Serveur d'exploration sur les dispositifs haptiques

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Implantation of a single-piece, hydrophilic, acrylic, minus-power foldable posterior chamber intraocular lens in a rabbit model: Clinicopathologic study of posterior capsule opacification

Identifieur interne : 000370 ( PascalFrancis/Curation ); précédent : 000369; suivant : 000371

Implantation of a single-piece, hydrophilic, acrylic, minus-power foldable posterior chamber intraocular lens in a rabbit model: Clinicopathologic study of posterior capsule opacification

Auteurs : Luis G. Vargas [États-Unis] ; Andrea M. Izak [États-Unis] ; David J. Apple [États-Unis] ; Liliana Werner [États-Unis] ; Suresh K. Pandey [États-Unis] ; Rupal H. Trivedi [États-Unis]

Source :

RBID : Pascal:03-0435746

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the extent of posterior capsule opacification (PCO) after implantation of a standard-power biconvex Centerflex® intraocular lens (IOL) and a newly introduced biconcave high-minus-power Centerflex design in rabbit eyes. Setting: The Center for Research on Ocular Therapeutics and Biodevices, Storm Eye Institute, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, and the David J. Apple, MD, Laboratories for Ophthalmic Devices Research, John A. Moran Eye Center, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA. Methods: Twelve rabbits had phacoemulsification and implantation of 2 foldable single-piece hydrophilic acrylic Centerflex posterior chamber lOLs. The right eyes received a standard-power (+21.00 diopters [D]) biconvex-optic lens and the left eyes, a minus-power (-7.00 D) biconcave-optic IOL. Formation of PCO was evaluated 3 weeks after surgery using the Miyake-Apple posterior photography technique. Histological sections from each globe were prepared to analyze capsular bag status and assess postsurgical intracapsular lens epithelial cell (LEC) proliferation, especially ingrowth of LECs across the visual axis. The data were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis 1-way analysis of variance for nonparametric measurements and the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. Results: There was no significant difference in Soemmering's ring formation between the 2 IOL models. The biconcave minus-power IOL showed significantly lower central and peripheral PCO scores than the biconvex standard-power lens (P<.05). Pathological evaluations revealed that the effective site of blockage of LECs was at the truncated optic edge of both lenses, even in the presence of retained and/or regenerative cortical material. Conclusions: This study confirms the efficacy of a truncated IOL optic in helping reduce the incidence of PCO. Both IOL designs have optic geometries that create clear-cut barrier effects. However, the biconcave minus-power IOL, which has a thicker, square, truncated optic edge with a ridge that encircles the periphery of the optic for 360 degrees, appears to have an enhanced barrier effect, especially at the optic-haptic junction. This further minimizes the ingrowth of migrating LECs toward the visual axis.
pA  
A01 01  1    @0 0886-3350
A02 01      @0 JCSUEV
A03   1    @0 J. cataract refractive surg.
A05       @2 29
A06       @2 8
A08 01  1  ENG  @1 Implantation of a single-piece, hydrophilic, acrylic, minus-power foldable posterior chamber intraocular lens in a rabbit model: Clinicopathologic study of posterior capsule opacification
A11 01  1    @1 VARGAS (Luis G.)
A11 02  1    @1 IZAK (Andrea M.)
A11 03  1    @1 APPLE (David J.)
A11 04  1    @1 WERNER (Liliana)
A11 05  1    @1 PANDEY (Suresh K.)
A11 06  1    @1 TRIVEDI (Rupal H.)
A14 01      @1 Center for Research on Ocular Therapeutics and Biodevices, Storm Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of South Carolina @2 Charleston, South Carolina @3 USA @Z 1 aut. @Z 6 aut.
A14 02      @1 David J. Apple, MD Laboratories for Ophthalmic Devices Research, John A. Moran Eye Center, University of Utah @2 Salt Lake City, Utah @3 USA @Z 2 aut. @Z 3 aut. @Z 4 aut. @Z 5 aut.
A20       @1 1613-1620
A21       @1 2003
A23 01      @0 ENG
A43 01      @1 INIST @2 20937 @5 354000112811290240
A44       @0 0000 @1 © 2003 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.
A45       @0 23 ref.
A47 01  1    @0 03-0435746
A60       @1 P
A61       @0 A
A64 01  1    @0 Journal of cataract and refractive surgery
A66 01      @0 USA
C01 01    ENG  @0 Purpose: To compare the extent of posterior capsule opacification (PCO) after implantation of a standard-power biconvex Centerflex® intraocular lens (IOL) and a newly introduced biconcave high-minus-power Centerflex design in rabbit eyes. Setting: The Center for Research on Ocular Therapeutics and Biodevices, Storm Eye Institute, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, and the David J. Apple, MD, Laboratories for Ophthalmic Devices Research, John A. Moran Eye Center, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA. Methods: Twelve rabbits had phacoemulsification and implantation of 2 foldable single-piece hydrophilic acrylic Centerflex posterior chamber lOLs. The right eyes received a standard-power (+21.00 diopters [D]) biconvex-optic lens and the left eyes, a minus-power (-7.00 D) biconcave-optic IOL. Formation of PCO was evaluated 3 weeks after surgery using the Miyake-Apple posterior photography technique. Histological sections from each globe were prepared to analyze capsular bag status and assess postsurgical intracapsular lens epithelial cell (LEC) proliferation, especially ingrowth of LECs across the visual axis. The data were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis 1-way analysis of variance for nonparametric measurements and the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. Results: There was no significant difference in Soemmering's ring formation between the 2 IOL models. The biconcave minus-power IOL showed significantly lower central and peripheral PCO scores than the biconvex standard-power lens (P<.05). Pathological evaluations revealed that the effective site of blockage of LECs was at the truncated optic edge of both lenses, even in the presence of retained and/or regenerative cortical material. Conclusions: This study confirms the efficacy of a truncated IOL optic in helping reduce the incidence of PCO. Both IOL designs have optic geometries that create clear-cut barrier effects. However, the biconcave minus-power IOL, which has a thicker, square, truncated optic edge with a ridge that encircles the periphery of the optic for 360 degrees, appears to have an enhanced barrier effect, especially at the optic-haptic junction. This further minimizes the ingrowth of migrating LECs toward the visual axis.
C02 01  X    @0 002B25B
C03 01  X  FRE  @0 Chirurgie expérimentale @5 01
C03 01  X  ENG  @0 Experimental surgery @5 01
C03 01  X  SPA  @0 Cirugía experimental @5 01
C03 02  X  FRE  @0 Animal @5 02
C03 02  X  ENG  @0 Animal @5 02
C03 02  X  SPA  @0 Animal @5 02
C03 03  X  FRE  @0 Lapin @5 03
C03 03  X  ENG  @0 Rabbit @5 03
C03 03  X  SPA  @0 Conejo @5 03
C03 04  X  FRE  @0 Implantation @5 08
C03 04  X  ENG  @0 Implantation @5 08
C03 04  X  SPA  @0 Implantación @5 08
C03 05  X  FRE  @0 Puissance @5 09
C03 05  X  ENG  @0 Power @5 09
C03 05  X  SPA  @0 Potencia @5 09
C03 06  X  FRE  @0 Lentille intraoculaire @5 11
C03 06  X  ENG  @0 Intraocular lens @5 11
C03 06  X  SPA  @0 Lente intraocular @5 11
C03 07  X  FRE  @0 Intraoculaire @5 12
C03 07  X  ENG  @0 Intraocular @5 12
C03 07  X  SPA  @0 Intraocular @5 12
C03 08  X  FRE  @0 Etude sur modèle @5 17
C03 08  X  ENG  @0 Model study @5 17
C03 08  X  SPA  @0 Estudio sobre modelo @5 17
C03 09  X  FRE  @0 Postérieur @5 18
C03 09  X  ENG  @0 Posterior @5 18
C03 09  X  SPA  @0 Posterior @5 18
C03 10  X  FRE  @0 Capsule @5 19
C03 10  X  ENG  @0 Capsule @5 19
C03 10  X  SPA  @0 Cápsula @5 19
C03 11  X  FRE  @0 Opacification @5 21
C03 11  X  ENG  @0 Opacification @5 21
C03 11  X  SPA  @0 Opacificación @5 21
C07 01  X  FRE  @0 Lagomorpha @2 NS
C07 01  X  ENG  @0 Lagomorpha @2 NS
C07 01  X  SPA  @0 Lagomorpha @2 NS
C07 02  X  FRE  @0 Mammalia @2 NS
C07 02  X  ENG  @0 Mammalia @2 NS
C07 02  X  SPA  @0 Mammalia @2 NS
C07 03  X  FRE  @0 Vertebrata @2 NS
C07 03  X  ENG  @0 Vertebrata @2 NS
C07 03  X  SPA  @0 Vertebrata @2 NS
C07 04  X  FRE  @0 Chirurgie @5 37
C07 04  X  ENG  @0 Surgery @5 37
C07 04  X  SPA  @0 Cirugía @5 37
N21       @1 300
N82       @1 PSI

Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)


Links to Exploration step

Pascal:03-0435746

Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI>
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en" level="a">Implantation of a single-piece, hydrophilic, acrylic, minus-power foldable posterior chamber intraocular lens in a rabbit model: Clinicopathologic study of posterior capsule opacification</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Vargas, Luis G" sort="Vargas, Luis G" uniqKey="Vargas L" first="Luis G." last="Vargas">Luis G. Vargas</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Center for Research on Ocular Therapeutics and Biodevices, Storm Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of South Carolina</s1>
<s2>Charleston, South Carolina</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>États-Unis</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Izak, Andrea M" sort="Izak, Andrea M" uniqKey="Izak A" first="Andrea M." last="Izak">Andrea M. Izak</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<inist:fA14 i1="02">
<s1>David J. Apple, MD Laboratories for Ophthalmic Devices Research, John A. Moran Eye Center, University of Utah</s1>
<s2>Salt Lake City, Utah</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>États-Unis</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Apple, David J" sort="Apple, David J" uniqKey="Apple D" first="David J." last="Apple">David J. Apple</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<inist:fA14 i1="02">
<s1>David J. Apple, MD Laboratories for Ophthalmic Devices Research, John A. Moran Eye Center, University of Utah</s1>
<s2>Salt Lake City, Utah</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>États-Unis</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Werner, Liliana" sort="Werner, Liliana" uniqKey="Werner L" first="Liliana" last="Werner">Liliana Werner</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<inist:fA14 i1="02">
<s1>David J. Apple, MD Laboratories for Ophthalmic Devices Research, John A. Moran Eye Center, University of Utah</s1>
<s2>Salt Lake City, Utah</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>États-Unis</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Pandey, Suresh K" sort="Pandey, Suresh K" uniqKey="Pandey S" first="Suresh K." last="Pandey">Suresh K. Pandey</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<inist:fA14 i1="02">
<s1>David J. Apple, MD Laboratories for Ophthalmic Devices Research, John A. Moran Eye Center, University of Utah</s1>
<s2>Salt Lake City, Utah</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>États-Unis</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Trivedi, Rupal H" sort="Trivedi, Rupal H" uniqKey="Trivedi R" first="Rupal H." last="Trivedi">Rupal H. Trivedi</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Center for Research on Ocular Therapeutics and Biodevices, Storm Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of South Carolina</s1>
<s2>Charleston, South Carolina</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>États-Unis</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno>
<idno type="inist">03-0435746</idno>
<date when="2003">2003</date>
<idno type="stanalyst">PASCAL 03-0435746 INIST</idno>
<idno type="RBID">Pascal:03-0435746</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">001141</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Curation">000370</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title xml:lang="en" level="a">Implantation of a single-piece, hydrophilic, acrylic, minus-power foldable posterior chamber intraocular lens in a rabbit model: Clinicopathologic study of posterior capsule opacification</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Vargas, Luis G" sort="Vargas, Luis G" uniqKey="Vargas L" first="Luis G." last="Vargas">Luis G. Vargas</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Center for Research on Ocular Therapeutics and Biodevices, Storm Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of South Carolina</s1>
<s2>Charleston, South Carolina</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>États-Unis</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Izak, Andrea M" sort="Izak, Andrea M" uniqKey="Izak A" first="Andrea M." last="Izak">Andrea M. Izak</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<inist:fA14 i1="02">
<s1>David J. Apple, MD Laboratories for Ophthalmic Devices Research, John A. Moran Eye Center, University of Utah</s1>
<s2>Salt Lake City, Utah</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>États-Unis</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Apple, David J" sort="Apple, David J" uniqKey="Apple D" first="David J." last="Apple">David J. Apple</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<inist:fA14 i1="02">
<s1>David J. Apple, MD Laboratories for Ophthalmic Devices Research, John A. Moran Eye Center, University of Utah</s1>
<s2>Salt Lake City, Utah</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>États-Unis</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Werner, Liliana" sort="Werner, Liliana" uniqKey="Werner L" first="Liliana" last="Werner">Liliana Werner</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<inist:fA14 i1="02">
<s1>David J. Apple, MD Laboratories for Ophthalmic Devices Research, John A. Moran Eye Center, University of Utah</s1>
<s2>Salt Lake City, Utah</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>États-Unis</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Pandey, Suresh K" sort="Pandey, Suresh K" uniqKey="Pandey S" first="Suresh K." last="Pandey">Suresh K. Pandey</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<inist:fA14 i1="02">
<s1>David J. Apple, MD Laboratories for Ophthalmic Devices Research, John A. Moran Eye Center, University of Utah</s1>
<s2>Salt Lake City, Utah</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>États-Unis</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Trivedi, Rupal H" sort="Trivedi, Rupal H" uniqKey="Trivedi R" first="Rupal H." last="Trivedi">Rupal H. Trivedi</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Center for Research on Ocular Therapeutics and Biodevices, Storm Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of South Carolina</s1>
<s2>Charleston, South Carolina</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>États-Unis</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series>
<title level="j" type="main">Journal of cataract and refractive surgery</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">J. cataract refractive surg.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0886-3350</idno>
<imprint>
<date when="2003">2003</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt>
<title level="j" type="main">Journal of cataract and refractive surgery</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">J. cataract refractive surg.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0886-3350</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass>
<keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en">
<term>Animal</term>
<term>Capsule</term>
<term>Experimental surgery</term>
<term>Implantation</term>
<term>Intraocular</term>
<term>Intraocular lens</term>
<term>Model study</term>
<term>Opacification</term>
<term>Posterior</term>
<term>Power</term>
<term>Rabbit</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Chirurgie expérimentale</term>
<term>Animal</term>
<term>Lapin</term>
<term>Implantation</term>
<term>Puissance</term>
<term>Lentille intraoculaire</term>
<term>Intraoculaire</term>
<term>Etude sur modèle</term>
<term>Postérieur</term>
<term>Capsule</term>
<term>Opacification</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Wicri" type="topic" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Lapin</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Purpose: To compare the extent of posterior capsule opacification (PCO) after implantation of a standard-power biconvex Centerflex® intraocular lens (IOL) and a newly introduced biconcave high-minus-power Centerflex design in rabbit eyes. Setting: The Center for Research on Ocular Therapeutics and Biodevices, Storm Eye Institute, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, and the David J. Apple, MD, Laboratories for Ophthalmic Devices Research, John A. Moran Eye Center, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA. Methods: Twelve rabbits had phacoemulsification and implantation of 2 foldable single-piece hydrophilic acrylic Centerflex posterior chamber lOLs. The right eyes received a standard-power (+21.00 diopters [D]) biconvex-optic lens and the left eyes, a minus-power (-7.00 D) biconcave-optic IOL. Formation of PCO was evaluated 3 weeks after surgery using the Miyake-Apple posterior photography technique. Histological sections from each globe were prepared to analyze capsular bag status and assess postsurgical intracapsular lens epithelial cell (LEC) proliferation, especially ingrowth of LECs across the visual axis. The data were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis 1-way analysis of variance for nonparametric measurements and the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. Results: There was no significant difference in Soemmering's ring formation between the 2 IOL models. The biconcave minus-power IOL showed significantly lower central and peripheral PCO scores than the biconvex standard-power lens (P<.05). Pathological evaluations revealed that the effective site of blockage of LECs was at the truncated optic edge of both lenses, even in the presence of retained and/or regenerative cortical material. Conclusions: This study confirms the efficacy of a truncated IOL optic in helping reduce the incidence of PCO. Both IOL designs have optic geometries that create clear-cut barrier effects. However, the biconcave minus-power IOL, which has a thicker, square, truncated optic edge with a ridge that encircles the periphery of the optic for 360 degrees, appears to have an enhanced barrier effect, especially at the optic-haptic junction. This further minimizes the ingrowth of migrating LECs toward the visual axis.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<inist>
<standard h6="B">
<pA>
<fA01 i1="01" i2="1">
<s0>0886-3350</s0>
</fA01>
<fA02 i1="01">
<s0>JCSUEV</s0>
</fA02>
<fA03 i2="1">
<s0>J. cataract refractive surg.</s0>
</fA03>
<fA05>
<s2>29</s2>
</fA05>
<fA06>
<s2>8</s2>
</fA06>
<fA08 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG">
<s1>Implantation of a single-piece, hydrophilic, acrylic, minus-power foldable posterior chamber intraocular lens in a rabbit model: Clinicopathologic study of posterior capsule opacification</s1>
</fA08>
<fA11 i1="01" i2="1">
<s1>VARGAS (Luis G.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="02" i2="1">
<s1>IZAK (Andrea M.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="03" i2="1">
<s1>APPLE (David J.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="04" i2="1">
<s1>WERNER (Liliana)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="05" i2="1">
<s1>PANDEY (Suresh K.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="06" i2="1">
<s1>TRIVEDI (Rupal H.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Center for Research on Ocular Therapeutics and Biodevices, Storm Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of South Carolina</s1>
<s2>Charleston, South Carolina</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA14 i1="02">
<s1>David J. Apple, MD Laboratories for Ophthalmic Devices Research, John A. Moran Eye Center, University of Utah</s1>
<s2>Salt Lake City, Utah</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA20>
<s1>1613-1620</s1>
</fA20>
<fA21>
<s1>2003</s1>
</fA21>
<fA23 i1="01">
<s0>ENG</s0>
</fA23>
<fA43 i1="01">
<s1>INIST</s1>
<s2>20937</s2>
<s5>354000112811290240</s5>
</fA43>
<fA44>
<s0>0000</s0>
<s1>© 2003 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.</s1>
</fA44>
<fA45>
<s0>23 ref.</s0>
</fA45>
<fA47 i1="01" i2="1">
<s0>03-0435746</s0>
</fA47>
<fA60>
<s1>P</s1>
</fA60>
<fA61>
<s0>A</s0>
</fA61>
<fA64 i1="01" i2="1">
<s0>Journal of cataract and refractive surgery</s0>
</fA64>
<fA66 i1="01">
<s0>USA</s0>
</fA66>
<fC01 i1="01" l="ENG">
<s0>Purpose: To compare the extent of posterior capsule opacification (PCO) after implantation of a standard-power biconvex Centerflex® intraocular lens (IOL) and a newly introduced biconcave high-minus-power Centerflex design in rabbit eyes. Setting: The Center for Research on Ocular Therapeutics and Biodevices, Storm Eye Institute, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, and the David J. Apple, MD, Laboratories for Ophthalmic Devices Research, John A. Moran Eye Center, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA. Methods: Twelve rabbits had phacoemulsification and implantation of 2 foldable single-piece hydrophilic acrylic Centerflex posterior chamber lOLs. The right eyes received a standard-power (+21.00 diopters [D]) biconvex-optic lens and the left eyes, a minus-power (-7.00 D) biconcave-optic IOL. Formation of PCO was evaluated 3 weeks after surgery using the Miyake-Apple posterior photography technique. Histological sections from each globe were prepared to analyze capsular bag status and assess postsurgical intracapsular lens epithelial cell (LEC) proliferation, especially ingrowth of LECs across the visual axis. The data were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis 1-way analysis of variance for nonparametric measurements and the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. Results: There was no significant difference in Soemmering's ring formation between the 2 IOL models. The biconcave minus-power IOL showed significantly lower central and peripheral PCO scores than the biconvex standard-power lens (P<.05). Pathological evaluations revealed that the effective site of blockage of LECs was at the truncated optic edge of both lenses, even in the presence of retained and/or regenerative cortical material. Conclusions: This study confirms the efficacy of a truncated IOL optic in helping reduce the incidence of PCO. Both IOL designs have optic geometries that create clear-cut barrier effects. However, the biconcave minus-power IOL, which has a thicker, square, truncated optic edge with a ridge that encircles the periphery of the optic for 360 degrees, appears to have an enhanced barrier effect, especially at the optic-haptic junction. This further minimizes the ingrowth of migrating LECs toward the visual axis.</s0>
</fC01>
<fC02 i1="01" i2="X">
<s0>002B25B</s0>
</fC02>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Chirurgie expérimentale</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Experimental surgery</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Cirugía experimental</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Animal</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Animal</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Animal</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Lapin</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Rabbit</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Conejo</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Implantation</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Implantation</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Implantación</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Puissance</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Power</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Potencia</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Lentille intraoculaire</s0>
<s5>11</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Intraocular lens</s0>
<s5>11</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Lente intraocular</s0>
<s5>11</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Intraoculaire</s0>
<s5>12</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Intraocular</s0>
<s5>12</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Intraocular</s0>
<s5>12</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Etude sur modèle</s0>
<s5>17</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Model study</s0>
<s5>17</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Estudio sobre modelo</s0>
<s5>17</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Postérieur</s0>
<s5>18</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Posterior</s0>
<s5>18</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Posterior</s0>
<s5>18</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Capsule</s0>
<s5>19</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Capsule</s0>
<s5>19</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Cápsula</s0>
<s5>19</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Opacification</s0>
<s5>21</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Opacification</s0>
<s5>21</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Opacificación</s0>
<s5>21</s5>
</fC03>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Lagomorpha</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Lagomorpha</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Lagomorpha</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Mammalia</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Mammalia</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Mammalia</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Vertebrata</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Vertebrata</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Vertebrata</s0>
<s2>NS</s2>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Chirurgie</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Surgery</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Cirugía</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fN21>
<s1>300</s1>
</fN21>
<fN82>
<s1>PSI</s1>
</fN82>
</pA>
</standard>
</inist>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/HapticV1/Data/PascalFrancis/Curation
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000370 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PascalFrancis/Curation/biblio.hfd -nk 000370 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Ticri/CIDE
   |area=    HapticV1
   |flux=    PascalFrancis
   |étape=   Curation
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     Pascal:03-0435746
   |texte=   Implantation of a single-piece, hydrophilic, acrylic, minus-power foldable posterior chamber intraocular lens in a rabbit model: Clinicopathologic study of posterior capsule opacification
}}

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23.
Data generation: Mon Jun 13 01:09:46 2016. Site generation: Wed Mar 6 09:54:07 2024