Reduced fields of view are neither necessary nor sufficient for distance underestimation but reduce precision and may cause calibration problems
Identifieur interne : 000C33 ( PascalFrancis/Checkpoint ); précédent : 000C32; suivant : 000C34Reduced fields of view are neither necessary nor sufficient for distance underestimation but reduce precision and may cause calibration problems
Auteurs : Andrea Loftus [Royaume-Uni] ; Susannah Murphy [Royaume-Uni] ; Isla Mckenna [Royaume-Uni] ; Mark Mon-Williams [Royaume-Uni]Source :
- Experimental brain research [ 0014-4819 ] ; 2004.
Descripteurs français
- Pascal (Inist)
- Wicri :
- topic : Homme.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
Abstract
Watt et al. (Exp Brain Res, 2000, 135:411-416) suggested that a reduced field of view causes objects to appear closer than their physical distance. This suggestion is based on the observation that individuals terminated open-loop prehension prematurely when pretending to grasp a paper rectangle initially viewed through a reduced field of view. We tested Watt et al.'s suggestion in an open-loop pointing task. In experiment 1, 21 participants pointed at targets in three locations (20, 30 and 40 cm relative to the starting position) in three viewing conditions (full, 16° and 4° field of view). No difference in accuracy was found between conditions but the reduced field of view led to an increase in end-point variability across trials. We interpret these results as indicating that a reduced field of view decreases precision but does not necessarily affect object localisation. In experiment 2, we asked participants to reach-and-grasp a real object under the same three open-loop viewing conditions but without vision following movement onset. The experimental design ensured that haptic feedback was available, which could be used to calibrate reaching movements. We found that the reduced field of view caused no changes in grasp but we observed changes in the transport kinematics consistent with increased variability in the perceptual estimate of target location. Notably there were no changes in the spatial path (expected from movements to a closer location). In experiment 3, we repeated the Watt et al. design but removed vision and forced participants to rely on memory. In this condition we found the same undershoots as described by Watt et al. We conclude that a reduced field of view is neither necessary nor sufficient for underestimation and suggest that a reduced field of view decreases precision. This can cause participants to undershoot and/or alter the movement kinematics but we argue that such findings cannot be ascribed unambiguously to perceptual underestimation as they may reflect strategic alterations in behaviour.
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
Links to Exploration step
Pascal:05-0153828Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Reduced fields of view are neither necessary nor sufficient for distance underestimation but reduce precision and may cause calibration problems</title><author><name sortKey="Loftus, Andrea" sort="Loftus, Andrea" uniqKey="Loftus A" first="Andrea" last="Loftus">Andrea Loftus</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>School of Psychology, William Guild Building, University of Aberdeen</s1><s2>Aberdeen, AB24 2UB</s2><s3>GBR</s3><sZ>1 aut.</sZ><sZ>4 aut.</sZ></inist:fA14><country>Royaume-Uni</country><wicri:noRegion>Aberdeen, AB24 2UB</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Murphy, Susannah" sort="Murphy, Susannah" uniqKey="Murphy S" first="Susannah" last="Murphy">Susannah Murphy</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>School of Psychology, University of St. Andrews</s1><s2>St. Andrews, Fife, KY16 9JU</s2><s3>GBR</s3><sZ>2 aut.</sZ><sZ>3 aut.</sZ></inist:fA14><country>Royaume-Uni</country><wicri:noRegion>St. Andrews, Fife, KY16 9JU</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Mckenna, Isla" sort="Mckenna, Isla" uniqKey="Mckenna I" first="Isla" last="Mckenna">Isla Mckenna</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>School of Psychology, University of St. Andrews</s1><s2>St. Andrews, Fife, KY16 9JU</s2><s3>GBR</s3><sZ>2 aut.</sZ><sZ>3 aut.</sZ></inist:fA14><country>Royaume-Uni</country><wicri:noRegion>St. Andrews, Fife, KY16 9JU</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Mon Williams, Mark" sort="Mon Williams, Mark" uniqKey="Mon Williams M" first="Mark" last="Mon-Williams">Mark Mon-Williams</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>School of Psychology, William Guild Building, University of Aberdeen</s1><s2>Aberdeen, AB24 2UB</s2><s3>GBR</s3><sZ>1 aut.</sZ><sZ>4 aut.</sZ></inist:fA14><country>Royaume-Uni</country><wicri:noRegion>Aberdeen, AB24 2UB</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno><idno type="inist">05-0153828</idno><date when="2004">2004</date><idno type="stanalyst">PASCAL 05-0153828 INIST</idno><idno type="RBID">Pascal:05-0153828</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">000E97</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Curation">000611</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Checkpoint">000C33</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Reduced fields of view are neither necessary nor sufficient for distance underestimation but reduce precision and may cause calibration problems</title><author><name sortKey="Loftus, Andrea" sort="Loftus, Andrea" uniqKey="Loftus A" first="Andrea" last="Loftus">Andrea Loftus</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>School of Psychology, William Guild Building, University of Aberdeen</s1><s2>Aberdeen, AB24 2UB</s2><s3>GBR</s3><sZ>1 aut.</sZ><sZ>4 aut.</sZ></inist:fA14><country>Royaume-Uni</country><wicri:noRegion>Aberdeen, AB24 2UB</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Murphy, Susannah" sort="Murphy, Susannah" uniqKey="Murphy S" first="Susannah" last="Murphy">Susannah Murphy</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>School of Psychology, University of St. Andrews</s1><s2>St. Andrews, Fife, KY16 9JU</s2><s3>GBR</s3><sZ>2 aut.</sZ><sZ>3 aut.</sZ></inist:fA14><country>Royaume-Uni</country><wicri:noRegion>St. Andrews, Fife, KY16 9JU</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Mckenna, Isla" sort="Mckenna, Isla" uniqKey="Mckenna I" first="Isla" last="Mckenna">Isla Mckenna</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>School of Psychology, University of St. Andrews</s1><s2>St. Andrews, Fife, KY16 9JU</s2><s3>GBR</s3><sZ>2 aut.</sZ><sZ>3 aut.</sZ></inist:fA14><country>Royaume-Uni</country><wicri:noRegion>St. Andrews, Fife, KY16 9JU</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Mon Williams, Mark" sort="Mon Williams, Mark" uniqKey="Mon Williams M" first="Mark" last="Mon-Williams">Mark Mon-Williams</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>School of Psychology, William Guild Building, University of Aberdeen</s1><s2>Aberdeen, AB24 2UB</s2><s3>GBR</s3><sZ>1 aut.</sZ><sZ>4 aut.</sZ></inist:fA14><country>Royaume-Uni</country><wicri:noRegion>Aberdeen, AB24 2UB</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author></analytic><series><title level="j" type="main">Experimental brain research</title><title level="j" type="abbreviated">Exp. brain res.</title><idno type="ISSN">0014-4819</idno><imprint><date when="2004">2004</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><title level="j" type="main">Experimental brain research</title><title level="j" type="abbreviated">Exp. brain res.</title><idno type="ISSN">0014-4819</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Accuracy</term><term>Body movement</term><term>Feedback regulation</term><term>Goal directed movement</term><term>Gripping</term><term>Haptic perception</term><term>Human</term><term>Kinematics</term><term>Memory</term><term>Motor control</term><term>Pointing task</term><term>Stimulus distance</term><term>Variability</term><term>Vision</term><term>Visual stimulus</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr"><term>Mouvement corporel</term><term>Préhension</term><term>Précision</term><term>Mouvement orienté</term><term>Cinématique</term><term>Mémoire</term><term>Vision</term><term>Stimulus visuel</term><term>Distance stimulus</term><term>Rétroaction</term><term>Variabilité</term><term>Homme</term><term>Contrôle moteur</term><term>Tâche pointage</term><term>Perception haptique</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Wicri" type="topic" xml:lang="fr"><term>Homme</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Watt et al. (Exp Brain Res, 2000, 135:411-416) suggested that a reduced field of view causes objects to appear closer than their physical distance. This suggestion is based on the observation that individuals terminated open-loop prehension prematurely when pretending to grasp a paper rectangle initially viewed through a reduced field of view. We tested Watt et al.'s suggestion in an open-loop pointing task. In experiment 1, 21 participants pointed at targets in three locations (20, 30 and 40 cm relative to the starting position) in three viewing conditions (full, 16° and 4° field of view). No difference in accuracy was found between conditions but the reduced field of view led to an increase in end-point variability across trials. We interpret these results as indicating that a reduced field of view decreases precision but does not necessarily affect object localisation. In experiment 2, we asked participants to reach-and-grasp a real object under the same three open-loop viewing conditions but without vision following movement onset. The experimental design ensured that haptic feedback was available, which could be used to calibrate reaching movements. We found that the reduced field of view caused no changes in grasp but we observed changes in the transport kinematics consistent with increased variability in the perceptual estimate of target location. Notably there were no changes in the spatial path (expected from movements to a closer location). In experiment 3, we repeated the Watt et al. design but removed vision and forced participants to rely on memory. In this condition we found the same undershoots as described by Watt et al. We conclude that a reduced field of view is neither necessary nor sufficient for underestimation and suggest that a reduced field of view decreases precision. This can cause participants to undershoot and/or alter the movement kinematics but we argue that such findings cannot be ascribed unambiguously to perceptual underestimation as they may reflect strategic alterations in behaviour.</div></front></TEI><inist><standard h6="B"><pA><fA01 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>0014-4819</s0></fA01><fA02 i1="01"><s0>EXBRAP</s0></fA02><fA03 i2="1"><s0>Exp. brain res.</s0></fA03><fA05><s2>158</s2></fA05><fA06><s2>3</s2></fA06><fA08 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG"><s1>Reduced fields of view are neither necessary nor sufficient for distance underestimation but reduce precision and may cause calibration problems</s1></fA08><fA11 i1="01" i2="1"><s1>LOFTUS (Andrea)</s1></fA11><fA11 i1="02" i2="1"><s1>MURPHY (Susannah)</s1></fA11><fA11 i1="03" i2="1"><s1>MCKENNA (Isla)</s1></fA11><fA11 i1="04" i2="1"><s1>MON-WILLIAMS (Mark)</s1></fA11><fA14 i1="01"><s1>School of Psychology, William Guild Building, University of Aberdeen</s1><s2>Aberdeen, AB24 2UB</s2><s3>GBR</s3><sZ>1 aut.</sZ><sZ>4 aut.</sZ></fA14><fA14 i1="02"><s1>School of Psychology, University of St. Andrews</s1><s2>St. Andrews, Fife, KY16 9JU</s2><s3>GBR</s3><sZ>2 aut.</sZ><sZ>3 aut.</sZ></fA14><fA20><s1>328-335</s1></fA20><fA21><s1>2004</s1></fA21><fA23 i1="01"><s0>ENG</s0></fA23><fA43 i1="01"><s1>INIST</s1><s2>12535</s2><s5>354000120351100070</s5></fA43><fA44><s0>0000</s0><s1>© 2005 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.</s1></fA44><fA45><s0>15 ref.</s0></fA45><fA47 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>05-0153828</s0></fA47><fA60><s1>P</s1></fA60><fA61><s0>A</s0></fA61><fA64 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>Experimental brain research</s0></fA64><fA66 i1="01"><s0>DEU</s0></fA66><fC01 i1="01" l="ENG"><s0>Watt et al. (Exp Brain Res, 2000, 135:411-416) suggested that a reduced field of view causes objects to appear closer than their physical distance. This suggestion is based on the observation that individuals terminated open-loop prehension prematurely when pretending to grasp a paper rectangle initially viewed through a reduced field of view. We tested Watt et al.'s suggestion in an open-loop pointing task. In experiment 1, 21 participants pointed at targets in three locations (20, 30 and 40 cm relative to the starting position) in three viewing conditions (full, 16° and 4° field of view). No difference in accuracy was found between conditions but the reduced field of view led to an increase in end-point variability across trials. We interpret these results as indicating that a reduced field of view decreases precision but does not necessarily affect object localisation. In experiment 2, we asked participants to reach-and-grasp a real object under the same three open-loop viewing conditions but without vision following movement onset. The experimental design ensured that haptic feedback was available, which could be used to calibrate reaching movements. We found that the reduced field of view caused no changes in grasp but we observed changes in the transport kinematics consistent with increased variability in the perceptual estimate of target location. Notably there were no changes in the spatial path (expected from movements to a closer location). In experiment 3, we repeated the Watt et al. design but removed vision and forced participants to rely on memory. In this condition we found the same undershoots as described by Watt et al. We conclude that a reduced field of view is neither necessary nor sufficient for underestimation and suggest that a reduced field of view decreases precision. This can cause participants to undershoot and/or alter the movement kinematics but we argue that such findings cannot be ascribed unambiguously to perceptual underestimation as they may reflect strategic alterations in behaviour.</s0></fC01><fC02 i1="01" i2="X"><s0>002A25E</s0></fC02><fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Mouvement corporel</s0><s5>02</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Body movement</s0><s5>02</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Movimiento corporal</s0><s5>02</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Préhension</s0><s5>03</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Gripping</s0><s5>03</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Prension</s0><s5>03</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Précision</s0><s5>04</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Accuracy</s0><s5>04</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Precisión</s0><s5>04</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Mouvement orienté</s0><s5>05</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Goal directed movement</s0><s5>05</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Movimiento orientado</s0><s5>05</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Cinématique</s0><s5>06</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Kinematics</s0><s5>06</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Cinemática</s0><s5>06</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Mémoire</s0><s5>07</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Memory</s0><s5>07</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Memoria</s0><s5>07</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Vision</s0><s5>08</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Vision</s0><s5>08</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Visión</s0><s5>08</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Stimulus visuel</s0><s5>10</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Visual stimulus</s0><s5>10</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Estimulo visual</s0><s5>10</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Distance stimulus</s0><s5>11</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Stimulus distance</s0><s5>11</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Distancia estímulo</s0><s5>11</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Rétroaction</s0><s5>13</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Feedback regulation</s0><s5>13</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Retroacción</s0><s5>13</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Variabilité</s0><s5>14</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Variability</s0><s5>14</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Variabilidad</s0><s5>14</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="12" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Homme</s0><s5>54</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="12" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Human</s0><s5>54</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="12" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Hombre</s0><s5>54</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="13" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Contrôle moteur</s0><s5>69</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="13" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Motor control</s0><s5>69</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="13" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Control motor</s0><s5>69</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="14" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Tâche pointage</s0><s4>CD</s4><s5>96</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="14" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Pointing task</s0><s4>CD</s4><s5>96</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="15" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Perception haptique</s0><s4>CD</s4><s5>97</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="15" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Haptic perception</s0><s4>CD</s4><s5>97</s5></fC03><fN21><s1>101</s1></fN21></pA></standard></inist><affiliations><list><country><li>Royaume-Uni</li></country></list><tree><country name="Royaume-Uni"><noRegion><name sortKey="Loftus, Andrea" sort="Loftus, Andrea" uniqKey="Loftus A" first="Andrea" last="Loftus">Andrea Loftus</name></noRegion><name sortKey="Mckenna, Isla" sort="Mckenna, Isla" uniqKey="Mckenna I" first="Isla" last="Mckenna">Isla Mckenna</name><name sortKey="Mon Williams, Mark" sort="Mon Williams, Mark" uniqKey="Mon Williams M" first="Mark" last="Mon-Williams">Mark Mon-Williams</name><name sortKey="Murphy, Susannah" sort="Murphy, Susannah" uniqKey="Murphy S" first="Susannah" last="Murphy">Susannah Murphy</name></country></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/HapticV1/Data/PascalFrancis/Checkpoint
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000C33 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PascalFrancis/Checkpoint/biblio.hfd -nk 000C33 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Ticri/CIDE
|area= HapticV1
|flux= PascalFrancis
|étape= Checkpoint
|type= RBID
|clé= Pascal:05-0153828
|texte= Reduced fields of view are neither necessary nor sufficient for distance underestimation but reduce precision and may cause calibration problems
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23. |  |