno type="pmid">25790567</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">000393</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Curation">000393</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Checkpoint">000235</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Should drivers be operating within an automation-free bandwidth? Evaluating haptic steering support systems with different levels of authority.</title><author><name sortKey="Petermeijer, Sebastiaan M" sort="Petermeijer, Sebastiaan M" uniqKey="Petermeijer S" first="Sebastiaan M" last="Petermeijer">Sebastiaan M. Petermeijer</name></author><author><name sortKey="Abbink, David A" sort="Abbink, David A" uniqKey="Abbink D" first="David A" last="Abbink">David A. Abbink</name></author><author><name sortKey="De Winter, Joost C F" sort="De Winter, Joost C F" uniqKey="De Winter J" first="Joost C F" last="De Winter">Joost C F. De Winter</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Human factors</title><idno type="ISSN">0018-7208</idno><imprint><date when="2015" type="published">2015</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Adult</term><term>Automation (instrumentation)</term><term>Automation (methods)</term><term>Automobile Driving</term><term>Computer Simulation</term><term>Feedback</term><term>Female</term><term>Humans</term><term>Male</term><term>Man-Machine Systems</term><term>Reaction Time</term><term>Task Performance and Analysis</term><term>Young Adult</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="instrumentation" xml:lang="en"><term>Automation</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="methods" xml:lang="en"><term>Automation</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Adult</term><term>Automobile Driving</term><term>Computer Simulation</term><term>Feedback</term><term>Female</term><term>Humans</term><term>Male</term><term>Man-Machine Systems</term><term>Reaction Time</term><term>Task Performance and Analysis</term><term>Young Adult</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">The aim of this study was to compare continuous versus bandwidth haptic steering guidance in terms of lane-keeping behavior, aftereffects, and satisfaction.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Owner="NLM" Status="MEDLINE"><PMID Version="1">25790567</PMID><DateCreated><Year>2015</Year><Month>03</Month><Day>20</Day></DateCreated><DateCompleted><Year>2015</Year><Month>04</Month><Day>28</Day></DateCompleted><Article PubModel="Print"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Print">0018-7208</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print"><Volume>57</Volume><Issue>1</Issue><PubDate><Year>2015</Year><Month>Feb</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Human factors</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Hum Factors</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Should drivers be operating within an automation-free bandwidth? Evaluating haptic steering support systems with different levels of authority.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>5-20</MedlinePgn></Pagination><Abstract><AbstractText Label="OBJECTIVE" NlmCategory="OBJECTIVE">The aim of this study was to compare continuous versus bandwidth haptic steering guidance in terms of lane-keeping behavior, aftereffects, and satisfaction.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="BACKGROUND" NlmCategory="BACKGROUND">An important human factors question is whether operators should be supported continuously or only when tolerance limits are exceeded. We aimed to clarify this issue for haptic steering guidance by investigating costs and benefits of both approaches in a driving simulator.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="METHODS" NlmCategory="METHODS">Thirty-two participants drove five trials, each with a different level of haptic support: no guidance (Manual); guidance outside a 0.5-m bandwidth (Band1); a hysteresis version of Band1, which guided back to the lane center once triggered (Band2); continuous guidance (Cont); and Cont with double feedback gain (ContS). Participants performed a reaction time task while driving. Toward the end of each trial, the guidance was unexpectedly disabled to investigate aftereffects.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="RESULTS" NlmCategory="RESULTS">All four guidance systems prevented large lateral errors (>0.7 m). Cont and especially ContS yielded smaller lateral errors and higher time to line crossing than Manual, Band1, and Band2. Cont and ContS yielded short-lasting aftereffects, whereas Band1 and Band2 did not. Cont yielded higher self-reported satisfaction and faster reaction times than Band1.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="CONCLUSIONS" NlmCategory="CONCLUSIONS">Continuous and bandwidth guidance both prevent large driver errors. Continuous guidance yields improved performance and satisfaction over bandwidth guidance at the cost of aftereffects and variability in driver torque (indicating human-automation conflicts).</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="APPLICATION" NlmCategory="CONCLUSIONS">The presented results are useful for designers of haptic guidance systems and support critical thinking about the costs and benefits of automation support systems.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Petermeijer</LastName><ForeName>Sebastiaan M</ForeName><Initials>SM</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Abbink</LastName><ForeName>David A</ForeName><Initials>DA</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>de Winter</LastName><ForeName>Joost C F</ForeName><Initials>JC</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>United States</Country><MedlineTA>Hum Factors</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>0374660</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0018-7208</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><CitationSubset>S</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D000328">Adult</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D001331">Automation</DescriptorName><QualifierName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="Q000295">instrumentation</QualifierName><QualifierName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="Q000379">methods</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="D001334">Automobile Driving</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="D003198">Computer Simulation</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="D005246">Feedback</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D005260">Female</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D006801">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D008297">Male</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="D008328">Man-Machine Systems</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D011930">Reaction Time</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D013647">Task Performance and Analysis</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D055815">Young Adult</DescriptorName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2015</Year><Month>3</Month><Day>21</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2015</Year><Month>3</Month><Day>21</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2015</Year><Month>4</Month><Day>29</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">25790567</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed><affiliations><list></list><tree><noCountry><name sortKey="Abbink, David A" sort="Abbink, David A" uniqKey="Abbink D" first="David A" last="Abbink">David A. Abbink</name><name sortKey="De Winter, Joost C F" sort="De Winter, Joost C F" uniqKey="De Winter J" first="Joost C F" last="De Winter">Joost C F. De Winter</name><name sortKey="Petermeijer, Sebastiaan M" sort="Petermeijer, Sebastiaan M" uniqKey="Petermeijer S" first="Sebastiaan M" last="Petermeijer">Sebastiaan M. Petermeijer</name></noCountry></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/HapticV1/Data/PubMed/Checkpoint
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000235 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Checkpoint/biblio.hfd -nk 000235 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Ticri/CIDE
|area= HapticV1
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Checkpoint
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:25790567
|texte= Should drivers be operating within an automation-free bandwidth? Evaluating haptic steering support systems with different levels of authority.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Checkpoint/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:25790567" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Checkpoint/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a HapticV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23. |  |