Influence of three‐piece and single‐piece designs of two sharp‐edge optic hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lenses on the prevention of posterior capsule opacification: a prospective, randomised, long‐term clinical trial
Identifieur interne : 000A51 ( Pmc/Curation ); précédent : 000A50; suivant : 000A52Influence of three‐piece and single‐piece designs of two sharp‐edge optic hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lenses on the prevention of posterior capsule opacification: a prospective, randomised, long‐term clinical trial
Auteurs : Reda Zemaitiene ; Vytautas Jasinskas ; Gerd U. AuffarthSource :
- The British Journal of Ophthalmology [ 0007-1161 ] ; 2006.
Abstract
Posterior capsule opacification (PCO) is still a major long‐term complication of modern cataract surgery. We evaluated the impact of sharp‐edged intraocular lenses (IOLs) with different haptic designs made from the same hydrophobic acrylic material on posterior and anterior lens capsule opacification.
Eye clinic of Kaunas University of Medicine, Lithuania. Prospective randomised clinical study.
Seventy‐four eyes of 74 patients scheduled for cataract surgery were included in a prospective randomised clinical study. Thirty‐seven eyes of 37 patients received a three‐piece acrylic hydrophobic (AcrySof, MA3OBA, Alcon) IOL; and thirty‐seven eyes of 37 patients received a one‐piece acrylic hydrophobic (AcrySof, SA3OAL, Alcon) IOL. Visual acuity, anterior capsule opacification (ACO), capsular folds, capsulorrhexis/optic overlapping and posterior capsule opacification (PCO) were evaluated. ACO was assessed subjectively. PCO values in the entire IOL optic area and in the central 3 mm optic zone were assessed using a photographic image‐analysis system (EPCO2000). Follow‐ups were performed postoperatively at 1 day, 6 months, 1 year and 2 years.
There were no significant differences in best corrected visual acuity, grade of ACO and capsulorrhexis/optic overlapping between IOL types during the follow‐up period. Patients in the one‐piece acrylic hydrophobic IOL group more frequently presented with capsular folds behind the IOL optic area than those in the three‐piece IOL group. In the three‐piece acrylic hydrophobic IOL group, PCO values (mean (SD)) of the entire IOL optic area were significantly lower six months postoperative (three‐piece: 0.002 (0.009); one‐piece: 0.007 (0.017); p = 0.04), one year postoperative (three‐piece: 0.004 (0.016); one‐piece: 0.026 (0.041); p = 0.001) as well as one year postoperative in the central 3 mm optic zone (three‐piece: 0.000 (0.0002); one‐piece: 0.019 (0.049); p = 0.001). However, two years postoperative, the PCO values of the groups did not show significant differences (entire IOL optic area: three‐piece, 0.136 (0.223); one‐piece, 0.154 (0.190); p = 0.18; central zone: three‐piece, 0.023 (0.065); one‐piece: 0.020 (0.039); p = 0.44).
The 2 year follow‐up after cataract surgery showed no significant difference in ACO and PCO development between three‐piece and one‐piece acrylic hydrophobic intraocular lenses.
Url:
DOI: 10.1136/bjo.2006.103648
PubMed: 17124239
PubMed Central: 1954737
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream Pmc, to step Corpus: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :000A51
Links to Exploration step
PMC:1954737Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Influence of three‐piece and single‐piece designs of two sharp‐edge optic hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lenses on the prevention of posterior capsule opacification: a prospective, randomised, long‐term clinical trial</title>
<author><name sortKey="Zemaitiene, Reda" sort="Zemaitiene, Reda" uniqKey="Zemaitiene R" first="Reda" last="Zemaitiene">Reda Zemaitiene</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Jasinskas, Vytautas" sort="Jasinskas, Vytautas" uniqKey="Jasinskas V" first="Vytautas" last="Jasinskas">Vytautas Jasinskas</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Auffarth, Gerd U" sort="Auffarth, Gerd U" uniqKey="Auffarth G" first="Gerd U" last="Auffarth">Gerd U. Auffarth</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PMC</idno>
<idno type="pmid">17124239</idno>
<idno type="pmc">1954737</idno>
<idno type="url">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1954737</idno>
<idno type="RBID">PMC:1954737</idno>
<idno type="doi">10.1136/bjo.2006.103648</idno>
<date when="2006">2006</date>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Corpus">000A51</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Curation">000A51</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a" type="main">Influence of three‐piece and single‐piece designs of two sharp‐edge optic hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lenses on the prevention of posterior capsule opacification: a prospective, randomised, long‐term clinical trial</title>
<author><name sortKey="Zemaitiene, Reda" sort="Zemaitiene, Reda" uniqKey="Zemaitiene R" first="Reda" last="Zemaitiene">Reda Zemaitiene</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Jasinskas, Vytautas" sort="Jasinskas, Vytautas" uniqKey="Jasinskas V" first="Vytautas" last="Jasinskas">Vytautas Jasinskas</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Auffarth, Gerd U" sort="Auffarth, Gerd U" uniqKey="Auffarth G" first="Gerd U" last="Auffarth">Gerd U. Auffarth</name>
</author>
</analytic>
<series><title level="j">The British Journal of Ophthalmology</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0007-1161</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1468-2079</idno>
<imprint><date when="2006">2006</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass></textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><sec><title>Background</title>
<p>Posterior capsule opacification (PCO) is still a major long‐term complication of modern cataract surgery. We evaluated the impact of sharp‐edged intraocular lenses (IOLs) with different haptic designs made from the same hydrophobic acrylic material on posterior and anterior lens capsule opacification.</p>
</sec>
<sec><title>Setting</title>
<p>Eye clinic of Kaunas University of Medicine, Lithuania. Prospective randomised clinical study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><title>Methods</title>
<p>Seventy‐four eyes of 74 patients scheduled for cataract surgery were included in a prospective randomised clinical study. Thirty‐seven eyes of 37 patients received a three‐piece acrylic hydrophobic (AcrySof, MA3OBA, Alcon) IOL; and thirty‐seven eyes of 37 patients received a one‐piece acrylic hydrophobic (AcrySof, SA3OAL, Alcon) IOL. Visual acuity, anterior capsule opacification (ACO), capsular folds, capsulorrhexis/optic overlapping and posterior capsule opacification (PCO) were evaluated. ACO was assessed subjectively. PCO values in the entire IOL optic area and in the central 3 mm optic zone were assessed using a photographic image‐analysis system (EPCO2000). Follow‐ups were performed postoperatively at 1 day, 6 months, 1 year and 2 years.</p>
</sec>
<sec><title>Results</title>
<p>There were no significant differences in best corrected visual acuity, grade of ACO and capsulorrhexis/optic overlapping between IOL types during the follow‐up period. Patients in the one‐piece acrylic hydrophobic IOL group more frequently presented with capsular folds behind the IOL optic area than those in the three‐piece IOL group. In the three‐piece acrylic hydrophobic IOL group, PCO values (mean (SD)) of the entire IOL optic area were significantly lower six months postoperative (three‐piece: 0.002 (0.009); one‐piece: 0.007 (0.017); p = 0.04), one year postoperative (three‐piece: 0.004 (0.016); one‐piece: 0.026 (0.041); p = 0.001) as well as one year postoperative in the central 3 mm optic zone (three‐piece: 0.000 (0.0002); one‐piece: 0.019 (0.049); p = 0.001). However, two years postoperative, the PCO values of the groups did not show significant differences (entire IOL optic area: three‐piece, 0.136 (0.223); one‐piece, 0.154 (0.190); p = 0.18; central zone: three‐piece, 0.023 (0.065); one‐piece: 0.020 (0.039); p = 0.44).</p>
</sec>
<sec><title>Conclusion</title>
<p>The 2 year follow‐up after cataract surgery showed no significant difference in ACO and PCO development between three‐piece and one‐piece acrylic hydrophobic intraocular lenses.</p>
</sec>
</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<pmc article-type="research-article"><pmc-comment>The publisher of this article does not allow downloading of the full text in XML form.</pmc-comment>
<front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">Br J Ophthalmol</journal-id>
<journal-title>The British Journal of Ophthalmology</journal-title>
<issn pub-type="ppub">0007-1161</issn>
<issn pub-type="epub">1468-2079</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>BMJ Group</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="pmid">17124239</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="pmc">1954737</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">bj103648</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1136/bjo.2006.103648</article-id>
<article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Extended Report</subject>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group><article-title>Influence of three‐piece and single‐piece designs of two sharp‐edge optic hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lenses on the prevention of posterior capsule opacification: a prospective, randomised, long‐term clinical trial</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Zemaitiene</surname>
<given-names>Reda</given-names>
</name>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Jasinskas</surname>
<given-names>Vytautas</given-names>
</name>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Auffarth</surname>
<given-names>Gerd U</given-names>
</name>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff><bold>Reda Zemaitiene</bold>
,<bold>Vytautas Jasinskas</bold>
, Eye Clinic of Kaunas University of Medicine, Kaunas, Lithuania</aff>
<aff><bold>Gerd U Auffarth</bold>
, Department of Ophthalmology, Ruprecht‐Karls‐University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany</aff>
<author-notes><corresp>Correspondence to: Reda Zemaitiene<break></break>
MD, PhD, Eye Clinic of Kaunas University of Medicine, Mickeviciaus 9, LT 44307 Kaunas, Lithuania; reda.zemaitiene@kmuk.lt</corresp>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="ppub"><month>5</month>
<year>2007</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>22</day>
<month>11</month>
<year>2006</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>91</volume>
<issue>5</issue>
<fpage>644</fpage>
<lpage>648</lpage>
<history><date date-type="accepted"><day>1</day>
<month>11</month>
<year>2006</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright © 2007 BMJ Publishing Group</copyright-statement>
</permissions>
<abstract><sec><title>Background</title>
<p>Posterior capsule opacification (PCO) is still a major long‐term complication of modern cataract surgery. We evaluated the impact of sharp‐edged intraocular lenses (IOLs) with different haptic designs made from the same hydrophobic acrylic material on posterior and anterior lens capsule opacification.</p>
</sec>
<sec><title>Setting</title>
<p>Eye clinic of Kaunas University of Medicine, Lithuania. Prospective randomised clinical study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><title>Methods</title>
<p>Seventy‐four eyes of 74 patients scheduled for cataract surgery were included in a prospective randomised clinical study. Thirty‐seven eyes of 37 patients received a three‐piece acrylic hydrophobic (AcrySof, MA3OBA, Alcon) IOL; and thirty‐seven eyes of 37 patients received a one‐piece acrylic hydrophobic (AcrySof, SA3OAL, Alcon) IOL. Visual acuity, anterior capsule opacification (ACO), capsular folds, capsulorrhexis/optic overlapping and posterior capsule opacification (PCO) were evaluated. ACO was assessed subjectively. PCO values in the entire IOL optic area and in the central 3 mm optic zone were assessed using a photographic image‐analysis system (EPCO2000). Follow‐ups were performed postoperatively at 1 day, 6 months, 1 year and 2 years.</p>
</sec>
<sec><title>Results</title>
<p>There were no significant differences in best corrected visual acuity, grade of ACO and capsulorrhexis/optic overlapping between IOL types during the follow‐up period. Patients in the one‐piece acrylic hydrophobic IOL group more frequently presented with capsular folds behind the IOL optic area than those in the three‐piece IOL group. In the three‐piece acrylic hydrophobic IOL group, PCO values (mean (SD)) of the entire IOL optic area were significantly lower six months postoperative (three‐piece: 0.002 (0.009); one‐piece: 0.007 (0.017); p = 0.04), one year postoperative (three‐piece: 0.004 (0.016); one‐piece: 0.026 (0.041); p = 0.001) as well as one year postoperative in the central 3 mm optic zone (three‐piece: 0.000 (0.0002); one‐piece: 0.019 (0.049); p = 0.001). However, two years postoperative, the PCO values of the groups did not show significant differences (entire IOL optic area: three‐piece, 0.136 (0.223); one‐piece, 0.154 (0.190); p = 0.18; central zone: three‐piece, 0.023 (0.065); one‐piece: 0.020 (0.039); p = 0.44).</p>
</sec>
<sec><title>Conclusion</title>
<p>The 2 year follow‐up after cataract surgery showed no significant difference in ACO and PCO development between three‐piece and one‐piece acrylic hydrophobic intraocular lenses.</p>
</sec>
</abstract>
<kwd-group><kwd>posterior capsule opacification</kwd>
<kwd>intraocular lens</kwd>
<kwd>hydrophobic acrylic</kwd>
<kwd>single‐piece</kwd>
<kwd>three‐piece</kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front>
</pmc>
</record>
Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/HapticV1/Data/Pmc/Curation
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000A51 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Pmc/Curation/biblio.hfd -nk 000A51 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien |wiki= Ticri/CIDE |area= HapticV1 |flux= Pmc |étape= Curation |type= RBID |clé= PMC:1954737 |texte= Influence of three‐piece and single‐piece designs of two sharp‐edge optic hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lenses on the prevention of posterior capsule opacification: a prospective, randomised, long‐term clinical trial }}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Pmc/Curation/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:17124239" \ | HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Pmc/Curation/biblio.hfd \ | NlmPubMed2Wicri -a HapticV1
![]() | This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23. | ![]() |