Comparative analysis of the visual performance after cataract surgery with implantation of a bifocal or trifocal diffractive IOL.
Identifieur interne : 003351 ( Ncbi/Merge ); précédent : 003350; suivant : 003352Comparative analysis of the visual performance after cataract surgery with implantation of a bifocal or trifocal diffractive IOL.
Auteurs : Peter Mojzis ; Lucia Kukuckova ; Katarina Majerova ; Katerina Liehneova ; David P. Pi EroSource :
- Journal of refractive surgery (Thorofare, N.J. : 1995) [ 1081-597X ] ; 2014.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Aberrometry, Adult, Aged, Contrast Sensitivity (physiology), Corneal Wavefront Aberration (physiopathology), Female, Humans, Lens Implantation, Intraocular, Lenses, Intraocular, Male, Middle Aged, Phacoemulsification, Prospective Studies, Prosthesis Design, Refraction, Ocular (physiology), Visual Acuity (physiology).
- MESH :
- physiology : Contrast Sensitivity, Refraction, Ocular, Visual Acuity.
- physiopathology : Corneal Wavefront Aberration.
- Aberrometry, Adult, Aged, Female, Humans, Lens Implantation, Intraocular, Lenses, Intraocular, Male, Middle Aged, Phacoemulsification, Prospective Studies, Prosthesis Design.
Abstract
To evaluate and compare the visual, refractive, contrast sensitivity, and aberrometric outcomes with a diffractive bifocal and trifocal intraocular lens (IOL) of the same material and haptic design.
DOI: 10.3928/1081597X-20140903-06
PubMed: 25291749
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream PubMed, to step Corpus: 000528
- to stream PubMed, to step Curation: 000528
- to stream PubMed, to step Checkpoint: 000702
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:25291749Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Comparative analysis of the visual performance after cataract surgery with implantation of a bifocal or trifocal diffractive IOL.</title><author><name sortKey="Mojzis, Peter" sort="Mojzis, Peter" uniqKey="Mojzis P" first="Peter" last="Mojzis">Peter Mojzis</name></author><author><name sortKey="Kukuckova, Lucia" sort="Kukuckova, Lucia" uniqKey="Kukuckova L" first="Lucia" last="Kukuckova">Lucia Kukuckova</name></author><author><name sortKey="Majerova, Katarina" sort="Majerova, Katarina" uniqKey="Majerova K" first="Katarina" last="Majerova">Katarina Majerova</name></author><author><name sortKey="Liehneova, Katerina" sort="Liehneova, Katerina" uniqKey="Liehneova K" first="Katerina" last="Liehneova">Katerina Liehneova</name></author><author><name sortKey="Pi Ero, David P" sort="Pi Ero, David P" uniqKey="Pi Ero D" first="David P" last="Pi Ero">David P. Pi Ero</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2014">2014</date><idno type="doi">10.3928/1081597X-20140903-06</idno><idno type="RBID">pubmed:25291749</idno><idno type="pmid">25291749</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">000528</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Curation">000528</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Checkpoint">000702</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Merge">003351</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Comparative analysis of the visual performance after cataract surgery with implantation of a bifocal or trifocal diffractive IOL.</title><author><name sortKey="Mojzis, Peter" sort="Mojzis, Peter" uniqKey="Mojzis P" first="Peter" last="Mojzis">Peter Mojzis</name></author><author><name sortKey="Kukuckova, Lucia" sort="Kukuckova, Lucia" uniqKey="Kukuckova L" first="Lucia" last="Kukuckova">Lucia Kukuckova</name></author><author><name sortKey="Majerova, Katarina" sort="Majerova, Katarina" uniqKey="Majerova K" first="Katarina" last="Majerova">Katarina Majerova</name></author><author><name sortKey="Liehneova, Katerina" sort="Liehneova, Katerina" uniqKey="Liehneova K" first="Katerina" last="Liehneova">Katerina Liehneova</name></author><author><name sortKey="Pi Ero, David P" sort="Pi Ero, David P" uniqKey="Pi Ero D" first="David P" last="Pi Ero">David P. Pi Ero</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Journal of refractive surgery (Thorofare, N.J. : 1995)</title><idno type="ISSN">1081-597X</idno><imprint><date when="2014" type="published">2014</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Aberrometry</term><term>Adult</term><term>Aged</term><term>Contrast Sensitivity (physiology)</term><term>Corneal Wavefront Aberration (physiopathology)</term><term>Female</term><term>Humans</term><term>Lens Implantation, Intraocular</term><term>Lenses, Intraocular</term><term>Male</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Phacoemulsification</term><term>Prospective Studies</term><term>Prosthesis Design</term><term>Refraction, Ocular (physiology)</term><term>Visual Acuity (physiology)</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="physiology" xml:lang="en"><term>Contrast Sensitivity</term><term>Refraction, Ocular</term><term>Visual Acuity</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="physiopathology" xml:lang="en"><term>Corneal Wavefront Aberration</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Aberrometry</term><term>Adult</term><term>Aged</term><term>Female</term><term>Humans</term><term>Lens Implantation, Intraocular</term><term>Lenses, Intraocular</term><term>Male</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Phacoemulsification</term><term>Prospective Studies</term><term>Prosthesis Design</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">To evaluate and compare the visual, refractive, contrast sensitivity, and aberrometric outcomes with a diffractive bifocal and trifocal intraocular lens (IOL) of the same material and haptic design.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Owner="NLM" Status="MEDLINE"><PMID Version="1">25291749</PMID><DateCreated><Year>2014</Year><Month>10</Month><Day>08</Day></DateCreated><DateCompleted><Year>2014</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>25</Day></DateCompleted><Article PubModel="Print"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Print">1081-597X</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print"><Volume>30</Volume><Issue>10</Issue><PubDate><Year>2014</Year><Month>Oct</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Journal of refractive surgery (Thorofare, N.J. : 1995)</Title><ISOAbbreviation>J Refract Surg</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Comparative analysis of the visual performance after cataract surgery with implantation of a bifocal or trifocal diffractive IOL.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>666-72</MedlinePgn></Pagination><ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.3928/1081597X-20140903-06</ELocationID><Abstract><AbstractText Label="PURPOSE" NlmCategory="OBJECTIVE">To evaluate and compare the visual, refractive, contrast sensitivity, and aberrometric outcomes with a diffractive bifocal and trifocal intraocular lens (IOL) of the same material and haptic design.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="METHODS" NlmCategory="METHODS">Sixty eyes of 30 patients undergoing bilateral cataract surgery were enrolled and randomly assigned to one of two groups: the bifocal group, including 30 eyes implanted with the bifocal diffractive IOL AT LISA 801 (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Jena, Germany), and the trifocal group, including eyes implanted with the trifocal diffractive IOL AT LISA tri 839 MP (Carl Zeiss Meditec). Analysis of visual and refractive outcomes, contrast sensitivity, ocular aberrations (OPD-Scan III; Nidek, Inc., Gagamori, Japan), and defocus curve were performed during a 3-month follow-up period.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="RESULTS" NlmCategory="RESULTS">No statistically significant differences between groups were found in 3-month postoperative uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuity (P ≥ .21). However, uncorrected, corrected, and distance-corrected near and intermediate visual acuities were significantly better in the trifocal group (P < .01). No significant differences between groups were found in postoperative spherical equivalent (P = .22). In the binocular defocus curve, the visual acuity was significantly better for defocus of -0.50 to -1.50 diopters in the trifocal group (P ≤ .04) and -3.50 to -4.00 diopters in the bifocal group (P ≤ .03). No statistically significant differences were found between groups in most of the postoperative corneal, internal, and ocular aberrations (P ≤ .31), and in contrast sensitivity for most frequencies analyzed (P ≤ .15).</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="CONCLUSIONS" NlmCategory="CONCLUSIONS">Trifocal diffractive IOLs provide significantly better intermediate vision over bifocal IOLs, with equivalent postoperative levels of visual and ocular optical quality.</AbstractText><CopyrightInformation>Copyright 2014, SLACK Incorporated.</CopyrightInformation></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Mojzis</LastName><ForeName>Peter</ForeName><Initials>P</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Kukuckova</LastName><ForeName>Lucia</ForeName><Initials>L</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Majerova</LastName><ForeName>Katarina</ForeName><Initials>K</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Liehneova</LastName><ForeName>Katerina</ForeName><Initials>K</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Piñero</LastName><ForeName>David P</ForeName><Initials>DP</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D003160">Comparative Study</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D016449">Randomized Controlled Trial</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>United States</Country><MedlineTA>J Refract Surg</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>9505927</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>1081-597X</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D057128">Aberrometry</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D000328">Adult</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D000368">Aged</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D015350">Contrast Sensitivity</DescriptorName><QualifierName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="Q000502">physiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D057108">Corneal Wavefront Aberration</DescriptorName><QualifierName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="Q000503">physiopathology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D005260">Female</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D006801">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="D019654">Lens Implantation, Intraocular</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="D007910">Lenses, Intraocular</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D008297">Male</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D008875">Middle Aged</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="D018918">Phacoemulsification</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D011446">Prospective Studies</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D011474">Prosthesis Design</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D012029">Refraction, Ocular</DescriptorName><QualifierName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="Q000502">physiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D014792">Visual Acuity</DescriptorName><QualifierName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="Q000502">physiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="received"><Year>2014</Year><Month>4</Month><Day>13</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="accepted"><Year>2014</Year><Month>7</Month><Day>09</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2014</Year><Month>10</Month><Day>8</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2014</Year><Month>10</Month><Day>8</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2014</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>15</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.3928/1081597X-20140903-06</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">25291749</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed><affiliations><list></list><tree><noCountry><name sortKey="Kukuckova, Lucia" sort="Kukuckova, Lucia" uniqKey="Kukuckova L" first="Lucia" last="Kukuckova">Lucia Kukuckova</name><name sortKey="Liehneova, Katerina" sort="Liehneova, Katerina" uniqKey="Liehneova K" first="Katerina" last="Liehneova">Katerina Liehneova</name><name sortKey="Majerova, Katarina" sort="Majerova, Katarina" uniqKey="Majerova K" first="Katarina" last="Majerova">Katarina Majerova</name><name sortKey="Mojzis, Peter" sort="Mojzis, Peter" uniqKey="Mojzis P" first="Peter" last="Mojzis">Peter Mojzis</name><name sortKey="Pi Ero, David P" sort="Pi Ero, David P" uniqKey="Pi Ero D" first="David P" last="Pi Ero">David P. Pi Ero</name></noCountry></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/HapticV1/Data/Ncbi/Merge
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 003351 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Ncbi/Merge/biblio.hfd -nk 003351 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Ticri/CIDE
|area= HapticV1
|flux= Ncbi
|étape= Merge
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:25291749
|texte= Comparative analysis of the visual performance after cataract surgery with implantation of a bifocal or trifocal diffractive IOL.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Ncbi/Merge/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:25291749" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Ncbi/Merge/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a HapticV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23. |  |