Effect of the field-of-view against target ratio in haptic exploration
Identifieur interne :
001617 ( PascalFrancis/Corpus );
précédent :
001616;
suivant :
001618
Effect of the field-of-view against target ratio in haptic exploration
Auteurs : S. LeeSource :
-
Advances in human factors/ergonomics
RBID : Pascal:98-0214989
Descripteurs français
- Pascal (Inist)
- Interface utilisateur,
Sensibilité tactile,
Affichage,
Relation homme machine,
Ordinateur,
Ergonomie,
Cécité,
Maladie congénitale,
Tâche discrimination,
Cognition,
Perception,
Homme,
Champ perceptif,
Icône.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Blindness,
Cognition,
Computer,
Congenital disease,
Discrimination task,
Display,
Ergonomics,
Human,
Man machine relation,
Perception,
Tactile sensitivity,
User interface.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to determine the most desirable ratio of the field of view of a tactile display against the size of target. Seven sighted and five congenitally blind subjects discriminated twelve icons by touch using the Optacon. The patterns of the subjects in using the three magnification settings on the vibrotactile display were recorded during the haptic exploration and analyzed. The best ratio used in the experiment seemed to be 1:2. Users tend not to use the larger cursor window, which set the ratio at 1:1 and caused the presentation of images in lower resolution. No significant difference in the performances between the sighted and blind subjects could be found.
Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)
Pour connaître la documentation sur le format Inist Standard.
| pA |
| A05 | | | | @2 21A |
|---|
| A08 | 01 | 1 | ENG | @1 Effect of the field-of-view against target ratio in haptic exploration |
|---|
| A09 | 01 | 1 | ENG | @1 Design of computing systems : San Francisco CA, 24-29 August 1997. Volume A: Cognitive considerations. Volume B: Social and ergonomic considerations |
|---|
| A11 | 01 | 1 | | @1 LEE (S.) |
|---|
| A12 | 01 | 1 | | @1 SALVENDY (Gavriel) @9 ed. |
|---|
| A12 | 02 | 1 | | @1 SMITH (Michael J.) @9 ed. |
|---|
| A12 | 03 | 1 | | @1 KOUBEK (Richard J.) @9 ed. |
|---|
| A14 | 01 | | | @1 Department of Industrial Engineering, Chonnam National University @2 Kwangju @3 KOR @Z 1 aut. |
|---|
| A20 | | | | @1 595-598 |
|---|
| A21 | | | | @1 1997 |
|---|
| A23 | 01 | | | @0 ENG |
|---|
| A26 | 01 | | | @0 0-444-82183-X |
|---|
| A43 | 01 | | | @1 INIST @2 21720 @5 354000077528361470 |
|---|
| A44 | | | | @0 0000 @1 © 1998 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved. |
|---|
| A45 | | | | @0 3 ref. |
|---|
| A47 | 01 | 1 | | @0 98-0214989 |
|---|
| A60 | | | | @1 P @2 C |
|---|
| A61 | | | | @0 A |
|---|
| A64 | | 2 | | @0 Advances in human factors/ergonomics |
|---|
| A66 | 01 | | | @0 NLD |
|---|
| C01 | 01 | | ENG | @0 The purpose of this study is to determine the most desirable ratio of the field of view of a tactile display against the size of target. Seven sighted and five congenitally blind subjects discriminated twelve icons by touch using the Optacon. The patterns of the subjects in using the three magnification settings on the vibrotactile display were recorded during the haptic exploration and analyzed. The best ratio used in the experiment seemed to be 1:2. Users tend not to use the larger cursor window, which set the ratio at 1:1 and caused the presentation of images in lower resolution. No significant difference in the performances between the sighted and blind subjects could be found. |
|---|
| C02 | 01 | X | | @0 002A26L07 |
|---|
| C03 | 01 | X | FRE | @0 Interface utilisateur @5 01 |
|---|
| C03 | 01 | X | ENG | @0 User interface @5 01 |
|---|
| C03 | 01 | X | SPA | @0 Interfase usuario @5 01 |
|---|
| C03 | 02 | X | FRE | @0 Sensibilité tactile @5 02 |
|---|
| C03 | 02 | X | ENG | @0 Tactile sensitivity @5 02 |
|---|
| C03 | 02 | X | SPA | @0 Sensibilidad tactil @5 02 |
|---|
| C03 | 03 | X | FRE | @0 Affichage @5 03 |
|---|
| C03 | 03 | X | ENG | @0 Display @5 03 |
|---|
| C03 | 03 | X | GER | @0 Bilddarstellung @5 03 |
|---|
| C03 | 03 | X | SPA | @0 Visualización @5 03 |
|---|
| C03 | 04 | X | FRE | @0 Relation homme machine @5 04 |
|---|
| C03 | 04 | X | ENG | @0 Man machine relation @5 04 |
|---|
| C03 | 04 | X | SPA | @0 Relación hombre máquina @5 04 |
|---|
| C03 | 05 | X | FRE | @0 Ordinateur @5 05 |
|---|
| C03 | 05 | X | ENG | @0 Computer @5 05 |
|---|
| C03 | 05 | X | GER | @0 Elektronische Rechenanlage @5 05 |
|---|
| C03 | 05 | X | SPA | @0 Computadora @5 05 |
|---|
| C03 | 06 | X | FRE | @0 Ergonomie @5 06 |
|---|
| C03 | 06 | X | ENG | @0 Ergonomics @5 06 |
|---|
| C03 | 06 | X | GER | @0 Arbeitswissenschaft @5 06 |
|---|
| C03 | 06 | X | SPA | @0 Ergonomía @5 06 |
|---|
| C03 | 07 | X | FRE | @0 Cécité @5 07 |
|---|
| C03 | 07 | X | ENG | @0 Blindness @5 07 |
|---|
| C03 | 07 | X | SPA | @0 Ceguera @5 07 |
|---|
| C03 | 08 | X | FRE | @0 Maladie congénitale @5 08 |
|---|
| C03 | 08 | X | ENG | @0 Congenital disease @5 08 |
|---|
| C03 | 08 | X | SPA | @0 Enfermedad congénita @5 08 |
|---|
| C03 | 09 | X | FRE | @0 Tâche discrimination @5 09 |
|---|
| C03 | 09 | X | ENG | @0 Discrimination task @5 09 |
|---|
| C03 | 09 | X | SPA | @0 Tarea discriminatoria @5 09 |
|---|
| C03 | 10 | X | FRE | @0 Cognition @5 19 |
|---|
| C03 | 10 | X | ENG | @0 Cognition @5 19 |
|---|
| C03 | 10 | X | SPA | @0 Cognición @5 19 |
|---|
| C03 | 11 | X | FRE | @0 Perception @5 20 |
|---|
| C03 | 11 | X | ENG | @0 Perception @5 20 |
|---|
| C03 | 11 | X | SPA | @0 Percepción @5 20 |
|---|
| C03 | 12 | X | FRE | @0 Homme @5 21 |
|---|
| C03 | 12 | X | ENG | @0 Human @5 21 |
|---|
| C03 | 12 | X | SPA | @0 Hombre @5 21 |
|---|
| C03 | 13 | X | FRE | @0 Champ perceptif @4 INC @5 86 |
|---|
| C03 | 14 | X | FRE | @0 Icône @4 INC @5 87 |
|---|
| C07 | 01 | X | FRE | @0 Oeil pathologie @5 53 |
|---|
| C07 | 01 | X | ENG | @0 Eye disease @5 53 |
|---|
| C07 | 01 | X | SPA | @0 Ojo patología @5 53 |
|---|
| C07 | 02 | X | FRE | @0 Trouble vision @5 54 |
|---|
| C07 | 02 | X | ENG | @0 Vision disorder @5 54 |
|---|
| C07 | 02 | X | SPA | @0 Trastorno visión @5 54 |
|---|
| N21 | | | | @1 138 |
|---|
|
|---|
| pR |
| A30 | 01 | 1 | ENG | @1 International conference on human-computer interactions @2 7 @3 San Francisco CA USA @4 1997-08-24 |
|---|
| A30 | 02 | 1 | ENG | @1 HCI international '95 @3 Tokyo JPN @4 1997-08-24 |
|---|
|
|---|
Format Inist (serveur)
| NO : | PASCAL 98-0214989 INIST |
|---|
| ET : | Effect of the field-of-view against target ratio in haptic exploration |
|---|
| AU : | LEE (S.); SALVENDY (Gavriel); SMITH (Michael J.); KOUBEK (Richard J.) |
|---|
| AF : | Department of Industrial Engineering, Chonnam National University/Kwangju/Corée, République de (1 aut.) |
|---|
| DT : | Publication en série; Congrès; Niveau analytique |
|---|
| SO : | Advances in human factors/ergonomics; Pays-Bas; Da. 1997; Vol. 21A; Pp. 595-598; Bibl. 3 ref. |
|---|
| LA : | Anglais |
|---|
| EA : | The purpose of this study is to determine the most desirable ratio of the field of view of a tactile display against the size of target. Seven sighted and five congenitally blind subjects discriminated twelve icons by touch using the Optacon. The patterns of the subjects in using the three magnification settings on the vibrotactile display were recorded during the haptic exploration and analyzed. The best ratio used in the experiment seemed to be 1:2. Users tend not to use the larger cursor window, which set the ratio at 1:1 and caused the presentation of images in lower resolution. No significant difference in the performances between the sighted and blind subjects could be found. |
|---|
| CC : | 002A26L07 |
|---|
| FD : | Interface utilisateur; Sensibilité tactile; Affichage; Relation homme machine; Ordinateur; Ergonomie; Cécité; Maladie congénitale; Tâche discrimination; Cognition; Perception; Homme; Champ perceptif; Icône |
|---|
| FG : | Oeil pathologie; Trouble vision |
|---|
| ED : | User interface; Tactile sensitivity; Display; Man machine relation; Computer; Ergonomics; Blindness; Congenital disease; Discrimination task; Cognition; Perception; Human |
|---|
| EG : | Eye disease; Vision disorder |
|---|
| GD : | Bilddarstellung; Elektronische Rechenanlage; Arbeitswissenschaft |
|---|
| SD : | Interfase usuario; Sensibilidad tactil; Visualización; Relación hombre máquina; Computadora; Ergonomía; Ceguera; Enfermedad congénita; Tarea discriminatoria; Cognición; Percepción; Hombre |
|---|
| LO : | INIST-21720.354000077528361470 |
|---|
| ID : | 98-0214989 |
|---|
Links to Exploration step
Pascal:98-0214989
Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Effect of the field-of-view against target ratio in haptic exploration</title>
<author><name sortKey="Lee, S" sort="Lee, S" uniqKey="Lee S" first="S." last="Lee">S. Lee</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Industrial Engineering, Chonnam National University</s1>
<s2>Kwangju</s2>
<s3>KOR</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno>
<idno type="inist">98-0214989</idno>
<date when="1997">1997</date>
<idno type="stanalyst">PASCAL 98-0214989 INIST</idno>
<idno type="RBID">Pascal:98-0214989</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">001617</idno>
</publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Effect of the field-of-view against target ratio in haptic exploration</title>
<author><name sortKey="Lee, S" sort="Lee, S" uniqKey="Lee S" first="S." last="Lee">S. Lee</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Industrial Engineering, Chonnam National University</s1>
<s2>Kwangju</s2>
<s3>KOR</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14><series><title level="j" type="main">Advances in human factors/ergonomics</title>
</series><seriesStmt><title level="j" type="main">Advances in human factors/ergonomics</title>
</seriesStmt><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Blindness</term>
<term>Cognition</term>
<term>Computer</term>
<term>Congenital disease</term>
<term>Discrimination task</term>
<term>Display</term>
<term>Ergonomics</term>
<term>Human</term>
<term>Man machine relation</term>
<term>Perception</term>
<term>Tactile sensitivity</term>
<term>User interface</term>
</keywords><keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr"><term>Interface utilisateur</term>
<term>Sensibilité tactile</term>
<term>Affichage</term>
<term>Relation homme machine</term>
<term>Ordinateur</term>
<term>Ergonomie</term>
<term>Cécité</term>
<term>Maladie congénitale</term>
<term>Tâche discrimination</term>
<term>Cognition</term>
<term>Perception</term>
<term>Homme</term>
<term>Champ perceptif</term>
<term>Icône</term>
</keywords><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">The purpose of this study is to determine the most desirable ratio of the field of view of a tactile display against the size of target. Seven sighted and five congenitally blind subjects discriminated twelve icons by touch using the Optacon. The patterns of the subjects in using the three magnification settings on the vibrotactile display were recorded during the haptic exploration and analyzed. The best ratio used in the experiment seemed to be 1:2. Users tend not to use the larger cursor window, which set the ratio at 1:1 and caused the presentation of images in lower resolution. No significant difference in the performances between the sighted and blind subjects could be found.</div>
</front><inist><standard h6="B"><pA><fA05><s2>21A</s2>
</fA05><fA08 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG"><s1>Effect of the field-of-view against target ratio in haptic exploration</s1>
</fA08><fA09 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG"><s1>Design of computing systems : San Francisco CA, 24-29 August 1997. Volume A: Cognitive considerations. Volume B: Social and ergonomic considerations</s1>
</fA09><fA11 i1="01" i2="1"><s1>LEE (S.)</s1>
</fA11><fA12 i1="01" i2="1"><s1>SALVENDY (Gavriel)</s1>
<s9>ed.</s9>
</fA12><fA12 i1="02" i2="1"><s1>SMITH (Michael J.)</s1>
<s9>ed.</s9>
</fA12><fA12 i1="03" i2="1"><s1>KOUBEK (Richard J.)</s1>
<s9>ed.</s9>
</fA12><fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Industrial Engineering, Chonnam National University</s1>
<s2>Kwangju</s2>
<s3>KOR</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</fA14><fA20><s1>595-598</s1>
</fA20><fA21><s1>1997</s1>
</fA21><fA23 i1="01"><s0>ENG</s0>
</fA23><fA26 i1="01"><s0>0-444-82183-X</s0>
</fA26><fA43 i1="01"><s1>INIST</s1>
<s2>21720</s2>
<s5>354000077528361470</s5>
</fA43><fA44><s0>0000</s0>
<s1>© 1998 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.</s1>
</fA44><fA45><s0>3 ref.</s0>
</fA45><fA47 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>98-0214989</s0>
</fA47><fA60><s1>P</s1>
<s2>C</s2>
</fA60><fA64 i2="2"><s0>Advances in human factors/ergonomics</s0>
</fA64><fA66 i1="01"><s0>NLD</s0>
</fA66><fC01 i1="01" l="ENG"><s0>The purpose of this study is to determine the most desirable ratio of the field of view of a tactile display against the size of target. Seven sighted and five congenitally blind subjects discriminated twelve icons by touch using the Optacon. The patterns of the subjects in using the three magnification settings on the vibrotactile display were recorded during the haptic exploration and analyzed. The best ratio used in the experiment seemed to be 1:2. Users tend not to use the larger cursor window, which set the ratio at 1:1 and caused the presentation of images in lower resolution. No significant difference in the performances between the sighted and blind subjects could be found.</s0>
</fC01><fC02 i1="01" i2="X"><s0>002A26L07</s0>
</fC02><fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Interface utilisateur</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03><fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>User interface</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03><fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Interfase usuario</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03><fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Sensibilité tactile</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03><fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Tactile sensitivity</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03><fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Sensibilidad tactil</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03><fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Affichage</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03><fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Display</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03><fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="GER"><s0>Bilddarstellung</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03><fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Visualización</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03><fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Relation homme machine</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03><fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Man machine relation</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03><fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Relación hombre máquina</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03><fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Ordinateur</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03><fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Computer</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03><fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="GER"><s0>Elektronische Rechenanlage</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03><fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Computadora</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03><fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Ergonomie</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03><fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Ergonomics</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03><fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="GER"><s0>Arbeitswissenschaft</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03><fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Ergonomía</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03><fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Cécité</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03><fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Blindness</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03><fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Ceguera</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03><fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Maladie congénitale</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03><fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Congenital disease</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03><fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Enfermedad congénita</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03><fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Tâche discrimination</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03><fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Discrimination task</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03><fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Tarea discriminatoria</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03><fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Cognition</s0>
<s5>19</s5>
</fC03><fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Cognition</s0>
<s5>19</s5>
</fC03><fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Cognición</s0>
<s5>19</s5>
</fC03><fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Perception</s0>
<s5>20</s5>
</fC03><fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Perception</s0>
<s5>20</s5>
</fC03><fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Percepción</s0>
<s5>20</s5>
</fC03><fC03 i1="12" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Homme</s0>
<s5>21</s5>
</fC03><fC03 i1="12" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Human</s0>
<s5>21</s5>
</fC03><fC03 i1="12" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Hombre</s0>
<s5>21</s5>
</fC03><fC03 i1="13" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Champ perceptif</s0>
<s4>INC</s4>
<s5>86</s5>
</fC03><fC03 i1="14" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Icône</s0>
<s4>INC</s4>
<s5>87</s5>
</fC03><fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Oeil pathologie</s0>
<s5>53</s5>
</fC07><fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Eye disease</s0>
<s5>53</s5>
</fC07><fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Ojo patología</s0>
<s5>53</s5>
</fC07><fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Trouble vision</s0>
<s5>54</s5>
</fC07><fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Vision disorder</s0>
<s5>54</s5>
</fC07><fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Trastorno visión</s0>
<s5>54</s5>
</fC07><fN21><s1>138</s1>
</fN21><pR><fA30 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG"><s1>International conference on human-computer interactions</s1>
<s2>7</s2>
<s3>San Francisco CA USA</s3>
<s4>1997-08-24</s4>
</fA30><fA30 i1="02" i2="1" l="ENG"><s1>HCI international '95</s1>
<s3>Tokyo JPN</s3>
<s4>1997-08-24</s4>
</fA30><server><NO>PASCAL 98-0214989 INIST</NO>
<ET>Effect of the field-of-view against target ratio in haptic exploration</ET>
<AU>LEE (S.); SALVENDY (Gavriel); SMITH (Michael J.); KOUBEK (Richard J.)</AU>
<AF>Department of Industrial Engineering, Chonnam National University/Kwangju/Corée, République de (1 aut.)</AF>
<DT>Publication en série; Congrès; Niveau analytique</DT>
<SO>Advances in human factors/ergonomics; Pays-Bas; Da. 1997; Vol. 21A; Pp. 595-598; Bibl. 3 ref.</SO>
<LA>Anglais</LA>
<EA>The purpose of this study is to determine the most desirable ratio of the field of view of a tactile display against the size of target. Seven sighted and five congenitally blind subjects discriminated twelve icons by touch using the Optacon. The patterns of the subjects in using the three magnification settings on the vibrotactile display were recorded during the haptic exploration and analyzed. The best ratio used in the experiment seemed to be 1:2. Users tend not to use the larger cursor window, which set the ratio at 1:1 and caused the presentation of images in lower resolution. No significant difference in the performances between the sighted and blind subjects could be found.</EA>
<CC>002A26L07</CC>
<FD>Interface utilisateur; Sensibilité tactile; Affichage; Relation homme machine; Ordinateur; Ergonomie; Cécité; Maladie congénitale; Tâche discrimination; Cognition; Perception; Homme; Champ perceptif; Icône</FD>
<FG>Oeil pathologie; Trouble vision</FG>
<ED>User interface; Tactile sensitivity; Display; Man machine relation; Computer; Ergonomics; Blindness; Congenital disease; Discrimination task; Cognition; Perception; Human</ED>
<EG>Eye disease; Vision disorder</EG>
<GD>Bilddarstellung; Elektronische Rechenanlage; Arbeitswissenschaft</GD>
<SD>Interfase usuario; Sensibilidad tactil; Visualización; Relación hombre máquina; Computadora; Ergonomía; Ceguera; Enfermedad congénita; Tarea discriminatoria; Cognición; Percepción; Hombre</SD>
<LO>INIST-21720.354000077528361470</LO>
<ID>98-0214989</ID>
</server>
Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/HapticV1/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001617 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 001617 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Ticri/CIDE
|area= HapticV1
|flux= PascalFrancis
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= Pascal:98-0214989
|texte= Effect of the field-of-view against target ratio in haptic exploration
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23.
Data generation: Mon Jun 13 01:09:46 2016. Site generation: Wed Mar 6 09:54:07 2024 |  |
