OBJECT REPRESENTATION, IDENTITY, AND THE PARADOX OF EARLY PERMANENCE: Steps Toward a New Framework
Identifieur interne : 002682 ( Pmc/Checkpoint ); précédent : 002681; suivant : 002683OBJECT REPRESENTATION, IDENTITY, AND THE PARADOX OF EARLY PERMANENCE: Steps Toward a New Framework
Auteurs : Andrew N. Meltzoff ; M. Keith MooreSource :
- Infant behavior & development [ 0163-6383 ] ; 1998.
Abstract
The sensorimotor theory of infancy has been overthrown, but there is little consensus on a replacement. We hypothesize that a capacity for representation is the starting point for infant development, not its culmination. Logical distinctions are drawn between object representation, identity, and permanence. Modern experiments on early object permanence and deferred imitation suggest: (a) even for young infants, representations persist over breaks in sensory contact, (b) numerical identity of objects (
Url:
DOI: 10.1016/S0163-6383(98)90003-0
PubMed: 25147418
PubMed Central: 4137884
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
Links to Exploration step
PMC:4137884Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">OBJECT REPRESENTATION, IDENTITY, AND THE PARADOX OF EARLY PERMANENCE: Steps Toward a New Framework</title><author><name sortKey="Meltzoff, Andrew N" sort="Meltzoff, Andrew N" uniqKey="Meltzoff A" first="Andrew N." last="Meltzoff">Andrew N. Meltzoff</name></author><author><name sortKey="Moore, M Keith" sort="Moore, M Keith" uniqKey="Moore M" first="M. Keith" last="Moore">M. Keith Moore</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PMC</idno><idno type="pmid">25147418</idno><idno type="pmc">4137884</idno><idno type="url">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4137884</idno><idno type="RBID">PMC:4137884</idno><idno type="doi">10.1016/S0163-6383(98)90003-0</idno><date when="1998">1998</date><idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Corpus">001945</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Curation">001945</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Checkpoint">002682</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a" type="main">OBJECT REPRESENTATION, IDENTITY, AND THE PARADOX OF EARLY PERMANENCE: Steps Toward a New Framework</title><author><name sortKey="Meltzoff, Andrew N" sort="Meltzoff, Andrew N" uniqKey="Meltzoff A" first="Andrew N." last="Meltzoff">Andrew N. Meltzoff</name></author><author><name sortKey="Moore, M Keith" sort="Moore, M Keith" uniqKey="Moore M" first="M. Keith" last="Moore">M. Keith Moore</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Infant behavior & development</title><idno type="ISSN">0163-6383</idno><idno type="eISSN">1934-8800</idno><imprint><date when="1998">1998</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p id="P2">The sensorimotor theory of infancy has been overthrown, but there is little consensus on a replacement. We hypothesize that a capacity for representation is the starting point for infant development, not its culmination. Logical distinctions are drawn between object representation, identity, and permanence. Modern experiments on early object permanence and deferred imitation suggest: (a) even for young infants, representations persist over breaks in sensory contact, (b) numerical identity of objects (<italic>O</italic>s) is initially specified by spatiotemporal criteria (place and trajectory), (c) featural and functional identity criteria develop, (d) events are analyzed by comparing representations to current perception, and (e) representation operates both prospectively, anticipating future contacts with an <italic>O</italic>, and retrospectively, reidentifying an <italic>O</italic> as the “same one again.” A model of the architecture and functioning of the early representational system is proposed. It accounts for young infants’ behavior toward absent people and things in terms of their efforts to determine the identity of objects. Our proposal is developmental without denying innate structure and elevates the power of perception and representation while being cautious about attributing complex concepts to young infants.</p></div></front></TEI><pmc article-type="research-article"><pmc-comment>The publisher of this article does not allow downloading of the full text in XML form.</pmc-comment>
<pmc-dir>properties manuscript</pmc-dir>
<front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-journal-id">7806016</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="pubmed-jr-id">32890</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">Infant Behav Dev</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="iso-abbrev">Infant Behav Dev</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Infant behavior & development</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">0163-6383</issn><issn pub-type="epub">1934-8800</issn></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="pmid">25147418</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="pmc">4137884</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0163-6383(98)90003-0</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="manuscript">NIHMS460596</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>OBJECT REPRESENTATION, IDENTITY, AND THE PARADOX OF EARLY PERMANENCE: Steps Toward a New Framework</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Meltzoff</surname><given-names>Andrew N.</given-names></name></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Moore</surname><given-names>M. Keith</given-names></name></contrib><aff id="A1">University of Washington</aff></contrib-group><author-notes><fn id="FN1"><p id="P1"><bold>Andrew N. Meltzoff</bold>, Department of Psychology, Box 357920, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195.</p></fn></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="nihms-submitted"><day>10</day><month>4</month><year>2013</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="ppub"><year>1998</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="pmc-release"><day>19</day><month>8</month><year>2014</year></pub-date><volume>21</volume><issue>2</issue><fpage>201</fpage><lpage>235</lpage><pmc-comment>elocation-id from pubmed: 10.1016/S0163-6383(98)90003-0</pmc-comment>
<permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright © 1998 Ablex Publishing Corporation</copyright-statement><copyright-year>1998</copyright-year></permissions><abstract><p id="P2">The sensorimotor theory of infancy has been overthrown, but there is little consensus on a replacement. We hypothesize that a capacity for representation is the starting point for infant development, not its culmination. Logical distinctions are drawn between object representation, identity, and permanence. Modern experiments on early object permanence and deferred imitation suggest: (a) even for young infants, representations persist over breaks in sensory contact, (b) numerical identity of objects (<italic>O</italic>s) is initially specified by spatiotemporal criteria (place and trajectory), (c) featural and functional identity criteria develop, (d) events are analyzed by comparing representations to current perception, and (e) representation operates both prospectively, anticipating future contacts with an <italic>O</italic>, and retrospectively, reidentifying an <italic>O</italic> as the “same one again.” A model of the architecture and functioning of the early representational system is proposed. It accounts for young infants’ behavior toward absent people and things in terms of their efforts to determine the identity of objects. Our proposal is developmental without denying innate structure and elevates the power of perception and representation while being cautious about attributing complex concepts to young infants.</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>representation</kwd><kwd>object identity</kwd><kwd>object permanence</kwd><kwd>imitation</kwd><kwd>cognitive development</kwd><kwd>memory</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front></pmc><affiliations><list></list><tree><noCountry><name sortKey="Meltzoff, Andrew N" sort="Meltzoff, Andrew N" uniqKey="Meltzoff A" first="Andrew N." last="Meltzoff">Andrew N. Meltzoff</name><name sortKey="Moore, M Keith" sort="Moore, M Keith" uniqKey="Moore M" first="M. Keith" last="Moore">M. Keith Moore</name></noCountry></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/HapticV1/Data/Pmc/Checkpoint
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 002682 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Pmc/Checkpoint/biblio.hfd -nk 002682 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Ticri/CIDE
|area= HapticV1
|flux= Pmc
|étape= Checkpoint
|type= RBID
|clé= PMC:4137884
|texte= OBJECT REPRESENTATION, IDENTITY, AND THE PARADOX OF EARLY PERMANENCE: Steps Toward a New Framework
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Pmc/Checkpoint/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:25147418" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Pmc/Checkpoint/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a HapticV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23. |  |