Serveur d'exploration sur les dispositifs haptiques

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Hand orientation is insufficiently compensated for in haptic spatial perception

Identifieur interne : 000C70 ( PascalFrancis/Corpus ); précédent : 000C69; suivant : 000C71

Hand orientation is insufficiently compensated for in haptic spatial perception

Auteurs : Astrid M. L. Kappers ; Roderik F. Viergever

Source :

RBID : Pascal:06-0407800

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

Abstract

What humans haptically perceive as parallel is often far from physically parallel. These deviations from parallelity are highly significant and very systematic. There exists accumulating evidence, both psychophysical and neurophysiological, that what is haptically parallel is decided in a frame of reference intermediate to an allocentric and an egocentric one. The central question here concerns the nature of the egocentric frame of reference. In the literature, various kinds of egocentric reference frames are mentioned for haptic spatial tasks, such as hand-centered, arm-centered, and body-centered frames of reference. Thus far, it has not been possible to distinguish between body-centered, arm-centered, and hand-centered reference frames in our experiments, as hand and arm orientation always covaried with distance from the body-midline. In the current set of experiments the influence of body-centered and hand-centered reference frames could be dissociated. Subjects were asked to make a test bar haptically parallel to a reference bar in five different conditions, in which their hands were oriented straight ahead, rotated to the left, rotated to the right, rotated outward or rotated inward. If the reference frame is body-centered, the deviations should be independent of condition. If, on the other hand, the reference frame is hand-centered, the deviations should vary with condition. The results show that deviation size varies strongly with condition, exactly in the way predicted by the influence of a hand-centered egocentric frame of reference. Interestingly, this implies that subjects do not sufficiently take into account the orientation of their hands.

Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)

Pour connaître la documentation sur le format Inist Standard.

pA  
A01 01  1    @0 0014-4819
A02 01      @0 EXBRAP
A03   1    @0 Exp. brain res.
A05       @2 173
A06       @2 3
A08 01  1  ENG  @1 Hand orientation is insufficiently compensated for in haptic spatial perception
A11 01  1    @1 KAPPERS (Astrid M. L.)
A11 02  1    @1 VIERGEVER (Roderik F.)
A14 01      @1 Helmholtz Instituut, Utrecht University, Princetonplein 5 @2 3584 CC, Utrecht @3 NLD @Z 1 aut. @Z 2 aut.
A20       @1 407-414
A21       @1 2006
A23 01      @0 ENG
A43 01      @1 INIST @2 12535 @5 354000133568380060
A44       @0 0000 @1 © 2006 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.
A45       @0 24 ref.
A47 01  1    @0 06-0407800
A60       @1 P
A61       @0 A
A64 01  1    @0 Experimental brain research
A66 01      @0 DEU
C01 01    ENG  @0 What humans haptically perceive as parallel is often far from physically parallel. These deviations from parallelity are highly significant and very systematic. There exists accumulating evidence, both psychophysical and neurophysiological, that what is haptically parallel is decided in a frame of reference intermediate to an allocentric and an egocentric one. The central question here concerns the nature of the egocentric frame of reference. In the literature, various kinds of egocentric reference frames are mentioned for haptic spatial tasks, such as hand-centered, arm-centered, and body-centered frames of reference. Thus far, it has not been possible to distinguish between body-centered, arm-centered, and hand-centered reference frames in our experiments, as hand and arm orientation always covaried with distance from the body-midline. In the current set of experiments the influence of body-centered and hand-centered reference frames could be dissociated. Subjects were asked to make a test bar haptically parallel to a reference bar in five different conditions, in which their hands were oriented straight ahead, rotated to the left, rotated to the right, rotated outward or rotated inward. If the reference frame is body-centered, the deviations should be independent of condition. If, on the other hand, the reference frame is hand-centered, the deviations should vary with condition. The results show that deviation size varies strongly with condition, exactly in the way predicted by the influence of a hand-centered egocentric frame of reference. Interestingly, this implies that subjects do not sufficiently take into account the orientation of their hands.
C02 01  X    @0 002A25E
C02 02  X    @0 002B17A01
C03 01  X  FRE  @0 Main @5 01
C03 01  X  ENG  @0 Hand @5 01
C03 01  X  SPA  @0 Mano @5 01
C03 02  X  FRE  @0 Orientation @5 02
C03 02  X  ENG  @0 Orientation @5 02
C03 02  X  SPA  @0 Orientación @5 02
C03 03  X  FRE  @0 Distance @5 03
C03 03  X  ENG  @0 Distance @5 03
C03 03  X  SPA  @0 Distancia @5 03
C03 04  X  FRE  @0 Homme @5 54
C03 04  X  ENG  @0 Human @5 54
C03 04  X  SPA  @0 Hombre @5 54
C03 05  X  FRE  @0 Perception haptique @4 CD @5 96
C03 05  X  ENG  @0 Haptic perception @4 CD @5 96
N21       @1 268
N44 01      @1 OTO
N82       @1 OTO

Format Inist (serveur)

NO : PASCAL 06-0407800 INIST
ET : Hand orientation is insufficiently compensated for in haptic spatial perception
AU : KAPPERS (Astrid M. L.); VIERGEVER (Roderik F.)
AF : Helmholtz Instituut, Utrecht University, Princetonplein 5/3584 CC, Utrecht/Pays-Bas (1 aut., 2 aut.)
DT : Publication en série; Niveau analytique
SO : Experimental brain research; ISSN 0014-4819; Coden EXBRAP; Allemagne; Da. 2006; Vol. 173; No. 3; Pp. 407-414; Bibl. 24 ref.
LA : Anglais
EA : What humans haptically perceive as parallel is often far from physically parallel. These deviations from parallelity are highly significant and very systematic. There exists accumulating evidence, both psychophysical and neurophysiological, that what is haptically parallel is decided in a frame of reference intermediate to an allocentric and an egocentric one. The central question here concerns the nature of the egocentric frame of reference. In the literature, various kinds of egocentric reference frames are mentioned for haptic spatial tasks, such as hand-centered, arm-centered, and body-centered frames of reference. Thus far, it has not been possible to distinguish between body-centered, arm-centered, and hand-centered reference frames in our experiments, as hand and arm orientation always covaried with distance from the body-midline. In the current set of experiments the influence of body-centered and hand-centered reference frames could be dissociated. Subjects were asked to make a test bar haptically parallel to a reference bar in five different conditions, in which their hands were oriented straight ahead, rotated to the left, rotated to the right, rotated outward or rotated inward. If the reference frame is body-centered, the deviations should be independent of condition. If, on the other hand, the reference frame is hand-centered, the deviations should vary with condition. The results show that deviation size varies strongly with condition, exactly in the way predicted by the influence of a hand-centered egocentric frame of reference. Interestingly, this implies that subjects do not sufficiently take into account the orientation of their hands.
CC : 002A25E; 002B17A01
FD : Main; Orientation; Distance; Homme; Perception haptique
ED : Hand; Orientation; Distance; Human; Haptic perception
SD : Mano; Orientación; Distancia; Hombre
LO : INIST-12535.354000133568380060
ID : 06-0407800

Links to Exploration step

Pascal:06-0407800

Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI>
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en" level="a">Hand orientation is insufficiently compensated for in haptic spatial perception</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Kappers, Astrid M L" sort="Kappers, Astrid M L" uniqKey="Kappers A" first="Astrid M. L." last="Kappers">Astrid M. L. Kappers</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Helmholtz Instituut, Utrecht University, Princetonplein 5</s1>
<s2>3584 CC, Utrecht</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Viergever, Roderik F" sort="Viergever, Roderik F" uniqKey="Viergever R" first="Roderik F." last="Viergever">Roderik F. Viergever</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Helmholtz Instituut, Utrecht University, Princetonplein 5</s1>
<s2>3584 CC, Utrecht</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno>
<idno type="inist">06-0407800</idno>
<date when="2006">2006</date>
<idno type="stanalyst">PASCAL 06-0407800 INIST</idno>
<idno type="RBID">Pascal:06-0407800</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">000C70</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title xml:lang="en" level="a">Hand orientation is insufficiently compensated for in haptic spatial perception</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Kappers, Astrid M L" sort="Kappers, Astrid M L" uniqKey="Kappers A" first="Astrid M. L." last="Kappers">Astrid M. L. Kappers</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Helmholtz Instituut, Utrecht University, Princetonplein 5</s1>
<s2>3584 CC, Utrecht</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Viergever, Roderik F" sort="Viergever, Roderik F" uniqKey="Viergever R" first="Roderik F." last="Viergever">Roderik F. Viergever</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Helmholtz Instituut, Utrecht University, Princetonplein 5</s1>
<s2>3584 CC, Utrecht</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series>
<title level="j" type="main">Experimental brain research</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Exp. brain res.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0014-4819</idno>
<imprint>
<date when="2006">2006</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt>
<title level="j" type="main">Experimental brain research</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Exp. brain res.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0014-4819</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass>
<keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en">
<term>Distance</term>
<term>Hand</term>
<term>Haptic perception</term>
<term>Human</term>
<term>Orientation</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Main</term>
<term>Orientation</term>
<term>Distance</term>
<term>Homme</term>
<term>Perception haptique</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">What humans haptically perceive as parallel is often far from physically parallel. These deviations from parallelity are highly significant and very systematic. There exists accumulating evidence, both psychophysical and neurophysiological, that what is haptically parallel is decided in a frame of reference intermediate to an allocentric and an egocentric one. The central question here concerns the nature of the egocentric frame of reference. In the literature, various kinds of egocentric reference frames are mentioned for haptic spatial tasks, such as hand-centered, arm-centered, and body-centered frames of reference. Thus far, it has not been possible to distinguish between body-centered, arm-centered, and hand-centered reference frames in our experiments, as hand and arm orientation always covaried with distance from the body-midline. In the current set of experiments the influence of body-centered and hand-centered reference frames could be dissociated. Subjects were asked to make a test bar haptically parallel to a reference bar in five different conditions, in which their hands were oriented straight ahead, rotated to the left, rotated to the right, rotated outward or rotated inward. If the reference frame is body-centered, the deviations should be independent of condition. If, on the other hand, the reference frame is hand-centered, the deviations should vary with condition. The results show that deviation size varies strongly with condition, exactly in the way predicted by the influence of a hand-centered egocentric frame of reference. Interestingly, this implies that subjects do not sufficiently take into account the orientation of their hands.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<inist>
<standard h6="B">
<pA>
<fA01 i1="01" i2="1">
<s0>0014-4819</s0>
</fA01>
<fA02 i1="01">
<s0>EXBRAP</s0>
</fA02>
<fA03 i2="1">
<s0>Exp. brain res.</s0>
</fA03>
<fA05>
<s2>173</s2>
</fA05>
<fA06>
<s2>3</s2>
</fA06>
<fA08 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG">
<s1>Hand orientation is insufficiently compensated for in haptic spatial perception</s1>
</fA08>
<fA11 i1="01" i2="1">
<s1>KAPPERS (Astrid M. L.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="02" i2="1">
<s1>VIERGEVER (Roderik F.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Helmholtz Instituut, Utrecht University, Princetonplein 5</s1>
<s2>3584 CC, Utrecht</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA20>
<s1>407-414</s1>
</fA20>
<fA21>
<s1>2006</s1>
</fA21>
<fA23 i1="01">
<s0>ENG</s0>
</fA23>
<fA43 i1="01">
<s1>INIST</s1>
<s2>12535</s2>
<s5>354000133568380060</s5>
</fA43>
<fA44>
<s0>0000</s0>
<s1>© 2006 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.</s1>
</fA44>
<fA45>
<s0>24 ref.</s0>
</fA45>
<fA47 i1="01" i2="1">
<s0>06-0407800</s0>
</fA47>
<fA60>
<s1>P</s1>
</fA60>
<fA61>
<s0>A</s0>
</fA61>
<fA64 i1="01" i2="1">
<s0>Experimental brain research</s0>
</fA64>
<fA66 i1="01">
<s0>DEU</s0>
</fA66>
<fC01 i1="01" l="ENG">
<s0>What humans haptically perceive as parallel is often far from physically parallel. These deviations from parallelity are highly significant and very systematic. There exists accumulating evidence, both psychophysical and neurophysiological, that what is haptically parallel is decided in a frame of reference intermediate to an allocentric and an egocentric one. The central question here concerns the nature of the egocentric frame of reference. In the literature, various kinds of egocentric reference frames are mentioned for haptic spatial tasks, such as hand-centered, arm-centered, and body-centered frames of reference. Thus far, it has not been possible to distinguish between body-centered, arm-centered, and hand-centered reference frames in our experiments, as hand and arm orientation always covaried with distance from the body-midline. In the current set of experiments the influence of body-centered and hand-centered reference frames could be dissociated. Subjects were asked to make a test bar haptically parallel to a reference bar in five different conditions, in which their hands were oriented straight ahead, rotated to the left, rotated to the right, rotated outward or rotated inward. If the reference frame is body-centered, the deviations should be independent of condition. If, on the other hand, the reference frame is hand-centered, the deviations should vary with condition. The results show that deviation size varies strongly with condition, exactly in the way predicted by the influence of a hand-centered egocentric frame of reference. Interestingly, this implies that subjects do not sufficiently take into account the orientation of their hands.</s0>
</fC01>
<fC02 i1="01" i2="X">
<s0>002A25E</s0>
</fC02>
<fC02 i1="02" i2="X">
<s0>002B17A01</s0>
</fC02>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Main</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Hand</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Mano</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Orientation</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Orientation</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Orientación</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Distance</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Distance</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Distancia</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Homme</s0>
<s5>54</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Human</s0>
<s5>54</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Hombre</s0>
<s5>54</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Perception haptique</s0>
<s4>CD</s4>
<s5>96</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Haptic perception</s0>
<s4>CD</s4>
<s5>96</s5>
</fC03>
<fN21>
<s1>268</s1>
</fN21>
<fN44 i1="01">
<s1>OTO</s1>
</fN44>
<fN82>
<s1>OTO</s1>
</fN82>
</pA>
</standard>
<server>
<NO>PASCAL 06-0407800 INIST</NO>
<ET>Hand orientation is insufficiently compensated for in haptic spatial perception</ET>
<AU>KAPPERS (Astrid M. L.); VIERGEVER (Roderik F.)</AU>
<AF>Helmholtz Instituut, Utrecht University, Princetonplein 5/3584 CC, Utrecht/Pays-Bas (1 aut., 2 aut.)</AF>
<DT>Publication en série; Niveau analytique</DT>
<SO>Experimental brain research; ISSN 0014-4819; Coden EXBRAP; Allemagne; Da. 2006; Vol. 173; No. 3; Pp. 407-414; Bibl. 24 ref.</SO>
<LA>Anglais</LA>
<EA>What humans haptically perceive as parallel is often far from physically parallel. These deviations from parallelity are highly significant and very systematic. There exists accumulating evidence, both psychophysical and neurophysiological, that what is haptically parallel is decided in a frame of reference intermediate to an allocentric and an egocentric one. The central question here concerns the nature of the egocentric frame of reference. In the literature, various kinds of egocentric reference frames are mentioned for haptic spatial tasks, such as hand-centered, arm-centered, and body-centered frames of reference. Thus far, it has not been possible to distinguish between body-centered, arm-centered, and hand-centered reference frames in our experiments, as hand and arm orientation always covaried with distance from the body-midline. In the current set of experiments the influence of body-centered and hand-centered reference frames could be dissociated. Subjects were asked to make a test bar haptically parallel to a reference bar in five different conditions, in which their hands were oriented straight ahead, rotated to the left, rotated to the right, rotated outward or rotated inward. If the reference frame is body-centered, the deviations should be independent of condition. If, on the other hand, the reference frame is hand-centered, the deviations should vary with condition. The results show that deviation size varies strongly with condition, exactly in the way predicted by the influence of a hand-centered egocentric frame of reference. Interestingly, this implies that subjects do not sufficiently take into account the orientation of their hands.</EA>
<CC>002A25E; 002B17A01</CC>
<FD>Main; Orientation; Distance; Homme; Perception haptique</FD>
<ED>Hand; Orientation; Distance; Human; Haptic perception</ED>
<SD>Mano; Orientación; Distancia; Hombre</SD>
<LO>INIST-12535.354000133568380060</LO>
<ID>06-0407800</ID>
</server>
</inist>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/HapticV1/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000C70 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000C70 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Ticri/CIDE
   |area=    HapticV1
   |flux=    PascalFrancis
   |étape=   Corpus
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     Pascal:06-0407800
   |texte=   Hand orientation is insufficiently compensated for in haptic spatial perception
}}

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23.
Data generation: Mon Jun 13 01:09:46 2016. Site generation: Wed Mar 6 09:54:07 2024