The Various Perceptions of Distance: An Alternative View of How Effort Affects Distance Judgments
Identifieur interne : 000F67 ( Pmc/Curation ); précédent : 000F66; suivant : 000F68The Various Perceptions of Distance: An Alternative View of How Effort Affects Distance Judgments
Auteurs : Adam J. Woods ; John W. Philbeck ; Jerome V. DanoffSource :
- Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance [ 0096-1523 ] ; 2009.
Abstract
D. R. Proffitt and colleagues (e. g.,
Url:
DOI: 10.1037/a0013622
PubMed: 19653752
PubMed Central: 2892267
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream Pmc, to step Corpus: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :000F67
Links to Exploration step
PMC:2892267Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">The Various Perceptions of Distance: An Alternative View of How Effort Affects Distance Judgments</title><author><name sortKey="Woods, Adam J" sort="Woods, Adam J" uniqKey="Woods A" first="Adam J." last="Woods">Adam J. Woods</name></author><author><name sortKey="Philbeck, John W" sort="Philbeck, John W" uniqKey="Philbeck J" first="John W." last="Philbeck">John W. Philbeck</name></author><author><name sortKey="Danoff, Jerome V" sort="Danoff, Jerome V" uniqKey="Danoff J" first="Jerome V." last="Danoff">Jerome V. Danoff</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PMC</idno><idno type="pmid">19653752</idno><idno type="pmc">2892267</idno><idno type="url">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2892267</idno><idno type="RBID">PMC:2892267</idno><idno type="doi">10.1037/a0013622</idno><date when="2009">2009</date><idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Corpus">000F67</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Curation">000F67</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a" type="main">The Various Perceptions of Distance: An Alternative View of How Effort Affects Distance Judgments</title><author><name sortKey="Woods, Adam J" sort="Woods, Adam J" uniqKey="Woods A" first="Adam J." last="Woods">Adam J. Woods</name></author><author><name sortKey="Philbeck, John W" sort="Philbeck, John W" uniqKey="Philbeck J" first="John W." last="Philbeck">John W. Philbeck</name></author><author><name sortKey="Danoff, Jerome V" sort="Danoff, Jerome V" uniqKey="Danoff J" first="Jerome V." last="Danoff">Jerome V. Danoff</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance</title><idno type="ISSN">0096-1523</idno><idno type="eISSN">1939-1277</idno><imprint><date when="2009">2009</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p id="P1">D. R. Proffitt and colleagues (e. g., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R23">D. R. Proffitt, J. Stefanucci, T. Banton, & W. Epstein, 2003</xref>) have suggested that objects appear farther away if more effort is required to act upon them (e.g., by having to throw a ball). The authors attempted to replicate several findings supporting this view but found no effort-related effects in a variety of conditions differing in environment, type of effort, and intention to act. Although they did find an effect of effort on verbal reports when participants were instructed to take into account nonvisual (cognitive) factors, no effort-related effect was found under apparent- and objective-distance instruction types. The authors’ interpretation is that in the paradigms tested, effort manipulations are prone to influencing response calibration because they encourage participants to take nonperceptual connotations of distance into account while leaving perceived distance itself unaffected. This in no way rules out the possibility that effort influences perception in other contexts, but it does focus attention on the role of response calibration in any verbal distance estimation task.</p></div></front></TEI><pmc article-type="research-article" xml:lang="EN"><pmc-comment>The publisher of this article does not allow downloading of the full text in XML form.</pmc-comment>
<pmc-dir>properties manuscript</pmc-dir>
<front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-journal-id">7502589</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="pubmed-jr-id">4732</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform</journal-id><journal-title>Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance</journal-title><issn pub-type="ppub">0096-1523</issn><issn pub-type="epub">1939-1277</issn></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="pmid">19653752</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="pmc">2892267</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1037/a0013622</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="manuscript">NIHMS209484</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>The Various Perceptions of Distance: An Alternative View of How Effort Affects Distance Judgments</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Woods</surname><given-names>Adam J.</given-names></name><aff id="A1">Department of Psychology, The George Washington University</aff></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Philbeck</surname><given-names>John W.</given-names></name><aff id="A2">Department of Psychology, The George Washington University</aff></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Danoff</surname><given-names>Jerome V.</given-names></name><aff id="A3">Department of Exercise Sciences, The George Washington University</aff></contrib></contrib-group><author-notes><corresp id="FN1">Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Adam J. Woods, Department of Psychology, The George Washington University, 2125 G St., NW, Washington, DC 20052. <email>ajwoods@gwmail.gwu.edu</email> or <email>woodsaj@gmail.com</email></corresp><fn id="FN2" fn-type="current-aff"><p>Jerome V. Danoff is now at the Rehabilitation Medicine Department, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, Maryland.</p></fn></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="nihms-submitted"><day>2</day><month>6</month><year>2010</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="ppub"><month>8</month><year>2009</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="pmc-release"><day>25</day><month>6</month><year>2010</year></pub-date><volume>35</volume><issue>4</issue><fpage>1104</fpage><lpage>1117</lpage><abstract><p id="P1">D. R. Proffitt and colleagues (e. g., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R23">D. R. Proffitt, J. Stefanucci, T. Banton, & W. Epstein, 2003</xref>) have suggested that objects appear farther away if more effort is required to act upon them (e.g., by having to throw a ball). The authors attempted to replicate several findings supporting this view but found no effort-related effects in a variety of conditions differing in environment, type of effort, and intention to act. Although they did find an effect of effort on verbal reports when participants were instructed to take into account nonvisual (cognitive) factors, no effort-related effect was found under apparent- and objective-distance instruction types. The authors’ interpretation is that in the paradigms tested, effort manipulations are prone to influencing response calibration because they encourage participants to take nonperceptual connotations of distance into account while leaving perceived distance itself unaffected. This in no way rules out the possibility that effort influences perception in other contexts, but it does focus attention on the role of response calibration in any verbal distance estimation task.</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>egocentric distance perception</kwd><kwd>effort</kwd><kwd>calibration</kwd><kwd>visual perception</kwd><kwd>instruction type</kwd></kwd-group><contract-num rid="NS1">R01 NS052137-04
||NS</contract-num><contract-sponsor id="NS1">National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke : NINDS</contract-sponsor></article-meta></front></pmc></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/HapticV1/Data/Pmc/Curation
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000F67 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Pmc/Curation/biblio.hfd -nk 000F67 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Ticri/CIDE
|area= HapticV1
|flux= Pmc
|étape= Curation
|type= RBID
|clé= PMC:2892267
|texte= The Various Perceptions of Distance: An Alternative View of How Effort Affects Distance Judgments
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Pmc/Curation/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:19653752" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Pmc/Curation/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a HapticV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23. |  |