Memory for curvature of objects : Haptic touch vs. vision
Identifieur interne : 000A03 ( PascalFrancis/Curation ); précédent : 000A02; suivant : 000A04Memory for curvature of objects : Haptic touch vs. vision
Auteurs : Miriam Ittyerah [Inde] ; Lawrence E. Marks [États-Unis]Source :
- British journal of psychology : (1953) [ 0007-1269 ] ; 2007.
Descripteurs français
- Pascal (Inist)
- Wicri :
- topic : Homme.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
Abstract
The present study examined the role of vision and haptics in memory for stimulus objects that vary along the dimension of curvature. Experiment I measured haptic-haptic (T-T) and haptic-visual (T-V) discrimination of curvature in a short-term memory paradigm, using 30-second retention intervals containing five different interpolated tasks. Results showed poorest performance when the interpolated tasks required spatial processing or movement, thereby suggesting that haptic information about shape is encoded in a spatial-motor representation. Experiment 2 compared visual-visual (V-V) and visual-haptic (V-T) short-term memory, again using 30-second delay intervals. The results of the ANOVA failed to show a significant effect of intervening activity. Intra-modal visual performance and cross-modal performance were similar. Comparing the four modality conditions (inter-modal V-T, T-V; intra-modal V-V, T-T, by combining the data of Experiments I and 2), in a global analysis, showed a reliable interaction between intervening activity and experiment (modality). Although there appears to be a general tendency for spatial and movement activities to exert the most deleterious effects overall, the patterns are not identical when the initial stimulus is encoded haptically (Experiment I) and visually (Experiment 2).
| pA |
|
|---|
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream PascalFrancis, to step Corpus: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :000A92
Links to Exploration step
Pascal:07-0503429Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Memory for curvature of objects : Haptic touch vs. vision</title><author><name sortKey="Ittyerah, Miriam" sort="Ittyerah, Miriam" uniqKey="Ittyerah M" first="Miriam" last="Ittyerah">Miriam Ittyerah</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Psychology, University of Delhi</s1><s2>Delhi</s2><s3>IND</s3><sZ>1 aut.</sZ></inist:fA14><country>Inde</country></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Marks, Lawrence E" sort="Marks, Lawrence E" uniqKey="Marks L" first="Lawrence E." last="Marks">Lawrence E. Marks</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>John B. Pierce Laboratory and Yale University</s1><s2>New Haven</s2><s3>USA</s3><sZ>2 aut.</sZ></inist:fA14><country>États-Unis</country></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno><idno type="inist">07-0503429</idno><date when="2007">2007</date><idno type="stanalyst">PASCAL 07-0503429 INIST</idno><idno type="RBID">Pascal:07-0503429</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">000A92</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Curation">000A03</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Memory for curvature of objects : Haptic touch vs. vision</title><author><name sortKey="Ittyerah, Miriam" sort="Ittyerah, Miriam" uniqKey="Ittyerah M" first="Miriam" last="Ittyerah">Miriam Ittyerah</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Psychology, University of Delhi</s1><s2>Delhi</s2><s3>IND</s3><sZ>1 aut.</sZ></inist:fA14><country>Inde</country></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Marks, Lawrence E" sort="Marks, Lawrence E" uniqKey="Marks L" first="Lawrence E." last="Marks">Lawrence E. Marks</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>John B. Pierce Laboratory and Yale University</s1><s2>New Haven</s2><s3>USA</s3><sZ>2 aut.</sZ></inist:fA14><country>États-Unis</country></affiliation></author></analytic><series><title level="j" type="main">British journal of psychology : (1953)</title><title level="j" type="abbreviated">Br. j. psychol. : (1953)</title><idno type="ISSN">0007-1269</idno><imprint><date when="2007">2007</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><title level="j" type="main">British journal of psychology : (1953)</title><title level="j" type="abbreviated">Br. j. psychol. : (1953)</title><idno type="ISSN">0007-1269</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Cognition</term><term>Curvature</term><term>Experimental study</term><term>Human</term><term>Intermodal perception</term><term>Perception</term><term>Space perception</term><term>Spatial memory</term><term>Tactile sensitivity</term><term>Vision</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr"><term>Courbure</term><term>Sensibilité tactile</term><term>Perception</term><term>Vision</term><term>Mémoire spatiale</term><term>Perception espace</term><term>Etude expérimentale</term><term>Perception intermodale</term><term>Cognition</term><term>Homme</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Wicri" type="topic" xml:lang="fr"><term>Homme</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">The present study examined the role of vision and haptics in memory for stimulus objects that vary along the dimension of curvature. Experiment I measured haptic-haptic (T-T) and haptic-visual (T-V) discrimination of curvature in a short-term memory paradigm, using 30-second retention intervals containing five different interpolated tasks. Results showed poorest performance when the interpolated tasks required spatial processing or movement, thereby suggesting that haptic information about shape is encoded in a spatial-motor representation. Experiment 2 compared visual-visual (V-V) and visual-haptic (V-T) short-term memory, again using 30-second delay intervals. The results of the ANOVA failed to show a significant effect of intervening activity. Intra-modal visual performance and cross-modal performance were similar. Comparing the four modality conditions (inter-modal V-T, T-V; intra-modal V-V, T-T, by combining the data of Experiments I and 2), in a global analysis, showed a reliable interaction between intervening activity and experiment (modality). Although there appears to be a general tendency for spatial and movement activities to exert the most deleterious effects overall, the patterns are not identical when the initial stimulus is encoded haptically (Experiment I) and visually (Experiment 2).</div></front></TEI><inist><standard h6="B"><pA><fA01 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>0007-1269</s0></fA01><fA02 i1="01"><s0>BJSGAE</s0></fA02><fA03 i2="1"><s0>Br. j. psychol. : (1953)</s0></fA03><fA05><s2>98</s2></fA05><fA06><s3>p. 4</s3></fA06><fA08 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG"><s1>Memory for curvature of objects : Haptic touch vs. vision</s1></fA08><fA11 i1="01" i2="1"><s1>ITTYERAH (Miriam)</s1></fA11><fA11 i1="02" i2="1"><s1>MARKS (Lawrence E.)</s1></fA11><fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Psychology, University of Delhi</s1><s2>Delhi</s2><s3>IND</s3><sZ>1 aut.</sZ></fA14><fA14 i1="02"><s1>John B. Pierce Laboratory and Yale University</s1><s2>New Haven</s2><s3>USA</s3><sZ>2 aut.</sZ></fA14><fA20><s1>589-610</s1></fA20><fA21><s1>2007</s1></fA21><fA23 i1="01"><s0>ENG</s0></fA23><fA43 i1="01"><s1>INIST</s1><s2>3116A</s2><s5>354000160989990040</s5></fA43><fA44><s0>0000</s0><s1>© 2007 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.</s1></fA44><fA45><s0>2 p.3/4</s0></fA45><fA47 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>07-0503429</s0></fA47><fA60><s1>P</s1></fA60><fA61><s0>A</s0></fA61><fA64 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>British journal of psychology : (1953)</s0></fA64><fA66 i1="01"><s0>GBR</s0></fA66><fC01 i1="01" l="ENG"><s0>The present study examined the role of vision and haptics in memory for stimulus objects that vary along the dimension of curvature. Experiment I measured haptic-haptic (T-T) and haptic-visual (T-V) discrimination of curvature in a short-term memory paradigm, using 30-second retention intervals containing five different interpolated tasks. Results showed poorest performance when the interpolated tasks required spatial processing or movement, thereby suggesting that haptic information about shape is encoded in a spatial-motor representation. Experiment 2 compared visual-visual (V-V) and visual-haptic (V-T) short-term memory, again using 30-second delay intervals. The results of the ANOVA failed to show a significant effect of intervening activity. Intra-modal visual performance and cross-modal performance were similar. Comparing the four modality conditions (inter-modal V-T, T-V; intra-modal V-V, T-T, by combining the data of Experiments I and 2), in a global analysis, showed a reliable interaction between intervening activity and experiment (modality). Although there appears to be a general tendency for spatial and movement activities to exert the most deleterious effects overall, the patterns are not identical when the initial stimulus is encoded haptically (Experiment I) and visually (Experiment 2).</s0></fC01><fC02 i1="01" i2="X"><s0>002A26E05</s0></fC02><fC02 i1="02" i2="X"><s0>002A26E03</s0></fC02><fC02 i1="03" i2="X"><s0>002A26F05A</s0></fC02><fC02 i1="04" i2="X"><s0>002A26E08</s0></fC02><fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Courbure</s0><s5>02</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Curvature</s0><s5>02</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Curvatura</s0><s5>02</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Sensibilité tactile</s0><s5>03</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Tactile sensitivity</s0><s5>03</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Sensibilidad tactil</s0><s5>03</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Perception</s0><s5>04</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Perception</s0><s5>04</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Percepción</s0><s5>04</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Vision</s0><s5>05</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Vision</s0><s5>05</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Visión</s0><s5>05</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Mémoire spatiale</s0><s5>06</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Spatial memory</s0><s5>06</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Memoria espacial</s0><s5>06</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Perception espace</s0><s5>07</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Space perception</s0><s5>07</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Percepción espacio</s0><s5>07</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Etude expérimentale</s0><s5>08</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Experimental study</s0><s5>08</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Estudio experimental</s0><s5>08</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Perception intermodale</s0><s5>09</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Intermodal perception</s0><s5>09</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Percepción intermodal</s0><s5>09</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Cognition</s0><s5>10</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Cognition</s0><s5>10</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Cognición</s0><s5>10</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Homme</s0><s5>18</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Human</s0><s5>18</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Hombre</s0><s5>18</s5></fC03><fN21><s1>330</s1></fN21></pA></standard></inist></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/HapticV1/Data/PascalFrancis/Curation
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000A03 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PascalFrancis/Curation/biblio.hfd -nk 000A03 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Ticri/CIDE
|area= HapticV1
|flux= PascalFrancis
|étape= Curation
|type= RBID
|clé= Pascal:07-0503429
|texte= Memory for curvature of objects : Haptic touch vs. vision
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23. |  |