Serveur d'exploration sur les dispositifs haptiques

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Robot assisted adrenalectomy: a handy tool or glorified obsession?

Identifieur interne : 003B84 ( Ncbi/Curation ); précédent : 003B83; suivant : 003B85

Robot assisted adrenalectomy: a handy tool or glorified obsession?

Auteurs : Mrinal Pahwa

Source :

RBID : PMC:4523626

Abstract

Robotic surgery has recently expanded its horizon in urology apart from radical prostatectomy, one of them being adrenalectomy. Till now, laparoscopic adrenalectomy has established itself as the procedure of choice for benign adrenal disorders. Brandao et al. have recently accomplished a thorough systematic review and meta-analysis of nine trials comparing laparoscopic and robotic adrenalectomy. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of conversion rate [odds ratio (OR): 0.82; 95% CI, 0.39-1.75; P=0.61] and operative time (WMD: 5.88; 95% CI, −6.02 to 17.79; P=0.33). There was a significantly longer hospital stay in the conventional laparoscopic group (WMD: −0.43; 95% CI, −0.56 to −0.30; P<0.00001), as well as a higher estimated blood loss (WMD: −18.21; 95% CI, −29.11 to −7.32; P=0.001). There was also no statistically significant difference in terms of postoperative complication rate. The authors seem to support the use of robot for adrenalectomy. However, robotic surgery suffers from cost issues and some technical drawbacks that limit its use in routine practice. Larger and appropriately powered randomized controlled trials are needed to establish and justify its use for performing adrenalectomy.


Url:
DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2227-684X.2015.05.01
PubMed: 26312212
PubMed Central: 4523626

Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)


Links to Exploration step

PMC:4523626

Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI>
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en">Robot assisted adrenalectomy: a handy tool or glorified obsession?</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Pahwa, Mrinal" sort="Pahwa, Mrinal" uniqKey="Pahwa M" first="Mrinal" last="Pahwa">Mrinal Pahwa</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">PMC</idno>
<idno type="pmid">26312212</idno>
<idno type="pmc">4523626</idno>
<idno type="url">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4523626</idno>
<idno type="RBID">PMC:4523626</idno>
<idno type="doi">10.3978/j.issn.2227-684X.2015.05.01</idno>
<date when="2015">2015</date>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Corpus">000064</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Curation">000064</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Checkpoint">000378</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Merge">003B84</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Curation">003B84</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title xml:lang="en" level="a" type="main">Robot assisted adrenalectomy: a handy tool or glorified obsession?</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Pahwa, Mrinal" sort="Pahwa, Mrinal" uniqKey="Pahwa M" first="Mrinal" last="Pahwa">Mrinal Pahwa</name>
</author>
</analytic>
<series>
<title level="j">Gland Surgery</title>
<idno type="ISSN">2227-684X</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">2227-8575</idno>
<imprint>
<date when="2015">2015</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass></textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">
<p>Robotic surgery has recently expanded its horizon in urology apart from radical prostatectomy, one of them being adrenalectomy. Till now, laparoscopic adrenalectomy has established itself as the procedure of choice for benign adrenal disorders. Brandao
<italic>et al</italic>
. have recently accomplished a thorough systematic review and meta-analysis of nine trials comparing laparoscopic and robotic adrenalectomy. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of conversion rate [odds ratio (OR): 0.82; 95% CI, 0.39-1.75; P=0.61] and operative time (WMD: 5.88; 95% CI, −6.02 to 17.79; P=0.33). There was a significantly longer hospital stay in the conventional laparoscopic group (WMD: −0.43; 95% CI, −0.56 to −0.30; P<0.00001), as well as a higher estimated blood loss (WMD: −18.21; 95% CI, −29.11 to −7.32; P=0.001). There was also no statistically significant difference in terms of postoperative complication rate. The authors seem to support the use of robot for adrenalectomy. However, robotic surgery suffers from cost issues and some technical drawbacks that limit its use in routine practice. Larger and appropriately powered randomized controlled trials are needed to establish and justify its use for performing adrenalectomy.</p>
</div>
</front>
</TEI>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/HapticV1/Data/Ncbi/Curation
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 003B84 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Ncbi/Curation/biblio.hfd -nk 003B84 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Ticri/CIDE
   |area=    HapticV1
   |flux=    Ncbi
   |étape=   Curation
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     PMC:4523626
   |texte=   Robot assisted adrenalectomy: a handy tool or glorified obsession?
}}

Pour générer des pages wiki

HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Ncbi/Curation/RBID.i   -Sk "pubmed:26312212" \
       | HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Ncbi/Curation/biblio.hfd   \
       | NlmPubMed2Wicri -a HapticV1 

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23.
Data generation: Mon Jun 13 01:09:46 2016. Site generation: Wed Mar 6 09:54:07 2024