Serveur d'exploration sur les dispositifs haptiques

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Biological versus psychometric intelligence : Halstead's (1947) distinction revisited

Identifieur interne : 000035 ( PascalFrancis/Curation ); précédent : 000034; suivant : 000036

Biological versus psychometric intelligence : Halstead's (1947) distinction revisited

Auteurs : G. Pallier [Australie] ; R. D. Roberts [Australie] ; L. Stankov [Australie]

Source :

RBID : Pascal:00-0224222

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

Abstract

This article reports an investigation into the empirical status of a little understood cognitive factor-tactile-kinesthetic ability. To this end, a variety of haptic tasks, including three subtests of the Halstead-Reitan Neuropsychological Test Battery (HRB), were administered to 108 participants, along with established markers commonly employed in contemporary psychometric investigations. The results suggest that these subtests of the HRB measure cognitive abilities conceptually equivalent to fluid intelligence. Since these tests reflect efforts to operationalize Halstead's (1947) concept of "biological intelligence, the results reported herein allow evaluation of this concept in relation to current models of human intelligence. Previous studies investigating the nature of abilities assessed by the HRB have reached contradictory conclusions. Present findings clarify the source of these anomalies.
pA  
A01 01  1    @0 0887-6177
A02 01      @0 ACNEET
A03   1    @0 Arch. clin. neuropsychol.
A05       @2 15
A06       @2 3
A08 01  1  ENG  @1 Biological versus psychometric intelligence : Halstead's (1947) distinction revisited
A11 01  1    @1 PALLIER (G.)
A11 02  1    @1 ROBERTS (R. D.)
A11 03  1    @1 STANKOV (L.)
A14 01      @1 University of Sydney @3 AUS @Z 1 aut. @Z 2 aut. @Z 3 aut.
A20       @1 205-226
A21       @1 2000
A23 01      @0 ENG
A43 01      @1 INIST @2 21173 @5 354000086536110020
A44       @0 0000 @1 © 2000 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.
A45       @0 3 p.1/4
A47 01  1    @0 00-0224222
A60       @1 P
A61       @0 A
A64 01  1    @0 Archives of clinical neuropsychology
A66 01      @0 USA
C01 01    ENG  @0 This article reports an investigation into the empirical status of a little understood cognitive factor-tactile-kinesthetic ability. To this end, a variety of haptic tasks, including three subtests of the Halstead-Reitan Neuropsychological Test Battery (HRB), were administered to 108 participants, along with established markers commonly employed in contemporary psychometric investigations. The results suggest that these subtests of the HRB measure cognitive abilities conceptually equivalent to fluid intelligence. Since these tests reflect efforts to operationalize Halstead's (1947) concept of "biological intelligence, the results reported herein allow evaluation of this concept in relation to current models of human intelligence. Previous studies investigating the nature of abilities assessed by the HRB have reached contradictory conclusions. Present findings clarify the source of these anomalies.
C02 01  X    @0 002A26H06
C03 01  X  FRE  @0 Test neuropsychologique @5 01
C03 01  X  ENG  @0 Neuropsychological test @5 01
C03 01  X  SPA  @0 Prueba neuropsichologica @5 01
C03 02  X  FRE  @0 Aptitude intellectuelle @5 02
C03 02  X  ENG  @0 Intellectual ability @5 02
C03 02  X  SPA  @0 Aptitud intelectual @5 02
C03 03  X  FRE  @0 Intelligence fluide @5 03
C03 03  X  ENG  @0 Fluent intelligence @5 03
C03 03  X  SPA  @0 Inteligencia fluido @5 03
C03 04  X  FRE  @0 Intelligence cristallisée @5 04
C03 04  X  ENG  @0 Crystallized intelligence @5 04
C03 04  X  SPA  @0 Inteligencia cristalizada @5 04
C03 05  X  FRE  @0 Sensibilité tactile @5 07
C03 05  X  ENG  @0 Tactile sensitivity @5 07
C03 05  X  SPA  @0 Sensibilidad tactil @5 07
C03 06  X  FRE  @0 Kinesthésie @5 08
C03 06  X  ENG  @0 Kinesthesia @5 08
C03 06  X  SPA  @0 Kinestesia @5 08
C03 07  X  FRE  @0 Neuropsychological Test Battery Halstead Reitan @2 NP @5 09
C03 07  X  ENG  @0 Neuropsychological Test Battery Halstead Reitan @2 NP @5 09
C03 07  X  SPA  @0 Neuropsychological Test Battery Halstead Reitan @2 NP @5 09
C03 08  X  FRE  @0 Test intelligence @5 10
C03 08  X  ENG  @0 Intelligence test @5 10
C03 08  X  SPA  @0 Prueba inteligencia @5 10
C03 09  X  FRE  @0 Adult Intelligence Scale Wechsler @2 NP @5 11
C03 09  X  ENG  @0 Adult Intelligence Scale Wechsler @2 NP @5 11
C03 09  X  SPA  @0 Adult Intelligence Scale Wechsler @2 NP @5 11
C03 10  X  FRE  @0 Cognition @5 19
C03 10  X  ENG  @0 Cognition @5 19
C03 10  X  SPA  @0 Cognición @5 19
C03 11  X  FRE  @0 Psychométrie @5 20
C03 11  X  ENG  @0 Psychometrics @5 20
C03 11  X  SPA  @0 Psicometría @5 20
C03 12  X  FRE  @0 Homme @5 21
C03 12  X  ENG  @0 Human @5 21
C03 12  X  SPA  @0 Hombre @5 21
N21       @1 157

Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)


Links to Exploration step

Pascal:00-0224222

Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI>
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en" level="a">Biological versus psychometric intelligence : Halstead's (1947) distinction revisited</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Pallier, G" sort="Pallier, G" uniqKey="Pallier G" first="G." last="Pallier">G. Pallier</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>University of Sydney</s1>
<s3>AUS</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>Australie</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Roberts, R D" sort="Roberts, R D" uniqKey="Roberts R" first="R. D." last="Roberts">R. D. Roberts</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>University of Sydney</s1>
<s3>AUS</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>Australie</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Stankov, L" sort="Stankov, L" uniqKey="Stankov L" first="L." last="Stankov">L. Stankov</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>University of Sydney</s1>
<s3>AUS</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>Australie</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno>
<idno type="inist">00-0224222</idno>
<date when="2000">2000</date>
<idno type="stanalyst">PASCAL 00-0224222 INIST</idno>
<idno type="RBID">Pascal:00-0224222</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">001478</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Curation">000035</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title xml:lang="en" level="a">Biological versus psychometric intelligence : Halstead's (1947) distinction revisited</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Pallier, G" sort="Pallier, G" uniqKey="Pallier G" first="G." last="Pallier">G. Pallier</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>University of Sydney</s1>
<s3>AUS</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>Australie</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Roberts, R D" sort="Roberts, R D" uniqKey="Roberts R" first="R. D." last="Roberts">R. D. Roberts</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>University of Sydney</s1>
<s3>AUS</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>Australie</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Stankov, L" sort="Stankov, L" uniqKey="Stankov L" first="L." last="Stankov">L. Stankov</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>University of Sydney</s1>
<s3>AUS</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>Australie</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series>
<title level="j" type="main">Archives of clinical neuropsychology</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Arch. clin. neuropsychol.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0887-6177</idno>
<imprint>
<date when="2000">2000</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt>
<title level="j" type="main">Archives of clinical neuropsychology</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Arch. clin. neuropsychol.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0887-6177</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass>
<keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en">
<term>Adult Intelligence Scale Wechsler</term>
<term>Cognition</term>
<term>Crystallized intelligence</term>
<term>Fluent intelligence</term>
<term>Human</term>
<term>Intellectual ability</term>
<term>Intelligence test</term>
<term>Kinesthesia</term>
<term>Neuropsychological Test Battery Halstead Reitan</term>
<term>Neuropsychological test</term>
<term>Psychometrics</term>
<term>Tactile sensitivity</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Test neuropsychologique</term>
<term>Aptitude intellectuelle</term>
<term>Intelligence fluide</term>
<term>Intelligence cristallisée</term>
<term>Sensibilité tactile</term>
<term>Kinesthésie</term>
<term>Neuropsychological Test Battery Halstead Reitan</term>
<term>Test intelligence</term>
<term>Adult Intelligence Scale Wechsler</term>
<term>Cognition</term>
<term>Psychométrie</term>
<term>Homme</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Wicri" type="topic" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Homme</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">This article reports an investigation into the empirical status of a little understood cognitive factor-tactile-kinesthetic ability. To this end, a variety of haptic tasks, including three subtests of the Halstead-Reitan Neuropsychological Test Battery (HRB), were administered to 108 participants, along with established markers commonly employed in contemporary psychometric investigations. The results suggest that these subtests of the HRB measure cognitive abilities conceptually equivalent to fluid intelligence. Since these tests reflect efforts to operationalize Halstead's (1947) concept of "biological intelligence, the results reported herein allow evaluation of this concept in relation to current models of human intelligence. Previous studies investigating the nature of abilities assessed by the HRB have reached contradictory conclusions. Present findings clarify the source of these anomalies.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<inist>
<standard h6="B">
<pA>
<fA01 i1="01" i2="1">
<s0>0887-6177</s0>
</fA01>
<fA02 i1="01">
<s0>ACNEET</s0>
</fA02>
<fA03 i2="1">
<s0>Arch. clin. neuropsychol.</s0>
</fA03>
<fA05>
<s2>15</s2>
</fA05>
<fA06>
<s2>3</s2>
</fA06>
<fA08 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG">
<s1>Biological versus psychometric intelligence : Halstead's (1947) distinction revisited</s1>
</fA08>
<fA11 i1="01" i2="1">
<s1>PALLIER (G.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="02" i2="1">
<s1>ROBERTS (R. D.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="03" i2="1">
<s1>STANKOV (L.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA14 i1="01">
<s1>University of Sydney</s1>
<s3>AUS</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA20>
<s1>205-226</s1>
</fA20>
<fA21>
<s1>2000</s1>
</fA21>
<fA23 i1="01">
<s0>ENG</s0>
</fA23>
<fA43 i1="01">
<s1>INIST</s1>
<s2>21173</s2>
<s5>354000086536110020</s5>
</fA43>
<fA44>
<s0>0000</s0>
<s1>© 2000 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.</s1>
</fA44>
<fA45>
<s0>3 p.1/4</s0>
</fA45>
<fA47 i1="01" i2="1">
<s0>00-0224222</s0>
</fA47>
<fA60>
<s1>P</s1>
</fA60>
<fA61>
<s0>A</s0>
</fA61>
<fA64 i1="01" i2="1">
<s0>Archives of clinical neuropsychology</s0>
</fA64>
<fA66 i1="01">
<s0>USA</s0>
</fA66>
<fC01 i1="01" l="ENG">
<s0>This article reports an investigation into the empirical status of a little understood cognitive factor-tactile-kinesthetic ability. To this end, a variety of haptic tasks, including three subtests of the Halstead-Reitan Neuropsychological Test Battery (HRB), were administered to 108 participants, along with established markers commonly employed in contemporary psychometric investigations. The results suggest that these subtests of the HRB measure cognitive abilities conceptually equivalent to fluid intelligence. Since these tests reflect efforts to operationalize Halstead's (1947) concept of "biological intelligence, the results reported herein allow evaluation of this concept in relation to current models of human intelligence. Previous studies investigating the nature of abilities assessed by the HRB have reached contradictory conclusions. Present findings clarify the source of these anomalies.</s0>
</fC01>
<fC02 i1="01" i2="X">
<s0>002A26H06</s0>
</fC02>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Test neuropsychologique</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Neuropsychological test</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Prueba neuropsichologica</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Aptitude intellectuelle</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Intellectual ability</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Aptitud intelectual</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Intelligence fluide</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Fluent intelligence</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Inteligencia fluido</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Intelligence cristallisée</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Crystallized intelligence</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Inteligencia cristalizada</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Sensibilité tactile</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Tactile sensitivity</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Sensibilidad tactil</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Kinesthésie</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Kinesthesia</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Kinestesia</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Neuropsychological Test Battery Halstead Reitan</s0>
<s2>NP</s2>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Neuropsychological Test Battery Halstead Reitan</s0>
<s2>NP</s2>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Neuropsychological Test Battery Halstead Reitan</s0>
<s2>NP</s2>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Test intelligence</s0>
<s5>10</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Intelligence test</s0>
<s5>10</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Prueba inteligencia</s0>
<s5>10</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Adult Intelligence Scale Wechsler</s0>
<s2>NP</s2>
<s5>11</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Adult Intelligence Scale Wechsler</s0>
<s2>NP</s2>
<s5>11</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Adult Intelligence Scale Wechsler</s0>
<s2>NP</s2>
<s5>11</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Cognition</s0>
<s5>19</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Cognition</s0>
<s5>19</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Cognición</s0>
<s5>19</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Psychométrie</s0>
<s5>20</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Psychometrics</s0>
<s5>20</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Psicometría</s0>
<s5>20</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="12" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Homme</s0>
<s5>21</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="12" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Human</s0>
<s5>21</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="12" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Hombre</s0>
<s5>21</s5>
</fC03>
<fN21>
<s1>157</s1>
</fN21>
</pA>
</standard>
</inist>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/HapticV1/Data/PascalFrancis/Curation
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000035 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PascalFrancis/Curation/biblio.hfd -nk 000035 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Ticri/CIDE
   |area=    HapticV1
   |flux=    PascalFrancis
   |étape=   Curation
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     Pascal:00-0224222
   |texte=   Biological versus psychometric intelligence : Halstead's (1947) distinction revisited
}}

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23.
Data generation: Mon Jun 13 01:09:46 2016. Site generation: Wed Mar 6 09:54:07 2024