HapticV1, PascalFrancis, Curation, bibRecord, 000383

Large systematic deviations in a bimanual parallelity task: further analysis of contributing factors

Identifieur interne : 000383 ( PascalFrancis/Curation ); précédent : 000382; suivant : 000384

Large systematic deviations in a bimanual parallelity task: further analysis of contributing factors

Auteurs : Astrid M. L. Kappers [Pays-Bas]

Source :

Acta psychologica [ 0001-6918 ] ; 2003.

RBID : Pascal:03-0505711

Descripteurs français

Pascal (Inist)
- Etude expérimentale, Activité bimanuelle, Sensibilité tactile, Perception espace, Obliquité, Sexe, Expérience professionnelle, Niveau étude, Comparaison interindividuelle, Perception, Cognition, Homme, Cadre référence.
Wicri :
- topic : Expérience professionnelle, Homme.

English descriptors

KwdEn :
- Bimanual activity, Cognition, Education level, Experimental study, Frame of reference, Human, Interindividual comparison, Obliqueness, Perception, Professional experience, Sex, Space perception, Tactile sensitivity.

Abstract

Previous studies showed that what subjects haptically perceive as parallel deviates largely from what is actually physically parallel [Perception 28 (1999) 1001; Acta Psychol. 109 (2002) 25; Perception 28 (1999) 781]. It also turned out that the deviations were strongly subject-dependent. It was hypothesized that what is haptically parallel is decided in a frame of reference intermediate to an allocentric and an egocentric one. The purposes of the present study were to collect more evidence for this hypothesis and to investigate the factor(s) that determines the specific weighting between the two reference frames. We found a highly significant reversal of a haptic oblique effect (in this context; larger systematic deviations for oblique orientations) for subjects with large deviations. This reversal provides convincing evidence that an intermediate frame of reference is used for the decision of haptic parallelity. Contrary to common expectation, several factors that might have been of influence on the weighting of the two frames of reference, such as arm length, arm span, shoulder width, turned out to be irrelevant. Surprisingly, the only factors that seem to be of influence are gender and job experience or education.

A01	`01`	`1`		`@0 0001-6918`
A02	`01`			`@0 APSOAZ`
A03		`1`		`@0 Acta psychol.`
A05				`@2 114`
A06				`@2 2`
A08	`01`	`1`	`ENG`	`@1 Large systematic deviations in a bimanual parallelity task: further analysis of contributing factors`
A11	`01`	`1`		`@1 KAPPERS (Astrid M. L.)`
A14	`01`			`@1 Helmholtz Instituut, Princetonplein 5 @2 3584 CC Utrecht @3 NLD @Z 1 aut.`
A20				`@1 131-145`
A21				`@1 2003`
A23	`01`			`@0 ENG`
A43	`01`			`@1 INIST @2 2174 @5 354000112476740020`
A44				`@0 0000 @1 © 2003 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.`
A45				`@0 17 ref.`
A47	`01`	`1`		`@0 03-0505711`
A60				`@1 P`
A61				`@0 A`
A64	`01`	`1`		`@0 Acta psychologica`
A66	`01`			`@0 NLD`
C01	`01`		`ENG`	@0 Previous studies showed that what subjects haptically perceive as parallel deviates largely from what is actually physically parallel [Perception 28 (1999) 1001; Acta Psychol. 109 (2002) 25; Perception 28 (1999) 781]. It also turned out that the deviations were strongly subject-dependent. It was hypothesized that what is haptically parallel is decided in a frame of reference intermediate to an allocentric and an egocentric one. The purposes of the present study were to collect more evidence for this hypothesis and to investigate the factor(s) that determines the specific weighting between the two reference frames. We found a highly significant reversal of a haptic oblique effect (in this context; larger systematic deviations for oblique orientations) for subjects with large deviations. This reversal provides convincing evidence that an intermediate frame of reference is used for the decision of haptic parallelity. Contrary to common expectation, several factors that might have been of influence on the weighting of the two frames of reference, such as arm length, arm span, shoulder width, turned out to be irrelevant. Surprisingly, the only factors that seem to be of influence are gender and job experience or education.
C02	`01`	`X`		`@0 002A26E05`
C03	`01`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Etude expérimentale @5 01`
C03	`01`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Experimental study @5 01`
C03	`01`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Estudio experimental @5 01`
C03	`02`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Activité bimanuelle @5 02`
C03	`02`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Bimanual activity @5 02`
C03	`02`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Actividad bimanual @5 02`
C03	`03`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Sensibilité tactile @5 03`
C03	`03`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Tactile sensitivity @5 03`
C03	`03`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Sensibilidad tactil @5 03`
C03	`04`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Perception espace @5 04`
C03	`04`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Space perception @5 04`
C03	`04`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Percepción espacio @5 04`
C03	`05`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Obliquité @5 05`
C03	`05`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Obliqueness @5 05`
C03	`05`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Oblicuidad @5 05`
C03	`06`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Sexe @5 07`
C03	`06`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Sex @5 07`
C03	`06`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Sexo @5 07`
C03	`07`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Expérience professionnelle @5 08`
C03	`07`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Professional experience @5 08`
C03	`07`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Experiencia profesional @5 08`
C03	`08`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Niveau étude @5 09`
C03	`08`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Education level @5 09`
C03	`08`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Nivel estudio @5 09`
C03	`09`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Comparaison interindividuelle @5 10`
C03	`09`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Interindividual comparison @5 10`
C03	`09`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Comparación interindividual @5 10`
C03	`10`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Perception @5 13`
C03	`10`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Perception @5 13`
C03	`10`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Percepción @5 13`
C03	`11`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Cognition @5 17`
C03	`11`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Cognition @5 17`
C03	`11`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Cognición @5 17`
C03	`12`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Homme @5 18`
C03	`12`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Human @5 18`
C03	`12`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Hombre @5 18`
C03	`13`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Cadre référence @4 CD @5 96`
C03	`13`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Frame of reference @4 CD @5 96`
N21				`@1 335`
N82				`@1 PSI`

Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)

to stream PascalFrancis, to step Corpus: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :001128

Links to Exploration step

Pascal:03-0505711

Le document en format XML

<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Large systematic deviations in a bimanual parallelity task: further analysis of contributing factors</title>
<author><name sortKey="Kappers, Astrid M L" sort="Kappers, Astrid M L" uniqKey="Kappers A" first="Astrid M. L." last="Kappers">Astrid M. L. Kappers</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Helmholtz Instituut, Princetonplein 5</s1>
<s2>3584 CC Utrecht</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>Pays-Bas</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno>
<idno type="inist">03-0505711</idno>
<date when="2003">2003</date>
<idno type="stanalyst">PASCAL 03-0505711 INIST</idno>
<idno type="RBID">Pascal:03-0505711</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">001128</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Curation">000383</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Large systematic deviations in a bimanual parallelity task: further analysis of contributing factors</title>
<author><name sortKey="Kappers, Astrid M L" sort="Kappers, Astrid M L" uniqKey="Kappers A" first="Astrid M. L." last="Kappers">Astrid M. L. Kappers</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Helmholtz Instituut, Princetonplein 5</s1>
<s2>3584 CC Utrecht</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>Pays-Bas</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series><title level="j" type="main">Acta psychologica</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Acta psychol.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0001-6918</idno>
<imprint><date when="2003">2003</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><title level="j" type="main">Acta psychologica</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Acta psychol.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0001-6918</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Bimanual activity</term>
<term>Cognition</term>
<term>Education level</term>
<term>Experimental study</term>
<term>Frame of reference</term>
<term>Human</term>
<term>Interindividual comparison</term>
<term>Obliqueness</term>
<term>Perception</term>
<term>Professional experience</term>
<term>Sex</term>
<term>Space perception</term>
<term>Tactile sensitivity</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr"><term>Etude expérimentale</term>
<term>Activité bimanuelle</term>
<term>Sensibilité tactile</term>
<term>Perception espace</term>
<term>Obliquité</term>
<term>Sexe</term>
<term>Expérience professionnelle</term>
<term>Niveau étude</term>
<term>Comparaison interindividuelle</term>
<term>Perception</term>
<term>Cognition</term>
<term>Homme</term>
<term>Cadre référence</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Wicri" type="topic" xml:lang="fr"><term>Expérience professionnelle</term>
<term>Homme</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Previous studies showed that what subjects haptically perceive as parallel deviates largely from what is actually physically parallel [Perception 28 (1999) 1001; Acta Psychol. 109 (2002) 25; Perception 28 (1999) 781]. It also turned out that the deviations were strongly subject-dependent. It was hypothesized that what is haptically parallel is decided in a frame of reference intermediate to an allocentric and an egocentric one. The purposes of the present study were to collect more evidence for this hypothesis and to investigate the factor(s) that determines the specific weighting between the two reference frames. We found a highly significant reversal of a haptic oblique effect (in this context; larger systematic deviations for oblique orientations) for subjects with large deviations. This reversal provides convincing evidence that an intermediate frame of reference is used for the decision of haptic parallelity. Contrary to common expectation, several factors that might have been of influence on the weighting of the two frames of reference, such as arm length, arm span, shoulder width, turned out to be irrelevant. Surprisingly, the only factors that seem to be of influence are gender and job experience or education.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<inist><standard h6="B"><pA><fA01 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>0001-6918</s0>
</fA01>
<fA02 i1="01"><s0>APSOAZ</s0>
</fA02>
<fA03 i2="1"><s0>Acta psychol.</s0>
</fA03>
<fA05><s2>114</s2>
</fA05>
<fA06><s2>2</s2>
</fA06>
<fA08 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG"><s1>Large systematic deviations in a bimanual parallelity task: further analysis of contributing factors</s1>
</fA08>
<fA11 i1="01" i2="1"><s1>KAPPERS (Astrid M. L.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA14 i1="01"><s1>Helmholtz Instituut, Princetonplein 5</s1>
<s2>3584 CC Utrecht</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA20><s1>131-145</s1>
</fA20>
<fA21><s1>2003</s1>
</fA21>
<fA23 i1="01"><s0>ENG</s0>
</fA23>
<fA43 i1="01"><s1>INIST</s1>
<s2>2174</s2>
<s5>354000112476740020</s5>
</fA43>
<fA44><s0>0000</s0>
<s1>© 2003 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.</s1>
</fA44>
<fA45><s0>17 ref.</s0>
</fA45>
<fA47 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>03-0505711</s0>
</fA47>
<fA60><s1>P</s1>
</fA60>
<fA61><s0>A</s0>
</fA61>
<fA64 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>Acta psychologica</s0>
</fA64>
<fA66 i1="01"><s0>NLD</s0>
</fA66>
<fC01 i1="01" l="ENG"><s0>Previous studies showed that what subjects haptically perceive as parallel deviates largely from what is actually physically parallel [Perception 28 (1999) 1001; Acta Psychol. 109 (2002) 25; Perception 28 (1999) 781]. It also turned out that the deviations were strongly subject-dependent. It was hypothesized that what is haptically parallel is decided in a frame of reference intermediate to an allocentric and an egocentric one. The purposes of the present study were to collect more evidence for this hypothesis and to investigate the factor(s) that determines the specific weighting between the two reference frames. We found a highly significant reversal of a haptic oblique effect (in this context; larger systematic deviations for oblique orientations) for subjects with large deviations. This reversal provides convincing evidence that an intermediate frame of reference is used for the decision of haptic parallelity. Contrary to common expectation, several factors that might have been of influence on the weighting of the two frames of reference, such as arm length, arm span, shoulder width, turned out to be irrelevant. Surprisingly, the only factors that seem to be of influence are gender and job experience or education.</s0>
</fC01>
<fC02 i1="01" i2="X"><s0>002A26E05</s0>
</fC02>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Etude expérimentale</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Experimental study</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Estudio experimental</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Activité bimanuelle</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Bimanual activity</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Actividad bimanual</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Sensibilité tactile</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Tactile sensitivity</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Sensibilidad tactil</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Perception espace</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Space perception</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Percepción espacio</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Obliquité</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Obliqueness</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Oblicuidad</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Sexe</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Sex</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Sexo</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Expérience professionnelle</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Professional experience</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Experiencia profesional</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Niveau étude</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Education level</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Nivel estudio</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Comparaison interindividuelle</s0>
<s5>10</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Interindividual comparison</s0>
<s5>10</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Comparación interindividual</s0>
<s5>10</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Perception</s0>
<s5>13</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Perception</s0>
<s5>13</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Percepción</s0>
<s5>13</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Cognition</s0>
<s5>17</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Cognition</s0>
<s5>17</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Cognición</s0>
<s5>17</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="12" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Homme</s0>
<s5>18</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="12" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Human</s0>
<s5>18</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="12" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Hombre</s0>
<s5>18</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="13" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Cadre référence</s0>
<s4>CD</s4>
<s5>96</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="13" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Frame of reference</s0>
<s4>CD</s4>
<s5>96</s5>
</fC03>
<fN21><s1>335</s1>
</fN21>
<fN82><s1>PSI</s1>
</fN82>
</pA>
</standard>
</inist>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/HapticV1/Data/PascalFrancis/Curation

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000383 | SxmlIndent | more

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PascalFrancis/Curation/biblio.hfd -nk 000383 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Ticri/CIDE
   |area=    HapticV1
   |flux=    PascalFrancis
   |étape=   Curation
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     Pascal:03-0505711
   |texte=   Large systematic deviations in a bimanual parallelity task: further analysis of contributing factors
}}

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23.
Data generation: Mon Jun 13 01:09:46 2016. Site generation: Wed Mar 6 09:54:07 2024

	Serveur d'exploration sur les dispositifs haptiques
	Attention, ce site est en cours de développement ! Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts. Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Serveur d'exploration sur les dispositifs haptiques

Large systematic deviations in a bimanual parallelity task: further analysis of contributing factors

Large systematic deviations in a bimanual parallelity task: further analysis of contributing factors

Source :

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

Abstract

Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)

Links to Exploration step

Le document en format XML

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri