HapticV1, PascalFrancis, Corpus, bibRecord, 000B77

Fellow-eye comparison of posterior capsule opacification rates after implantation of 1CU accommodating and AcrySof MA30 monofocal intraocular lenses

Identifieur interne : 000B77 ( PascalFrancis/Corpus ); précédent : 000B76; suivant : 000B78

Fellow-eye comparison of posterior capsule opacification rates after implantation of 1CU accommodating and AcrySof MA30 monofocal intraocular lenses

Auteurs : Joanne Hancox ; David Spalton ; Catherine Heatley ; Hari Jayaram ; Jennifer Yip ; James Boyce ; John Marshall

Source :

Journal of cataract and refractive surgery [ 0886-3350 ] ; 2007.

RBID : Pascal:07-0165996

Descripteurs français

Pascal (Inist)
- Oeil adelphe, Etude comparative, Postérieur, Capsule, Opacification, Taux, Implantation, Lentille intraoculaire, Chirurgie, Ophtalmologie, Traitement.

English descriptors

KwdEn :
- Capsule, Comparative study, Fellow eye, Implantation, Intraocular lens, Opacification, Ophthalmology, Posterior, Rate, Surgery, Treatment.

Abstract

PURPOSE: To measure posterior capsule opacification (PCO) and neodymium:YAG (Nd:YAG) capsulotomy rates between the AcrySof MA30 intraocular lens (10L) (Alcon) and the 1CU 10L (Human-Optics) in a fellow-eye comparison. SETTING: Ophthalmology Department, St. Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom. METHODS: Thirty patients who had bilateral cataract surgery with a 1CU IOL prospectively randomly allocated to 1 eye and an AcrySof MA30 monofocal 10L to the other eye were examined. Best corrected distance visual acuity was recorded using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study logMAR chart. Digital retroillumination images of the posterior capsule were taken with the pupil dilated and analyzed with POCO software. RESULTS: Eyes with the 1 CU 10L had significantly higher PCO rates than eyes with the MA30 10L at all time points. By 2 years after surgery, 50% of eyes with a 1CU 10L had required Nd:YAG capsulotomy compared with no eyes with an MA30 10L. There was no significant difference in visual acuity at any time point when post Nd:YAG capsulotomy was taken in to account. CONCLUSIONS: The 1 CU 10L has 4 broad optic-haptic junctions where the square-edged barrier is breached; this appeared to allow passage of lens epithelial cells, leading to an increase in PCO. However, the increased PCO cannot be attributed to this alone as the 1 CU is hydrophilic, a factor known to be associated with higher PCO rates.

Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)

Pour connaître la documentation sur le format Inist Standard.

A01	`01`	`1`		`@0 0886-3350`
A02	`01`			`@0 JCSUEV`
A03		`1`		`@0 J. cataract refractive surg.`
A05				`@2 33`
A06				`@2 3`
A08	`01`	`1`	`ENG`	`@1 Fellow-eye comparison of posterior capsule opacification rates after implantation of 1CU accommodating and AcrySof MA30 monofocal intraocular lenses`
A11	`01`	`1`		`@1 HANCOX (Joanne)`
A11	`02`	`1`		`@1 SPALTON (David)`
A11	`03`	`1`		`@1 HEATLEY (Catherine)`
A11	`04`	`1`		`@1 JAYARAM (Hari)`
A11	`05`	`1`		`@1 YIP (Jennifer)`
A11	`06`	`1`		`@1 BOYCE (James)`
A11	`07`	`1`		`@1 MARSHALL (John)`
A14	`01`			`@1 Ophthalmology Department, St. Thomas' Hospital @2 London @3 GBR @Z 1 aut. @Z 2 aut. @Z 3 aut. @Z 4 aut. @Z 5 aut. @Z 6 aut. @Z 7 aut.`
A20				`@1 413-417`
A21				`@1 2007`
A23	`01`			`@0 ENG`
A43	`01`			`@1 INIST @2 20937 @5 354000146975030170`
A44				`@0 0000 @1 © 2007 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.`
A45				`@0 24 ref.`
A47	`01`	`1`		`@0 07-0165996`
A60				`@1 P`
A61				`@0 A`
A64	`01`	`1`		`@0 Journal of cataract and refractive surgery`
A66	`01`			`@0 USA`
C01	`01`		`ENG`	@0 PURPOSE: To measure posterior capsule opacification (PCO) and neodymium:YAG (Nd:YAG) capsulotomy rates between the AcrySof MA30 intraocular lens (10L) (Alcon) and the 1CU 10L (Human-Optics) in a fellow-eye comparison. SETTING: Ophthalmology Department, St. Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom. METHODS: Thirty patients who had bilateral cataract surgery with a 1CU IOL prospectively randomly allocated to 1 eye and an AcrySof MA30 monofocal 10L to the other eye were examined. Best corrected distance visual acuity was recorded using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study logMAR chart. Digital retroillumination images of the posterior capsule were taken with the pupil dilated and analyzed with POCO software. RESULTS: Eyes with the 1 CU 10L had significantly higher PCO rates than eyes with the MA30 10L at all time points. By 2 years after surgery, 50% of eyes with a 1CU 10L had required Nd:YAG capsulotomy compared with no eyes with an MA30 10L. There was no significant difference in visual acuity at any time point when post Nd:YAG capsulotomy was taken in to account. CONCLUSIONS: The 1 CU 10L has 4 broad optic-haptic junctions where the square-edged barrier is breached; this appeared to allow passage of lens epithelial cells, leading to an increase in PCO. However, the increased PCO cannot be attributed to this alone as the 1 CU is hydrophilic, a factor known to be associated with higher PCO rates.
C02	`01`	`X`		`@0 002B25B`
C03	`01`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Oeil adelphe @5 02`
C03	`01`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Fellow eye @5 02`
C03	`01`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Ojo adelphe @5 02`
C03	`02`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Etude comparative @5 03`
C03	`02`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Comparative study @5 03`
C03	`02`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Estudio comparativo @5 03`
C03	`03`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Postérieur @5 05`
C03	`03`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Posterior @5 05`
C03	`03`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Posterior @5 05`
C03	`04`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Capsule @5 06`
C03	`04`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Capsule @5 06`
C03	`04`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Cápsula @5 06`
C03	`05`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Opacification @5 08`
C03	`05`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Opacification @5 08`
C03	`05`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Opacificación @5 08`
C03	`06`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Taux @5 09`
C03	`06`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Rate @5 09`
C03	`06`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Tasa @5 09`
C03	`07`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Implantation @5 11`
C03	`07`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Implantation @5 11`
C03	`07`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Implantación @5 11`
C03	`08`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Lentille intraoculaire @5 12`
C03	`08`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Intraocular lens @5 12`
C03	`08`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Lente intraocular @5 12`
C03	`09`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Chirurgie @5 14`
C03	`09`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Surgery @5 14`
C03	`09`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Cirugía @5 14`
C03	`10`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Ophtalmologie @5 15`
C03	`10`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Ophthalmology @5 15`
C03	`10`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Oftalmología @5 15`
C03	`11`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Traitement @5 25`
C03	`11`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Treatment @5 25`
C03	`11`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Tratamiento @5 25`
N21				`@1 106`
N44	`01`			`@1 OTO`
N82				`@1 OTO`

Format Inist (serveur)

NO :	PASCAL 07-0165996 INIST
ET :	Fellow-eye comparison of posterior capsule opacification rates after implantation of 1CU accommodating and AcrySof MA30 monofocal intraocular lenses
AU :	HANCOX (Joanne); SPALTON (David); HEATLEY (Catherine); JAYARAM (Hari); YIP (Jennifer); BOYCE (James); MARSHALL (John)
AF :	Ophthalmology Department, St. Thomas' Hospital/London/Royaume-Uni (1 aut., 2 aut., 3 aut., 4 aut., 5 aut., 6 aut., 7 aut.)
DT :	Publication en série; Niveau analytique
SO :	Journal of cataract and refractive surgery; ISSN 0886-3350; Coden JCSUEV; Etats-Unis; Da. 2007; Vol. 33; No. 3; Pp. 413-417; Bibl. 24 ref.
LA :	Anglais
EA :	PURPOSE: To measure posterior capsule opacification (PCO) and neodymium:YAG (Nd:YAG) capsulotomy rates between the AcrySof MA30 intraocular lens (10L) (Alcon) and the 1CU 10L (Human-Optics) in a fellow-eye comparison. SETTING: Ophthalmology Department, St. Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom. METHODS: Thirty patients who had bilateral cataract surgery with a 1CU IOL prospectively randomly allocated to 1 eye and an AcrySof MA30 monofocal 10L to the other eye were examined. Best corrected distance visual acuity was recorded using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study logMAR chart. Digital retroillumination images of the posterior capsule were taken with the pupil dilated and analyzed with POCO software. RESULTS: Eyes with the 1 CU 10L had significantly higher PCO rates than eyes with the MA30 10L at all time points. By 2 years after surgery, 50% of eyes with a 1CU 10L had required Nd:YAG capsulotomy compared with no eyes with an MA30 10L. There was no significant difference in visual acuity at any time point when post Nd:YAG capsulotomy was taken in to account. CONCLUSIONS: The 1 CU 10L has 4 broad optic-haptic junctions where the square-edged barrier is breached; this appeared to allow passage of lens epithelial cells, leading to an increase in PCO. However, the increased PCO cannot be attributed to this alone as the 1 CU is hydrophilic, a factor known to be associated with higher PCO rates.
CC :	002B25B
FD :	Oeil adelphe; Etude comparative; Postérieur; Capsule; Opacification; Taux; Implantation; Lentille intraoculaire; Chirurgie; Ophtalmologie; Traitement
ED :	Fellow eye; Comparative study; Posterior; Capsule; Opacification; Rate; Implantation; Intraocular lens; Surgery; Ophthalmology; Treatment
SD :	Ojo adelphe; Estudio comparativo; Posterior; Cápsula; Opacificación; Tasa; Implantación; Lente intraocular; Cirugía; Oftalmología; Tratamiento
LO :	INIST-20937.354000146975030170
ID :	07-0165996

Links to Exploration step

Pascal:07-0165996

Le document en format XML

<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Fellow-eye comparison of posterior capsule opacification rates after implantation of 1CU accommodating and AcrySof MA30 monofocal intraocular lenses</title>
<author><name sortKey="Hancox, Joanne" sort="Hancox, Joanne" uniqKey="Hancox J" first="Joanne" last="Hancox">Joanne Hancox</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Ophthalmology Department, St. Thomas' Hospital</s1>
<s2>London</s2>
<s3>GBR</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>7 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Spalton, David" sort="Spalton, David" uniqKey="Spalton D" first="David" last="Spalton">David Spalton</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Ophthalmology Department, St. Thomas' Hospital</s1>
<s2>London</s2>
<s3>GBR</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>7 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Heatley, Catherine" sort="Heatley, Catherine" uniqKey="Heatley C" first="Catherine" last="Heatley">Catherine Heatley</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Ophthalmology Department, St. Thomas' Hospital</s1>
<s2>London</s2>
<s3>GBR</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>7 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Jayaram, Hari" sort="Jayaram, Hari" uniqKey="Jayaram H" first="Hari" last="Jayaram">Hari Jayaram</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Ophthalmology Department, St. Thomas' Hospital</s1>
<s2>London</s2>
<s3>GBR</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>7 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Yip, Jennifer" sort="Yip, Jennifer" uniqKey="Yip J" first="Jennifer" last="Yip">Jennifer Yip</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Ophthalmology Department, St. Thomas' Hospital</s1>
<s2>London</s2>
<s3>GBR</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>7 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Boyce, James" sort="Boyce, James" uniqKey="Boyce J" first="James" last="Boyce">James Boyce</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Ophthalmology Department, St. Thomas' Hospital</s1>
<s2>London</s2>
<s3>GBR</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>7 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Marshall, John" sort="Marshall, John" uniqKey="Marshall J" first="John" last="Marshall">John Marshall</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Ophthalmology Department, St. Thomas' Hospital</s1>
<s2>London</s2>
<s3>GBR</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>7 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno>
<idno type="inist">07-0165996</idno>
<date when="2007">2007</date>
<idno type="stanalyst">PASCAL 07-0165996 INIST</idno>
<idno type="RBID">Pascal:07-0165996</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">000B77</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Fellow-eye comparison of posterior capsule opacification rates after implantation of 1CU accommodating and AcrySof MA30 monofocal intraocular lenses</title>
<author><name sortKey="Hancox, Joanne" sort="Hancox, Joanne" uniqKey="Hancox J" first="Joanne" last="Hancox">Joanne Hancox</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Ophthalmology Department, St. Thomas' Hospital</s1>
<s2>London</s2>
<s3>GBR</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>7 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Spalton, David" sort="Spalton, David" uniqKey="Spalton D" first="David" last="Spalton">David Spalton</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Ophthalmology Department, St. Thomas' Hospital</s1>
<s2>London</s2>
<s3>GBR</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>7 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Heatley, Catherine" sort="Heatley, Catherine" uniqKey="Heatley C" first="Catherine" last="Heatley">Catherine Heatley</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Ophthalmology Department, St. Thomas' Hospital</s1>
<s2>London</s2>
<s3>GBR</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>7 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Jayaram, Hari" sort="Jayaram, Hari" uniqKey="Jayaram H" first="Hari" last="Jayaram">Hari Jayaram</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Ophthalmology Department, St. Thomas' Hospital</s1>
<s2>London</s2>
<s3>GBR</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>7 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Yip, Jennifer" sort="Yip, Jennifer" uniqKey="Yip J" first="Jennifer" last="Yip">Jennifer Yip</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Ophthalmology Department, St. Thomas' Hospital</s1>
<s2>London</s2>
<s3>GBR</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>7 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Boyce, James" sort="Boyce, James" uniqKey="Boyce J" first="James" last="Boyce">James Boyce</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Ophthalmology Department, St. Thomas' Hospital</s1>
<s2>London</s2>
<s3>GBR</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>7 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Marshall, John" sort="Marshall, John" uniqKey="Marshall J" first="John" last="Marshall">John Marshall</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Ophthalmology Department, St. Thomas' Hospital</s1>
<s2>London</s2>
<s3>GBR</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>7 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series><title level="j" type="main">Journal of cataract and refractive surgery</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">J. cataract refractive surg.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0886-3350</idno>
<imprint><date when="2007">2007</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><title level="j" type="main">Journal of cataract and refractive surgery</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">J. cataract refractive surg.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0886-3350</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Capsule</term>
<term>Comparative study</term>
<term>Fellow eye</term>
<term>Implantation</term>
<term>Intraocular lens</term>
<term>Opacification</term>
<term>Ophthalmology</term>
<term>Posterior</term>
<term>Rate</term>
<term>Surgery</term>
<term>Treatment</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr"><term>Oeil adelphe</term>
<term>Etude comparative</term>
<term>Postérieur</term>
<term>Capsule</term>
<term>Opacification</term>
<term>Taux</term>
<term>Implantation</term>
<term>Lentille intraoculaire</term>
<term>Chirurgie</term>
<term>Ophtalmologie</term>
<term>Traitement</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">PURPOSE: To measure posterior capsule opacification (PCO) and neodymium:YAG (Nd:YAG) capsulotomy rates between the AcrySof MA30 intraocular lens (10L) (Alcon) and the 1CU 10L (Human-Optics) in a fellow-eye comparison. SETTING: Ophthalmology Department, St. Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom. METHODS: Thirty patients who had bilateral cataract surgery with a 1CU IOL prospectively randomly allocated to 1 eye and an AcrySof MA30 monofocal 10L to the other eye were examined. Best corrected distance visual acuity was recorded using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study logMAR chart. Digital retroillumination images of the posterior capsule were taken with the pupil dilated and analyzed with POCO software. RESULTS: Eyes with the 1 CU 10L had significantly higher PCO rates than eyes with the MA30 10L at all time points. By 2 years after surgery, 50% of eyes with a 1CU 10L had required Nd:YAG capsulotomy compared with no eyes with an MA30 10L. There was no significant difference in visual acuity at any time point when post Nd:YAG capsulotomy was taken in to account. CONCLUSIONS: The 1 CU 10L has 4 broad optic-haptic junctions where the square-edged barrier is breached; this appeared to allow passage of lens epithelial cells, leading to an increase in PCO. However, the increased PCO cannot be attributed to this alone as the 1 CU is hydrophilic, a factor known to be associated with higher PCO rates.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<inist><standard h6="B"><pA><fA01 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>0886-3350</s0>
</fA01>
<fA02 i1="01"><s0>JCSUEV</s0>
</fA02>
<fA03 i2="1"><s0>J. cataract refractive surg.</s0>
</fA03>
<fA05><s2>33</s2>
</fA05>
<fA06><s2>3</s2>
</fA06>
<fA08 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG"><s1>Fellow-eye comparison of posterior capsule opacification rates after implantation of 1CU accommodating and AcrySof MA30 monofocal intraocular lenses</s1>
</fA08>
<fA11 i1="01" i2="1"><s1>HANCOX (Joanne)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="02" i2="1"><s1>SPALTON (David)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="03" i2="1"><s1>HEATLEY (Catherine)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="04" i2="1"><s1>JAYARAM (Hari)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="05" i2="1"><s1>YIP (Jennifer)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="06" i2="1"><s1>BOYCE (James)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="07" i2="1"><s1>MARSHALL (John)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA14 i1="01"><s1>Ophthalmology Department, St. Thomas' Hospital</s1>
<s2>London</s2>
<s3>GBR</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>7 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA20><s1>413-417</s1>
</fA20>
<fA21><s1>2007</s1>
</fA21>
<fA23 i1="01"><s0>ENG</s0>
</fA23>
<fA43 i1="01"><s1>INIST</s1>
<s2>20937</s2>
<s5>354000146975030170</s5>
</fA43>
<fA44><s0>0000</s0>
<s1>© 2007 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.</s1>
</fA44>
<fA45><s0>24 ref.</s0>
</fA45>
<fA47 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>07-0165996</s0>
</fA47>
<fA60><s1>P</s1>
</fA60>
<fA61><s0>A</s0>
</fA61>
<fA64 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>Journal of cataract and refractive surgery</s0>
</fA64>
<fA66 i1="01"><s0>USA</s0>
</fA66>
<fC01 i1="01" l="ENG"><s0>PURPOSE: To measure posterior capsule opacification (PCO) and neodymium:YAG (Nd:YAG) capsulotomy rates between the AcrySof MA30 intraocular lens (10L) (Alcon) and the 1CU 10L (Human-Optics) in a fellow-eye comparison. SETTING: Ophthalmology Department, St. Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom. METHODS: Thirty patients who had bilateral cataract surgery with a 1CU IOL prospectively randomly allocated to 1 eye and an AcrySof MA30 monofocal 10L to the other eye were examined. Best corrected distance visual acuity was recorded using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study logMAR chart. Digital retroillumination images of the posterior capsule were taken with the pupil dilated and analyzed with POCO software. RESULTS: Eyes with the 1 CU 10L had significantly higher PCO rates than eyes with the MA30 10L at all time points. By 2 years after surgery, 50% of eyes with a 1CU 10L had required Nd:YAG capsulotomy compared with no eyes with an MA30 10L. There was no significant difference in visual acuity at any time point when post Nd:YAG capsulotomy was taken in to account. CONCLUSIONS: The 1 CU 10L has 4 broad optic-haptic junctions where the square-edged barrier is breached; this appeared to allow passage of lens epithelial cells, leading to an increase in PCO. However, the increased PCO cannot be attributed to this alone as the 1 CU is hydrophilic, a factor known to be associated with higher PCO rates.</s0>
</fC01>
<fC02 i1="01" i2="X"><s0>002B25B</s0>
</fC02>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Oeil adelphe</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Fellow eye</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Ojo adelphe</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Etude comparative</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Comparative study</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Estudio comparativo</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Postérieur</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Posterior</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Posterior</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Capsule</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Capsule</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Cápsula</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Opacification</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Opacification</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Opacificación</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Taux</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Rate</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Tasa</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Implantation</s0>
<s5>11</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Implantation</s0>
<s5>11</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Implantación</s0>
<s5>11</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Lentille intraoculaire</s0>
<s5>12</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Intraocular lens</s0>
<s5>12</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Lente intraocular</s0>
<s5>12</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Chirurgie</s0>
<s5>14</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Surgery</s0>
<s5>14</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Cirugía</s0>
<s5>14</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Ophtalmologie</s0>
<s5>15</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Ophthalmology</s0>
<s5>15</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Oftalmología</s0>
<s5>15</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Traitement</s0>
<s5>25</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Treatment</s0>
<s5>25</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Tratamiento</s0>
<s5>25</s5>
</fC03>
<fN21><s1>106</s1>
</fN21>
<fN44 i1="01"><s1>OTO</s1>
</fN44>
<fN82><s1>OTO</s1>
</fN82>
</pA>
</standard>
<server><NO>PASCAL 07-0165996 INIST</NO>
<ET>Fellow-eye comparison of posterior capsule opacification rates after implantation of 1CU accommodating and AcrySof MA30 monofocal intraocular lenses</ET>
<AU>HANCOX (Joanne); SPALTON (David); HEATLEY (Catherine); JAYARAM (Hari); YIP (Jennifer); BOYCE (James); MARSHALL (John)</AU>
<AF>Ophthalmology Department, St. Thomas' Hospital/London/Royaume-Uni (1 aut., 2 aut., 3 aut., 4 aut., 5 aut., 6 aut., 7 aut.)</AF>
<DT>Publication en série; Niveau analytique</DT>
<SO>Journal of cataract and refractive surgery; ISSN 0886-3350; Coden JCSUEV; Etats-Unis; Da. 2007; Vol. 33; No. 3; Pp. 413-417; Bibl. 24 ref.</SO>
<LA>Anglais</LA>
<EA>PURPOSE: To measure posterior capsule opacification (PCO) and neodymium:YAG (Nd:YAG) capsulotomy rates between the AcrySof MA30 intraocular lens (10L) (Alcon) and the 1CU 10L (Human-Optics) in a fellow-eye comparison. SETTING: Ophthalmology Department, St. Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom. METHODS: Thirty patients who had bilateral cataract surgery with a 1CU IOL prospectively randomly allocated to 1 eye and an AcrySof MA30 monofocal 10L to the other eye were examined. Best corrected distance visual acuity was recorded using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study logMAR chart. Digital retroillumination images of the posterior capsule were taken with the pupil dilated and analyzed with POCO software. RESULTS: Eyes with the 1 CU 10L had significantly higher PCO rates than eyes with the MA30 10L at all time points. By 2 years after surgery, 50% of eyes with a 1CU 10L had required Nd:YAG capsulotomy compared with no eyes with an MA30 10L. There was no significant difference in visual acuity at any time point when post Nd:YAG capsulotomy was taken in to account. CONCLUSIONS: The 1 CU 10L has 4 broad optic-haptic junctions where the square-edged barrier is breached; this appeared to allow passage of lens epithelial cells, leading to an increase in PCO. However, the increased PCO cannot be attributed to this alone as the 1 CU is hydrophilic, a factor known to be associated with higher PCO rates.</EA>
<CC>002B25B</CC>
<FD>Oeil adelphe; Etude comparative; Postérieur; Capsule; Opacification; Taux; Implantation; Lentille intraoculaire; Chirurgie; Ophtalmologie; Traitement</FD>
<ED>Fellow eye; Comparative study; Posterior; Capsule; Opacification; Rate; Implantation; Intraocular lens; Surgery; Ophthalmology; Treatment</ED>
<SD>Ojo adelphe; Estudio comparativo; Posterior; Cápsula; Opacificación; Tasa; Implantación; Lente intraocular; Cirugía; Oftalmología; Tratamiento</SD>
<LO>INIST-20937.354000146975030170</LO>
<ID>07-0165996</ID>
</server>
</inist>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/HapticV1/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000B77 | SxmlIndent | more

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000B77 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Ticri/CIDE
   |area=    HapticV1
   |flux=    PascalFrancis
   |étape=   Corpus
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     Pascal:07-0165996
   |texte=   Fellow-eye comparison of posterior capsule opacification rates after implantation of 1CU accommodating and AcrySof MA30 monofocal intraocular lenses
}}

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23.
Data generation: Mon Jun 13 01:09:46 2016. Site generation: Wed Mar 6 09:54:07 2024

	Serveur d'exploration sur les dispositifs haptiques
	Attention, ce site est en cours de développement ! Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts. Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Serveur d'exploration sur les dispositifs haptiques

Fellow-eye comparison of posterior capsule opacification rates after implantation of 1CU accommodating and AcrySof MA30 monofocal intraocular lenses

Fellow-eye comparison of posterior capsule opacification rates after implantation of 1CU accommodating and AcrySof MA30 monofocal intraocular lenses

Source :

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

Abstract

Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)

Format Inist (serveur)

Links to Exploration step

Le document en format XML

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri