HapticV1, PascalFrancis, Corpus, bibRecord, 001142

Posterior capsule opacification: Silicone plate-haptic versus AcrySof intraocular lenses

Identifieur interne : 001142 ( PascalFrancis/Corpus ); précédent : 001141; suivant : 001143

Posterior capsule opacification: Silicone plate-haptic versus AcrySof intraocular lenses

Auteurs : Kiran A. Abhilakh Missier ; Rudy M. M. A. Nuijts ; Khiun F. Tjia

Source :

Journal of cataract and refractive surgery [ 0886-3350 ] ; 2003.

RBID : Pascal:03-0435723

Descripteurs français

Pascal (Inist)
- Implantation, Biomatériau, Siloxane polymère, Etude comparative, Homme, Postérieur, Capsule, Gélule, Opacification, Plaque, Lentille intraoculaire.

English descriptors

KwdEn :
- Biomaterial, Capsule, Comparative study, Hard capsule, Human, Implantation, Intraocular lens, Opacification, Plate, Posterior, Siloxane polymer.

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate posterior capsule opacification (PCO) in fellow eyes, 1 receiving a silicone intraocular lens (IOL) and the other, an acrylate IOL. Setting: Department of Ophthalmology, Isala Clinics, Zwolle, The Netherlands. Methods: This retrospective study comprised 107 patients (214 eyes). In each patient, 1 eye was randomly selected to have implantation of an acrylate IOL (AcrySof® MA30BA or MA60BM, Alcon) and the other eye, a plate-haptic silicone IOL (AA4203VF, Staar). Outcome measures were the total PCO index, percentage of neodymium:YAG (Nd:YAG) capsulotomies performed, and logMAR best corrected visual acuity (BCVA). The follow-up was 3 years. Results: The total PCO index was significantly lower in the AcrySof group than in the plate-haptic silicone group (P<.0001). There was no significant difference in logMAR BCVA between groups (P>.05). The percentage of Nd:YAG laser treatments was significantly lower in the AcrySof group (2.8%) than in the plate-haptic silicone group (23.1 %) (P<.05). Conclusions: There was significantly less PCO and a lower Nd:YAG laser capsulotomy rate after AcrySof IOL implantation than after plate-haptic silicone IOL implantation. These results did not seem to affect the logMAR BCVA as there were no significant differences between groups in this parameter.

Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)

Pour connaître la documentation sur le format Inist Standard.

A01	`01`	`1`		`@0 0886-3350`
A02	`01`			`@0 JCSUEV`
A03		`1`		`@0 J. cataract refractive surg.`
A05				`@2 29`
A06				`@2 8`
A08	`01`	`1`	`ENG`	`@1 Posterior capsule opacification: Silicone plate-haptic versus AcrySof intraocular lenses`
A11	`01`	`1`		`@1 ABHILAKH MISSIER (Kiran A.)`
A11	`02`	`1`		`@1 NUIJTS (Rudy M. M. A.)`
A11	`03`	`1`		`@1 TJIA (Khiun F.)`
A14	`01`			`@1 Department of Ophthalmology, Academic Hospital Maastricht @2 Maastricht @3 NLD @Z 1 aut. @Z 2 aut.`
A14	`02`			`@1 Isaka Clinics @2 Zwolle @3 NLD @Z 3 aut.`
A20				`@1 1569-1574`
A21				`@1 2003`
A23	`01`			`@0 ENG`
A43	`01`			`@1 INIST @2 20937 @5 354000112811290170`
A44				`@0 0000 @1 © 2003 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.`
A45				`@0 40 ref.`
A47	`01`	`1`		`@0 03-0435723`
A60				`@1 P`
A61				`@0 A`
A64	`01`	`1`		`@0 Journal of cataract and refractive surgery`
A66	`01`			`@0 USA`
C01	`01`		`ENG`	@0 Purpose: To evaluate posterior capsule opacification (PCO) in fellow eyes, 1 receiving a silicone intraocular lens (IOL) and the other, an acrylate IOL. Setting: Department of Ophthalmology, Isala Clinics, Zwolle, The Netherlands. Methods: This retrospective study comprised 107 patients (214 eyes). In each patient, 1 eye was randomly selected to have implantation of an acrylate IOL (AcrySof® MA30BA or MA60BM, Alcon) and the other eye, a plate-haptic silicone IOL (AA4203VF, Staar). Outcome measures were the total PCO index, percentage of neodymium:YAG (Nd:YAG) capsulotomies performed, and logMAR best corrected visual acuity (BCVA). The follow-up was 3 years. Results: The total PCO index was significantly lower in the AcrySof group than in the plate-haptic silicone group (P<.0001). There was no significant difference in logMAR BCVA between groups (P>.05). The percentage of Nd:YAG laser treatments was significantly lower in the AcrySof group (2.8%) than in the plate-haptic silicone group (23.1 %) (P<.05). Conclusions: There was significantly less PCO and a lower Nd:YAG laser capsulotomy rate after AcrySof IOL implantation than after plate-haptic silicone IOL implantation. These results did not seem to affect the logMAR BCVA as there were no significant differences between groups in this parameter.
C02	`01`	`X`		`@0 002B25B`
C03	`01`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Implantation @5 01`
C03	`01`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Implantation @5 01`
C03	`01`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Implantación @5 01`
C03	`02`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Biomatériau @5 02`
C03	`02`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Biomaterial @5 02`
C03	`02`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Biomaterial @5 02`
C03	`03`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Siloxane polymère @2 NK @5 03`
C03	`03`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Siloxane polymer @2 NK @5 03`
C03	`03`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Siloxano polímero @2 NK @5 03`
C03	`04`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Etude comparative @5 04`
C03	`04`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Comparative study @5 04`
C03	`04`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Estudio comparativo @5 04`
C03	`05`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Homme @5 05`
C03	`05`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Human @5 05`
C03	`05`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Hombre @5 05`
C03	`06`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Postérieur @5 08`
C03	`06`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Posterior @5 08`
C03	`06`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Posterior @5 08`
C03	`07`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Capsule @5 09`
C03	`07`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Capsule @5 09`
C03	`07`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Cápsula @5 09`
C03	`08`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Gélule @5 11`
C03	`08`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Hard capsule @5 11`
C03	`08`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Cápsula dura @5 11`
C03	`09`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Opacification @5 12`
C03	`09`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Opacification @5 12`
C03	`09`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Opacificación @5 12`
C03	`10`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Plaque @5 14`
C03	`10`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Plate @5 14`
C03	`10`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Placa @5 14`
C03	`11`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Lentille intraoculaire @5 17`
C03	`11`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Intraocular lens @5 17`
C03	`11`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Lente intraocular @5 17`
C07	`01`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Chirurgie @5 37`
C07	`01`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Surgery @5 37`
C07	`01`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Cirugía @5 37`
N21				`@1 300`
N82				`@1 PSI`

Format Inist (serveur)

NO :	PASCAL 03-0435723 INIST
ET :	Posterior capsule opacification: Silicone plate-haptic versus AcrySof intraocular lenses
AU :	ABHILAKH MISSIER (Kiran A.); NUIJTS (Rudy M. M. A.); TJIA (Khiun F.)
AF :	Department of Ophthalmology, Academic Hospital Maastricht/Maastricht/Pays-Bas (1 aut., 2 aut.); Isaka Clinics/Zwolle/Pays-Bas (3 aut.)
DT :	Publication en série; Niveau analytique
SO :	Journal of cataract and refractive surgery; ISSN 0886-3350; Coden JCSUEV; Etats-Unis; Da. 2003; Vol. 29; No. 8; Pp. 1569-1574; Bibl. 40 ref.
LA :	Anglais
EA :	Purpose: To evaluate posterior capsule opacification (PCO) in fellow eyes, 1 receiving a silicone intraocular lens (IOL) and the other, an acrylate IOL. Setting: Department of Ophthalmology, Isala Clinics, Zwolle, The Netherlands. Methods: This retrospective study comprised 107 patients (214 eyes). In each patient, 1 eye was randomly selected to have implantation of an acrylate IOL (AcrySof® MA30BA or MA60BM, Alcon) and the other eye, a plate-haptic silicone IOL (AA4203VF, Staar). Outcome measures were the total PCO index, percentage of neodymium:YAG (Nd:YAG) capsulotomies performed, and logMAR best corrected visual acuity (BCVA). The follow-up was 3 years. Results: The total PCO index was significantly lower in the AcrySof group than in the plate-haptic silicone group (P<.0001). There was no significant difference in logMAR BCVA between groups (P>.05). The percentage of Nd:YAG laser treatments was significantly lower in the AcrySof group (2.8%) than in the plate-haptic silicone group (23.1 %) (P<.05). Conclusions: There was significantly less PCO and a lower Nd:YAG laser capsulotomy rate after AcrySof IOL implantation than after plate-haptic silicone IOL implantation. These results did not seem to affect the logMAR BCVA as there were no significant differences between groups in this parameter.
CC :	002B25B
FD :	Implantation; Biomatériau; Siloxane polymère; Etude comparative; Homme; Postérieur; Capsule; Gélule; Opacification; Plaque; Lentille intraoculaire
FG :	Chirurgie
ED :	Implantation; Biomaterial; Siloxane polymer; Comparative study; Human; Posterior; Capsule; Hard capsule; Opacification; Plate; Intraocular lens
EG :	Surgery
SD :	Implantación; Biomaterial; Siloxano polímero; Estudio comparativo; Hombre; Posterior; Cápsula; Cápsula dura; Opacificación; Placa; Lente intraocular
LO :	INIST-20937.354000112811290170
ID :	03-0435723

Links to Exploration step

Pascal:03-0435723

Le document en format XML

<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Posterior capsule opacification: Silicone plate-haptic versus AcrySof intraocular lenses</title>
<author><name sortKey="Abhilakh Missier, Kiran A" sort="Abhilakh Missier, Kiran A" uniqKey="Abhilakh Missier K" first="Kiran A." last="Abhilakh Missier">Kiran A. Abhilakh Missier</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Ophthalmology, Academic Hospital Maastricht</s1>
<s2>Maastricht</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Nuijts, Rudy M M A" sort="Nuijts, Rudy M M A" uniqKey="Nuijts R" first="Rudy M. M. A." last="Nuijts">Rudy M. M. A. Nuijts</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Ophthalmology, Academic Hospital Maastricht</s1>
<s2>Maastricht</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Tjia, Khiun F" sort="Tjia, Khiun F" uniqKey="Tjia K" first="Khiun F." last="Tjia">Khiun F. Tjia</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>Isaka Clinics</s1>
<s2>Zwolle</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno>
<idno type="inist">03-0435723</idno>
<date when="2003">2003</date>
<idno type="stanalyst">PASCAL 03-0435723 INIST</idno>
<idno type="RBID">Pascal:03-0435723</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">001142</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Posterior capsule opacification: Silicone plate-haptic versus AcrySof intraocular lenses</title>
<author><name sortKey="Abhilakh Missier, Kiran A" sort="Abhilakh Missier, Kiran A" uniqKey="Abhilakh Missier K" first="Kiran A." last="Abhilakh Missier">Kiran A. Abhilakh Missier</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Ophthalmology, Academic Hospital Maastricht</s1>
<s2>Maastricht</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Nuijts, Rudy M M A" sort="Nuijts, Rudy M M A" uniqKey="Nuijts R" first="Rudy M. M. A." last="Nuijts">Rudy M. M. A. Nuijts</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Ophthalmology, Academic Hospital Maastricht</s1>
<s2>Maastricht</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Tjia, Khiun F" sort="Tjia, Khiun F" uniqKey="Tjia K" first="Khiun F." last="Tjia">Khiun F. Tjia</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>Isaka Clinics</s1>
<s2>Zwolle</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series><title level="j" type="main">Journal of cataract and refractive surgery</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">J. cataract refractive surg.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0886-3350</idno>
<imprint><date when="2003">2003</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><title level="j" type="main">Journal of cataract and refractive surgery</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">J. cataract refractive surg.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0886-3350</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Biomaterial</term>
<term>Capsule</term>
<term>Comparative study</term>
<term>Hard capsule</term>
<term>Human</term>
<term>Implantation</term>
<term>Intraocular lens</term>
<term>Opacification</term>
<term>Plate</term>
<term>Posterior</term>
<term>Siloxane polymer</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr"><term>Implantation</term>
<term>Biomatériau</term>
<term>Siloxane polymère</term>
<term>Etude comparative</term>
<term>Homme</term>
<term>Postérieur</term>
<term>Capsule</term>
<term>Gélule</term>
<term>Opacification</term>
<term>Plaque</term>
<term>Lentille intraoculaire</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Purpose: To evaluate posterior capsule opacification (PCO) in fellow eyes, 1 receiving a silicone intraocular lens (IOL) and the other, an acrylate IOL. Setting: Department of Ophthalmology, Isala Clinics, Zwolle, The Netherlands. Methods: This retrospective study comprised 107 patients (214 eyes). In each patient, 1 eye was randomly selected to have implantation of an acrylate IOL (AcrySof® MA30BA or MA60BM, Alcon) and the other eye, a plate-haptic silicone IOL (AA4203VF, Staar). Outcome measures were the total PCO index, percentage of neodymium:YAG (Nd:YAG) capsulotomies performed, and logMAR best corrected visual acuity (BCVA). The follow-up was 3 years. Results: The total PCO index was significantly lower in the AcrySof group than in the plate-haptic silicone group (P<.0001). There was no significant difference in logMAR BCVA between groups (P>.05). The percentage of Nd:YAG laser treatments was significantly lower in the AcrySof group (2.8%) than in the plate-haptic silicone group (23.1 %) (P<.05). Conclusions: There was significantly less PCO and a lower Nd:YAG laser capsulotomy rate after AcrySof IOL implantation than after plate-haptic silicone IOL implantation. These results did not seem to affect the logMAR BCVA as there were no significant differences between groups in this parameter.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<inist><standard h6="B"><pA><fA01 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>0886-3350</s0>
</fA01>
<fA02 i1="01"><s0>JCSUEV</s0>
</fA02>
<fA03 i2="1"><s0>J. cataract refractive surg.</s0>
</fA03>
<fA05><s2>29</s2>
</fA05>
<fA06><s2>8</s2>
</fA06>
<fA08 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG"><s1>Posterior capsule opacification: Silicone plate-haptic versus AcrySof intraocular lenses</s1>
</fA08>
<fA11 i1="01" i2="1"><s1>ABHILAKH MISSIER (Kiran A.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="02" i2="1"><s1>NUIJTS (Rudy M. M. A.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="03" i2="1"><s1>TJIA (Khiun F.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Ophthalmology, Academic Hospital Maastricht</s1>
<s2>Maastricht</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA14 i1="02"><s1>Isaka Clinics</s1>
<s2>Zwolle</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA20><s1>1569-1574</s1>
</fA20>
<fA21><s1>2003</s1>
</fA21>
<fA23 i1="01"><s0>ENG</s0>
</fA23>
<fA43 i1="01"><s1>INIST</s1>
<s2>20937</s2>
<s5>354000112811290170</s5>
</fA43>
<fA44><s0>0000</s0>
<s1>© 2003 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.</s1>
</fA44>
<fA45><s0>40 ref.</s0>
</fA45>
<fA47 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>03-0435723</s0>
</fA47>
<fA60><s1>P</s1>
</fA60>
<fA61><s0>A</s0>
</fA61>
<fA64 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>Journal of cataract and refractive surgery</s0>
</fA64>
<fA66 i1="01"><s0>USA</s0>
</fA66>
<fC01 i1="01" l="ENG"><s0>Purpose: To evaluate posterior capsule opacification (PCO) in fellow eyes, 1 receiving a silicone intraocular lens (IOL) and the other, an acrylate IOL. Setting: Department of Ophthalmology, Isala Clinics, Zwolle, The Netherlands. Methods: This retrospective study comprised 107 patients (214 eyes). In each patient, 1 eye was randomly selected to have implantation of an acrylate IOL (AcrySof® MA30BA or MA60BM, Alcon) and the other eye, a plate-haptic silicone IOL (AA4203VF, Staar). Outcome measures were the total PCO index, percentage of neodymium:YAG (Nd:YAG) capsulotomies performed, and logMAR best corrected visual acuity (BCVA). The follow-up was 3 years. Results: The total PCO index was significantly lower in the AcrySof group than in the plate-haptic silicone group (P<.0001). There was no significant difference in logMAR BCVA between groups (P>.05). The percentage of Nd:YAG laser treatments was significantly lower in the AcrySof group (2.8%) than in the plate-haptic silicone group (23.1 %) (P<.05). Conclusions: There was significantly less PCO and a lower Nd:YAG laser capsulotomy rate after AcrySof IOL implantation than after plate-haptic silicone IOL implantation. These results did not seem to affect the logMAR BCVA as there were no significant differences between groups in this parameter.</s0>
</fC01>
<fC02 i1="01" i2="X"><s0>002B25B</s0>
</fC02>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Implantation</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Implantation</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Implantación</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Biomatériau</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Biomaterial</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Biomaterial</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Siloxane polymère</s0>
<s2>NK</s2>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Siloxane polymer</s0>
<s2>NK</s2>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Siloxano polímero</s0>
<s2>NK</s2>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Etude comparative</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Comparative study</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Estudio comparativo</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Homme</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Human</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Hombre</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Postérieur</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Posterior</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Posterior</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Capsule</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Capsule</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Cápsula</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Gélule</s0>
<s5>11</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Hard capsule</s0>
<s5>11</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Cápsula dura</s0>
<s5>11</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Opacification</s0>
<s5>12</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Opacification</s0>
<s5>12</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Opacificación</s0>
<s5>12</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Plaque</s0>
<s5>14</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Plate</s0>
<s5>14</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Placa</s0>
<s5>14</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Lentille intraoculaire</s0>
<s5>17</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Intraocular lens</s0>
<s5>17</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Lente intraocular</s0>
<s5>17</s5>
</fC03>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Chirurgie</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Surgery</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Cirugía</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fN21><s1>300</s1>
</fN21>
<fN82><s1>PSI</s1>
</fN82>
</pA>
</standard>
<server><NO>PASCAL 03-0435723 INIST</NO>
<ET>Posterior capsule opacification: Silicone plate-haptic versus AcrySof intraocular lenses</ET>
<AU>ABHILAKH MISSIER (Kiran A.); NUIJTS (Rudy M. M. A.); TJIA (Khiun F.)</AU>
<AF>Department of Ophthalmology, Academic Hospital Maastricht/Maastricht/Pays-Bas (1 aut., 2 aut.); Isaka Clinics/Zwolle/Pays-Bas (3 aut.)</AF>
<DT>Publication en série; Niveau analytique</DT>
<SO>Journal of cataract and refractive surgery; ISSN 0886-3350; Coden JCSUEV; Etats-Unis; Da. 2003; Vol. 29; No. 8; Pp. 1569-1574; Bibl. 40 ref.</SO>
<LA>Anglais</LA>
<EA>Purpose: To evaluate posterior capsule opacification (PCO) in fellow eyes, 1 receiving a silicone intraocular lens (IOL) and the other, an acrylate IOL. Setting: Department of Ophthalmology, Isala Clinics, Zwolle, The Netherlands. Methods: This retrospective study comprised 107 patients (214 eyes). In each patient, 1 eye was randomly selected to have implantation of an acrylate IOL (AcrySof® MA30BA or MA60BM, Alcon) and the other eye, a plate-haptic silicone IOL (AA4203VF, Staar). Outcome measures were the total PCO index, percentage of neodymium:YAG (Nd:YAG) capsulotomies performed, and logMAR best corrected visual acuity (BCVA). The follow-up was 3 years. Results: The total PCO index was significantly lower in the AcrySof group than in the plate-haptic silicone group (P<.0001). There was no significant difference in logMAR BCVA between groups (P>.05). The percentage of Nd:YAG laser treatments was significantly lower in the AcrySof group (2.8%) than in the plate-haptic silicone group (23.1 %) (P<.05). Conclusions: There was significantly less PCO and a lower Nd:YAG laser capsulotomy rate after AcrySof IOL implantation than after plate-haptic silicone IOL implantation. These results did not seem to affect the logMAR BCVA as there were no significant differences between groups in this parameter.</EA>
<CC>002B25B</CC>
<FD>Implantation; Biomatériau; Siloxane polymère; Etude comparative; Homme; Postérieur; Capsule; Gélule; Opacification; Plaque; Lentille intraoculaire</FD>
<FG>Chirurgie</FG>
<ED>Implantation; Biomaterial; Siloxane polymer; Comparative study; Human; Posterior; Capsule; Hard capsule; Opacification; Plate; Intraocular lens</ED>
<EG>Surgery</EG>
<SD>Implantación; Biomaterial; Siloxano polímero; Estudio comparativo; Hombre; Posterior; Cápsula; Cápsula dura; Opacificación; Placa; Lente intraocular</SD>
<LO>INIST-20937.354000112811290170</LO>
<ID>03-0435723</ID>
</server>
</inist>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/HapticV1/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001142 | SxmlIndent | more

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 001142 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Ticri/CIDE
   |area=    HapticV1
   |flux=    PascalFrancis
   |étape=   Corpus
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     Pascal:03-0435723
   |texte=   Posterior capsule opacification: Silicone plate-haptic versus AcrySof intraocular lenses
}}

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23.
Data generation: Mon Jun 13 01:09:46 2016. Site generation: Wed Mar 6 09:54:07 2024

	Serveur d'exploration sur les dispositifs haptiques
	Attention, ce site est en cours de développement ! Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts. Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Serveur d'exploration sur les dispositifs haptiques

Posterior capsule opacification: Silicone plate-haptic versus AcrySof intraocular lenses

Posterior capsule opacification: Silicone plate-haptic versus AcrySof intraocular lenses

Source :

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

Abstract

Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)

Format Inist (serveur)

Links to Exploration step

Le document en format XML

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri